Physician counseling on colorectal cancer screening and receipt of screening among Latino patients.

BACKGROUND: Latinos have lower rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and later stage diagnosis than Whites, which may be partially explained by physician communication factors. OBJECTIVE: We assessed associations between patient-reported physician counseling regarding CRC screening and receipt of CRC screening among Latino primary care patients. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional telephone survey. PARTICIPANTS: The participants of this study were Latino primary care patients 50 years of age or older, with one or more visits during the preceding year. MAIN MEASURES: We developed patient-reported measures to assess whether physicians provided explanations of CRC risks and tests, elicited patients' barriers to CRC screening, were responsive to patients' concerns about screening, and encouraged patients to be screened. Outcomes were patient reports of receipt of endoscopy (sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy) and fecal occult blood test (FOBT) within recommended guidelines. KEY RESULTS: Of 817 eligible patients contacted, 505 (62 %) completed the survey; mean age was 61 years (SD 8.4), 69 % were women, and 53 % had less than high school education. Forty-six percent reported obtaining endoscopy (with or without FOBT), 13 % reported FOBT only, and 41 % reported no CRC screening. In bivariate analyses, physician explanations, elicitation of barriers, responsiveness to concerns, and greater encouragement for screening were associated with receipt of endoscopy (p < 0.001), and explanations (p < 0.05) and encouragement (p < 0.001) were associated with FOBT. Adjusting for covariates, physician explanations (OR = 1.27; 95 % CI 1.03, 1.58) and greater physician encouragement (OR = 6.74; 95 % CI 3.57, 12.72) were associated with endoscopy; patients reporting quite a bit/a lot of physician encouragement had six times higher odds of obtaining the FOBT as those reporting none/a little encouragement (OR = 6.54; 95 % CI 2.76, 15.48). CONCLUSIONS: Among primarily lower-socioeconomic status Latino patients, the degree to which patients perceived that physicians encouraged CRC screening was more strongly associated with screening than with providing risk information, eliciting barriers, and responding to their concerns about screening.

Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and breast cancer risk in a high-incidence population: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Marin County, CA has very high incidence of breast cancer. Traditional risk factors, such as those included in the Gail model, do not effectively stratify breast cancer in this population. This retrospective case-control pilot study evaluates DNA from volunteers from a previous Marin County breast cancer epidemiology study. A polyfactorial risk model (OncoVue; InterGenetics Incorporated) that incorporates 22 polymorphisms in 19 genes and 5 clinical risk factors was used to stratify risk in Marin County women. STUDY DESIGN: DNA genotyping was performed on 164 Caucasian women diagnosed with primary breast cancer in Marin County from 1997 to 1999 and 174 age- and ethnicity-matched control subjects. Individual lifetime risks were determined using the polyfactorial risk model and genotype frequencies in women at elevated risk were compared with the overall genotypes. RESULTS: The vitamin D receptor VDR ApaI A2/A2 (rs7975232) homozygous polymorphism was present in high frequency in elevated-risk women. Sixty-four percent of elevated-risk women had the VDR Apa1 A2/A2 genotype compared with only 34% in the overall study, a statistically significant 1.9-fold difference (p = 0.0003). VDR Apa1 A2/a1 and a1/a1 genotypes were also present, but in lower frequencies. CONCLUSIONS: The high frequency of the VDR Apa1 A2/A2 homozygous polymorphism in women designated as elevated risk for breast cancer by the polyfactorial risk model might be related to the high incidence rates of breast cancer in Marin County, CA. Vitamin D supplementation could modify risk of breast cancer in this population.

