ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Data after enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) with same-day discharge in breast reconstruction is limited. This study evaluates early postoperative outcomes after same-day discharge in tissue-expander immediate breast reconstruction (TE-IBR) and oncoplastic breast reconstruction. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review of TE-IBR patients from 2017 to 2022 and oncoplastic breast reconstruction patients from 2014 to 2022 was performed. Patients were divided by procedure and recovery pathway: group 1 (TE-IBR, overnight admission), group 2 (TE-IBR, ERAS), group 3 (oncoplastic, overnight admission), and group 4 (oncoplastic, ERAS). Groups 1 and 2 were subdivided by implant location: groups 1a (prepectoral) and 1b (subpectoral), and groups 2a (prepectoral) and 2b (subpectoral). Demographics, comorbidities, complications, and reoperations were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 160 TE-IBR patients (group 1, 91; group 2, 69) and 60 oncoplastic breast reconstruction patients (group 3, 8; group 4, 52) were included. Of the 160 TE-IBR patients, 73 underwent prepectoral reconstruction (group 1a, 25; group 2a, 48), and 87 underwent subpectoral reconstruction (group 1b, 66; group 2b, 21). There were no differences in demographics and comorbidities between groups 1 and 2. Group 3 had a higher average body mass index than group 4 (37.6 vs 32.2, P = 0.022). There was no significant difference between groups 1a and 2a or between groups 1b and 2b in rates of for rates of infection, hematoma, skin necrosis, wound dehiscence, fat necrosis, implant loss, or reoperations. Group 3 and group 4 showed no significant difference in any complications or in reoperations. Notably, no patients in same-day discharge groups required unplanned hospital admission. CONCLUSIONS: Many surgical subspecialities have successfully adopted ERAS protocols into their patient care and have shown both its safety and feasibility. Our research shows that same-day discharge in both TE-IBR and oncoplastic breast reconstruction does not increase risk for major complications or reoperations.
Subject(s)
Breast Implantation , Breast Implants , Breast Neoplasms , Enhanced Recovery After Surgery , Mammaplasty , Humans , Female , Breast Implants/adverse effects , Patient Discharge , Mammaplasty/methods , Tissue Expansion Devices/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Breast Implantation/methodsABSTRACT
Carcinomas arising from breast hamartomas are exceedingly rare. We present the first reported case of an African-American female presenting with a right breast lump and a subsequent mammogram suggestive of a hamartoma. She later underwent lumpectomy and was found to have HER2+ invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) arising from a hamartoma. She was amenable to HER2-targeted trastuzumab, hormone therapy and adjuvant radiation but declined chemotherapy. In a review of the literature, IDC is the predominant neoplastic type found in hamartomas. The average hamartoma size at time of neoplasm diagnosis is 6.0 cm. Patients with hamartomas greater than 6.0 cm, with changes in calcification pattern; new nodules or asymmetry should be considered for additional evaluation with ultrasound, MRI and/or biopsy. HER2 status is under-reported among cases and should be evaluated in any malignancy found within hamartomas as HER-2 therapy has improved overall survival and recurrence free survival in HER2+breast cancer patients.