Case 327.

HISTORY: A 58-year-old man who was an active smoker was admitted twice to the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary referral thoracic center for severe hypercapnic acute respiratory failure and persistent bilateral chest radiograph opacities that were unchanged over the course of the two ICU admissions within a 3-month period (Fig 1). He had obesity (body mass index, 36 kg/m2), stage 3 vascular chronic renal insufficiency, and hebephrenic schizophrenia treated with haloperidol, carbamazepine, and cyamemazine. He reported chronic dyspnea on exertion, which worsened for 6 months. At the second ICU admission, he was afebrile, with a blood pressure of 160/72 mm Hg and pulse oximetry of 93% on 6 L/min oxygen therapy through a nonrebreathing mask. Physical examination showed signs of respiratory failure with wheezing and active abdominal expiration, bilateral pulmonary crackles without chest pain, hemoptysis, clubbing, or signs of cardiac failure. He had no peripheral lymphadenopathy and no enlarged spleen. Blood gases (on 6 L/min oxygen) showed respiratory acidosis (pH, 7.15 [normal range, 7.38-7.42]; Pao2 level, 67 mm Hg [normal range, 80-100 mm Hg]; Paco2 level, 102 mm Hg [normal range, 38-42 mm Hg]; Hco3- level, 29 mmol/L [normal range, 22-27 mmol/L]). Noninvasive ventilation was initiated. Imaging performed during the second ICU hospitalization included noncontrast chest CT (Fig 2), MRI of the chest without contrast enhancement (Fig 3), and fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT (Fig 4).

Cell and cytokine analyses from bronchoalveolar lavage in non-critical COVID-19 pneumonia.

Cell and cytokine analyses from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in non-critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia are poorly described. This study focused on patients hospitalized in the non-intensive care unit for either suspected COVID-19 pneumonia or persistent respiratory symptoms following proven COVID-19 pneumonia. Overall, 54 patients who underwent BAL between April 2020 and February 2021 for suspected or follow-up of proven COVID-19 pneumonia were included. Based on SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction test results and clinical follow-up, three pulmonary disease groups were defined: non-COVID-19 (n = 20), acute COVID-19 (n = 13), and post-COVID-19 (n = 24) pneumonia patients. Cytological and cytokine analyses were performed on BAL fluid (IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α, IFN-γ, HGF, and TGF-ß), with investigators blinded to the patient groups. Lymphocytic alveolitis with plasmocytes was observed in acute COVID-19 pneumonia, returning to normal post-COVID-19. The highest cytokine levels were observed in COVID-19 patients, with significantly increased IFN-γ, IL-10, and HGF levels compared to non-COVID-19 patients, while significantly decreased IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and HGF levels were noted in post-COVID-19 patients. In COVID-19 patients, correlations between IL-10, TNF-α and IFN-γ concentrations were found. Lymphocytic alveolitis with plasmacytosis was found in non-critical COVID-19 pneumonia This alveolitis is associated with the presence of IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α, IFN-γ and HGF. Alveolitis and cytokines levels decreased in post-COVID-19 pneumonia.

Diagnosis and prognosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome related to diffuse pneumonic-type adenocarcinoma: a single-center case series study.

