ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ensuring reliable gastrointestinal drug absorption of orally administered immunosuppressive medications posttransplant is critical to ensuring graft survival. METHODS: A 66-year-old man of East Asian origin with a previous total gastrectomy was evaluated for living donor kidney transplantation. Pretransplant pharmacokinetic testing was performed to determine the most appropriate posttransplant medication strategy. The Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index and Gastrointestinal Rating Scale questionnaires were administered to gauge immunosuppressive medication-related side effects in the absence of a stomach. RESULTS: The patient's ability to absorb cyclosporin, tacrolimus (Tac), enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) and sirolimus (SRL) in oral dosage forms was well-preserved. Compared to nongastrectomy reference populations, the rate and extent of absorption of SRL and mycophenolic acid from EC-MPS were similar. The absorption of Tac and cyclosporin was greater than expected. Mycophenolate mofetil did not provide mycophenolic acid absorption as well as EC-MPS. The patient had worsened gastrointestinal symptoms with mycophenolate mofetil or EC-MPS in combination with Tac and cyclosporin, but this was not seen with isolated SRL. CONCLUSIONS: This case demonstrates that commonly used postkidney transplantation immunosuppressive regimes may be prescribed after total gastrectomy as long as their limitations are noted.
Subject(s)
Gastrectomy , Gastric Absorption , Immunosuppressive Agents/pharmacokinetics , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Administration, Oral , Aged , Drug Therapy, Combination , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Kidney Failure, Chronic/diagnosis , Living Donors , Male , Models, Biological , Patient Selection , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Limited comparative data are available on the outcomes between extended-release and standard-release tacrolimus when used de novo in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). METHODS: We identified KTRs transplanted at our institution during 2009-10 routinely prescribed extended-release tacrolimus and compared them with those transplanted during 2008-09 prescribed standard-release tacrolimus. Graft function (eGFR by MDRD-7 equation) at 12 months post-transplant (primary outcome); new-onset diabetes and other cardiovascular risk factors, BK viremia incidence, acute rejection, and graft survival to 12 months (secondary outcomes) were compared by intent-to-treat analysis. Time-to-steady-state concentration and number of dose adjustments required to attain steady state were recorded. RESULTS: There were no important demographic differences between the extended-release (N = 106) and standard-release (N = 95) cohorts. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 12 months was similar (58.8 ± 17 versus 59.2 ± 18 mL/min/1.73 m(2), P = 0.307). There was no difference in new-onset diabetes (17 versus 20%, P = 0.581), BK viremia (10 versus 7%, P = 0.450), acute rejection (7 versus 16%, P = 0.067) or graft survival (97 versus 95%, P = 0.301). Time-to-steady state was similar (9.2 ± 1.1 versus 8.1 ± 4.7 days, P = 0.490) although extended-release patients required fewer adjustments to attain steady state (1.2 ± 1.7 [0-8] versus 1.7 ± 1.5 [0-7], P = 0.030) but a similar dose (7.2 ± 2.4 [2-17] versus 7 ± 2.7 [2-16] mg/day, P = 0.697). CONCLUSION: De novo KTRs prescribed extended-release or standard-release tacrolimus demonstrate similar 12-month outcomes.
