Development of an Information Guideline for Kidney Transplant Recipients in a Clinical Trial: Protocol for a Modified Delphi Method.

BACKGROUND: Renal transplantation is the treatment of choice for most cases of end-stage renal disease. Recipients need to lead a healthy lifestyle to minimize the potential side effects of immunosuppressive drugs and improve transplant outcomes. There is not much evidence about the best way to increase adherence to healthy lifestyles in kidney transplant recipients, so one of the objectives set by the nursing team is to train people to acquire the necessary skills and tools to be able to take care of themselves. In this sense, the consensual development of appropriate materials may be useful and of interest. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop an information guide for adults with kidney transplants to be assessed in a subsequent clinical trial as an intervention to increase adherence to healthy habits. METHODS: We used a 3-step, methodological, sequential approach: (1) training from a group of experts and item consensus; (2) review of the medical literature available; and (3) use of the Delphi technique with on-site meetings. A total of 5 nurses from the Community of Madrid Kidney Transplantation Unit in Spain were asked to participate. The patients' lifestyle factors that, according to the medical literature available and experts' opinions, have the greatest impact on the survival of the transplanted organ and the recipients themselves were all described. RESULTS: After using the modified Delphi method to reach a consensus on the items to be included and the information needed in each, an information guide for adult kidney transplant patients was developed. This guide facilitates the structuring of health care, information, and recommendations necessary for effective self-care for each person. The result is considered to be an easy-to-understand tool, useful for transplant doctors and nurses, in simple language, with information based on the latest scientific-medical evidence published to date, aspects of which will be evaluated in a clinical trial designed for this purpose. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, this guide is the main intervention variable of a clinical trial (registered on ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT05715580) aimed at improving compliance with healthy habits in kidney transplant recipients in the Community of Madrid, Spain. The method used in its development has been useful and agile, and the result is a guide that can be easily updated periodically following the same procedure. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/46961.

Análisis de la influencia de la pandemia por el virus SARS-CoV-2 sobre la tasa de bacteriemia en catéteres venosos tunelizados en una unidad de hemodiálisis / Analysis of the influence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus pandemic on the bacteriemia rate in tunneled venous catheters in a hemodialysis unit

Antecedentes: La infección relacionada con catéter venoso central (CVC) está asociada a una elevada morbimortalidad y se ha relacionado con la bacteriemia asociada a CVC, disfunciones de catéter, la manipulación y las medidas higiénicas tomadas durante la misma.Objetivo: El objetivo del presente estudio fue comparar la tasa de bacteriemia entre los años 2019 y 2020, primer año de pandemia por el virus SARS-CoV-2, en una unidad de hemodiálisis de un hospital de la Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid. Material y Método: Se ha llevado a cabo un estudio observacional retrospectivo transversal en el que se compararon datos relativos a la manipulación y al funcionamiento del catéter, y tasa de bacteriemias relacionadas con el catéter entre los años 2019 y 2020 a través de la base de datos de la unidad. Resultados: En 2019 se incluyeron 35 pacientes, que presentaron una tasa de bacteriemia de 1,42/1.000 días de catéter y 29 pacientes en 2020, con una tasa de bacteriemia de 1,82/1.000 días de catéter, no encontrándose diferencias significativas (p=0,54), no encontrando un riesgo de bacteriemia incrementado o disminuido durante el primer año de pandemia producida por el virus SARS-CoV-2.Conclusiones: Como principal conclusión de este estudio, podemos afirmar que no se ha evidenciado que la llegada de la pandemia producida por la enfermedad del coronavirus y las medidas adoptadas frente al virus SARS-CoV-2, tanto organizacionales como de prevención, sean un factor de riesgo o protección respecto a la tasa de bacteriemia, probablemente debido al bajo número de eventos encontrados.(AU)

Background: Central venous catheter (CVC) related infection is associated with high morbidity and mortality. It has also been linked to CVCassociated bacteremia, catheter dysfunctions, as well as handling and hygienic measures taken during that time. Objective: The aim of the present study is to compare the bacteremia rate between 2019 and 2020, the last one during which the SARS-CoV-2 virus pandemic started. The study was accomplished in a hemodialysis unit at the Comunidad Autonoma de Madrid hospital. Material and Method: An observational retrospective cross-sectional study has been carried out in which data related to the management and functioning of the catheter were compared to the bacteremia rate linked to the catheter between 2019 and 2020 through the unit’s database.Results: In 2019, thirty-five patients were included, who had a bacteraemia rate of 1.42/1,000 catheter days, and twenty-nine patients in 2020, with a bacteraemia rate of 1.82/1,000 catheter days, finding no significant differences (p=0.54), as well as not finding an increased or decreased bacteremia risk during the first year of the pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.Conclusions: As the main conclusion of this case of study, we are able to confirm that there is no evidence of the coronavirus pandemic and the measures adopted against the SARS-CoV-2 virus (both organizational and preventives), being a risk or protection factor in regard to the bacteraemia rate, most likely due to the low number of events found.(AU)