Background: The absence of diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) concerns 20% of cancer patients and is associated with poorer outcomes. Diffuse pneumonic-type adenocarcinoma (P-ADC) is part of these difficult-to-diagnose ARDS, but only limited data are available regarding critically ill patients with diffuse P-ADC. We sought to describe the diagnosis process and the prognosis of P-ADC related ARDS patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: Single-center observational case series study. All consecutive patients admitted to the ICU over a two-decade period presenting with (I) histologically or cytologically proven adenocarcinoma of the lung and (II) ARDS according to Berlin definition were included. Clinical, biological, radiological and cytological features of P-ADC were collected to identify diagnostic clues. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess factors associated with ICU and hospital mortality. Results: Among the 24 patients included [70 (61-75) years old, 17 (71%) males], the cancer diagnosis was performed during the ICU stay in 19 (79%), and 17 (71%) required mechanical ventilation. The time between the first symptoms and the diagnosis of P-ADC was 210 days (92-246 days). A non-resolving pneumonia after 2 (2 to 3) antibiotics lines observed in 23 (96%) patients with a 34 mg/L (19 to 75 mg/L) plasma C-reactive protein level at ICU admission. Progressive dyspnea, bronchorrhea, salty expectoration, fissural bulging and compressed bronchi and vessels were present in 100%, 83%, 69%, 57% and 43% of cases. Cytological examination of sputum or broncho-alveolar lavage provided a 75% diagnostic yield. The ICU and hospital mortality rates were 25% and 63%, respectively. The time (in days) between first symptoms and diagnosis [odds ratio (OR) 1.02, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.00-1.03, P=0.046] and the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (OR 1.16, 95% CI: 1.01-1.33, P=0.040) were independently associated with ICU mortality. Conclusions: Non-resolving pneumonia after several antibiotics lines without inflammatory syndrome, associated with progressive dyspnea, salty bronchorrhea, and lobar swelling (i.e., fissural bulging, compressed bronchi and vessels) were suggestive of P-ADC. Delayed diagnosis of diffuse P-ADC seemed an independent prognostic predictor and disease timely recognition may contribute to prognosis improvement.

Identification of bronchoalveolar and blood immune-inflammatory biomarker signature associated with poor 28-day outcome in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

The local immune-inflammatory response elicited by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is still poorly described, as well as the extent to which its characteristics may be associated with the outcome of critical Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this prospective monocenter study, all consecutive COVID-19 critically ill patients admitted from February to December 2020 and explored by fiberoptic bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) were included. Biological assays, including digital ELISA cytokine profiling and targeted eicosanoid metabolomic analysis, were performed on paired blood and BAL fluid (BALF). Clinical outcome was assessed through the World Health Organization 10-point Clinical Progression Scale (WHO-CPS) at the 28th day (D28) following the admission to intensive care unit. A D28-WHO-CPS value higher than 5 defined a poor outcome. Seventy-six patients were included, 45 (59%) had a poor day-28 outcome. As compared to their counterparts, patients with D28-WHO-CPS > 5 exhibited a neutrophil-predominant bronchoalveolar phenotype, with a higher BALF neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, a blunted local type I interferon response, a decompartimentalized immune-inflammatory response illustrated by lower BALF/blood ratio of concentrations of IL-6 (1.68 [0.30-4.41] vs. 9.53 [2.56-19.1]; p = 0.001), IL-10, IL-5, IL-22 and IFN-γ, and a biological profile of vascular endothelial injury illustrated by a higher blood concentration of VEGF and higher blood and/or BALF concentrations of several vasoactive eicosanoids. In critically ill COVID-19 patients, we identified bronchoalveolar and blood immune-inflammatory biomarker signature associated with poor 28-day outcome.

Diagnostic chest X-rays and breast cancer risk among women with a hereditary predisposition to breast cancer unexplained by a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic ionizing radiation is a risk factor for breast cancer (BC). BC risk increases with increased dose to the chest and decreases with increased age at exposure, with possible effect modification related to familial or genetic predisposition. While chest X-rays increase the BC risk of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers compared to non-carriers, little is known for women with a hereditary predisposition to BC but who tested negative for a BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutation. METHODS: We evaluated the effect of chest X-rays from diagnostic medical procedures in a dataset composed of 1552 BC cases identified through French family cancer clinics and 1363 unrelated controls. Participants reported their history of X-ray exposures in a detailed questionnaire and were tested for 113 DNA repair genes. Logistic regression and multinomial logistic regression models were used to assess the association with BC. RESULTS: Chest X-ray exposure doubled BC risk. A 3% increased BC risk per additional exposure was observed. Being 20 years old or younger at first exposure or being exposed before first full-term pregnancy did not seem to modify this risk. Birth after 1960 or carrying a rare likely deleterious coding variant in a DNA repair gene other than BRCA1/2 modified the effect of chest X-ray exposure. CONCLUSION: Ever/never chest X-ray exposure increases BC risk 2-fold regardless of age at first exposure and, by up to 5-fold when carrying 3 or more rare variants in a DNA repair gene. Further studies are needed to evaluate other DNA repair genes or variants to identify those which could modify radiation sensitivity. Identification of subpopulations that are more or less susceptible to ionizing radiation is important and potentially clinically relevant.

