Difficulties encountered by physicians and mental health professionals in evaluating and caring for affective and behavioral problems in pediatric brain tumor survivors.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric brain tumor survivors (PBTS) present a high risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. When addressing these difficulties, differences in study designs; variety of and disagreement about diagnoses; and intricate links of emotional, behavioral, and cognitive issues may complicate the interpretation of studies and probably also the work of clinicians. We aimed to survey the difficulties perceived by physicians and mental health professionals in their practice and their interest in developing a new evaluative tool. METHODOLOGY: We surveyed 29 health professionals involved in the follow-up of this population. They completed questionnaires about their clinical practice (difficulties, needs, activities) and indicated diagnosis hypotheses and treatment plans on a clinical case developed for this study. RESULTS: Emotional and behavioral disorders were reported as difficult to assess for 93% of participants. The overlap of symptoms (90%) and the lack of an adapted diagnostic framework (90%) were the main reasons mentioned. Respectively 93%, 90%, and 65% of participants would at least "often" make referrals to psychological (93%), neuropsychological (90%), and psychiatric (65%) assessments and care. Family and group therapy were less common as was drug management. All participants were in favor of creating a tool to help with diagnosis and treatment. When responding to a clinical case, the heterogeneity of participants' responses highlighted their issues in diagnosing and managing these patients. CONCLUSION: This survey exemplifies the difficulties of health professionals related to the evaluation and management of affective and behavioral disorders experienced by PBTS. It underlines the need to help professionals by initiating systematic assessment strategies with this vulnerable population.

[An updated synthesis of the international recommendations about the use of non-pharmacological interventions in the treatment of fatigue]. / Synthèse actualisée des recommandations internationales sur le traitement de la fatigue par des interventions non pharmacologiques.

INTRODUCTION: Fatigue is a frequent and disturbing symptom in oncology but remains undertreated. Given the absence of effective drug treatment, non-pharmacological interventions have a prominent place in the treatment of fatigue. However, they are relatively unknown by professionals who lack of clear points of reference to refer patients with confidence. This article aims to improve the knowledge about this therapeutic field through an updated synthesis of the levels of recommendations and available evidence. METHODS: A three-step approach was conducted, including (1) a synthesis of international guidelines on non-pharmacological interventions in the treatment of fatigue among adults in oncology, (2) a systematic review of recent data in the literature, (3) a comparison between the synthesis of guidelines and the systematic review with the aim of updating the levels of evidence. RESULTS: Five guidelines were synthesized; 111 systematic reviews were analyzed. Their comparison mainly showed: (1) a convergence in favor of the use of physical activity, educational interventions and cognitive-behavioral therapies, with levels of evidence ranging from moderate to high; (2) a consolidation of short-term efficacy evidence to support the use of mindfulness-based approaches and yoga; 3) the persistence of a lack of sufficiently reliable data to establish the efficacy of other types of intervention. DISCUSSION: Supported by international guidelines and recent data, the use of non-pharmacological interventions in the treatment of fatigue is critical and has to become better known.