Corticosteroids for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of corticosteroids in the setting of maintenance therapy for Crohn's disease has never been clearly demonstrated. It would be important to determine, based upon the currently available data from controlled trials, if the use of chronic corticosteroid therapy is of benefit in patients with quiescent Crohn's disease or if there is an identifiable subgroup of Crohn's disease patients, such as those in whom therapy cannot be successfully tapered, who might benefit from such treatment. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of conventional systemic corticosteroid therapy in maintaining clinical remission in Crohn's disease. SEARCH STRATEGY: A computer-assisted search of the on-line bibliographic database MEDLINE of studies published in English, French, Spanish, Italian and German between 1966 and July, 2003. Manual searches of the reference lists from the potentially relevant studies were performed in order to identify additional studies that may have been missed using the computer-assisted search strategy. Proceedings from major gastrointestinal meetings were also manually searched from 1985 to 2003 in order to identify unpublished studies. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Review Group Specialized Trials Register were also searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials involving patients of any age with Crohn's disease in clinical remission as defined by a CDAI < 150 or by the presence of no symptoms or only mild symptoms at the time of entry into the trial. The experimental treatment consisted of oral conventional corticosteroid therapy (excluding budesonide, fluticasone, etc). Clinical disease relapse was used as the outcome measure of interest. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Eligible studies were selected by 4 reviewers and data were extracted onto standardized data extraction forms. Disagreements in eligibility or data extraction were resolved by consensus. Data were converted into individual 2x2 tables for each study. The presence of significant heterogeneity among studies was tested using the chi-square test. The 2x2 tables were synthesized into a summary test statistic using the pooled odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals as described by Cochran and Mantel and Haenszel (the 'odds ratio' in MetaView). A fixed effects model was used for the pooling of data. MAIN RESULTS: Four studies were initially judged as being eligible for inclusion. After obtaining additional information on one of the studies it was excluded because it was not double-blind. The total number of subjects included in the analysis at the time points of 6, 12 and 24 months were 142, 131 and 95 for the corticosteroid group and 161, 138 and 87 for the control group. The odds ratios for relapse on active treatment and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals were 0.71 (0.39, 1.31), 0.82 (0.47, 1.43) and 0.72 (0.38, 1.35) at 6, 12 and 24 months. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The use of conventional systemic corticosteroids in patients with clinically quiescent Crohn's disease does not appear to reduce the risk of relapse over a 24 month period of follow-up. This review updates the existing review of corticosteroids for maintaining remission of Crohn's disease which was published in the Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2003).

Replacement of conventional glucocorticoids by oral pH-modified release budesonide in active and inactive Crohn's disease: results of an open, prospective, multicenter trial.

Glucocorticosteroids (GCS) are established in the treatment of active Crohn's ileitis and ileocolitis. Recently, the topical steroid budesonide was found to be effective in untreated patients with Crohn's disease (CD) causing less side effects than conventional GCS. No clinical data have been reported about the effects of switching from conventional GCS to budesonide in terms of side effects and disease activity. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the development of side effects after switching from conventional GCS treatment to Eudragit L-coated budesonide (pH-modified release formulation) in patients taking 5-30 mg prednisolone equivalent per day for at least two weeks. In all, 178 patients with active CD (N = 88) or CD in remission during GCS treatment (N = 90) were included. Conventional GCS treatment was tapered down during a maximum of three weeks, with simultaneous intake of 3 x 3 mg budesonide. Thereafter, patients received 3 x 3 mg budesonide alone for six weeks. GCS-related side effects, disease activity and adverse events were documented at study entry and after 0, 2, 4, and 6 weeks of budesonide treatment. The percentage of patients with GCS-related side effects decreased from 65.2% (intention-to-treat-population) at entry to 43.3% (P < 0.0001) at the end of the trial. The total number of GCS-related side effects decreased significantly from 269 to 90. Of the patients who entered the study with active disease under conventional GCS therapy, 38.6% were in remission at the end of the study. Of the patients who entered the study with CD in remission, 78% stayed in remission after switching from conventinal GCS to budesonide. In conclusion, switching from conventional GCS treatment to budesonide leads to a significant reduction of GCS related side effects in patients with CD without causing rapid deterioration of the disease.