Broad-based SARS-CoV-2 testing program for healthcare workers in a primary care hospital in France.

A broad-based SARS-CoV-2 testing program for all symptomatic healthcare workers (HCWs) was implemented in Tenon hospital, Paris, France. From February 26 to April 22, 2020, 701 symptomatic HCWs were screened, of whom 247 (35.2%) tested positive for SARS-Cov-2. Myalgia, fever, anosmia and ageusia were associated with RT-PCR positivity. Testing of HCWs is an essential step toward control of the epidemic. Further studies could establish clinical algorithms for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis to compensate for RT-PCR test and chest CT limits or unavailability.

Familial breast cancer and DNA repair genes: Insights into known and novel susceptibility genes from the GENESIS study, and implications for multigene panel testing.

Pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 only explain the underlying genetic cause of about 10% of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families. Because of cost-effectiveness, multigene panel testing is often performed even if the clinical utility of testing most of the genes remains questionable. The purpose of our study was to assess the contribution of rare, deleterious-predicted variants in DNA repair genes in familial breast cancer (BC) in a well-characterized and homogeneous population. We analyzed 113 DNA repair genes selected from either an exome sequencing or a candidate gene approach in the GENESIS study, which includes familial BC cases with no BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation and having a sister with BC (N = 1,207), and general population controls (N = 1,199). Sequencing data were filtered for rare loss-of-function variants (LoF) and likely deleterious missense variants (MV). We confirmed associations between LoF and MV in PALB2, ATM and CHEK2 and BC occurrence. We also identified for the first time associations between FANCI, MAST1, POLH and RTEL1 and BC susceptibility. Unlike other associated genes, carriers of an ATM LoF had a significantly higher risk of developing BC than carriers of an ATM MV (ORLoF = 17.4 vs. ORMV = 1.6; p Het = 0.002). Hence, our approach allowed us to specify BC relative risks associated with deleterious-predicted variants in PALB2, ATM and CHEK2 and to add MAST1, POLH, RTEL1 and FANCI to the list of DNA repair genes possibly involved in BC susceptibility. We also highlight that different types of variants within the same gene can lead to different risk estimates.

Effect on perceived control and psychological distress of genetic knowledge in women with breast cancer receiving a BRCA1/2 test result.

Information provision during BRCA1/2 genetic counseling is complex and expected to be increasingly so with gene panel testing. This prospective study evaluated whether genetic knowledge in counselees with breast cancer (BC) after a pre-test genetic counseling visit (T1) enhance their feeling of personal control while minimizing distress after the notification of BRCA1/2 result (T2). At T1, 243 (89% response rate) counselees completed questionnaires on genetic knowledge (BGKQ), perceived cancer genetic risk; of which, at T2, 180 (66%) completed the BGKQ again, scales of anxiety/depression, distress specific to genetic risk, and perceived control. Multilevel models were performed accounting for clinician, and testing an effect of knowledge on psychological outcomes according to the adequacy of counselees' perceived genetic predisposition to cancer. The mean knowledge score was moderate at T1, decreased while not significantly differing by BRCA1/2 test result at T2. Knowledge at T1 had no direct effect on psychological outcomes, but in counselees who over-estimated their cancer genetic risk, higher knowledge at T1 predicted higher specific distress at T2. In BC affected counselees who over-estimate their cancer genetic risk, higher BRCA1/2 pre-test genetic knowledge seem to lead to increased specific distress. Identifying these BC affected counselees who over-estimate their genetic cancer risk and helping them to interpret their genetic knowledge instead of providing them with exhaustive genetic information could minimize their distress after test result receipt.

