Perioperative Pain Management for Distal Radius Fractures.

Distal radius fractures have a high incidence among both young and elderly patients, and in many instances require operative intervention. When operative intervention is employed, adequate pain management is essential to decrease postoperative complications, such as chronic pain and disability, while minimizing the risk of prolonged opioid use and dependence. Strategies to optimize pain management include regional anesthesia, preoperative dosing of medication, multimodal regimens, long-acting selective opioids at the time of surgery, corticosteroids, and non-pharmacologic therapies.

Radiation exposure in multiple hereditary exostoses: A retrospective review.

Background: Exposure to ionizing radiation in patients with Multiple Hereditary Exostoses (MHE) is inevitable and necessary for the diagnosis and treatment of MHE. Radiation exposure has many potentially dangerous consequences, including the increased risk of developing cancer. This is especially concerning in the pediatric patient population since children are more likely to develop adverse effects from radiation than adults. This study aimed to quantify radiation exposure over a five-year period among patients diagnosed with MHE since such information is not currently available in the literature. Methods: Diagnostic radiographs, computed tomography (CT) scans, nuclear medicine studies, and intraoperative fluoroscopy exposures were analyzed for radiation exposure in 37 patients diagnosed with MHE between 2015 and 2020. Results: Thirty-seven patients with MHE underwent 1200 imaging studies, 976 of which were related to MHE and 224 unrelated to MHE. The mean estimated MHE cumulative radiation dose per patient was 5.23 mSv. Radiographs related to MHE contributed the most radiation. Patients from the ages of 10- to 24-years-old received the most imaging studies and exposure to ionizing radiation, especially compared to those under age 10 (P = 0.016). The 37 patients also received a total of 53 surgical-excision procedures, with a mean of 1.4 procedures per person. Conclusions: MHE patients are exposed to increased levels of ionizing radiation secondary to serial diagnostic imaging, with those ages 10-24 years old being exposed to significantly higher doses of radiation. Because pediatric patients are more sensitive to radiation exposure and are at an overall higher risk, the use of radiographs should always be justified in those patients.

Sagittal Band Injury and Extensor Tendon Realignment.

The sagittal bands are structurally important, aiding in the central alignment of the extensor tendons over the heads of each metacarpal. They resist the deviation of the tendon with flexion of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint. Injury to the sagittal band can cause the extensor tendon to lose its alignment leading to pain, tendon subluxation, or dislocation. Generally, if these injuries are recognized and treated within 3 weeks of injury, they will not require surgery. The goal of surgery is to restore the anatomic alignment of the extensor tendon by either direct repair of the sagittal band or reconstruction.

Treatment Patterns for Distal Radius Fractures Before and After Appropriate Use Criteria Adoption.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine agreement with the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for distal radius fractures (DRFs), before and after their adoption, and secondarily determine predictors of operative management. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective cohort study comparing patients treated either nonoperatively (115 patients) or operatively (767 patients) for DRFs between May 1, 2008, and May 1, 2018, by 8 hand surgeons was performed. Data included demographics, injury characteristics, DRF radiographic measurements, treatment rendered, and their appropriateness according to the AUC. Statistical testing used the Fisher and χ2 tests, t test, and multiple variable logistic regression, with a significance level of .05. RESULTS: Overall, there was a significant increase in AUC agreement for operatively treated DRFs (82.7%-89.3%, P = .01), but no difference in agreement for nonoperatively treated DRFs (12.5%-10.7%, P = .77). Age <80 years, AO classes other than B, intra-articular displacement >1 mm, radial inclination <18°, high-energy mechanism of injury, and greater than 1 week to treatment were independent predictors of operative treatment. The area under the curve for the validated regression model using the aforementioned predictors was 0.82. CONCLUSION: Agreement with AUC for DRFs increased after its adoption for operatively treated, but not for nonoperatively treated, fractures. In addition, a predictive model for operative treatment was developed and validated. Future studies may benefit from further model refinement and testing in other patient cohorts.

Outcomes following Distal Radius Fractures with Preexisting Ulnocarpal Abutment.

Background Due to the commonality of distal radius fractures (DRFs), the potential impact of ulnocarpal abutment (UA) on patient outcomes is significant, whether it developed after or prior to injury. It is, therefore, important to consider whether preexisting UA has any impact on outcomes after an acute DRF. Questions/Purpose The aims of this study were to determine if differences were present in (1) pain at final follow-up, (2) complications, and (3) unintended operations in patients with DRFs and either without or with preexisting radiographic UA. Methods A single institution retrospective cohort study comparing patients treated either nonoperatively (43 patients) or operatively (473 patients) for DRFs between 5/1/2008 to 5/1/2018 was performed. Data included demographics, prior wrist pain or surgery, ulnar variance, select treatment data, and presence of pain, complication, or unintended operation by final follow-up. Statistical testing used Fisher's exact test and chi-squared test, with a significance level of 0.05. Results The prevalence of preexisting UA was 14.0 and 15.6% in the nonoperatively- and operatively treated groups, respectively. In nonoperatively treated patients without or with UA, no differences in pain (37.8 vs. 33.3%, p = 1.00) or complications were seen (13.5 vs. 50.0%, p = 0.07). A higher unintended operation rate for nonoperatively treated DRFs with UA, compared with those without, UA was seen (5.4 vs. 50.0%, p = 0.01). No differences in pain, complications, or unintended operations were seen between those without and with UA in the operatively treated group. Conclusion Preexisting UA is not associated with pain, complications, or unintended operations after operative treatment of DRFs. Prospective studies further evaluating outcomes in nonoperatively treated DRFs with UA may be beneficial.