Corticosteroids for maintaining remission of Crohn's disease.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of conventional systemic corticosteroid therapy in maintaining clinical remission in Crohn's disease. SEARCH STRATEGY: A computer-assisted search of the on-line bibliographic database MEDLINE of studies published in English, French, Spanish, Italian and German between 1966 and February, 2001. Manual searches of the reference lists from the potentially relevant studies were performed in order to identify additional studies that may have been missed using the computer-assisted search strategy. Proceedings from major gastrointestinal meetings were also manually searched from 1985 to 2000 in order to identify unpublished studies. The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Review Group Trials Register were also searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials involving patients of any age with Crohn's disease in clinical remission as defined by a CDAI < 150 or by the presence of no symptoms or only mild symptoms at the time of entry into the trial. The experimental treatment consisted of oral conventional corticosteroid therapy (excluding budesonide, fluticasone, etc). Clinical disease relapse was used as the outcome measure of interest. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Eligible studies were selected by 4 reviewers and data were extracted onto standardized data extraction forms. Disagreements in eligibility or data extraction were resolved by consensus. Data were converted into individual 2x2 tables for each study. The presence of significant heterogeneity among studies was tested using the chi-square test. The 2x2 tables were synthesized into a summary test statistic using the pooled odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals as described by Cochran and Mantel and Haenszel (the 'odds ratio' in MetaView). A fixed effects model was used for the pooling of data. MAIN RESULTS: Four studies were initially judged as being eligible for inclusion. After obtaining additional information on one of the studies it was excluded because it was not double-blind. The total number of subjects included in the analysis at the time points of 6, 12 and 24 months were 142, 131 and 95 for the corticosteroid group and 161, 138 and 87 for the control group. The odds ratios for relapse on active treatment and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals were 0.71 (0.39, 1.31), 0.82 (0.47, 1.43) and 0.72 (0.38, 1.35) at 6, 12 and 24 months. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The use of conventional systemic corticosteroids in patients with clinically quiescent Crohn's disease does not appear to reduce the risk of relapse over a 24 month period of follow-up. This review updates the existing review of corticosteroids for maintaining remission of Crohn's disease which was published in the Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2001).

Corticosteroids for maintaining remission of Crohn's disease.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of conventional systemic corticosteroid therapy in maintaining clinical remission in Crohn's disease. SEARCH STRATEGY: A computer-assisted search of the on-line bibliographic database MEDLINE of studies published in English, French, Spanish, Italian and German between 1966 and May, 1998. Manual searches of the reference lists from the potentially relevant studies were performed in order to identify additional studies that may have been missed using the computer-assisted search strategy. Proceedings from major gastrointestinal meetings were also manually searched from 1985 to 1997 in order to identify unpublished studies. The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Review Group Trials Register were also searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials involving patients of any age with Crohn's disease in clinical remission as defined by a CDAI < 150 or by the presence of no symptoms or only mild symptoms at the time of entry into the trial. The experimental treatment consisted of oral conventional corticosteroid therapy (excluding budesonide, fluticasone, etc). Clinical disease relapse was used as the outcome measure of interest. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Eligible studies were selected by 4 reviewers and data were extracted onto standardized data extraction forms. Disagreements in eligibility or data extraction were resolved by consensus. Data were converted into individual 2x2 tables for each study. The presence of significant heterogeneity among studies was tested using the chi-square test. The 2x2 tables were synthesized into a summary test statistic using the pooled odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals as described by Cochran and Mantel and Haenszel (the 'odds ratio' in MetaView). A fixed effects model was used for the pooling of data. MAIN RESULTS: Four studies were initially judged as being eligible for inclusion. After obtaining additional information on one of the studies it was excluded because it was not double-blind. The total number of subjects included in the analysis at the time points of 6, 12 and 24 months were 142, 131 and 95 for the corticosteroid group and 161, 138 and 87 for the control group. The odds ratios for relapse on active treatment and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals were 0.71 (0.39, 1.31), 0.82 (0.47, 1.43) and 0.72 (0.38, 1.35) at 6, 12 and 24 months. The numbers needed to treat with corticosteroids to prevent one additional relapse were 24, 35, 15 respectively. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The use of conventional systemic corticosteroids in patients with clinically quiescent Crohn's disease does not appear to reduce the risk of relapse over a 24 month period of follow-up.

IOIBD questionnaire on the clinical use of azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, cyclosporin A and methotrexate in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases.