Incidencia de infección por SARS-COV-2 en pacientes con un trasplante renal funcionante en un hospital terciario de la Comunidad de Madrid / Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with a functioning renal transplant in a tertiary hospital in the community of Madrid

En diciembre de 2019, apareció un nuevo coronavirus que ha dado lugar a una pandemia. Dadas las características del paciente trasplantado, se hace necesario conocer cuál ha sido la repercusión respecto a la infección por SARS-CoV-2, planteándonos como objetivo describir la incidencia de SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes con un trasplante renal.Se llevó a cabo un estudio observacional de cohorte retrospectiva de pacientes con un trasplante renal y que están en seguimiento por la consulta de trasplantes de un hospital terciario, durante el periodo comprendido entre el 1 de marzo de 2020 y el 1 de marzo de 2021. Se incluyeron 604 individuos, con una edad media de 61,6±12,8 años. Un 62,3% (n=376) fueron hombres. La incidencia por SARS-CoV-2 fue 14,9% (n=90). La mortalidad por SARS-CoV-2 fue 3,8% (n=23) lo que supone una letalidad del 25,5%. Al comparar si han pasado la infección en función del sexo no se encontraron diferencias significativas. Tampoco al comparar en función de la edad media, que fue de 60,9±11,8 años en los infectados y de 61,7±12,9 años en los no infectados. Se encontraron diferencias significativas (p=0,005) al comparar la media de años transcurridos desde el trasplante; que fue de 8,7±5,6 años en los infectados y de 11 ±7,3 años en los no infectados.La incidencia de infección por SARS-CoV-2 encontrada en personas con TR fue muy superior a la descrita para la población general. La letalidad y la mortalidad también fueron mayores que en la población general, pero acordes con otras poblaciones de individuos con TR. (AU)

In December 2019, a new coronavirus appeared and generated a pandemic. Considering the characteristics of the transplanted patient, it is relevant to know the impact regarding SARS-CoV-2 infection, aiming to describe the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 in renal transplant patients.A retrospective observational cohort study of patients with a renal transplant and under follow-up by the transplant clinic of a tertiary hospital was conducted during the period from 1 March 2020 to 1 March 2021. A total of 604 individuals were included, with a mean age of 61.6 ±12.8 years. 62.3% (n=376) were men.SARS-CoV-2 incidence was 14.9% (n=90). Mortality due to SARS-CoV-2 was 3.8% (n=23), giving a case fatality of 25.5%. No significant differences were found according to sex and age, being 60.9±11.8 years in those infected and 61.7±12.9 years in those not infected. Significant differences (p=0.005) were found for the mean number of years since transplantation; 8.7±5.6 years in those infected and 11±7.3 years in those not infected.The incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in renal transplant recipients was much higher than that described for the general population. Case fatality and mortality were also higher than in the general population, but in line with other series of individuals with renal transplantation. (AU)

Incidencia de infecciones en el postrasplante renal inmediato / Incidence of infections in the immediate post-renal transplant period

Introducción: El receptor de un trasplante renal es un paciente de alto riesgo para sufrir infección debido a las potenciales complicaciones quirúrgicas y al tratamiento inmunosupresor que reciben.El desarrollo de infecciones supone un riesgo aumentado de pérdida del injerto y de la mortalidad.Objetivos:El objetivo principal fue conocer la incidencia de las infecciones más frecuentes en el paciente con un trasplante renal, durante el periodo postrasplante inmediato.Los objetivos secundarios fueron describir los gérmenes responsables de las infecciones más frecuentes y analizar la relación entre los tipos de infección estudiados y sus posibles factores de riesgo.Metodología:Estudio observacional retrospectivo en pacientes trasplantados renales entre enero de 2018 y diciembre de 2019 durante el periodo del postrasplante inmediato.Resultados:La incidencia de infección fue 69,4%, los síndromes descritos fueron infección del tracto urinario (48%), bacteriemia (9,2%), infección relacionada con catéter (8,2%) e infección por citomegalovirus (4,1%). Los microorganimos más frecuentemente implicados, en estos procesos infecciosos fueron Escherichia coli (16,3%), Enterococus faecium (12,2%) y Enterobacter cloacae (8,1%).Se ha encontrado relación significativa entre la aparición de infección y la duración del ingreso, así como con la presencia o no del antecedente personal de hipertensión arterial. También entre la incidencia de infección relacionada con el catéter venoso central y el tiempo que permaneció insertado.Conclusiones:La infección más frecuente encontrada en el postrasplante renal inmediato fue la infección del tracto urinario, mientras que el microorganismo más presente habitualmente en los procesos infecciosos fue la Escherichia coli. (AU)

