Estimating Clostridioides difficile infection-associated readmission rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The economic burden of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is considerable and mostly associated with a high frequency of hospitalizations. Numerous publications have demonstrated that CDI is associated with a higher risk of hospital readmission, but not always a specific rate or attributable to disease recurrence. METHODS: In this systematic review, we describe the incidence of 30-day CDI-associated readmission rates and the effect of active interventions. Three search engines were utilized for the literature search, and a total of 9 studies were included in this review. Hospital readmission proportions from interventional and observational studies were analyzed through meta-analysis with random effects. RESULTS: Two thousand five hundred and twenty-one articles were identified. After screening full-text articles, 9 eligible articles published between 2002 and 2023 met the inclusion criteria. In total, 132,862 CDI patients were evaluated. Thirty-day CDI-associated readmissions were defined as either an ICD9/10 code indicating CDI admission with a prior admission within the past 30 days (n = 4) or a medical chart evaluation of signs and symptoms consistent with CDI (diarrhea) along with a positive diagnostic test (n = 5) with a prior hospitalization for CDI within the past 30 days. Meta-analysis of observational studies estimated 30-day CDI readmissions were 6% (95% CI, 5%-7%). Three studies evaluated the effect of active interventions to reduce CDI-associated 30-day readmission rates. Two of 3 interventions reduced the likelihood of CDI-associated 30-day readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review identified a 6% rate of 30-day CDI-associated hospital readmission. Antimicrobial stewardship efforts and the use of specific therapeutics were shown to reduce these rates.

Reduced Vancomycin Susceptibility in Clostridioides difficile is Associated with Lower Rates of Initial Cure and Sustained Clinical Response.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies have shown decreasing vancomycin susceptibility among clinical Clostridioides difficile isolates, but the impact on patient outcomes is unknown. We hypothesized that reduced vancomycin susceptibility would be associated with decreased rates of sustained clinical response (SCR). METHODS: This multicenter cohort study included adults with C. difficile infection (CDI) treated with oral vancomycin between 2016-2021. C. difficile isolates underwent agar dilution vancomycin susceptibility testing, ribotyping, and Sanger sequencing of the vancomycin resistance vanR gene. Reduced susceptibility was defined as vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) >2 µg/mL. The primary outcome was 30-day SCR; secondary outcomes were 14-day initial cure, 30-day recurrence, and 30-day mortality. Exploratory analysis assessed the association between the VanR Thr115Ala polymorphism, susceptibility, and outcomes. RESULTS: A high proportion (34%, 102/300) of C. difficile isolates exhibited reduced vancomycin susceptibility (range: 0.5-16 µg/mL, MIC50/90 = 2/4 µg/mL). Ribotype (RT) 027 accounted for the highest proportion (77.4%, 41/53) of isolates with reduced vancomycin susceptibility. Overall, 83% (249) of patients achieved 30-day SCR. Reduced vancomycin susceptibility was associated with lower rates of 30-day SCR (76%, 78/102) than vancomycin susceptible strains (86%, 171/198; P=0.031). A significantly lower rate of 14-day initial cure was also observed among individuals infected with strains with reduced vancomycin susceptibility (89% vs. 96%; P=0.04). Reduced susceptibility remained an independent predictor of 30-day SCR in multivariable modeling (odds ratio, 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.97; P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced vancomycin susceptibility in C. difficile was associated with decreased odds of 30-day SCR and lower 14-day initial cure rates in the studied patient cohort.

Antibacterial activity of ibezapolstat against antimicrobial-resistant clinical strains of Clostridioides difficile.