OBJECTIVE: To obtain information on the clinical experience with azathioprine (AZA), 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), cyclosporin A (CyA) and methotrexate (MTX) in the treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) by gastroenterologists and internists in different countries. DESIGN: A questionnaire designed by the International Organization for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IOIBD) was mailed to 300 gastroenterologists, living in North America (n = 76) and Europe (n = 224) (12 countries), to obtain information on clinical experience. PARTICIPANTS: More than half of the respondents (168/298; 56.4%) worked in university hospitals and 58/298 (19.5%) in general (non-university) hospitals. Two-thirds (65%) had more than 10 years' experience in gastroenterology. RESULTS: The respondents had personal experience with AZA (88.4%), 6-MP (33.3%), CyA (48.7%) and MTX (36.3%). AZA was prescribed more frequently in Europe (92.6%) than in North America (74.2%) (P = 0.0002), 6-MP less frequently by the European than the North American respondents (23.8 and 53.3% respectively, P = 0.0001). Two-thirds (69.7%) usually prescribed AZA together with steroids to Crohn's disease patients; 62.4% of the respondents prescribed AZA for periods longer than 24 months. For ulcerative colitis, 77.9% had experience with AZA (Europe > North America, P = 0.0001). AZA had been prescribed by 69 respondents to pregnant patients, without apparent toxicity. Acute pancreatitis had been observed after AZA by 56.7% respondents; 25 malignancies were mentioned (six lymphoma, three leukaemia, three colon cancer, four renal carcinoma, nine others). CyA had been prescribed in acute ulcerative colitis by 140/291 respondents (North America 45.1%, Europe 49.1 %); of all respondents 63.9% treated < 5 patients with CyA, 36.1% 6-20 cases. CyA results were considered good in 29.5%, acceptable but with recurrences in 58.6%, and poor in 14.3%. MTX was prescribed in North America by 47.8% of the respondents, and by 33.9% in Europe (not significant). Several significant differences were observed between the prescription behaviour of respondents working at university hospitals and non-university hospitals, in particular in relation to participation in clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable experience exists in the use of immunosuppressive therapy in IBD; however, differential prescription behaviour exists in the choice of immunosuppressives between North America and Europe. These IOIBD study results may contribute to a better insight in the daily use of immunosuppressive agents in IBD by gastroenterologists and other specialists.

Inflammation does not decrease intraluminal pH in chronic inflammatory bowel disease.

Intestinal inflammation may influence intraluminal pH. Profiles of the gastrointestinal pH were evaluated in 15 patients with active Crohn's disease of the ileocecal area. In addition, five patients with moderate (1) or severe (4) ulcerative colitis were studied. Fifteen healthy subjects served as controls. Intraluminal pH of the different parts of the gastrointestinal tract was measured by a free-floating pH-sensitive telemetering capsule. A metal sphere was attached to the capsule for exact localization by a metal detector. Physiological patterns of pH were maintained throughout the gastrointestinal tract including the inflamed segments. Median pH in the terminal ileum of the patients with Crohn's disease was 7.5 vs. 7.7 and in the rectum in ulcerative colitis 7.8 vs. 7.2 in the controls. In conclusion, intraluminal pH is not decreased by inflammatory changes in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, allowing eudragit-coated pH-controlled-release formulations of mesalazine to dissolve in diseased areas also.

Anti-TNF antibody in Crohn's disease--status of information, comments and recommendations of an international working group.

The chimeric anti-TNF antibody Remicade (Infliximab) has recently been approved for human use by the FDA and is now available on the market. Since there is considerable interest in this kind of treatment among patients with Crohn's disease, an international working group has summarized the presently available information about efficacy, side effects and possible problems of this treatment. Studies show that Remicade is effective in the treatment of active Crohn's disease, maintaining remission and fistulae. The working group does not see Infliximab as a first-line treatment for Crohn's disease. It may be used in active phase recurrent disease, chronic active disease and fistulae if standard treatment was not successful. For the surveillance special attention has to be given to the unknown malignancy rate of Infliximab. Infusion should be performed in an institution, routinely performing intravenous infusions and a two-hour surveillance of the patients should be guaranteed to recognize anaphylactic reactions or acute side effects. There is presently no information indication that the combination with immunosuppressants might increase risks or side effects of this treatment. Due to the limited information available the working group would prefer to use Remicade in studies only and recommends central collection and documentation of all data on efficacy and side effects for the next year.