The patient-reported Clinicians' Cultural Sensitivity Survey: a field test among older Latino primary care patients.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported measures of clinicians' cultural sensitivity are important to assess comprehensively quality of care among ethnically diverse patients and may help address persistent health inequities. OBJECTIVE: Create a patient-reported, multidimensional survey of clinicians' cultural sensitivity to cultural factors affecting quality of care. DESIGN: Using a comprehensive conceptual framework, items were written and field-tested in a cross-sectional telephone survey. Multitrait scaling and factor analyses were used to develop measures. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Latino patients age ≥50 from primary care practices in California. MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED: Thirty-five items hypothesized to assess clinicians' sensitivity. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Validity and reliability of cultural sensitivity measures. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 35 items measuring 14 constructs were retained. Eleven measures assessed sensitivity issues relevant to all participants: complementary and alternative medicine, mind-body connections, causal attributions, preventive care, family involvement, modesty, prescription medications, spirituality, physician discrimination due to education, physician discrimination due to race/ethnicity and staff discrimination due to race/ethnicity. Three measures were group specific: two to limited English proficient patients (sensitivity to language needs and discrimination due to language) and one to immigrants (sensitivity to immigrant status). Twelve multi-item scales demonstrated adequate reliability (alpha ≥0.68 except for Spanish discrimination due to education) and evidence of construct validity (item-scale correlations for all scales >0.40 except for sensitivity to immigrant status). Two single-item measures demonstrated sufficient construct validity to retain for further development. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The Clinicians' Cultural Sensitivity Survey can be used to assess the quality of care of older Latino patients.

Breast cancer and psychosocial factors: early stressful life events, social support, and well-being.

BACKGROUND: The allostasis theory postulates that stress causes the body to activate physiologic systems in order to maintain stability. OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to examine the relationship between earlier stress and later development of breast cancer (BC). METHODS: Authors correlated discrete and interactive relationships of stressful life events, social support, and well-being during childhood and adolescence with the occurrence of BC in adulthood among 300 women with primary BC and 305 matched control subjects. RESULTS: BC patients and control subjects reported similar childhood experiences. Yet, although childhood stressful life events were associated with reports of less family support and well being among the controls, those in the BC group who experienced high stress in early childhood actually expressed higher levels of family support and well-being than did those who had experienced lower levels of stress. CONCLUSION: These findings may reflect a tendency toward a repressive coping style among the BC group, which may be either a risk factor for the disease or a result of having it.

Risk factors for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

HYPOTHESIS: Some risk factors associated with breast cancer may be more predictive of estrogen receptor (ER)- positive than ER-negative tumors. DESIGN: Survey of patients enrolled in a study of breast cancer risk factors. SETTING: Community population in a northern California county. PATIENTS: A total of 234 individuals diagnosed as having breast cancer between July 1, 1997, and June 30, 1999, reporting Marin County, California, residence and participating in a questionnaire regarding exposure to breast cancer risk factors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Diagnosis of ER-positive vs ER-negative breast cancer. RESULTS: Comparison between ER-positive and ER-negative cases showed several factors predictive of ER-positive tumors. In a multivariate model, years of hormone therapy use remained the most significant predictor of ER-positive disease. CONCLUSIONS: Patients diagnosed as having ER-positive breast cancer were more likely to have undergone hormone therapy. The excess of ER-positive breast cancers reported in Marin County could, therefore, in part, be related to hormone therapy.

Risk factors for breast cancer in a population with high incidence rates.

BACKGROUND: This report examines generally recognized breast cancer risk factors and years of residence in Marin County, California, an area with high breast cancer incidence and mortality rates. METHODS: Eligible women who were residents of Marin County diagnosed with breast cancer in 1997-99 and women without breast cancer obtained through random digit dialing, frequency-matched by cases' age at diagnosis and ethnicity, participated in either full in-person or abbreviated telephone interviews. RESULTS: In multivariate analyses, 285 cases were statistically significantly more likely than 286 controls to report being premenopausal, never to have used birth control pills, a lower highest lifetime body mass index, four or more mammograms in 1990-94, beginning drinking after the age of 21, on average drinking two or more drinks per day, the highest quartile of pack-years of cigarette smoking and having been raised in an organized religion. Cases and controls did not significantly differ with regard to having a first-degree relative with breast cancer, a history of benign breast biopsy, previous radiation treatment, age at menarche, parity, use of hormone replacement therapy, age of first living in Marin County, or total years lived in Marin County. Results for several factors differed for women aged under 50 years or 50 years and over. CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar distributions of several known breast cancer risk factors, case-control differences in alcohol consumption suggest that risk in this high-risk population might be modifiable. Intensive study of this or other areas of similarly high incidence might reveal other important risk factors proximate to diagnosis.