BRAF V600E detection in cytological thyroid samples: A key component of the decision tree for surgical treatment of papillary thyroid carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Whether preoperative knowledge of the BRAF mutation status would help to determine the extent of surgery for thyroid nodules is still under investigation. METHODS: We developed a method to state the V600E mutation before surgery on fine-needle aspiration (FNA) stained smears checked to contain tumor cells. We evaluated the interest of the preoperative assessment of the mutation for surgical strategy of nodules, diagnosed as malignant, suspicious for malignancy or follicular neoplasms. RESULTS: The mutation was found in 81% (79 of 97) malignant, 59% (20 of 34) suspicious nodules, and in none of follicular neoplasms (n = 29). Overall, the mutation was detected in 82% of papillary carcinomas. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the diagnosis of malignancy were 75%, 100%, 100%, and 46%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The preoperative knowledge of the V600E mutation status is fundamental to plan total thyroidectomy with certainty and should be part of the decision tree for the management of thyroid nodules. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: 1017-1021, 2016.

GENESIS: a French national resource to study the missing heritability of breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Less than 20% of familial breast cancer patients who undergo genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 carry a pathogenic mutation in one of these two genes. The GENESIS (GENE SISter) study was designed to identify new breast cancer susceptibility genes in women attending cancer genetics clinics and with no BRCA1/2 mutation. METHODS: The study involved the French national network of family cancer clinics. It was based on enrichment in genetic factors of the recruited population through case selection relying on familial criteria, but also on the consideration of environmental factors and endophenotypes like mammary density or tumor characteristics to assess potential genetic heterogeneity. One of the initial aims of GENESIS was to recruit affected sibpairs. Siblings were eligible when index cases and at least one affected sister were diagnosed with infiltrating mammary or ductal adenocarcinoma, with no BRCA1/2 mutation. In addition, unrelated controls and unaffected sisters were recruited. The enrolment of patients, their relatives and their controls, the collection of the clinical, epidemiological, familial and biological data were centralized by a coordinating center. RESULTS: Inclusion of participants started in February 2007 and ended in December 2013. A total of 1721 index cases, 826 affected sisters, 599 unaffected sisters and 1419 controls were included. 98% of participants completed the epidemiological questionnaire, 97% provided a blood sample, and 76% were able to provide mammograms. Index cases were on average 59 years old at inclusion, were born in 1950, and were 49.7 years of age at breast cancer diagnosis. The mean age at diagnosis of affected sisters was slightly higher (51.4 years). The representativeness of the control group was verified. CONCLUSIONS: The size of the study, the availability of biological specimens and the clinical data collection together with the detailed and complete epidemiological questionnaire make this a unique national resource for investigation of the missing heritability of breast cancer, by taking into account environmental and life style factors and stratifying data on endophenotypes to decrease genetic heterogeneity.

Hormonal prevention of breast cancer.

Breast cancer prevention can be provided by using SERMs or aromatase inhibitors depending on the ovarian status, with a global risk reduction of 50 to 60%. Prophylactic annexectomy offered to reduce ovarian risk in BRCA mutation carriers also lowers breast cancer risk by 50%. Main side effects include deep vein thrombosis for SERMs, hot flushes and joint pain (although less frequently than initially suspected) with aromatase inhibitors. Other strategies based on progesterone, insulin or prolactin signaling modulation may be offered in the future. Criteria for candidate selection remain to be established.

Influence of ABCB1 polymorphisms and docetaxel pharmacokinetics on pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

We have previously reported an association between ABCB1 C3435T polymorphism and docetaxel pharmacokinetics in breast cancer patients. We therefore investigated whether these parameters could account for variations in pathological response. Five ABCB1 polymorphisms including C3435T polymorphism were analyzed in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin and docetaxel (n = 101). Pathological response was assessed using the Sataloff classification. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed for the first course of docetaxel (n = 84). No significant association was found between ABCB1 polymorphisms or docetaxel pharmacokinetics and pathological complete response. C3435T genotype was an independent predictive factor of good response in breast (response >50 %, i.e., Sataloff T-A and T-B): OR: 4.6 (95 % CI: 1.3-16.1), p = 0.015, for TT patients versus CT and CC patients. Area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of docetaxel was the only independent predictive factor of the total absence of response in breast (Sataloff T-D): OR: 14.3, (95 % CI: 1.7-118), p = 0.015, for AUC of docetaxel <3,500 µg h/L versus ≥3,500 µg h/L. These results suggest that C3435T polymorphism and docetaxel exposure are involved in the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients and may be useful to optimize individualized therapy.

