ABSTRACT
Antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery is one of the most effective measures for preventing surgical site infection, although its use is frequently inadequate and may even increase the risk of infection, toxicities and bacterial resistance. As a result of advances in surgical techniques and the emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms, the current guidelines for prophylaxis need to be revised. La Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas (Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology) (SEIMC) together with the Asociación Española de Cirujanos (Spanish Association of Surgeons) (AEC) have revised and updated the recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis to adapt them to any type of surgical intervention and to current epidemiology. This document gathers together the recommendations on antimicrobial prophylaxis in the various procedures, with doses, duration, prophylaxis in special patient groups, and in epidemiological settings of multidrug resistance to facilitate standardized management and the safe, effective and rational use of antibiotics in elective surgery
La profilaxis antibiótica en cirugía es una de las medidas más eficaces para la prevención de la infección de localización quirúrgica, aunque su uso es con frecuencia inadecuado, pudiendo incrementar el riesgo de infección, toxicidades y resistencias bacterianas. Debido al avance en las técnicas quirúrgicas y la emergencia de microorganismos multirresistentes, las actuales pautas de profilaxis precisan ser revisadas. La Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas (SEIMC), conjuntamente con la Asociación Española de Cirujanos (AEC), ha revisado y actualizado las recomendaciones de profilaxis antimicrobiana para adaptarlas a cada tipo de intervención quirúrgica y a la epidemiología actual. En este documento se recogen las recomendaciones de los antimicrobianos utilizados en profilaxis en los diferentes procedimientos, las dosis, la duración, la profilaxis en huéspedes especiales, y en situación epidemiológica de multirresistencia, de tal forma que permitan un manejo estandarizado, un uso racional, seguro y efectivo de los mismos en la cirugía electiva
Subject(s)
Humans , Consensus Development Conferences as Topic , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/standards , Surgical Procedures, Operative/standards , Societies, Medical/standards , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Infection Control/organization & administrationABSTRACT
La profilaxis antibiótica en cirugía es una de las medidas más eficaces para la prevención de la infección de localización quirúrgica, aunque su uso es con frecuencia inadecuado, pudiendo incrementar el riesgo de infección, toxicidades y resistencias bacterianas. Debido al avance en las técnicas quirúrgicas y la emergencia de microorganismos multirresistentes las actuales pautas de profilaxis precisan ser revisadas. La Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas (SEIMC), conjuntamente con la Asociación Española de Cirujanos (AEC) ha revisado y actualizado las recomendaciones de profilaxis antimicrobiana para adaptarlas a cada tipo de intervención quirúrgica y a la epidemiología actual. En este documento se recogen las recomendaciones de los antimicrobianos utilizados en profilaxis en los diferentes procedimientos, las dosis, la duración, la profilaxis en huéspedes especiales, y en situación epidemiológica de multirresistencia, de tal forma que permitan un manejo estandarizado, un uso racional, seguro y efectivo de los mismos en la cirugía electiva
Antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery is one of the most effective measures for preventing surgical site infection, although its use is frequently inadequate and may even increase the risk of infection, toxicities and antimicrobial resistance. As a result of advances in surgical techniques and the emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms, the current guidelines for prophylaxis need to be revised. The Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas (Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology) (SEIMC) together with the Asociación Española de Cirujanos (Spanish Association of Surgeons) (AEC) have revised and updated the recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery to adapt them to any type of surgical intervention and to current epidemiology. This document gathers together the recommendations on antimicrobial prophylaxis in the various procedures, with doses, duration, prophylaxis in special patient groups, and in epidemiological settings of multidrug resistance to facilitate standardized management and the safe, effective and rational use of antibiotics in elective surgery
Subject(s)
Humans , Consensus Development Conferences as Topic , Consensus , Societies, Medical/standards , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/standards , Surgical Procedures, Operative/standards , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , ProjectsABSTRACT
Antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery is one of the most effective measures for preventing surgical site infection, although its use is frequently inadequate and may even increase the risk of infection, toxicities and antimicrobial resistance. As a result of advances in surgical techniques and the emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms, the current guidelines for prophylaxis need to be revised. The Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas (Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology) (SEIMC) together with the Asociación Española de Cirujanos (Spanish Association of Surgeons) (AEC) have revised and updated the recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery to adapt them to any type of surgical intervention and to current epidemiology. This document gathers together the recommendations on antimicrobial prophylaxis in the various procedures, with doses, duration, prophylaxis in special patient groups, and in epidemiological settings of multidrug resistance to facilitate standardized management and the safe, effective and rational use of antibiotics in elective surgery.