Low-dose budesonide treatment for prevention of postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease: a multicentre randomized placebo-controlled trial. German Budesonide Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic recurrence of Crohn's disease frequently occurs within weeks after 'curative' operation. Treatment with 3 x 1 mg oral pH-modified release budesonide was tried to prevent postoperative recurrence. DESIGN: A multicentre randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of 1 year duration was performed. SETTING: Departments of surgery, endoscopy and pathology of three university hospitals participated in the trial. PATIENTS: Patients with Crohn's disease who underwent ileal and/or colonic resection and whose anastomosis was accessible to colonoscopy were admitted to the study. Of the 88 randomized patients, 83 patients were included in the efficacy analysis (budesonide n = 43, placebo n = 40). Treatment was started within 2 weeks after surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Colonoscopy was performed 3 and 12 months postoperatively. The anastomosis and the adjacent bowel were evaluated by endoscopy and histology. For follow-up of the clinical course of the disease the Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) was used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome variable was recurrence of Crohn's disease based on endoscopic findings. Secondary efficacy variables were histology scores, CDAI, time-to-failure and global judgement of well-being of the patient. RESULTS: The recurrence rate after 1 year (endoscopic and/or clinical) was 57% (20/35) in the budesonide group and 70% (19/27) in the placebo group (n.s.). Mean time-to-failure was 196 days under budesonide and 154 days under placebo (n.s.). Median CDAI (relapse 19% vs. 28%) and global patients' judgement at the end of treatment (bad 5% vs. 15%) was slightly in favour of budesonide. One patient in each group discontinued the trial because of adverse events. Potentially steroid-related side effects were reported more frequently in the placebo than in the budesonide group (32% vs. 17%) (n.s.). SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION: Although the effect of budesonide was altogether positive in almost all variables studied in this trial (e.g. endoscopic and histopathological score, time-to-failure, CDAI, patients' global judgement and rate of side effects), this increase in efficacy was small and the power for detecting differences versus placebo was too low to be statistically significant. According to these results, low-dose oral budesonide cannot be recommended to be used for the prevention of postoperative relapse in Crohn's disease.

Olsalazine versus mesalazine in the treatment of mild to moderate ulcerative colitis.

AIM: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of olsalazine sodium with enteric-coated mesalazine in inducing endoscopic remission in patients with mild to moderate active ulcerative colitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with mild to moderate active ulcerative colitis were randomized to receive either olsalazine sodium, 3 g/day (n = 88), or mesalazine, 3 g/day (n = 80), for up to 12 weeks. RESULTS: Of the patients treated with olsalazine sodium, 52.2% achieved endoscopic remission, compared with 48.8% of patients treated with mesalazine. This difference was not significant (P = 0.67). There was a nonsignificant trend for patients with left-sided colitis or a more severe endoscopic grade to achieve remission if they were treated with olsalazine sodium than if they were treated with mesalazine. Both treatments were comparable with respect to clinical activity index and an investigator's global assessment. Seventy patients reported one or more adverse events; adverse events were seen in 45% of olsalazine sodium-treated patients and in 36% of mesalazine-treated patients. Eleven patients treated with olsalazine sodium and nine patients treated with mesalazine withdrew from the study because of adverse events. One patient treated with olsalazine sodium compared with two treated with mesalazine stopped treatment because of diarrhoea. Serious adverse events occurred in three patients treated with olsalazine sodium and in four treated with mesalazine. CONCLUSION: Therapeutic effectiveness and tolerance to the treatment did not differ between olsalazine sodium, 3 g/day, and mesalazine, 3 g/day, in inducing endoscopic remission in patients with mild to moderate active ulcerative colitis within 12 weeks of treatment.

Gastrointestinal pH profiles in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: 5-Amino salicylic acid preparations are used in therapy for patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. The bioavailability of these drugs depends on their coating. AIM: To determine whether intraluminal pH is decreased by the presence of inflammation, thereby altering the release of 5-amino salicylic acid in the intestinal lumen. METHODS: Intraluminal gastrointestinal pH was measured by means of a radiotelemetry capsule in 12 healthy controls, in 12 patients with Crohn's disease (five with active disease), and in 11 patients with ulcerative colitis (seven with active disease). RESULTS: The median gastric pH values in the patient groups (Crohn's disease 2.4, range 1.5-4.1; ulcerative colitis 1.95, range 1.55-4.4) were significantly higher than those observed in the controls (1.55, range 0.95-2.6). In the small bowel and colonic segments, all the pH values of Crohn's disease patients were comparable to those of the controls, as were the pH values in the proximal small intestine and in the left colon in patients with ulcerative colitis. However, the latter group had higher pH values in the terminal ileum, the caecum and the right colon. Patients with active disease had comparable median gastrointestinal pH values to patients in remission. CONCLUSIONS: The luminal release of 5-amino salicylic acid might not be inhibited by low pH in patients with active inflammatory bowel diseases. This supports a safe disintegration of the slow release mesalazine preparations even in the presence of severe disease.

