ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Pruritus associated with chronic kidney disease is defined as the sensation of itching, in people with chronic kidney disease, in a one area or all over the body that causes the need to scratch, after having ruled out other dermatological or systemic causes. It is an old and known problem whose prevalence has been able to decrease with the improvement of dialytic techniques but which still persists and is underdiagnosed. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to analyse the current perception of nephrologists about this problem that influences the quality of life of people with chronic kidney disease through a survey. RESULTS: 135 nephrologists, most of them engaged in haemodialysis, participated. 86% considered that pruritus associated with chronic kidney disease is still a problem today that affects the quality of life. Most nephrologists believe that the main pathophysiological cause is uremic toxins (60%) and only 16% believe that it is due to the dysregulation of the opioid system/endorphins-dynorphins. Only 16% comment that the prevalence of pruritus in their centre is greater than 20%. 40% believe that the diagnosis is made because it is manifested by the patient and only 27% because it is asked by the doctor. Moreover, it is not usual to use scales to measure it or the codification in the medical records. The main treatment used is antihistamines (96%), followed by moisturizers/anaesthetics (93%) and modification of the dialysis regimen (70%). CONCLUSIONS: Pruritus associated with chronic kidney disease is still a current problem, it is underdiagnosed, not codified and with a lack of indicated, effective and safe treatments. Nephrologists do not know its real prevalence and the different pathophysiological mechanisms involved in its development. Many therapeutic options are used with very variable results, ignoring their efficacy and applicability at the present time. The new emerging kappa-opioid-receptor agonist agents offer us an opportunity to reevaluate this age-old problem and improve the quality of life for our patients with chronic kidney disease.
Subject(s)
Nephrologists , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Humans , Quality of Life , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Pruritus/etiology , PerceptionABSTRACT
Introducción: El prurito asociado a enfermedad renal crónica se define como la sensación desagradable que provoca la necesidad de rascarse en una parte del cuerpo o en todo en personas con enfermedad renal crónica, tras haberse descartado otras causas dermatológicas o sistémicas. Es un problema antiguo y conocido cuya prevalencia ha podido disminuir con la mejoría de la eficacia dialítica pero que todavía persiste y está infradiagnosticado. Objetivos: El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar la percepción y práctica actual de los nefrólogos sobre este problema que impacta en la calidad de vida de las personas con enfermedad renal crónica a través de una encuesta anónima. Resultados: Participaron 135 nefrólogos, la mayoría dedicados a hemodiálisis. Un 86% consideró que el prurito asociado a enfermedad renal crónica sigue siendo un problema en la actualidad que afecta a la calidad de vida. La mayoría de los nefrólogos opinan que la principal causa fisiopatológica son las toxinas urémicas (60%) y solo un 16% cree que se debe a la desregulación del sistema opioide/endorfinas-dinorfinas. Únicamente un 16% comenta que la prevalencia de prurito en su centro es mayor del 20%. Un 40% cree que el diagnóstico se realiza porque lo manifiesta el paciente y solo un 27% porque lo pregunta el facultativo. Además, no es habitual usar escalas ni codificarlo en la historia clínica. El tratamiento más común son los antihistamínicos (96%), seguido de las cremas hidratantes/anestésicas (93%) y la modificación de la pauta de diálisis (70%). (AU)
Introduction: Pruritus associated with chronic kidney disease is defined as the sensation of itching, in people with chronic kidney disease, in a one area or all over the body that causes the need to scratch, after having ruled out other dermatological or systemic causes. It is an old and known problem whose prevalence has been able to decrease with the improvement of dialytic techniques but which still persists and is underdiagnosed. Objectives: The objective of this study was to analyze the current perception of nephrologists about this problem that influences the quality of life of people with chronic kidney disease through a survey. Results: 135 nephrologists, most of them engaged in hemodialysis, participated. 86% considered that pruritus associated with chronic kidney disease is still a problem today that affects the quality of life. Most nephrologists believe that the main pathophysiological cause is uremic toxins (60%) and only 16% believe that it is due to the dysregulation of the opioid system/endorphins-dynorphins. Only 16% comment that the prevalence of pruritus in their center is greater than 20%. 40% believe that the diagnosis is made because it is manifested by the patient and only 27% because it is asked by the doctor. Moreover, it is not usual to use scales to measure it or the codification in the medical records. The main treatment used is antihistamines (96%), followed by moisturizers/anesthetics (93%) and modification of the dialysis regimen (70%). (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Pruritus , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Nephrologists , Surveys and Questionnaires , Spain , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIM: Cystatin C (Cys C) is an endogenous marker of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) unaffected by body composition. The aim of the present study was to assess the utility of Cys C-based GFR prediction equations (Hoek, Larsson and Stevens) and creatinine (modification of diet in renal disease-isotope dilution mass spectrometry--MDRD-IDMS, and Cockcroft-Gault--CG) compared with 51Cr-EDTA. METHODS: This study was carried out in 40 Caucasian older patients with advanced age (> or = 60) and chronic kidney disease stages 3-4. To assess the utility of prediction equations in relation to body composition, we measured lean mass (LM) with densitometry (DXA). Pearson's, Bland-Altman and Lin's coefficient (Rc) were used to study accuracy and precision. RESULTS: 51Cr-EDTA was 36.9 +/- 9.2 ml/min/1.73 m2 (22-60). Cys C levels were 2.2 +/- 0.8 mg/l (r = 0.085; p = 0.662 LM) and creatinine 2.8 +/- 1.1 mg/dl (r = 0.427; p = 0.021 LM). The most accurate equations were the Hoek, Larsson and Stevens formulae, with a bias of -0.2 (Rc 0.48), -2.9 (Rc 0.44) and 2.6 ml/min/1.73 m2 (Rc 0.58). The biases obtained with MDRD-IDMS and CG were -14.6 (Rc 0.35) and -12.5 (Rc 0.40). All correlations among biases obtained with creatinine-based formulae and LM were negative and statistically significant (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results show superiority of Cys C-based GFR formulae over the MDRD-IDMS and CG equations. This significant underestimation obtained with conventional prediction equations was directly related to the influence of LM.
