Single-dose pharmacokinetics of the renin inhibitor ACT-077825 in elderly and young subjects of both sexes.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The study objective was to investigate and compare the pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of ACT-077825, a novel direct renin inhibitor, in young and elderly, male and female healthy subjects and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of ACT-077825 in these population groups. METHODS: A total of 32 healthy subjects were included in this single-center, open-label study. The subjects were divided into 4 groups, including 8 young male, 8 young female, 8 elderly male and 8 elderly female subjects. Each participant received a single 200-mg dose of ACT-077825. Blood samples were taken over 5 days (120 h) to determine the plasma levels of ACT-077825. Safety and tolerability were monitored using standard assessments before drug administration, on the administration day and at the end of the blood sampling period. RESULTS: Upon pooling male and female subjects, exposure was higher in elderly compared to young subjects, showing an increase of 65% for AUC0-∞, 40% for Cmax and 38% for t1/2. While young male and female subjects showed similar plasma profiles and exposure, a significant increase in exposure occurred with age in both sexes compared to younger subjects. The difference was largest between young and elderly females. Furthermore, the exposure to ACT-077825 was around 30% higher in elderly female compared to elderly male subjects. ACT-077825 was well tolerated by all groups, including the elderly females who showed the highest exposure. CONCLUSIONS: ACT-077825 exposure is moderately increased in elderly subjects. The clinical relevance of this observation should be explored in the context of further studies.

Bioequivalence evaluation of a folate-supplemented oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol/drospirenone/levomefolate calcium versus ethinylestradiol/drospirenone and levomefolate calcium alone.

BACKGROUND: Neural tube defects (NTDs) are congenital malformations that occur during early embryonic development. Suboptimal maternal folate status is a well-known risk factor for the occurrence of NTDs, and periconceptional folic acid supplementation has been shown to reduce the risk of NTDs. Folate-supplemented oral contraceptives (OCs) offer a means of improving folate status in women of childbearing potential by increasing their likelihood of having raised folate levels at the time of conception. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to demonstrate bioequivalence of ethinylestradiol (EE), drospirenone and L-5-methyl-tetrahydrofolate (L-5-methyl-THF; active moiety of levomefolate calcium) when taken as a new folate-supplemented OC containing EE/drospirenone/levomefolate calcium, with the respective OC containing EE/drospirenone and a tablet containing levomefolate calcium only. METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, three-period crossover study carried out at a single centre in Germany. The study included 45 healthy women (age range 18-38 years). The women were randomly assigned to single doses of (i) EE 0.03 mg/drospirenone 3 mg/levomefolate calcium 0.451 mg (SAFYRAL®), (ii) EE 0.03 mg/drospirenone 3 mg (Yasmin®), and (iii) levomefolate calcium 0.451 mg, administered using a crossover design, with one or more menstrual cycle washout between doses. The primary variables were maximum concentrations (C(max)) and area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) values for EE, drospirenone and L-5-methyl-THF. RESULTS: The bioavailability of EE and drospirenone was similar after administration of EE/drospirenone/levomefolate calcium and EE/drospirenone. The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and its 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for AUC values and C(max) were within the pre-specified range (80.00-125.00%) for bioequivalence for EE and drospirenone in both formulations. The bioavailability of L-5-methyl-THF was similar after administration of EE/drospirenone/levomefolate calcium and levomefolate calcium. The respective GMRs and 90% CIs of baseline-uncorrected and -corrected AUC(last) (AUC from time zero to time of last measurable concentration) and C(max) were also within the 80.00-125.00% range. CONCLUSION: The novel folate-supplemented OC EE/drospirenone/levomefolate calcium is bioequivalent to the established OC Yasmin® (EE/drospirenone components) and to levomefolate calcium (folate component).

Bioequivalence study of generic tablet formulations containing ethinylestradiol and chlormadinone acetate in healthy female volunteers.

The bioavailability and bioequivalence of two different film coated tablets containing ethinylestradiol (CAS 57-63-6) and chlormadinone acetate (CAS 302-22-7) (Bellissima as test and the respective preparation from the originator as reference) were investigated in 20 healthy female volunteers after oral single-dose administration. The study was performed according to a single-center, randomised, single-dose, 2-way cross-over design with a wash-out phase of 28 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling were taken up to 168 h post-dose, and ethinylestradiol and chlormadinone acetate plasma concentrations were determined with a validated LC-MS/MS method. The observed mean maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of ethinylestradiol were 124.96 pg/ml (test) and 129.12 pg/ml (reference). In the case of chlormadinone acetate, Cmax averaged 6.9566 ng/ml (test) and 6.6663 ng/m (reference). The geometric means of area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) of ethinylestradiol were 1292.35 pg/ml x h (test) and 1380.49 pg/ml x h (reference). For chlormadinone acetate, geometric means of AUC(0-infinity) were 53.322 ng/ml x h (test) and 58.111 ng/ml x h (reference). The median of tmax of ethinylestradiol was 1.5 h for both test and reference and the median of tmax of chlormadinone acetate 1.0 h (test) and 1.5 h (reference). Plasma elimination half-lives (t1/2) of ethinylestradiol were 14.96 h (test) and 15.41 h (reference) and of chlormadinone acetate 56.63 h (test) and 56.17 h (reference), respectively. Both primary target parameters AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA). The point estimator and the 90% confidence intervals for the AUC(0-infinity) ratio (test/reference: 93.72% [86.62%-101.39%]) indicate high similarity of both formulations with respect to the extent of ethinylestradiol exposure. A high degree of similarity was also observed for Cmax of ethinylestradiol, as the point estimator and the 90% confidence interval for the Cmax ratio are 96.18% (90.82%-101.86%). Regarding the AUC(0-infinity) ratio of chlormadinone acetate, the point estimator is 91.60% and the 90% confidence interval 84.08%-99.79%. Furthermore, exchangeability of both formulations is also suggested by the point estimator and 90% confidence of Cmax of this active agent (104.72% [95.76%-114.53%]). Bioequivalence between test and reference formulation was demonstrated since for both ethinylestradiol and chlormadinone acetate all 90% confidence intervals of AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax fall into the generally accepted range of 80%-125%.