Low dose oral pH modified release budesonide for maintenance of steroid induced remission in Crohn's disease. The Budesonide Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The relapse rate after steroid induced remission in Crohn's disease is high. AIMS: To test whether oral pH modified release budesonide (3 x 1 mg/day) reduces the relapse rate and to identify patient subgroups with an increased risk of relapse. METHODS: In a multicentre, randomised, double blind study, 179 patients with steroid induced remission of Crohn's disease received either 3 x 1 mg budesonide (n = 84) or placebo (n = 95) for one year. The primary study aim was the maintenance of remission of Crohn's disease for one year. RESULTS: Patient characteristics at study entry were similar for both groups. The relapse rate was 67% (56/84) in the budesonide group and 65% (62/95) in the placebo group. The relapse curves in both groups were similar. The mean time to relapse was 93.5 days in the budesonide group and 67.0 days in the placebo group. No prognostic factors allowing prediction of an increased risk for relapse or definition of patient subgroups who derived benefit from low dose budesonide were found. Drug related side effects were mild and no different between the budesonide and the placebo group. CONCLUSION: Oral pH modified release budesonide at a dose of 3 x 1 mg/day is not effective for maintaining steroid induced remission in Crohn's disease.

Treatment of active and postactive ileal and colonic Crohn's disease with oral pH-modified-release budesonide. German Budesonide Study Group.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Budesonide is a glucocorticoid with a high topical anti-inflammatory but low systemic activity due to its rapid hepatic inactivation. The aim of this open, multicenter study was to investigate efficacy and safety of oral pH-modified-release budesonide in patients with active Crohn's disease of the ileum and colon and in maintaining budesonide-induced remission in postactive Crohn's disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 81 patients (intention-to-treat) received 3 x 3 mg budesonide/day for 6 weeks, followed by 3 x 2 mg budesonide for another 6 weeks in case of response to initial treatment. Clinical and laboratory parameters were assessed at study entry as well as after 2, 4, 6 and 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: On an intention-to-treat basis remission was induced in 54.3% of 81 patients with active Crohn's disease, 71.4% of 35 patients stayed in remission after the acute-phase treatment until the end of the trial. Typical steroid-related side effects were observed during the acute-phase treatment in only 18% of the patients. Duration, severity and extent of disease at study entry played no significant role in the outcome of the trial, but there was a tendency towards better results during the acute-phase treatment in patients with moderate disease activity and affection of the terminal ileum and proximal colon. CONCLUSIONS: Budesonide could be an alternative to conventional steroid treatment in patients with active Crohn's disease.

Fecal alpha 1-antitrypsin in newborn infants.

BACKGROUND: Fecal alpha 1-antitrypsin is used as a marker for intestinal protein loss reflecting increased intestinal permeability. Exact data of fecal alpha 1-antitrypsin in newborn infants are not available. METHODS: 30 healthy mature neonates and three infants with impaired gastrointestinal passage due to stenoses and atresia respectively, were investigated during the first days of life. The amniotic fluid of 13 and the serum of 17 infants was available. alpha 1-antitrypsin was determined using the radial immunodiffusion method. RESULTS: Normal newborns showed mean fecal alpha 1-antitrypsin levels (+/-SD) of 2061 +/- 817 mg/dl (day 1), 1186 +/- 720 mg/dl (day 2), 308 +/- 380 (day 3), 35 +/- 27 (day 5), and 27 +/- 21 mg/dl (day 6). Two infants with esophageal atresia presented a much lower pattern, and one with annular pancreas had a fecal alpha 1-antitrypsin pattern comparable with that of normal babies. Serum alpha 1-antitrypsin was normal (275 +/- 52 mg/dl), and amniotic fluid contained 20 +/- 12 mg/dl alpha 1-antitrypsin. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of neonatal fecal alpha 1-antitrypsin content appears to reflect the meconium clearance of the gut rather than intestinal permeability and "gut closure." We hypothesize that the origin of increased fecal alpha 1-antitrypsin is the result of accumulated secretions from bile, the pancreas, and the duodenum, but alpha 1-antitrypsin originating from swallowed amniotic fluid during pregnancy may play an additional role.

n-3 fatty acids only delay early relapse of ulcerative colitis in remission.

