Clinical characteristics and treatment approach of established New-Onset status epilepticus (eNOSE): A Real-World multicenter experience.

INTRODUCTION: Status Epilepticus (SE) can occur in patients without a previous epilepsy diagnosis, a condition identified as "new-onset status epilepticus" (NOSE). Treatment with benzodiazepine may fail in NOSE termination, requiring anti-seizure medication (ASM) employment. The term "established NOSE" (eNOSE) is generally employed in this context. This study aims to describe the main clinical characteristics of a large sample of patients suffering from eNOSE, compare the ASM efficacy, and explore the risk factors associated with ASM treatment unresponsiveness and eNOSE-associated mortality. METHODS: Adult patients diagnosed with eNOSE were retrospectively selected between January 2016 and December 2022. We reviewed demographics, clinical data, diagnostic work-up, and treatment. We considered the last ASM introduced before the eNOSE termination as effective. RESULTS: 123 patients were included (age: 67.9 ± 17.3). eNOSE acute etiology was mostly reported. In the overall cohort, phenytoin showed the highest response rate (p = 0.01). In the pairwise comparisons, valproate was superior to levetiracetam (p = 0.02) but not to lacosamide (p = 0.50). Phenytoin had a significantly higher resolution rate than levetiracetam (p = 0.001) but not lacosamide (p = 0.14). Thirty patients were refractory to ASM treatment. No predictors of refractoriness were identified. Thirty-nine patients died. Age and GCS were identified as eNOSE-related mortality risk factors. CONCLUSION: eNOSE frequently has an acute etiology with several associated syndromes. Phenytoin is more effective in managing eNOSE, even though lacosamide, valproate, and levetiracetam can represent further therapeutic options. Age and GCS are the main risk factors for eNOSE-associated mortality.

Status epilepticus as a complication of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: Two case reports and systematic review with individual patients' data analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Status Epilepticus (SE) stands as a prominent neurological emergency, showing a mortality rate of approximately 20%. Since February 2021, a worldwide vaccination campaign has been launched against the Coronavirus 19 disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Several possible vaccine-related adverse events have been identified, including neurological manifestations. SE is beginning to surface in literature as an emergent condition in COVID-19-vaccinated individuals, though defined reasons accounting for this correlation are still missing. METHODS: We report two cases of SE related to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. In addition, we performed a systematic search of the literature to identify the consistency of the association between the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and the SE onset. The following databases were consulted: PubMed and Google Scholar. RESULTS: Two novel super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) cases associated with the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine were identified. Both patients received the second dose of the vaccine about 14 days prior to SE onset. Patients showed a non-convulsive semiology and were treated with a combined anesthetic and immunomodulant therapy, leading to SE resolution in both cases. The literature review identified seven additional cases, primarily non-convulsive SE. Four patients received the Spikevax (ex-COVID-19 Moderna mRNA -1273 vaccine), 2 patients the BNT162b2 (Pfizer/Biotech), and 1 patient the ChAdOx1-s (AstraZeneca) vaccine. The first vaccine dose (5/7, 71.4%) emerged as the most frequently associated with SE onset, which manifested at an average of 4.5 days (± 3.4) following vaccination. Five patients presented RSE and required continuous intravenous anesthetic drug administration. Resolution of SE was achieved in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Status Epilepticus is a rare complication associated with Sars-CoV-2 vaccines. Additional studies are needed to ascertain the potential association between Sars-CoV-2 vaccines and status epilepticus.

Exploring epileptic phenotypes in PRRT2-related disorders: A report of two cases and literature appraisal.