A one-step prescreening for point mutations and large rearrangement in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and high-resolution melting curve analysis.

High-resolution melting (HRM) of DNA is a versatile method for mutation scanning that monitors the fluorescence of double-strand DNA with saturating dye. Performing HRM on a real-time thermocycler enables semiquantitative analysis (quantitative polymerase chain reaction, qPCR) to be associated to HRM analysis for detection of both large gene rearrangements and point mutations (qPCR-HRM). We evaluated this method of mutation screening for the two major breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. Screening of these two genes is time-consuming and must include exploration of large rearrangements that represent 5% to 15% of the alterations observed in these genes. To assess the reliability of the HRM technology, 201 known nucleotide variations scattered over all amplicons were tested. The sensitivity of qPCR was evaluated by analyzing seven large rearrangements. All previously identified variants tested were detected by qPCR-HRM. A retrospective study was done with 45 patients: qPCR-HRM allowed all the variants previously tested by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography to be identified. qPCR analysis showed three cases of allele dropout (due to a 104-bp deletion, SNP primer mismatch, and an Alu insertion). A prospective study was done with 165 patients allowing 22 deleterious mutations, 16 unclassified variants, and 2 rearrangements to be detected. qPCR-HRM is a simple, sensitive, and fast method that does not require modified PCR primers. Thus, this method allows in one step the detection of point mutation, gene rearrangements, and prevention of missing a mutation due to primer mismatch.

MDRView: a visualization of the polymorphisms of MDR1(ABCB1) GENE in breast cancer.

This paper presents the Generalized CaseView method applied to the study of polymorphisms of MDR1 (Multi Drug Resistant), a gene coding for a trans-membrane transporting protein. The data base contains Single nucleotide polymorphisms, their positions in cDNA, and the Area Under the Curve of drugs concentrations. The generalized CaseView method permits a compact visualization of these data. The main result is that pharmacokinetics of some anticancer drugs depends on the genotype.

In vitro prediction of stop-codon suppression by intravenous gentamicin in patients with cystic fibrosis: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is caused by mutations in the gene encoding the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein, which acts as a chloride channel activated by cyclic AMP (cAMP). The most frequent mutation found in 70% of CF patients is F508del, while premature stop mutations are found in about 10% of patients. In vitro aminoglycoside antibiotics (e.g. gentamicin) suppress nonsense mutations located in CFTR permitting translation to continue to the natural termination codon. Pharmacologic suppression of stop mutations within the CFTR may be of benefit to a significant number of patients. Our pilot study was conducted to determine whether intravenous gentamicin suppresses stop codons in CF patients and whether it has clinical benefits. METHODS: A dual gene reporter system was used to determine the gentamicin-induced readthrough level of the most frequent stop mutations within the CFTR in the French population. We investigated readthrough efficiency in response to 10 mg/kg once-daily intravenous gentamicin perfusions in patients with and without stop mutations. Respiratory function, sweat chloride concentration, nasal potential difference (NPD) and CFTR expression in nasal epithelial cells were measured at baseline and after 15 days of treatment. RESULTS: After in vitro gentamicin incubation, the readthrough efficiency for the Y122X mutation was at least five times higher than that for G542X, R1162X, and W1282X. In six of the nine patients with the Y122X mutation, CFTR immunodetection showed protein at the membrane of the nasal epithelial cells and the CFTR-dependent Cl- secretion in NPD measurements increased significantly. Respiratory status also improved in these patients, irrespective of the gentamicin sensitivity of the bacteria present in the sputum. Mean sweat chloride concentration decreased significantly and normalised in two patients. Clinical status, NPD and sweat Cl- values did not change in the Y122X patients with no protein expression, in patients with the other stop mutations investigated in vitro and those without stop mutations. CONCLUSION: Suppression of stop mutations in the CFTR gene with parenteral gentamicin can be predicted in vitro and is associated with clinical benefit and significant modification of the CFTR-mediated Cl- transport in nasal and sweat gland epithelium.