Relapse prevention by dietary n-3 fatty acids (5.1 g/day) was studied in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 64 patients with ulcerative colitis in remission and off steroids. 5-ASA compounds were stopped three months after randomization and clinical disease activity monitored for two years. Macroscopic and histologic activity and extension was assessed by colonoscopy at entry and at exit. Both treatment groups were well matched at start. Nine patients on placebo and eight on n-3 fatty acids stopped taking their medication prematurely. Actuarial relapse-free survival was improved by n-3 fatty acids only during months 2 and 3 (2P < 0.05-0.01), but cumulative relapse rate at two years was similar for those taking placebo (18/33 = 55%) and n-3 fatty acids (18/31 = 58%). There was also no consistent difference in clinical, macroscopic, and histologic disease activity between treatment groups. The n-3 fatty acids temporarily retard, but do not prevent, relapse of ulcerative colitis.

Oral pH-modified release budesonide versus 6-methylprednisolone in active Crohn's disease. German/Austrian Budesonide Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: Corticosteroids are effective in acute Crohn's disease (CD). The present study assessed the effectiveness and safety of oral pH-modified release budesonide (BUD) in patients with active CD in comparison with 6-methylprednisolone (MPred). DESIGN: This was a prospective multicentre, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study. METHODS: A total of 67 patients with active CD (CDAI > 150) were included. Patients were treated with 3 x 3 mg BUD (n = 34) or MPred (n = 33) according to a weekly tapering schedule (48-32-24-20-16-12-8 mg). The primary aim was remission of CD (CDAI < 150 and decrease by at least 60 points from baseline) after eight weeks. RESULTS: Baseline demographics, disease activity and localization of CD in the small bowel and the colon were similar in both treatment groups. On an intention-to-treat basis 19/34 patients in the BUD group (55.9%) and 24/33 patients in the MPred group (72.7%) were in remission after eight weeks (P = 0.237). Therapy failed in 15/34 patients (44.1%) of the BUD group and in 9/33 patients (27.3%) of the MPred group. The mean CDAI decreased from 262 +/- 50 to 118 +/- 69 in the BUD-group and from 262 +/- 81 to 95 +/- 61 in the Mored group (P = 0.183, final CDAI BUD vs. MPred). Steroid-related side effects appeared in 28.6% of the patients in the BUD group and in 69.7% of the patients in the Mored group (P = 0.0015). CONCLUSIONS: Oral pH-modified release budesonide (3 x 3 mg/day) is almost as effective as a conventional corticosteroid in patients with active CD but causes significantly less corticosteroid-related side effects.

[Enteropathic spondylarthritis in chronic inflammatory bowel diseases: prevalence, manifestation pattern and HLA association]. / Enteropathische Spondarthritiden bei chronisch entzündlichen Darmerkrankungen: Prävalenz, Befallsmuster und HLA-Assoziation.

BACKGROUND: Enteropathic spondylarthropathies (SpA) are the most frequent extraintestinal manifestation of the chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), Crohn's disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC). It was the aim of the present study, to analyze a large number of IBD patients for the prevalence and pattern of joint manifestation and the association of SpA with the extend of bowel involvement and HLA-haplotype. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 521 patients (409 CD and 112 UC) were prospectively analyzed over a period of one year. SpA was diagnosed on the basis of an appropriate patient history as well as clinical, radiological and immunoserological parameters. RESULTS: SpA was diagnosed in 10.7% of all CD and 14.4% of all UC patients. In 26.8% of all patients symptoms of SpA occurred prior to and in 14.4% simultaneously with IBD. 28.1% of all patients presented with isolated peripheral arthritis, 26.8% of all patients showed an isolated involvement of the spine or sacroiliic joints and 45.1% of all patients presented with combined involvement. 2/12 UC patients with SpA suffered from rectosigmoiditis, 5/12 from partial colitis and 5/12 had pancolitis. In CD patients with SpA, 8/59 had isolated colitis, 8/59 ileocolitis and 31/59 isolated small bowel involvement. There was a positive correlation between SpA and HLA-B27 (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Enteropathic spondylarthropathies are an important extraintestinal manifestation of IBD. Spondylarthropathies occur irrespective of the extend of IBD and frequently become symptomatic prior to IBD. These and recent data describing inflammatory bowel disease in patients with SpA of unknown etiology suggest that both diseases have a common pathogenetic background.