BACKGROUND: The proline-rich transmembrane protein 2 (PRRT2) is a synaptic protein involved in neurotransmitter vesicle release. PRRT2 protein is highly expressed in the cerebellum, cerebral cortex, basal ganglia, and hippocampus. Variants in PRRT2 have been identified as a cause of several neurological disorders, including epilepsy, movement disorders, and headache. METHODS: We report two families carrying two distinct PRRT2 mutations showing childhood onset of movement disorders, headache, and epilepsy. Demographics, clinical, EEG, neuroimaging, and genetic sequencing study data were collected. A systematic review of the literature was also performed to dissect the most frequently reported PRRT2-associated epileptic phenotypes. RESULTS: two variants in PRRT2 gene (NM_145239.3:c718C>T, p.Arg240Ter; c.649dupC, p.Arg217Profs*8) were identified. The two variants altered the same extracellular domain of PRRT2. The de novo PRRT2 mutation (c718C>T, p.Arg240Ter) was related to multi-drug-resistant epilepsy. According to the literature, homozygous, biallelic variants and 16p11.2 deletions lead to PRRT2 haploinsufficiency and a more severe phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: PRRT2 mutations can be associated with several epileptic phenotypes ranging from benign ASM-responsive form to more severe epileptic encephalopathies. Identifying PRRT2 variants in epilepsy patients may help achieve more personalized treatment approaches. However, phenotype-genotype correlations remain a challenge.

Perinatal outcome in anti-NMDAr encephalitis during pregnancy-a systematic review with individual patients' data analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAr) antibody encephalitis is an autoimmune disorder characterized by synaptic NMDAr current disruption and receptor hypofunction, often affecting women during pregnancy. Clinical manifestations associated with anti-NMDAr encephalitis can occur both in the mother and fetus. METHODS: We generated a systematic search of the literature to identify epidemiological, clinical, and serological data related to pregnant women with anti-NMDAr encephalitis and their children, analyzing the fetal outcomes. We examined the age and neurologic symptoms of the mothers, the presence of an underlying tumor, immunotherapies used during pregnancy, duration of the pregnancy, and type of delivery. RESULTS: Data from 41 patients were extrapolated from the included studies. Spontaneous interruption of pregnancy, premature birth, and cesarean section were reported in pregnant women with NMDAr encephalitis. Several fetal and neonatal symptoms (e.g., movement disorders, spina bifida, poor sucking, respiratory distress, cardiac arrhythmias, infections, icterus, hypoglycemia, and low birth weight) depending on the mother's serum anti-NR1 concentration were also reported. CONCLUSIONS: We characterized the outcomes of children born from mothers with anti-NMDAr encephalitis, analyzing the pivotal risk factors related to pregnancy and maternal disorder. Neuropsychiatric involvement seems strictly related to pathogenic NMDAr antibodies detected in maternal and/or neonatal serum. These findings clarify a complex condition to manage, outlining the risks associated with pregnant women with anti-NMDAr encephalitis and also providing a concrete guide for therapeutic strategies to prevent potential harm to the fetus and the child's neurodevelopment.

A systematic review of immunotherapy in high-grade glioma: learning from the past to shape future perspectives.

High-grade gliomas (HGGs) constitute the most common malignant primary brain tumor with a poor prognosis despite the standard multimodal therapy. In recent years, immunotherapy has changed the prognosis of many cancers, increasing the hope for HGG therapy. We conducted a comprehensive search on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases to include relevant studies. This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Fifty-two papers were finally included (44 phase II and eight phase III clinical trials) and further divided into four different subgroups: 14 peptide vaccine trials, 15 dendritic cell vaccination (DCV) trials, six immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) trials, and 17 miscellaneous group trials that included both "active" and "passive" immunotherapies. In the last decade, immunotherapy created great hope to increase the survival of patients affected by HGGs; however, it has yielded mostly dismal results in the setting of phase III clinical trials. An in-depth analysis of these clinical results provides clues about common patterns that have led to failures at the clinical level and helps shape the perspective for the next generation of immunotherapies in neuro-oncology.

