The Norms and Corporatization of Medicine Influence Physician Moral Distress in the United States.

PhenomenonMoral distress, which occurs when someone's moral integrity is seriously compromised because they feel unable to act in accordance with their core values and obligations, is an increasingly important concern for physicians. Due in part to limited understanding of the root causes of moral distress, little is known about which approaches are most beneficial for mitigating physicians' distress. Our objective was to describe system-level factors in United States (U.S.) healthcare that contribute to moral distress among pediatric hospitalist attendings and pediatric residents.ApproachIn this qualitative study, we conducted one-on-one semi-structured interviews with pediatric hospitalist attendings and pediatric residents from 4 university-affiliated, freestanding children's hospitals in the U.S. between August 2019 and February 2020. Data were coded with an iteratively developed codebook, categorized into themes, and then synthesized.FindingsWe interviewed 22 hospitalists and 18 residents. Participants described in detail how the culture of medicine created a context that cultivated moral distress. Norms of medical education and the practice of medicine created conflicts between residents' strong sense of professional responsibility to serve the best interests of their patients and the expectations of a hierarchical system of decision-making. The corporatization of the U.S. healthcare system created administrative and financial pressures that conflicted with the moral responsibility felt by both residents and hospitalists to provide the care that their patients and families needed.InsightsThese findings highlight the critical role of systemic sources of moral distress. These findings suggest that system-level interventions must supplement existing interventions that target individual health care providers. Preventing and managing moral distress will require a broad approach that addresses systemic drivers, such as the corporatization of medicine, which are entrenched in the culture of medicine.

How Attendings Can Help Residents Navigate Moral Distress: A Qualitative Study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore how pediatric hospitalist attendings can recognize, prevent, and mitigate moral distress among pediatric residents. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study, utilizing a deductive approach, from August 2019 to February 2020 at 4 university-affiliated, freestanding children's hospitals in the United States using semistructured, one-on-one interviews with pediatric residents and pediatric hospitalist attendings. All transcripts were coded by pairs of research team members. Using constant comparative analysis, codes were categorized into themes and subsequently grouped into domains. We then conceptualized the relationships between the domains. RESULTS: We interviewed 40 physicians (18 residents, 22 attendings) and identified specific strategies for attendings to help residents navigate moral distress, which were categorized into 4 proactive and 4 responsive themes. The proactive themes included strategies employed before morally distressing events to minimize impact: ensuring attendings' awareness of residency factors influencing residents' moral distress; knowing available support resources; creating a learning environment that lays the foundation for mitigating distress; and recognizing moral distress in residents. The responsive themes included strategies that help mitigate the impact of morally distressing situations after they occur: partnering with the senior resident to develop a team-specific plan; consideration of who will participate in, the timing of, and content of the debrief. CONCLUSIONS: We present multiple strategies that attendings can implement to learn to recognize, prevent, and mitigate moral distress among residents. Our findings highlight the need for both proactive and reactive strategies and offer a possible roadmap for attending physicians to help their residents navigate moral distress.

Moral Distress in Pediatric Residents and Pediatric Hospitalists: Sources and Association With Burnout.

OBJECTIVE: Moral distress is increasingly identified as a major problem affecting healthcare professionals, but it is poorly characterized among pediatricians. Our objective was to assess the sources of moral distress in residents and pediatric hospitalist attendings and to examine the association of moral distress with reported burnout. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey from January through March 2019 of pediatric residents and hospital medicine attending physicians affiliated with 4 free-standing children's hospitals. Moral distress was measured using the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP). Burnout was measured using 2 items adapted from the Maslach Burnout Inventory. RESULTS: Respondents included 288 of 541 eligible pediatric residents (response rate: 53%) and 118 of 168 pediatric hospitalists (response rate: 70%; total response rate: 57%). The mean MMD-HP composite score was 93.4 (SD = 42.5). Residents reported significantly higher frequency scores (residents: M = 38.5 vs. hospitalists: M = 33.3; difference: 5.2, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9-7.5) and composite scores (residents: M = 97.6 vs hospitalists: M = 83.0; difference:14.6, 95% CI, 5.7-23.5) than hospitalists. The most frequent source of moral distress was "having excessive documentation requirements that compromise patient care," and the most intense source of moral distress was "be[ing] required to work with abusive patients/family members who are compromising quality of care." Significantly higher mean MMD-HP composite scores were observed among participants reporting that they felt burned out at least once per week (M= 114.6 vs M= 82.3; difference: 32.3, 95% CI, 23.5-41.2). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric residents and hospitalists report experiencing moral distress from a variety of patient-, team-, and system-level sources, and this distress is associated with burnout.

An Examination of Physician-, Caregiver-, and Disease-Related Factors Associated With Readmission From a Pediatric Hospital Medicine Service.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe the characteristics and reasons for pediatric hospital medicine readmissions. We also aimed to describe characteristics of potentially preventable cases and the reliability of classification. METHODS: Retrospective descriptive study from December 2008 through June 2010 in a large academic tertiary care children's hospital in Houston, Texas. Children were included if they were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of discharge from the pediatric hospital medicine service. Reasons for readmission were grouped into three categories: physician-related, caretaker-related, and disease-related. Readmissions with physician- or caretaker-related reasons were considered potentially preventable. RESULTS: The overall readmission rate was 3.1%, and a total of 204 subjects were included in the analysis. Lymphadenitis and failure to thrive had the highest readmission rates with 21%, and 13%, respectively. Twenty percent (n=41/204) of readmissions were preventable with 24% (n=10/41) being physician-related, 12% (n=5/41) caregiver-related, and 63% (n=26/41) for mixed reasons. When comparing classification of readmissions into preventable status, there was moderate agreement between 2 reviewers (K=0.44, 95% confidence interval: 0.28-0.60). Among patients with preventable readmission, the probability of having had a readmission by 7 days and 15 days was 73% and 78%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Reliable identification of preventable pediatric readmissions using individual reviewers remains a challenge. Additional studies are needed to develop a reliable approach to identify preventable readmissions and underlying modifiable factors. A focused review of 7-day readmissions and diagnoses with high readmission rates may allow use of fewer resources.