Risk Profile and 1-Year Outcome of Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation in Japan　- Insights From GARFIELD-AF.

BACKGROUND: Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF) is an ongoing prospective non-interventional study of stroke prevention in patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular AF (NAVF) that is being conducted in 35 countries. Methods and Results: A total of 52,081 patients with a new diagnosis of NVAF were enrolled prospectively in GARFIELD-AF. Of these, 4859 (9.3%) were recruited in Japan (2010-2016). In cohort 1 (2010-2011), few patients were on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) globally. From cohort 2 onwards (2011-2016), however, there was a rapid increase in NOAC use around the globe, especially in Japan. By the last year of enrolment (2015-2016), 67.9% of patients in Japan and 43.1% of patients globally were on NOAC±antiplatelet therapy (AP). In Japan and globally, 17.0% and 12.2% of patients, respectively, did not receive stroke prevention treatment. Few patients in Japan (5.7%) received AP only. Compared with the other countries, the unadjusted rates of all-cause mortality and major bleeding were low, while rates of stroke/systemic embolism were similar after 1 year of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: GARFIELD-AF continues to provide important information on the homogeneity and heterogeneity of baseline characteristics and treatment patterns in patients with newly diagnosed NVAF. This diversity reflects the differences in outcomes in Japan compared with the rest of the world.

Differences in 24-h blood pressure profile of Japanese hypertensive patients under ARB treatment.

Blood pressure (BP) control throughout the entire day is recommended for cardiovascular protection. Angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely used in hypertensive patients because of beneficial class effects. It is uncertain, however, whether are there any differences in 24-h BP profiles among ARBs. We examined ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) among 211 Japanese hypertensive patients (age, 69.4 ± 9.6 years; female, 59.2%) under treatment with five different ARBs. Patients were divided into five groups according to ARBs prescribed. Patient backgrounds were almost identical in all the groups and there were no differences in office, 24-h and daytime BP; however, nighttime BP with olmesartan was significantly lower than with other ARBs. Office BPs with candesartan and telmisartan, but not other ARBs, correlated well with 24-h BP (p < 0.01). Also, there were higher correlations between daytime and nighttime BP with candesartan and telmisartan. In all patients, pulse pressure with office BP was significantly correlated with ambulatory arterial stiffness index (p = 0.001) and fluctuation of systolic BP on ABPM (p = 0.002). In conclusion, different ARB treatments produced meaningful differences in 24-h profiles.

Diuretics enhance effects of increased dose of candesartan on ambulatory blood pressure reduction in Japanese patients with uncontrolled hypertension treated with medium-dose angiotensin II receptor blockers.

Abstract Although blockade of the renin-angiotensin system by increasing the dose of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) is recommended to achieve clinical benefits in terms of blood pressure (BP) control and cardiovascular and renal outcomes, the effect of this increased dose on ambulatory BP monitoring has not been evaluated completely in Japanese patients with uncontrolled hypertension undergoing medium-dose ARB therapy. The primary objective of this study was to examine the effect of the relatively high dose of the ARB candesartan (12 mg/day) on 24-h systolic BP and the attainment of target BP levels in uncontrolled hypertension treated with a medium dose of ARBs. A total of 146 hypertensive patients (age: 69.9 ± 9.3 years; females: 65.8%) completed the study. After switching to candesartan at 12 mg/day, all these BP measurements decreased significantly (p<0.001). Attainment of the target office BP (p=0.0014) and 24-h BP levels (p=0.0296) also improved significantly. Subgroup analysis indicated that the reduction of 24-h systolic BP was larger in patients treated with diuretics than those without (p=0.0206). Multivariate analysis revealed a significant correlation between the combined ARB and diuretic therapy, and the change in 24-h systolic BP irrespective of preceding ARBs. In conclusion, the switching therapy to increased dose of candesartan caused significant reductions in office and ambulatory BP levels, and improved the attainment of target BP levels in patients with uncontrolled hypertension treated with a medium dose of ARBs. Combination with diuretics enhanced this effect.

Three-year safety and effectiveness of fixed-dose losartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy in Japanese patients with hypertension under clinical setting (PALM-1 Extension Study).

Concerns about metabolic complications often disturb prolonged use of diuretics in Japan. We investigated 3-year safety and efficacy in Japanese patients with hypertension who were uncontrolled with angiotensin receptor blocker or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor regimens and then switched to losartan (50 mg)/hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 mg; HCTZ) combinations. Blood pressure decreased favorably and maintained a steady state for 3 years (157 ± 16/88 ± 11 mm Hg to 132 ± 13/75 ± 9 mm Hg, P < .0001). Metabolic parameters maintained a limited range of changes after 3 years, and adverse events were markedly decreased after 1-year treatment. The losartan/HCTZ combination minimized diuretic-related adverse effects and thus may be useful for the treatment of Japanese patients with hypertension.