ABSTRACT
Antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery is one of the most effective measures for preventing surgical site infection, although its use is frequently inadequate and may even increase the risk of infection, toxicities and bacterial resistance. As a result of advances in surgical techniques and the emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms, the current guidelines for prophylaxis need to be revised. La Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas (Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology) (SEIMC) together with the Asociación Española de Cirujanos (Spanish Association of Surgeons) (AEC) have revised and updated the recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis to adapt them to any type of surgical intervention and to current epidemiology. This document gathers together the recommendations on antimicrobial prophylaxis in the various procedures, with doses, duration, prophylaxis in special patient groups, and in epidemiological settings of multidrug resistance to facilitate standardized management and the safe, effective and rational use of antibiotics in elective surgery.
Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases , Surgeons , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Consensus , Humans , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & controlABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Colistin has a narrow therapeutic window with nephrotoxicity being the major dose-limiting adverse effect. Currently, the optimal doses and therapeutic plasma levels are unknown. METHODS: Prospective observational cohort study, including patients infected by colistin-susceptible P. aeruginosa treated with intravenous colistimethate sodium (CMS). Clinical data and colistin plasma levels at steady-state (Css) were recorded. The primary and secondary end points were clinical cure and 30-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were included. Clinical cure was observed in 72 (79%) patients. The mean (SD) Css was 1.49 (1.4) mg/L and 2.42 (1.5) mg/L (p = 0.01) in patients who achieved clinical cure and those who not, respectively. Independent risk factors for clinical failure were male sex (OR 5.88; 95% CI 1.09-31.63), APACHE II score (OR 1.15; 95% CI 1.03-1.27) and nephrotoxicity at the EOT (OR 9.13; 95% CI 95% 2.06-40.5). The 30-day mortality rate was 30.8%. Risk factors for 30-day mortality included the APACHE II score (OR 1.98; 95% CI 1-1.20), the McCabe score (OR 2.49; 95% CI 1.14-5.43) and the presence of nephrotoxicity at the end of treatment (EOT) (OR 3.8; 95% CI 1.26-11.47). CONCLUSION: In this series of patients with infections caused by XDR P. aeruginosa infections, Css is not observed to be related to clinical outcome.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/blood , Colistin/blood , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Pseudomonas Infections/blood , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Administration, Intravenous , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Biological Availability , Colistin/administration & dosage , Colistin/adverse effects , Colistin/analogs & derivatives , Colistin/pharmacokinetics , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/drug effects , Female , Humans , Kidney Diseases/blood , Kidney Diseases/chemically induced , Male , Middle Aged , Pseudomonas Infections/drug therapy , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular risk (CVR) assessment helps to identify patients at high CVR. The Framingham CVR score (FRS) is the most widely used methods but may overestimate risk in regions with low incidence of cardiovascular disease. The objective was to compare the 10-year performance of the original and the adapted REGICOR - Framingham CVR functions in HIV-infected individuals. METHODS: We carried out a longitudinal study of HIV-infected patients with CVR evaluation in a hospital in Barcelona between 2003 and 2013. STATISTICS: Risk probability was calculated using the FRAMINGHAM function and REGICOR adaptation to the Spanish population, and individuals were categorized in three groups (low, 0 < 5%; moderate, 5-10%; and high, >10%). For each risk group, the number of events over 10 years was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the expected number of events was calculated by multiplying the frequency of participants in the group by the mean of the probabilities from the risk function. We used the X(2) goodness-of-fit test to assess