Correlation of anorectal malformation complexity and associated urologic abnormalities.

BACKGROUND: Patients with anorectal malformations (ARM) commonly have associated urologic anomalies. Few large studies exist to accurately characterize the incidence or associations between severity of malformation and urologic diagnosis. The purpose of our study was to determine the incidence of urologic diagnoses in a large cohort of children with ARM and evaluate for any correlation between severity of ARM and the incidence and number of associated urologic diagnoses. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients with ARM treated at our pediatric colorectal center. All patients underwent protocolized urologic screening. ARM subtypes were ordered with increasing severity as follows in males: perineal, bulbar, prostatic and bladder neck fistulae. Females were similarly categorized as perineal, vestibular and vaginal fistulae followed by cloaca with <3 cm common channel and cloaca with >3 cm common channel. The following urologic diagnoses were assessed to determine whether a correlation existed with the severity of the ARM subtype: hydronephrosis, vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), solitary kidney, renal ascent anomalies (ectopic or pelvic), renal fusion anomalies (horseshoe or cross fused kidney), duplex kidney, hypospadias and undescended testicle. ARM subtypes were defined by distal rectal anatomy. RESULTS: A total of 712 patients were included in our study with a mean age of 4 years and of whom 45% were male. The overall rate of urologic anomalies was greater in males than females (65% vs 56% p < 0.026). In both sexes, the rate of urologic anomalies increased with increasing severity of ARM subtype (p<0.00010) finding that males with bladder neck fistula and females with cloacal malformations, particularly with long common channels, being the highest incidence. In males and females, the rate of hydronephrosis increased as the complexity of ARM increased and this correlated significantly (p < 0.0001 vs p < 0.0003 respectively). Similarly, the incidence of VUR also increased as complexity of ARM increased in both males and females (p = 0.01 and p<0.0001 respectively). The remaining urologic diagnoses were not significantly correlated with severity of ARM. CONCLUSIONS: Urologic anomalies occur at a high rate in children with ARM and appear to increase in frequency with increasing complexity of ARM subtype. These findings stress the importance of proper ARM screening and proactive collaboration with a clinician with expertise in pediatric urology early in the management of such children to improve early recognition of urologic diagnoses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Endoscopic Valves and Irrigation Devices for Flexible Ureteroscopy: Is There a Difference?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A variety of ureteroscopic irrigation systems are available, ranging from gravity-driven pressure bags to hand-operated pumps. Endoscopic valves maintain a watertight seal during ureteroscopy (URS) while facilitating passage of instruments. The clinical utility and ergonomics of such devices have not been established. We systematically compare the mechanical properties and usability of select valve devices and hand-operated irrigation systems in an in vitro setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro testing of four different endoscopic valves: UroSeal adjustable endoscopic valve (US Urology), adjustable biopsy port seal (Gyrus ACMI), Blue Silicone Seal ACMI CS B612 (Gyrus ACMI), and REF ABP Biopsy Port Seal (ACMI Corporation) was performed. Usability was evaluated via insertion/extraction forces and insertion time for instruments, including a straight tip sensor wire, 0.035″, (Boston Scientific), a laser fiber (Flexiva 200, Boston Scientific), and an Ngage Nitinol Stone Extractor 1.7F (Cook Urological) through a flexible ureteroscope (Olympus URF P5, Olympus). Flow rate, flow time, and user fatigue were tested for two irrigation systems: The single action pumping system (SAP, Boston Scientific) and the Pathfinder Plus (PP, Utah Medical Products). RESULTS: The US needed the shortest time for both wire insertion and basket insertion (P=0.005, and P<0.001, respectively), while the BSS needed the greatest time for laser fiber insertion (P<0.005). The REF ABP needed the greatest force for withdrawal of the Ngage basket, the laser fiber, and the Captura stone grasper through a closed seal, while the US took the least amount of force for both laser fiber withdrawal and insertion via analysis of variance. Leak point pressure assessment demonstrated that the US was leak free at irrigation pressures up to 200 mm Hg, while the ABP, BSS, and the REF ABP devices demonstrated leaks ranging from 30 to 200 mm Hg. The average and peak flow of the SAP were significantly higher than that of the PP. Mean grip strength decreased significantly after operation of the SAP for 10 minutes, while no loss of grip strength was observed after use of the PP. CONCLUSIONS: The US valve has the advantage of facile manipulation of wires and baskets while maintaining a watertight seal, while other devices may be more cost-effective and secure. The PP has the advantage of less operator hand fatigue and ease of use, but the SAPS may allow for greater on-demand pressures. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of these irrigation systems on outcomes.