Antimicrobial resistance is emerging in clinical strains of Clostridioides difficile. Ibezapolstat (IBZ) is a DNA polymerase IIIC inhibitor that has completed phase II clinical trials. IBZ has potent in vitro activity against wild-type, susceptible strains but its effect on C. difficile strains with reduced susceptibility to metronidazole (MTZ), vancomycin (VAN), or fidaxomicin (FDX) has not been tested. The primary objective of this study was to test the antibacterial properties of IBZ against multidrug-resistant C. difficile strains. The in vitro activity, bactericidal, and time-kill activity of IBZ versus comparators were evaluated against 100 clinical strains of which 59 had reduced susceptibility to other C. difficile antibiotics. Morphologic changes against a multidrug resistance strain were visualized by light and scanning electron microscopy. The overall IBZ MIC50/90 values (µg/mL) for evaluated C. difficile strains were 4/8, compared with 2/4 for VAN, 0.5/1 for FDX, and 0.25/4 for MTZ. IBZ MIC50/90 values did not differ based on non-susceptibility to antibiotic class or number of classes to which strains were non-susceptible. IBZ bactericidal activity was similar to the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and maintained in wild-type and non-susceptible strains. Time-kill assays against two laboratory wild-type and two clinical non-susceptible strains demonstrated sustained IBZ activity despite reduced killing by comparator antibiotics for IBZ and VAN non-susceptible strains. Microscopy visualized increased cell lengthening and cellular damage in multidrug-resistant strains exposed to IBZ sub-MIC concentrations. This study demonstrated the potent antibacterial activity of IBZ against a large collection of C. difficile strains including multidrug-resistant strains. This study highlights the therapeutic potential of IBZ against multidrug-resistant strains of C. difficile.

Impact of Hypoalbuminemia on Ceftriaxone Treatment Failure in Patients With Enterobacterales Bacteremia: A Propensity-Matched, Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Ceftriaxone is frequently prescribed due to its convenience of dosing and robust antimicrobial activity. However, patients with hypoalbuminemia may experience suboptimal ceftriaxone exposure due to the high degree of protein binding. We aimed to evaluate the impact of hypoalbuminemia on treatment failure among hospitalized adults with Enterobacterales bacteremia who received ceftriaxone therapy. Methods: We conducted an observational cohort study among patients with Enterobacterales bacteremia who received >72 hours of ceftriaxone initiated within 48 hours of index culture. A propensity-score model was used to match and compare patients with hypoalbuminemia. The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as a composite of (1) escalation from ceftriaxone to ertapenem or an intravenous antibacterial agent with activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, or (2) inpatient death. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, duration of antibiotic therapy, and time to infection resolution. Results: Of 260 patients included, the majority developed bacteremia from a urinary source (71.5%), and Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen identified (72.3%). Patients with hypoalbuminemia experienced numerically higher rates of treatment failure, although not reaching statistical significance (12.3% vs 7.7%; P = .21). Among patients receiving care in the intensive care unit, the impact of hypoalbuminemia on treatment failure was more pronounced (24.4% vs 7.3%; P = .07). Conclusions: Hypoalbuminemia may not have a significant impact on clinical outcomes among patients with Enterobacterales bacteremia treated with ceftriaxone. However, critically ill patients may be subject to higher incidence of treatment failure in the presence of hypoalbuminemia.

Significant Publications on Infectious Diseases Pharmacotherapy in 2020.

Purpose. To summarize the most highly esteemed, peer-reviewed, infectious diseases (ID) pharmacotherapy articles published in 2020. Summary. Members of the Houston Infectious Diseases Network (HIDN) nominated articles that were deemed to have noteworthy contributions to ID pharmacotherapy in 2020, including those on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS). To select the most significant articles of 2020, a survey was created and distributed to members of the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists (SIDP) to vote on their top 10 articles of general ID and COVID-19 pharmacotherapy and one noteworthy HIV/AIDS publication. A total of 40 articles were nominated by HIDN: 35 articles pertaining to general ID/COVID-19 pharmacotherapy and 5 articles with HIV/AIDS involvement. Of the 247 SIDP members who responded to the survey, 205 and 42 members voted for general ID/COVID-19 pharmacotherapy articles and HIV/AIDS related articles, respectively. The top publications are summarized. Conclusion. In a taxing year of a global pandemic, the abundant and rapid distribution of ID literature has made it challenging for clinicians to stay informed of significant publications across the ID spectrum. This review summarizes significant ID-related publications in 2020 with the goal of aiding clinicians in staying up to date on the most relevant publications in ID pharmacotherapy.

Genetic Mechanisms of Vancomycin Resistance in Clostridioides difficile: A Systematic Review.

Antimicrobial resistance to treatments for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) poses a significant threat to global health. C. difficile is widely thought to be susceptible to oral vancomycin, which is increasingly the mainstay of CDI treatment. However, clinical labs do not conduct C. difficile susceptibility testing, presenting a challenge to detecting the emergence and impact of resistance. In this systematic review, we describe gene determinants and associated clinical and laboratory mechanisms of vancomycin resistance in C. difficile, including drug-binding site alterations, efflux pumps, RNA polymerase mutations, and biofilm formation. Additional research is needed to further characterize these mechanisms and understand their clinical impact.