agreement between observed and expected. RESULTS: Six hundred and forty-one patients were followed up for a median of 10.2 years, and 20 ischemic heart events (IHE) were observed. The mean (95% CI) number of IHEs per 1000 person-years was 3.7 (2.06-5.27). The estimates from the Framingham and REGICOR functions were 40 and 14 IHEs, respectively. The estimate from the original Framingham function differed significantly from the observed incidence (p < 0.001), whereas that from the REGICOR-adapted function did not (p = 0.15). In terms of the number of cardiovascular events (38 events observed), the REGICOR function significantly underestimated risk (p = 0.01), whereas the estimate from the Framingham function was similar to observed (p:0.93). CONCLUSIONS: The FRS significantly overestimates risk of IHE events in our HIV-infected patients, while the REGICOR function is a better predictor of these events. In terms of cardiovascular events, the REGICOR function significantly underestimates risk, whereas the FRS is a better estimator. We recommend using CVR scales and adjusting them to the origin of the population being studied.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , HIV Infections/complications , Risk Assessment/methods , Adult , Algorithms , Biomarkers , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Comorbidity , Female , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/immunology , HIV Infections/virology , Humans , Incidence , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Public Health Surveillance , Risk Factors , Spain/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Nephrotoxicity limits the effective use of colistin for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) infections. We previously defined a steady-state colistin plasma concentration (Css) of 2.42 mg/L that predicted nephrotoxicity at end of treatment (EOT). The objective of this study was to validate this breakpoint in a prospective cohort. This was a multicentre, prospective, observational study conducted at three hospitals with a cohort of patients treated for MDR-GNB infection with colistin methanesulfonate from September 2011 until January 2015. Nephrotoxicity was evaluated at Day 7 and at EOT using the RIFLE criteria. Css values were measured and analysed using HPLC. Taking the previously defined breakpoint for colistin concentration as a criterion, patients were divided into two groups (Css, ≤2.42 mg/L vs. >2.42 mg/L). Sixty-four patients were included. Seven patients (10.9%) had a Css > 2.42 mg/L and were compared with the remaining patients. Bivariate analysis showed that patients with a Css > 2.42 mg/L were older and had a significantly higher incidence of nephrotoxicity at Day 7 and EOT. Although not statistically significant, nephrotoxicity occurred earlier in these patients (6.2 days vs. 9.2 days in patients with lower Css; P = 0.091). Multivariate analysis of nephrotoxicity showed that Css > 2.42 mg/L was the only predictive factor. Nephrotoxicity was more frequent and occurred earlier in patients with colistin plasma concentrations higher than the previously defined breakpoint (2.42 mg/L). Colistin therapeutic drug monitoring should be routinely considered to avoid reaching this toxicity threshold and potential clinical consequences.
Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/analysis , Colistin/analogs & derivatives , Plasma/chemistry , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Colistin/administration & dosage , Colistin/adverse effects , Colistin/analysis , Drug Monitoring , Female , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Hospitals , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
AIM: We reviewed the clinical use of daptomycin in daily practice. MATERIALS & METHODS: Efficacy and safety were assessed in 175 consecutive patients given daptomycin for at least 72 h. RESULTS: Daptomycin was given as rescue treatment in 50.9% of cases. Bloodstream infection (34.8%) and skin/soft-tissue infection (19.4%) were the most frequent. In 62.3% of patients, the dose of ≤ 6 mg/kg/day was administered. Staphylococcus spp. were isolated in 52.6% of cases (MRSA in 9.5%, CoNS in 34.3%) and Enterococcus spp. in 8.7%. Clinical success was 75% and microbiological eradication 48.6%. Two patients discontinued daptomycin due to hemolytic anemia of unlikely and possible relationship with daptomycin, respectively. CONCLUSION: Daptomycin was effective and well tolerated in patients with severe Gram-positive infections.
