Determinants of human papillomavirus vaccine hesitancy among Lebanese parents.

INTRODUCTION: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection. HPV is responsible for cancer of cervix uteri. Despite its safety and immunogenicity, HPV vaccine hesitancy is one of the most challenging topics that pediatricians face. METHODS: We aimed to describe the impact of knowledge, attitude, and practice towards vaccines in general, on practice related to HPV vaccination in Lebanon. A questionnaire addressed to parents of students (3-18 years of age) was distributed in 2 public and 2 private schools randomly selected from the greater Beirut area during the school year 2017-2018. Questionnaires covered knowledge, attitude, and practices of vaccination in general and HPV vaccine in particular. RESULTS: Out of 400 distributed questionnaires, 306 (76.5%) were returned. Of the 185 parents aware of HPV vaccine, 60% hadn't given or were not planning to give the HPV vaccine to their children. Of parents not in favor of HPV vaccine, 7.5 thought that vaccines aren't necessary versus none among those in favor of HPV vaccine(p = 0.02). Thirteen percent of those not in favor of HPV vaccine thought that vaccines are not safe versus 2.7% in the group in favor (p = 0.02). An effect of gender on vaccine acceptance was noted: mothers vs fathers and daughters vs sons. Lack of recommendation by pediatricians and the thought that too little is known about the vaccine were the most selected reasons for parents not wanting to vaccinate their children against HPV, whereas cost and religious and cultural beliefs seemed to have no impact. CONCLUSION: Most parents in our study did not vaccinate or weren't willing to vaccinate their children against HPV even when they were in favor of vaccines in general. Physician recommendation was shown to be one of the most important predictors of vaccination. Effort should be put into educating parents about the importance of the vaccine and its well-established safety and efficacy regardless of gender. Lebanese physicians should also be educated and empowered to recommend HPV vaccine more strongly and consistently.

Optimized Infliximab Induction Predicts Better Long-Term Clinical and Biomarker Outcomes Compared to Standard Induction Dosing.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of standard and optimized infliximab induction dosing in attaining corticosteroid (CS) free clinical remission at week 52 and the effect that post-induction trough levels have on long-term outcome. METHODS: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients ≤18 years commenced on infliximab between August 1, 2016, and August 1, 2018, from Vancouver, Canada, and Glasgow, Scotland, were included. The Glasgow cohort followed standard induction while the Vancouver cohort undertook induction optimization based on clinical, biomarker, and proactive infliximab trough levels. Baseline characteristics and laboratory values were documented. RESULTS: In total, 140 children were included [median age 14.1 years (interquartile range (IQR) 12.0-16.0)]; 54% male. CS-free clinical remission at week 52 was higher in the optimized group compared to the standard cohort [65/78 (83%) vs. 32/62 (52%), P < 0.001]. Combined CS-free clinical and biomarker remission (CRP < 5 mg/L) was also higher in the optimized compared to the standard cohort [65/78 (83%) vs 25/62 (40%), P < 0.001]. The median post-induction trough level was higher in children who were in CS-free clinical remission at week 52 [3.6 mg/L (1.5-7.1)] vs. those who were not [2.0 mg/L (0.8-4.1), P = 0.04]. The odds of attaining a therapeutic post-induction trough level were almost 4-fold higher in the optimized group than the standard cohort (OR 3.97, 95% CI: 1.89-8.68, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Standard infliximab induction resulted in less favorable long-term outcomes for pediatric IBD patients. Optimizing induction using clinical, biomarker, and proactive trough levels resulted in higher post-induction trough levels and a greater odds of attaining long-term clinical remission.