Diagnosis and treatment of status epilepticus in Down Syndrome (DS): A case report and systematic literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Epilepsy is one of the most frequent neurological comorbidities in patients with Down Syndrome (DS). Young patients and adults are the most affected, the latter mostly showing a phenotype labeled as "Late-onset myoclonic epilepsy" (LOMEDS). Status epilepticus (SE) is a life-threatening complication in patients with epilepsy. In this study, we described a non-convulsive SE (NCSE) case in a patient diagnosed with LOMEDS. We also performed a systematic review of the literature on SE diagnosis and treatment in patients with Down Syndrome. METHODS: Clinical and demographic characteristics of a DS patient diagnosed with NCSE were described. The systematic literature search dissected the diagnostic and therapeutic management of SE in patients with DS. The following databases were used: PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. RESULTS: 5 DS individuals (4 from the past literature + 1 novel case report) with SE have been identified. The median age at SE onset was 42 years (IQR: 21-60.5 years). The most common SE type was myoclonic SE (MSE), followed by NCSE. Two cases of acute symptomatic etiology were described, whereas a progressive symptomatic etiology was otherwise reported. Ictal EEG recording information was available in two patients who showed generalized spike waves and polyspike and wave discharges. In 3 cases, SE was treated with intravenous antiseizure medications that produced a complete resolution. CONCLUSION: SE may represent a rare complication in patients with DS. Although no definitive conclusions may be achieved due to the lack of evidence, treatment with valproic acid seems effective, especially in MSE. NCSE management is more challenging. It requires low doses of anesthetics, which should be used cautiously due to the high rate of complications.

Case Report: Brain tumor's pitfalls: two cases of high-grade brain tumors mimicking autoimmune encephalitis with positive onconeuronal antibodies.

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor in adulthood. Initial diagnosis is generally based on clinical and MRI findings, which may be misinterpreted as other neurological pictures, including autoimmune encephalitis (AE). AE is a heterogeneous group of neuroinflammatory diseases due to the presence of auto-antibodies targeting antigens on neuronal synaptic or cell surface. In the present report, we describe two peculiar cases of GBM initially misdiagnosed as AE, focusing on the diagnostic pitfalls and the treatment strategies. Methods: We report the case of two patients with high-grade brain tumors, initially misdiagnosed and treated for AE. Clinical, laboratory, and neuroradiological data are discussed in terms of differential diagnosis between AE and GBM. Results: The presence of atypical brain MRI findings and the unresponsiveness to immunosuppressive treatment are major red flags in the differential diagnosis between AE and GBM. In these cases, a brain biopsy is necessary to confirm the diagnosis. Conclusions: Atypical brain tumor presentation causes a diagnostic and therapeutic delay. A positive onconeural autoantibodies result should always be interpreted cautiously, considering the possibility of a false-positive test. A brain biopsy is mandatory for a definite diagnosis.

Autoimmune encephalitis during pregnancy: A diagnostic and therapeutic challenge-A systematic review with individual patients' analysis and clinical recommendations.

Several reports have described the autoimmune encephalitis' (AE) possible onset during pregnancy. In this systematic review, we summarize the available data on the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to AE during pregnancy, highlighting the associated maternal and fetal clinical outcomes. A systematic search of the literature was performed. The following databases were used: PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and CrossRef. The revision was registered on the PROSPERO platform (CRD42022336357). Forty-nine patients were included. AE onset was mainly observed during the first and the second trimester of pregnancy with psychiatric manifestations and seizures as main onset symptoms. CSF analysis showed AE-specific autoantibody positivity in 33 patients (anti-NMDA receptor as the most frequent). EEG generally showed normal findings. MRI revealed pathological findings in less than half of patients. Tumor screening was positive in 14 cases. First-line immunotherapy (single or combined) was generally employed while second line was administered in a minority of patients. Levetiracetam was the most used antiseizure medication. Cesarean section was performed in 18 women. Most of the women had an excellent early outcome after delivery but 22 showed persistent neurological deficits in long-term follow-up. Fetal outcome was positive in 33 cases, whereas 12 cases of fetal death were reported. A logistic regression showed that no variable significantly influenced the odds of good/bad maternal and fetal clinical outcome. Diagnosis and treatment of AE during pregnancy is challenging. The rate of miscarriage in women with AE seems to be higher than the general population. In addition, mothers may show long-term neurological deficits.