Synergistic effect of chronic kidney disease and high circulatory norepinephrine level on stroke risk in Japanese hypertensive patients.

OBJECTIVE: Evidence is now available about the association between chronic kidney disease (CKD) and stroke. However, less is known about the underlying mechanisms, and there is currently no reliable marker for identifying stroke-prone high-risk patients among CKD patients. METHODS: A total of 514 hypertensive patients aged >50 years (mean, 72.3 years; 37% men) underwent 24-h BP monitoring and measurement of circulatory high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and norepinephrine at baseline. CKD was defined as eGFR<60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) using the Cockcroft-Gault equation. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: During an average of 41 months (1751 person-years), there were 43 stroke events. Compared with hypertensive patients without CKD, those with CKD (n=225) had higher levels of sleep systolic BP (SBP) (125 mmHg vs. 129 mmHg), circulatory hs-CRP (0.12 mg/L vs. 0.20 mg/L) and norepinephrine (332.2 pg/ml vs. 372.8 pg/ml; all P<0.05). On multivariable analysis, the hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) for stroke in CKD vs. non-CKD was 2.7 (1.2-6.9) (P<0.05). CKD, as well as the baseline presence of silent cerebral infarction, sleep SBP increase, and high hs-CRP level (highest quartile: ≥0.42 mg/L) were independently and additively associated with stroke events; above all, there was a synergistic effect of CKD and high norepinephrine level (highest quartile: ≥538 pg/ml) on stroke risk (all P<0.05). Among hypertensive patients with CKD, those within the highest quartiles of norepinephrine had a greater stroke risk compared to those who were in the lower quartiles of norepinephrine (HR (95% CI): 2.2 (1.0-4.5); P=0.045). In conclusion, CKD is an independent predictor of stroke in Japanese hypertensive patients; in particular, hypertensive patients with CKD and a high norepinephrine level have a synergistically augmented stroke risk.

One-year effectiveness and safety of open-label losartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy in Japanese patients with hypertension uncontrolled with ARBs or ACE inhibitors.

The long-term antihypertensive efficacy and safety of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combinations have not been appropriately evaluated in Japan. In this study, treated hypertensive patients taking angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) regimens not at blood pressure (BP) goals proposed by the Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH) were switched to losartan/HCTZ combinations and followed for 1 year. Data analysis included 244 patients aged 64.5+/-10.7 years, 56% male, 27% with diabetes mellitus and 36% with dyslipidemia. Pre-switching BP 157+/-16/88+/-10 mm Hg promptly decreased and maintained a steady state, reaching 132+/-15/77+/-9 mm Hg (P<0.001) 1 year later. After 1 year of treatment, 50% of patients cleared the goals of the JSH guideline for systolic BP and 79% for diastolic BP. Patients with maximal doses of ARBs tended to show larger decreases in BP (159+/-11/90+/-10 to 128+/-10/75+/-8 mm Hg, P<0.001, n=32). Clinical and laboratory adverse events were reported for 29 patients (11%), but serious abnormalities were not observed. In particular, plasma levels of uric acid (UA) were well-maintained for 1 year, and significant decreases in UA were observed in patients with higher levels of UA (>/=7.0 mg dl(-1)). Losartan/HCTZ combinations showed strong and steady hypotensive abilities and acceptable safety and tolerability in patients currently not at BP goals with regimens including ARBs or ACEIs in Japan.

Atrial and brain natriuretic peptides as markers of cardiac load and volume retention in primary aldosteronism.

BACKGROUND: Atrial and brain natriuretic peptides (ANP and BNP, respectively) are cardiac hormones with natriuretic and vasodilator actions. The present study was carried out to determine the natriuretic peptide that is closely related to cardiac load and volume retention in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA). METHODS: We examined 11 patients with PA due to aldosterone-producing adrenal adenoma before and after surgical resection. Plasma levels of ANP and BNP were measured by specific immunoradiometric assays, and total blood volume was determined by a plasma tracer method with (131)I-human albumin. RESULTS: Plasma levels of ANP and BNP were elevated in the PA patients compared with normotensive control subjects (P < .01), and the elevated ANP and BNP levels were reduced (P < .01) after adenoma resection. When analyzed with the pre- and postoperative data, a significant relationship was observed between mean blood pressure and plasma levels of ANP (r = 0.64, P < .01) and BNP (r = 0.58, P < .01). The BNP was significantly correlated with the SV1 + RV5 voltage (r = 0.65, P < .01) and with total blood volume (r = 0.57, P < .01), but this was not the case for ANP. CONCLUSION: The present results suggest that the plasma level of BNP is more closely related to cardiac load or volume status than ANP is, in patients with PA due to adrenal adenoma.