Variability in axillary lymph node delineation for breast cancer radiotherapy in presence of guidelines on a multi-institutional platform.

AIM: To quantify the variability between radiation oncologists (ROs) when outlining axillary nodes in breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For each participating center, three ROs with different levels of expertise, i.e., junior (J), senior (S) and expert (E), contoured axillary nodal levels (L1, L2, L3 and L4) on the CT images of three different patients (P) of an increasing degree of anatomical complexity (from P1 to P2 to P3), according to contouring guidelines. Consensus contours were generated using the simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) method. RESULTS: Fifteen centers and 42 ROs participated. Overall, the median Dice similarity coefficient was 0.66. Statistically significant differences were observed according to the level of expertise (better agreement for J and E, worse for S); the axillary level (better agreement for L1 and L4, worse for L3); the patient (better agreement for P1, worse for P3). Statistically significant differences in contouring were found in 18% of the inter-center comparison. Less than a half of the centers could claim to have a good agreement between the internal ROs. CONCLUSIONS: The overall intra-institute and inter-institute agreement was moderate. Central lymph-node levels were the most critical and variability increased as the complexity of the patient's anatomy increased. These findings might have an effect on the interpretation of results from multicenter and even mono-institute studies.

Diarrhoea in irradiated patients: a prospective multicentre observational study.

AIMS: To determine the incidence of cancer treatment-induced diarrhoea in patients submitted to irradiation. METHODS: Forty-five Italian radiation oncology departments took part in this prospective observational study and a total of 1020 patients were enrolled. The accrual lasted three consecutive weeks; evaluation was based on diary cards filled in daily by patients during radiotherapy and one week after cessation. Diary cards recorded both the onset and intensity of diarrhoea. RESULTS: A total of 1004 patients were eligible for this analysis. 147/1004 (14.6%) patients had diarrhoea. The median minimum number of daily events was 1 (range 1-7) with a median maximum events of 3 (range 1-23). 82/147 patients (56.2%) had a drug prescription for diarrhoea. In the evaluation of the onset of diarrhoea, in multivariate analysis, we found the following factors to be statistically significant predictors of an increased likelihood of diarrhoea: primitive tumour site, therapeutic purpose and field size. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with abdominal-pelvic cancer, treated with curative purpose and using large field sizes are at high risk of cancer treatment-induced diarrhoea. Diarrhoea was also observed in patients treated at other sites. In this population group there is the need for more stringent monitoring during the delivery of radiation therapy.

Protracted low doses of temozolomide for the treatment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma: A phase II study.

O(6)-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGAT), involved in temozolomide-induced DNA damage repair, plays a key role in the efficacy of temozolomide. AGAT activity may be reduced by protracted temozolomide doses. On the basis of the preclinical findings, we treated patients with a histologically-proven diagnosis of glioblastoma (GBM) following adjuvant temozolomide failure with a low protracted dose of temozolomide (130 mg/m(2)/day, days 1-7 and 15-21, every 4 weeks). The primary endpoint of the study was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS-6 m). The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) from the start of temozolomide alternative schedule and toxicity. Enrolment was ceased at 27 patients due to the lack of effectiveness of this regimen. Results indicate that our schedule is well-tolerated, but ineffective in patients with GBM and further strategies are required to improve the outcome of these patients.

A prospective observational trial on emesis in radiotherapy: analysis of 1020 patients recruited in 45 Italian radiation oncology centres.

PURPOSE: A prospective observational multicentre trial was carried out to assess the incidence, pattern, and prognostic factors of radiation-induced emesis (RIE), and to evaluate the use of antiemetic drugs in patients treated with radiotherapy or concomitant radio-chemotherapy. The application in clinical practice of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer guidelines was also studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five Italian radiation oncology centres took part in this trial. The accrual lasted for 3 consecutive weeks and only patients starting radiotherapy or concomitant radio-chemotherapy in this period were enrolled. Evaluation was based on diary card filled in daily by patients during treatment and one week after stopping it. Diary card recorded the intensity of nausea/vomiting and prophylactic/symptomatic antiemetic drug prescriptions. RESULTS: A total of 1020 patients entered into the trial, and 1004 were evaluable. Vomiting and nausea occurred in 11.0% and 27.1% of patients, respectively, and 27.9% patients had both vomiting and nausea. In multifactorial analysis, the only statistically significant patient-related risk factors were concomitant chemotherapy and previous experience of vomiting induced by chemotherapy. Moreover, two radiotherapy-related factors were significant risk factors for RIE, the irradiated site (upper abdomen) and field size (>400 cm(2)). An antiemetic drug was given only to a minority (17%) of patients receiving RT, and the prescriptions were prophylactic in 12.4% and symptomatic in 4.6%. Different compounds and a wide range of doses and schedules were used. CONCLUSIONS: These data were similar to those registered in our previous observational trial, and the radiation oncologists' attitude in underestimating RIE and under prescribing antiemetics was confirmed.

Mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma can be associated to tumor downstaging after preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate downstaging as primary end point, and progression-free survival and overall survival as secondary end points, in rectal adenocarcinoma patients treated with preoperative chemoradiation. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-six extraperitoneal adenocarcinoma patients (33 low rectum T2, 74 T3, 29 T4 [without sacral invasion], 25 with mucinous subtype) were treated with posterior pelvis preoperative radiotherapy (5040 cGy total dose, 180 cGy/fr, 5 fr/w, 10-15 MV linac X-rays) and concomitant 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. After 6 to 8 weeks patients underwent surgery and prechemoradiation clinical stage was compared with pathologic stage to evaluate downstaging in each patient. Seventy-four patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 39 months (4-84). RESULTS: Forty-four patients had macroscopic complete response, 52 patients had partial response, 37 patients showed no change and 3 patients had progression. At multivariate analysis only histotype showed correlation with downstaging (hazard ratio = 0.350 and 0.138 - 0.885 95 percent confidence interval) because of the evidence for poor downstaging in mucinous subtype. There were no significant differences in overall survival and progression-free survival between adenocarcinoma and mucinous subtype. CONCLUSIONS: The main finding is that mucinous histology is associated with poor downstaging after preoperative chemoradiation but this poor response was not associated with worse outcome in this small study. The good outcome for mucinous histology is at odds with other reports in the literature and requires further study.

Down-staging after two different preoperative chemoradiation schedules in rectal cancer.

AIMS: To compare preoperative down-staging, toxicity and sphincter-saving procedures obtained with preoperative radiotherapy and two different concomitant chemotherapy schedules. METHODS: From February 1997 to August 2001, 68 consecutive patients were treated with external radiotherapy (5040 cGy in 28 fractions) and concomitant chemotherapy: group a) 36 patients (10 T2, 19 T3, 7 T4, 25 adenocarcinoma and 11 mucinous histology) were treated with cis-diamminedichloroplatinum bolus + 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion; group b) 32 patients (14 T2, 18 T3, 27 adenocarcinoma and 5 mucinous histology) were treated with 5-fluorouracil bolus +/- mitomycin C. The interval between the end of radiotherapy and surgery ranged from 4 to 9 weeks. RESULTS: Group a) Overall down-staging was 63.9%. Longitudinal shrinkage of the neoplasm allowed conservative surgery in 6 of 11 patients with a pre-chemoradiation tumor location < or = 3 cm from the external anal ring. When patients with adenocarcinoma (25/36) were studied separately from patients with mucinous histology, 7/25 patients (28%) were found to have no microscopic evidence of residual tumor (pT0); 8/25 (32%) were found to have only rare isolated cancer cells (pTmic); only 7/25 patients (28%) were found to have no change. Overall, 72% patients had down-staging. In contrast, only 5/11 (45.5%) of mucinous tumors had partial down-staging and 6/11 (54.5%) no down-staging at all. Group b) Overall down-staging was 46.9%. When patients with adenocarcinoma (27/32) were studied separately, 7/27 (26%) were found to have pT0, 3/27 (11.1%) pTmic, and 13/27 (48.1%) no change. Only 1/5 (20%) of mucinous tumors had down-staging and 4/5 (80%) had no down-staging at all. Overall toxicity was comparable among groups a and b, except for lower hematologic and gastrointestinal G3-4 toxicity observed in group a. CONCLUSIONS: The overall response allowed conservative surgery in 56 (82.3%) of the 68 patients. Continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil and diamminedichloroplatinum as a radiosensitizer determined better results in group a than group b (63.9% down-staging vs 46.9% even with a higher incidence of mucinous histology). Mucinous histology, for a definitely lower response rate, could benefit from an even more aggressive approach.