Introduction: The kidney transplant recipient is a high-risk patient for infection due to potential surgical complications and immunosuppressive treatment.The development of infections poses an increased risk of graft loss and mortality.Objectives:The main objective was to determine the incidence of the most frequent infections in renal transplant patients during the immediate post-transplant period. The secondary objectives were to describe the most frequent infection-producing germs and to analyse the relationship between the types of infection studied and their possible risk factors.Methodology:Retrospective observational study in renal transplant patients between January 2018 and December 2019 during the immediate post-transplant period.Results:The incidence of infection was 69.4%, the syndromes described were urinary tract infection (48%), bacteraemia (9.2%), catheter-related infection (8.2%) and cytomegalovirus infection (4.1%). The main microorganisms involved were Escherichia coli (16.3%), Enterococcus faecium (12.2%) and Enterobacter cloacae (8.1%).A significant relationship was found between the occurrence of infection and the duration of admission, as well as with the presence or absence of a personal history of arterial hypertension. There was also a significant association between the incidence of central venous catheter-related infection and the length of time the catheter was inserted.Conclusions:The most frequent infection found in the immediate post-renal transplant period was urinary tract infection, while the most common micro-organism present in the infectious processes was Escherichia coli. (AU)

Frecuencia de los diagnósticos de enfermería en el primer ingreso del paciente con un trasplante renal reciente / Frequency of nursing diagnoses on the first admission of the patient with a recent renal transplant

La insuficiencia renal crónica es un problema de salud cuya prevalencia ha ido en aumento y que conlleva serias implicaciones para el paciente. El trasplante renal mejora la calidad de vida de estos pacientes pero les obliga a modificar hábitos en su vida diaria. La enfermería busca el compromiso del paciente con su autocuidado para evitar el rechazo del órgano trasplantado y para ello es importante sistematizar el trabajo a través de planes de cuidados adecuados a la situación de cada paciente y a sus necesidades. Se trata de un estudio descriptivo retrospectivo cuyo objetivo fue conocer los diagnósticos de enfermería (DxE) más frecuentes en el primer ingreso postrasplante, así como el motivo por el que ingresan, y se realizó sobre todos aquellos pacientes que recibieron un trasplante renal, en el Hospital Clínico San Carlos de Madrid, durante el periodo 2010 a 2014. Durante este periodo se realizaron 331 trasplantes, de los cuales ingresaron durante el año postraplante el 50.8% (167). En el primer ingreso tras el trasplante renal se asignaron una mediana de 4 DxE (RI=2-7) por paciente, siendo los más frecuentes Riesgo de Infección con un 25,1% (83), Dolor agudo con un 11,8% (39) y Conocimientos deficientes con un 10,3% (34). Conocer los DxE más frecuentes nos permite establecer planes de cuidados que mejoren la calidad asistencial e intentar prevenir posibles complicaciones del trasplante que perjudican la calidad de vida del paciente. Esto nos ayudará a reducir costes en el tratamiento, y lo que es más importante, a aumentar la satisfacción del paciente y su seguridad, al mismo tiempo que le ayudamos a recuperar su salud (AU)

Chronic kidney failure is a health problem whose prevalence has increased and has serious implications for the patient. Renal transplantation improves the quality of life of these patients but it forces them to modify habits in their daily life. The nurse seeks the commitment of the patient with their self-care to avoid rejection of the transplanted organ and for this it is important to systematize the work through plans of care appropriate to the situation of each patient and their needs. A retrospective descriptive study was carried out. The aim was to know the most frequent nursing diagnoses (NxD) in the first post-transplant admission, as well as the reason for the admission. All patients who received a kidney transplant at the Hospital Clínico San Carlos of Madrid, during the period 2010 to 2014, were included. During this period, 331 transplants were performed, of which 50.8% (167) were admitted during the post-transplant year. In the first admission after kidney transplantation, a median of 4 NxD (RI = 2-7) per patient was assigned, being the most frequent ‘Infection Risk’ with 25.1% (83), ‘Acute Pain’ with 11.8% (39) and ‘Poor Knowledge’ with 10.3% (34). Knowing the most frequent NxD, allows establishing plans of care that improve the quality of care and try to prevent possible complications of transplantation that affect the quality of life of the patient. This fact will help reduce costs in treatment, and more importantly, increase patient satisfaction and safety, while at the same time recover their health (AU)

Venous International Assessment, VIA scale, validated classification procedure for the peripheral venous system.

PURPOSE: VIA scale is a dynamic performance status tool of the peripheral venous system that is divided into five different grades, composed of three parameters: number of observable puncture points; optimal catheter size for cannulation and ease of performing venipuncture and risk of extravasation. METHODS: Prospective single-center, observational, open, non-randomized study divided into two phases. In the first longitudinal phase, we studied the clinical characteristics and the changes in their peripheral venous systems during intravenous chemotherapy for 16 patients (n=16) for an average period of 24 months. In the second transverse phase, we measured the vein's diameter at the selected puncture points with a high-resolution ultrasound and paired this figure with VIA scale. We selected a group of oncology patients (n=52) and a control group (n=56). RESULTS: In the first phase, the level of agreement between the three reviewers was excellent. The second step was to assess the relationship between the measurements obtained with ultrasound and the VIA scale. The vein diameter measurements show a decrease directly related to the assessment of observers in the VIA scale. CONCLUSIONS: The VIA scale is a simple, easy and practical method for classification of the peripheral venous system in terms of vascular access. The practical application of our VIA scale significantly increases the quality of life of patients by increasing the chances of successful venipuncture and cannulation and thus reducing the risk of extravasation and material costs, allowing both an economical and a safe venous assessment tool.