ABSTRACT
The Canalis Sinuosus is a structure of the maxilla that allows the passage of the anterosuperior alveolar nerve and has a neurovascular activity. To visualize this structure, Conical Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) is best recommended. This article aimed to report a case of facial pain after the insertion of a dental implant due to compression of the Canalis Sinuosus. Thus, the implant was removed, followed by the insertion of a bone graft. After that, the facial pain stopped. In conclusion, the identification of anatomical structures in preoperative examinations is essential in surgical dental procedures.
O Canalis Sinuosus é uma estrutura da maxila, que permite a passagem do nervo alveolar anterosuperior e tem uma atividade neurovascular. Para visualizar essa estrutura, a Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico (TCFC) é melhor recomendada. Este artigo teve como objetivo relatar um caso de dor facial após a inserção de um implante dentário, devido à compressão do Canalis Sinuosus. Assim, o implante foi removido, seguido pela inserção de um enxerto ósseo. Depois disso, a dor facial foi interrompida. Em conclusão, a identificação de estruturas anatômicas em exames pré-operatórios é essencial em procedimentos odontológicos cirúrgicos.
Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Facial Pain , Tomography , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , MaxillaABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of digital periapical radiography for the detection of the second mesiobuccal (MB2) canal when the adjacent canals are unfilled or filled with gutta percha. Forty human maxillary first molars were selected, 20 of which had an MB2 canal. The presence or absence of the MB2 canal was confirmed using microcomputed tomography. Digital periapical radiographs of each tooth were obtained from 3 horizontal angles before and after the adjacent root canals were filled with gutta percha. Three experienced oral radiologists evaluated all images and indicated the presence or absence of the MB2 canal using a confidence scale of 5 points. To assess intraobserver and interobserver agreement, weighted kappa coefficients were calculated. The diagnostic test (sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) values were calculated and compared between groups (n = 40): radiographs of the first molars with unfilled adjacent canals and radiographs of the same teeth with filled adjacent canals. For all observers, intraobserver reproducibility ranged from substantial (0.70) to almost perfect (0.86), and interobserver reproducibility ranged from fair (0.39) to substantial (0.67). Similar values of specificity and Az for the detection of the MB2 canal were observed with unfilled and filled adjacent canals. The sensitivity and accuracy were slightly greater when the adjacent root canals were filled with gutta percha. Detection of the MB2 canal on digital periapical radiographs can be challenging even when obtained at varying horizontal angles, and the presence of gutta percha does not influence the detection.
Subject(s)
Dental Pulp Cavity , Maxilla , Dental Pulp Cavity/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Radiography, Dental, Digital , Reproducibility of Results , X-Ray MicrotomographyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different intracanal materials and the metallic artifact reduction (MAR) tool of cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging on the detection of the second mesiobuccal (MB2) canal in maxillary first molars. METHODS: Forty maxillary first molars were selected; half of them had the MB2 canal in the mesiobuccal root confirmed by micro-computed tomographic imaging. All teeth were instrumented, except for the MB2 canal, and filled with gutta-percha, which was passively inserted up to the working length. Each tooth was individually inserted into a dry human skull, and CBCT scans were performed using the OP300 device (Instrumentarium Dental, Tuusula, Finland) with and without the use of the MAR tool. For each scanned tooth, the following intracanal materials were used in the palatal root: gutta-percha, silver palladium, nickel chromium, and cobalt chromium. Five examiners assessed the images for the detection of the MB2 canal using a 5-point scale. The weighted kappa test was applied to evaluate intra- and interexaminer reproducibility. The diagnostic values (sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) were calculated in the different groups and compared using 2-way analysis of variance and the Tukey post hoc test. RESULTS: The intra- and interobserver agreement ranges for the different conditions were studied. The diagnostic values were not significantly different (P > .05) regardless of the intracanal material and the use of the MAR tool. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of different intracanal materials and MAR activation does not influence CBCT-based detection of MB2 canals.