Immunologic benefits of maternal living donor allografts in pediatric liver transplantation: fewer rejection episodes and no evidence of de novo allosensitization.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric liver transplant (LT) recipients of maternal living liver donor (LLD) grafts have been reported to experience fewer rejection episodes. However, it is unclear whether this benefit translates to reduction in developing donor-specific antibody (DSA) among maternal-LLD recipients. The aim of this study was to compare immunologic outcomes among maternal-LLD, non-maternal-LLD, and deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) recipients. METHODS: Children (≤18 years) who underwent LT between 1/1998 and 12/2019 at two high-volume LT centers in North America were evaluated. Patients were divided into three groups by type of graft received (maternal-LLD, non-maternal LLD, and DDLT). Clinical variables and outcomes were compared according to each graft type. RESULTS: A total of 450 pediatric primary LT were analyzed: 275 (61.1%) DDLT, 73 (16.2%) maternal-LLD, and 102 (22.6%) non-maternal-LLD. Children receiving LLD grafts were less likely to develop rejection when compared to the DDLT group (DDLT 46.9% vs. maternal-LLD 31.5% vs. non-maternal-LLD 28.4%, p = 0.001). There was no difference in rejection rates between maternal and non-maternal-LLD recipients. A higher percentage of maternal-LLD recipients were on immunosuppression monotherapy compared to non-maternal-LLD and DDLT recipients (6.7% vs. 1.2 vs. 2.4%, respectively). A subgroup of 68 patients were tested for DSA post-LT. Maternal-LLD recipients were less likely to develop de novo DSA (maternal-LLD 11.8% vs. non-maternal-LLD 19.3% vs. DDLT 43%, p = 0.018). None of the maternal-LLD recipients developed antibody-mediated rejection. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the concept of immunologic benefit of maternal-LLD in pediatric LT, with lower rates of rejection and allosensitization post-LT when compared to DDLT recipients.

Knowledge, attitude and practice of influenza vaccination among Lebanese parents: A cross-sectional survey from a developing country.

BACKGROUND: A growing number of parents refuse vaccination due to concerns about side effects. Influenza vaccine is no exception and remains one of the most controversial vaccines. Data regarding influenza vaccine uptake and parental knowledge, attitude and practice towards vaccination in the Lebanese population is lacking. The aim of this study was to assess the rate of vaccination refusal and potential associated factors among Lebanese parents of school-aged children, in general and with a focus on influenza vaccine. METHODS: A parent questionnaire was distributed in randomly selected 2 public and 2 private schools from the greater Beirut area during the school year 2017-2018. Questionnaires covered knowledge, attitude (including themes of efficacy, hesitancy and trust), and practice of vaccination in general and influenza vaccine in particular. RESULTS: The response rate was 76.5% (306/400). Overall, 29.4% parents reported vaccinating their children against influenza (62.2% in private and 37.7% in public schools). Younger age, paternal employment and higher household income were associated with higher vaccination rates (p = 0.01, 0.02 and <0.0001 respectively). Lack of vaccine recommendation by the physician was the most common reason for not taking it (47%). Parents who accepted influenza vaccination had higher scores in efficacy, hesitancy and trust and were more compliant with other vaccinations. CONCLUSION: One third of parents of school aged children in the greater Beirut area vaccinate their children against influenza. This rate is likely lower in rural remote areas. Physician's recommendation is the single most important predictor of such vaccination. Future studies tackling physicians' attitude and practice are needed to help improve influenza vaccination rates in the Lebanese population.

Sequential paternal haploidentical donor liver and HSCT in EPP allow discontinuation of immunosuppression post-organ transplant.

BACKGROUND: EPP is characterized by photosensitivity and by liver disease. When LT is performed in EPP, recurrence often occurs in the allograft due to ongoing protoporphyrin production in bone marrow. Therefore, curative treatment requires allogeneic HSCT after LT. Long-term immunosuppression could be spared by using the same donor for both transplants. METHODS: A 2-year-old girl with EPP in liver failure underwent liver transplant from her father. Transfusion and apheresis therapy were used to lower protoporphyrin levels before and after liver transplant. Ten weeks after liver transplant, she underwent HSCT, using the same donor. Conditioning was with treosulfan, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and ATG. GVHD prophylaxis was with abatacept, methotrexate, MMF, and tacrolimus. We followed the patient's erythrocyte protoporphyrin and liver and skin health for 2 years after transplant. RESULTS: After hematopoietic stem cell engraftment, a decline in protoporphyrin levels was observed, with clinical resolution of photosensitivity. Liver biopsies showed no evidence of EPP. Mild ACR occurred and responded to steroid pulse. Two years post-HSCT, the patient has been weaned off all immunosuppression and remains GVHD and liver rejection free. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential liver and HSCT from the same haploidentical donor are feasible in EPP. This strategy can allow for discontinuation of immune suppression.