Systemic uptake of 5-aminosalicylic acid from olsalazine and eudragit L coated mesalazine in patients with ulcerative colitis in remission.

UNLABELLED: Aminosalicylates are used to maintain remission in patients with ulcerative colitis. Since there are potential systemic side effects of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) and long term treatment is necessary for maintenance therapy preparations with low rates of absorption in the small intestine would be optimal for this indication. In this trial olsalazine (Dipentum), a 5-ASA dimer, and an eudragit L coated mesalazine preparation (Salofalk) were compared. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with ulcerative colitis in clinical and endoscopical remission were randomized in a cross over design. They either received a 2 x 2 capsules of olsalazine 250 mg or 3 x 2 tablets mesalazine 250 mg, these being the doses recommended for maintenance therapy. After a five days equilibration period morning pre-dose serum samples and 24 hour urine were collected on two consecutive days and analyzed for 5-ASA and acetylated 5-ASA. Subsequently, patients were crossed over to receive the alternative preparation and were evaluated after five days correspondingly. RESULTS: Uptake of 5-ASA from mesalazine was significantly higher than from olsalazine (p < 0.0001). Plasma concentrations of 5-ASA were 3.4 times and of acetyl-5-ASA 3.2 times higher after mesalazine administration than after olsalazine. The same applies to the 24 hour 5-ASA and acetyl-5-ASA urinary excretion (median: 3.2 versus 1.0 mmol/24 hr) as well as to the percentage of administered dose (32.4 versus 17.7%). All patients finished the trial and no major systemic side effects occured with either preparation. CONCLUSION: Systemic uptake of 5-ASA from olsalazine was significantly lower than from eudragit L coated mesalazine. Therefore, olsalazine is less likely to produce side effects and seems to be especially suited for maintenance therapy in ulcerative colitis.

Tolerance exists towards resident intestinal flora but is broken in active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)

Hyporesponsiveness to a universe of bacterial and dietary antigens from the gut lumen is a hallmark of the intestinal immune system. Since hyperresponsiveness against these antigens might be associated with inflammation, we studied the immune response to the indigenous intestinal microflora in peripheral blood, inflamed and non-inflamed human intestine. Lamina propria monocuclear cells (LPMC) isolated from inflamed intestine but not peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of IBD patients with active inflammatory disease strongly proliferated after co-culture with sonicates of bacteria from autologous intestine (BsA). Proliferation was inhibitable by anti-MHC class II MoAb, suggesting that it was driven by antigen. LPMC from adjacent non-inflamed intestinal areas of the same IBD patients and PBMC or LPMC isolated from non-inflamed intestine of controls and patients with IBD in remission, in contrast, did not proliferate. PBMC or LPMC which had been tolerant to bacteria from autologous intestine, however, strongly proliferated after co-culture with bacterial sonicates from heterologous intestine (BsH). This proliferation was associated with an expansion of CD8+ T cells, increased expression of activation markers on both CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocyte subsets, and production of IL-12, interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), and IL-10 protein. These results show that tolerance selectively exists to intestinal flora from autologous but not heterologous intestine, and that tolerance is broken in intestinal inflammation. This may be an important mechanism for the perpetuation of chronic IBD.

Effect of 4 x 250 mg erythromycin on human gastrointestinal transit.

The motilin agonist erythromycin affects gastrointestinal motility. We studied its influence on gastric, intestinal, and colonic transit of indigestible solids. Ten healthy volunteers measured the gastrointestinal transit of a 6-8 mm metal sphere by metal detector with oral intake of 250 mg erythromycin q.i.d. or placebo in randomized order. Postprandial gastric emptying of the sphere after a standard meal was measured after a single i.v. dose of 250 mg erythromycin, subsequently followed by determination of small and large bowel transit. Motilin serum levels were measured for one hour. Gastric transit of the sphere was shortened from 243 +/- 34 to 72 +/- 46 min (mean +/- SD) (p = 0.002) and shifted from the interdigestive to the digestive phase. Small and large bowel transit were not influenced, and gastric transit times and motilin serum levels were not correlated. In conclusion, 250 mg erythromycin shortened postprandial gastric emptying of indigestible solids, most likely due to overcoming of pyloric sieving function by strong gastric antral contractions without effecting the transit through the lower part of the gastrointestinal tract.