Successful Treatment of Invasive Mucormycosis in Orthotopic Liver Transplant Population.

Mucormycosis is caused by ubiquitous fungi and encompasses a variety of different opportunistic syndromes in humans that disproportionately affect immunocompromised patients. Mortality has been documented to range between 50 and 100%; however, location of infection greatly dictates likelihood of survival. Treatment of mucormycosis involves aggressive surgical intervention and combination therapy of antifungal agents. In solid organ transplant recipients, immunosuppressive agents used to prevent rejection of the transplanted organ pose additional obstacles in the treatment of invasive fungal infections. We report on 3 high models for end-stage liver disease (MELD-Na) score orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients who all were diagnosed with Rhizopus spp. infections with positive, 1-year outcomes after aggressive, individualized treatment.

Role of Rapid Diagnostics in Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Sepsis.

Delayed administration of active anti-infective therapy is associated with increased rates of adverse events, mortality, and costs among sepsis patients. Inherent limitations of conventional culture identification methods and the lengthy turnaround time of antimicrobial susceptibility testing are significant barriers to the timely delivery of life-saving therapy, particularly among antibiotic-resistant infections. Culture-independent diagnostic techniques that detect pathogens and antimicrobial resistance genes within clinical samples present a tremendous benefit to timely diagnosis and management of patients. Improved outcomes for rapid intervention with rapid diagnostics have been documented and include decreased mortality rates, decreased health care delivery costs, and faster delivery of appropriate therapeutics.

Treatment of COVID-19 Patients with Convalescent Plasma in Houston, Texas.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 disease, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has spread globally, and no proven treatments are available. Convalescent plasma therapy has been used with varying degrees of success to treat severe microbial infections for more than 100 years. METHODS: Patients (n=25) with severe and/or life-threatening COVID-19 disease were enrolled at the Houston Methodist hospitals from March 28 to April 14, 2020. Patients were transfused with convalescent plasma obtained from donors with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and had been symptom free for 14 days. The primary study outcome was safety, and the secondary outcome was clinical status at day 14 post-transfusion. Clinical improvement was assessed based on a modified World Health Organization 6-point ordinal scale and laboratory parameters. Viral genome sequencing was performed on donor and recipient strains. RESULTS: At baseline, all patients were receiving supportive care, including anti-inflammatory and anti-viral treatments, and all patients were on oxygen support. At day 7 post-transfusion with convalescent plasma, nine patients had at least a 1-point improvement in clinical scale, and seven of those were discharged. By day 14 post-transfusion, 19 (76%) patients had at least a 1-point improvement in clinical status and 11 were discharged. No adverse events as a result of plasma transfusion were observed. The whole genome sequencing data did not identify a strain genotype-disease severity correlation. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that administration of convalescent plasma is a safe treatment option for those with severe COVID-19 disease. Randomized, controlled trials are needed to determine its efficacy.

Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Patients with Convalescent Plasma.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, has spread globally, and no proven treatments are available. Convalescent plasma therapy has been used with varying degrees of success to treat severe microbial infections for >100 years. Patients (n = 25) with severe and/or life-threatening COVID-19 disease were enrolled at the Houston Methodist hospitals from March 28, 2020, to April 14, 2020. Patients were transfused with convalescent plasma, obtained from donors with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection who had recovered. The primary study outcome was safety, and the secondary outcome was clinical status at day 14 after transfusion. Clinical improvement was assessed on the basis of a modified World Health Organization six-point ordinal scale and laboratory parameters. Viral genome sequencing was performed on donor and recipient strains. At day 7 after transfusion with convalescent plasma, nine patients had at least a one-point improvement in clinical scale, and seven of those were discharged. By day 14 after transfusion, 19 (76%) patients had at least a one-point improvement in clinical status, and 11 were discharged. No adverse events as a result of plasma transfusion were observed. Whole genome sequencing data did not identify a strain genotype-disease severity correlation. The data indicate that administration of convalescent plasma is a safe treatment option for those with severe COVID-19 disease.