ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: All-epiphyseal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a well-described technique for skeletally immature patients. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the early complication rate and identify associated risk factors for rerupture after this procedure in children. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent all-epiphyseal ACL reconstructions performed at a large, tertiary care children's hospital between January 2007 and April 2013. Relevant postoperative data including the development of leg-length discrepancy, angular deformity, rerupture, infection, knee range of motion, arthrofibrosis, and other complications were recorded. Independent variables analyzed for association with rerupture included age, body mass index, graft type, graft size, and associated injuries addressed at surgery. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients (average 12.1 y old; range, 6.3 to 15.7) were analyzed. The mean follow-up was 21 months. The overall complication rate was 16.5% (17/103), including 11 reruptures (10.7%), 1 case (<1.0%) of clinical leg-length discrepancy of <1 cm, and 2 cases (1.9%) of arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation under anesthesia. Two patients (1.9%) sustained contralateral ACL ruptures and 3 (2.9%) sustained subsequent ipsilateral meniscus tears during the study period. There were no associations found between age, sex, graft type, graft thickness, body mass index, or associated injuries addressed during surgery and rerupture rate. Knee flexion continued to improve by 20 degrees on an average between the 6 weeks and 6 months postoperative visits (P<0.001; paired samples Student's t test). CONCLUSIONS: When taken in the context of known risk of future injury in an ACL-deficient knee, all-epiphyseal ACL reconstruction in children is safe. The rate of growth disturbance in this study is similar to previous reports in this patient demographic. The rerupture rate in this cohort is slightly higher compared with ACL reconstruction in older patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-retrospective case series.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Epiphyses/surgery , Postoperative Complications , Adolescent , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/physiopathology , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/physiopathology , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/adverse effects , Child , Female , Humans , Joint Instability/surgery , Knee Joint/surgery , Male , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SafetyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine if there is a shift in the treatment of children with medial epicondyle fractures toward children's hospitals, and to explore potential confounders of any observed effect. STUDY DESIGN: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Kids' Inpatient Database was used to examine the epidemiology of medial epicondyle fractures, particularly with attention to whether they were admitted to a general hospital or a children's hospital (defined as free-standing children's hospitals, specialty children's hospitals, and children's units within general hospitals). Age and insurance payer status were also collected and evaluated as potential confounders. RESULTS: The proportion of medial epicondyle hospital discharges from children's hospitals increased (from 29%-46%; P < .001), and the proportion of discharges from general hospitals declined over the study period (from 71%-42%; P < .001). Age and insurance payer status both remained consistent throughout the study period and did not contribute to this finding. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates an increase in the proportion of discharges for pediatric medial epicondyle fractures from children's hospitals. Although this finding is likely multifactorial, it may represent increasing subspecialization and increasing medical liability when treating children. Children's hospitals should identify those conditions which will continue to increase in number and consider constructing clinical pathways in order to optimize delivery of care and resource utilization.