Diagnosis and treatment of late-onset myoclonic epilepsy in Down syndrome (LOMEDS): A systematic review with individual patients' data analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The late onset myoclonic epilepsy in Down Syndrome (LOMEDS) is a peculiar epilepsy type characterized by cortical myoclonus and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS), in people suffering from cognitive decline in Down syndrome (DS). In this review, we analyzed available data on the diagnostic and therapeutic management of individuals with LOMEDS. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of the literature to identify the diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients with LOMEDS. The following databases were used: PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, CrossRef. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (registration code: CRD42023390748). RESULTS: Data from 46 patients were included. DS was diagnosed according to the patient's clinical and genetic characteristics. Diagnosis of Alzheimer's dementia (AD) preceded the onset of epilepsy in all cases. Both myoclonic seizures (MS) and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) were reported, the latter preceding the onset of MS in 28 cases. EEG was performed in 45 patients, showing diffuse theta/delta slowing with superimposed generalized spike-and-wave or polyspike-and-wave. A diffuse cortical atrophy was detected in 34 patients on neuroimaging. Twenty-seven patients were treated with antiseizure medication (ASM) monotherapy, with reduced seizure frequency in 17 patients. Levetiracetam and valproic acid were the most used ASMs. Up to 41% of patients were unresponsive to first-line treatment and needed adjunctive therapy for seizure control. CONCLUSIONS: AD-related pathological changes in the brain may play a role in LOMEDS onset, although the mechanism underlying this phenomenon is still unknown. EEG remains the most relevant investigation to be performed. A significant percentage of patients developed a first-line ASM refractory epilepsy. ASMs which modulate the glutamatergic system may represent a good therapeutic option.

Heart rate variability modification as a predictive factor of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: How far are we? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is a sudden, unexpected death in people with epilepsy, with or without evidence of an epileptic seizure. The pathophysiological mechanism underlying SUDEP appears to be partly associated with an autonomic nervous system (ANS) dysfunction. Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis is a reliable, non-invasive method for detecting fluctuations in the ANS. In this systematic review we analyzed the data available in the literature on changes in HRV parameters in patients with SUDEP. METHODS: We carried out a systematic search of the literature to identify the quantitative variations of HRV in epileptic patients with SUDEP. The following databases were used: Pubmed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and CrossRef. A pooled analysis was carried out, and the results obtained were compared using mean difference (MD). The review was registered on the PROSPERO platform (CRD42021291586). RESULTS: Seven articles were included, with a total of 72 SUDEP cases associated with altered HRV parameters. Generally, a reduction of SDNN (standard deviation of the RR intervals) and RMSSD (root mean square differences of successive RR intervals) was reported in most SUDEP patients. According to MD, the SUDEP patients showed no differences in time and frequency domain parameters compared to controls. However, a trend toward increased low frequency and high frequency ratio (LF/HF) was observed in the SUDEP patients. CONCLUSIONS: HRV analysis is a valuable method for assessing cardiovascular risk and cardioautonomic impairment. Although a possible association between HRV variation and SUDEP has been reported, further studies are needed to assess the potential role of HRV modifications as a SUDEP biomarker.

Heart rate variability modifications in adult patients with early versus late-onset temporal lobe epilepsy: A comparative observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most frequent form of focal epilepsy. TLE is associated with cardio-autonomic dysfunction and increased cardiovascular (CV) risk in patients over the fifth decade of age. In these subjects, TLE can be classified as early-onset (EOTLE; i.e., patients who had developed epilepsy in their youth) and late-onset (LOTLE; i.e., patients who developed epilepsy in adulthood). Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis is useful for assessing cardio-autonomic function and identifying patients with increased CV risk. This study compared changes in HRV occurring in patients over the age of 50, with EOTLE or LOTLE. METHODS: We enrolled twenty-seven adults with LOTLE and 23 with EOTLE. Each patient underwent a EEG and EKG recording during 20-minutes of resting state and a 5-minutes hyperventilation (HV). Short-term HRV analysis was performed both in time and frequency domains. Linear Mixed Models (LMM) were used to analyze HRV parameters according to the condition (baseline and HV) and group (LOTLE and EOTLE groups). RESULTS: Compared to the LOTLE group, the EOTLE group showed significantly decreased LnRMSSD (natural logarithm of the root mean square of the difference between contiguous RR intervals) (p-value=0.05), LnHF ms2 (natural logarithm of high frequency absolute power) (p-value=0.05), HF n.u. (high frequency power expressed in normalized units) (p-value=0.008) and HF% (high frequency power expressed in percentage) (p-value=0.01). In addition, EOTLE patients exhibited increased LF n.u. (low frequency power expressed in normalized units) (p-value=0.008) and LF/HF (low frequency/high frequency) ratio (p-value=0.007). During HV, the LOTLE group exhibited a multiplicative effect for the interaction between group and condition with increased LF n.u. (p = 0.003) and LF% (low frequency expressed in percentage) (p = 0.05) values. CONCLUSIONS: EOTLE is associated with reduced vagal tone compared to LOTLE. Patients with EOTLE may have a higher risk of developing cardiac dysfunction or cardiac arrhythmia than LOTLE patients.

