ABSTRACT
Background and study aims Achalasia can be classified as either primary (idiopathic) achalasia or secondary achalasia, which is a consequence of another systemic disease. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an effective and safe treatment for achalasia. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of POEM in patients with Chagasic achalasia compared to idiopathic achalasia. Patients and methods We evaluated POEM procedures performed at a single institution from November 2016 to January 2018. Demographic data, Eckardt score, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, body mass index, post-operative erosive esophagitis, adverse events, length of hospital stay, and procedure-related parameters were analyzed. Results Fifty-one patients underwent POEM as a treatment for achalasia in this period (20 patients with Chagasic and 31 with Idiopathic etiology). The overall clinical success rate was 92.1â%, with no statistical difference between groups (90â% in the Chagasic group vs. 93.5â% in the Idiopathic group, P â=â0.640). Both groups had significant reduction in Eckardt score and in LES pressure, and increase in bodey mass index (BMI) at 1-year follow-up.âThere was no statistical difference between groups regarding Eckardt score ( P â=â0.439), LES pressure (pâ=â0.507), BMI ( P â=â0.254), post erosive esophagitis (35â% vs. 38.7â%, P â=â0.789), adverse events (30â% vs. 12â%, P â=â0.163,) length of hospital stay (3.75 days vs. 3.58 days, P â=â0.622), and operative time (101.3âmin vs. 99.1âmin, P â=â0.840). Conclusion POEM is an effective and safe treatment for patients with achalasia. There is no difference in POEM outcomes for those patients with Chagasic or Idiopathic achalasia.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare surgical and endoscopic treatment for pancreatic pseudocyst (PP). METHODS: The researchers did a search in Medline, EMBASE, Scielo/Lilacs, and Cochrane electronic databases for studies comparing surgical and endoscopic drainage of PP s in adult patients. Then, the extracted data were used to perform a meta-analysis. The outcomes were therapeutic success, drainage-related adverse events, general adverse events, recurrence rate, cost, and time of hospitalization. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between treatment success rate (risk difference [RD] -0.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.20,0.01]; Pâ=â.07), drainage-related adverse events (RD -0.02; 95% CI [-0.04,0.08]; Pâ=â.48), general adverse events (RD -0.05; 95% CI [-0.12, 0.02]; Pâ=â.13) and recurrence (RD: 0.02; 95% CI [-0.04,0.07]; Pâ=â.58) between surgical and endoscopic treatment.Regarding time of hospitalization, the endoscopic group had better results (RD: -4.23; 95% CI [-5.18, -3.29]; Pâ<â.00001). When it comes to treatment cost, the endoscopic arm also had better outcomes (RD: -4.68; 95% CI [-5.43,-3.94]; Pâ<â.00001). CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference between surgical and endoscopic treatment success rates, adverse events and recurrence for PP. However, time of hospitalization and treatment costs were lower in the endoscopic group.
Subject(s)
Drainage/methods , Endoscopy/methods , Pancreatic Pseudocyst/surgery , Cost Savings , Drainage/adverse effects , Drainage/economics , Endoscopy/adverse effects , Endoscopy/economics , Humans , Length of Stay/economics , Postoperative Complications , Recurrence , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The pancreatic biliary maljunction is a rare anomaly that affects mainly females, defined as an anatomical maljunction of the pancreatic duct and the biliary duct confluence, and may be a rare cause of recurrent acute pancreatitis. In order to early diagnosis and prompt treatment, ERCP has an important role in it
La Malformación de la unión biliopancreática es una afección rara y ocurre más en mujeres jóvenes. Es una causa de pancreatitis aguda de causa no conocida. CPRE es una herramienta eficiente para el diagnóstico y también para ser de la terapéutica