Migraine Pharmacological Treatment and Cognitive Impairment: Risks and Benefits.

Migraine is a common neurological disorder impairing the quality of life of patients. The condition requires, as an acute or prophylactic line of intervention, the frequent use of drugs acting on the central nervous system (CNS). The long-term impact of these medications on cognition and neurodegeneration has never been consistently assessed. The paper reviews pharmacological migraine treatments and discusses their biological and clinical effects on the CNS. The different anti-migraine drugs show distinct profiles concerning neurodegeneration and the risk of cognitive deficits. These features should be carefully evaluated when prescribing a pharmacological treatment as many migraineurs are of scholar or working age and their performances may be affected by drug misuse. Thus, a reconsideration of therapy guidelines is warranted. Furthermore, since conflicting results have emerged in the relationship between migraine and dementia, future studies must consider present and past pharmacological regimens as potential confounding factors.

Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) in the COVID-19 pandemic era: A systematic review with individual patients' analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) resemble epileptic seizures but are not due to underlying epileptic activity and in some cases coexist alongside epilepsy. We described the clinical characteristics of patients with PNES as reported in the literature from the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated differences between patients with a diagnosis made immediately before the pandemic (pPNES) and those newly diagnosed during it (nPNES). METHODS: A systematic search with individual patient analysis of PNES cases published since the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak was performed. Differences between pPNES and nPNES were analyzed using Chi-square or Fisher exact test. RESULTS: Eleven articles were included, with 133 patients (106 pPNES and 27 nPNES). In the pPNES group, PNES frequency increased during the pandemic in 20/106 patients, whereas in 78/106, the frequency remained stable or decreased. nPNES was associated with higher risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection and epilepsy diagnosis, whereas psychiatric comorbidities were less frequent. CONCLUSIONS: During the pandemic, most patients with pPNES remained stable or improved, whereas nPNES was associated with a lower burden of psychiatric comorbidities. These intriguing findings suggest that, at least in some patients, the COVID-19 pandemic may not necessarily lead to worsening in the frequency of PNES and quality of life.

COVID-19 and first manic episodes: a systematic review.

Sars-CoV-2 is a respiratory virus that can access the central nervous system, as indicated by the presence of the virus in patients' cerebrospinal fluid and the occurrence of several neurological syndromes during and after COVID-19. Growing evidence indicates that Sars-CoV-2 can also trigger the acute onset of mood disorders or psychotic symptoms. COVID-19-related first episodes of mania, in subjects with no known history of bipolar disorder, have never been systematically analyzed. Thus, the present study assesses a potential link between the two conditions. This systematic review analyzes cases of first appearance of manic episodes associated with COVID-19. Clinical features, pharmacological therapies, and relationships with pre-existing medical conditions are also appraised. Medical records of twenty-three patients fulfilling the current DSM-5 criteria for manic episode were included. Manic episodes started, on average, after 12.71±6.65 days from the infection onset. Psychotic symptoms were frequently reported. 82.61% of patients exhibited delusions, whereas 39.13% of patients presented hallucinations. A large discrepancy in the diagnostic workups was observed. Mania represents an underestimated clinical presentation of COVID-19. Further studies should focus on the pathophysiological substrates of COVID-19-related mania and pursue appropriate and specific diagnostic and therapeutic workups.