ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Since there is still an unmet need for potent adjuvant strategies for renal cancer patients with high progression risk after surgery, several targeted therapies are currently evaluated in this setting. We analyzed whether inclusion criteria of contemporary trials (ARISER, ASSURE, SORCE, EVEREST, PROTECT, S-TRAC, ATLAS) correctly identify high-risk patients. METHODS: The study group comprised 8873 patients of the international CORONA-database after surgery for non-metastatic renal cancer without any adjuvant treatment. Patients were divided into potentially eligible high-risk and assumable low-risk patients who didn't meet inclusion criteria of contemporary adjuvant clinical trials. The ability of various inclusion criteria for disease-free survival (DFS) prediction was evaluated by Harrell's c-index. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 53 months 15.2% of patients experienced recurrence (5-year-DFS 84%). By application of trial inclusion criteria, 24% (S-TRAC) to 47% (SORCE) of patients would have been eligible for enrollment. Actual recurrence rates of eligible patients ranged between 29% (SORCE) and 37% (S-TRAC) opposed to <10% in excluded patients. Highest Hazard Ratio for selection criteria was proven for the SORCE-trial (HR 6.42; p < 0.001), while ASSURE and EVEREST reached the highest c-index for DFS prediction (both 0.73). In a separate multivariate Cox-model, two risk-groups were identified with a maximum difference in 5-year-DFS (94% vs. 61%). CONCLUSION: Results of contemporary adjuvant clinical trials will not be comparable as inclusion criteria differ significantly. Risk assessment according to our model might improve patient selection in clinical trials by defining a high-risk group (28% of all patients) with a 5-year-recurrence rate of almost 40%.
Subject(s)
Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Diagnostic Imaging , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Neoplasm Staging , Nephrectomy , Quality Improvement , Risk Assessment , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The chromophobe subtype represents the third most common histological subtype of renal cell carcinoma (chRCC). Due to the rarity of this subtype only one publication regarding the specific analysis of clinical and histopathological criteria as well as survival analysis of more than 200 patients with chRCC is known to date. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 6,234 RCC patients from 11 centres who were treated by (partial) nephrectomy are contained in the database of this multinational study. Of the patients 259 were diagnosed with chRCC (4.2 %) and thus formed the study group for this retrospective investigation. These subjects were compared to 4,994 patients with a clear cell subtype (80.1 %) with respect to clinical and histopathological criteria. The independent influence of the chromophobe subtype regarding tumor-specific survival and overall survival was determined using analysis by Cox proportional hazards regression models. The median follow-up was 59 months (interquartile range 29-106 months). RESULTS: The chRCC patients were significantly younger (60 vs. 63.2 years, p < 0.001), more often female (50 vs. 41 %, p = 0.005) and showed simultaneous distant metastases to a lesser extent (3.5 vs. 7.1 %, p = 0.023) compared to patients with a clear cell subtype. Despite a comparable median tumor size a ≥ pT3 tumor stage was diagnosed in only 24.7 % of the patients compared to of 30.5 % in patients with a clear cell subtype (p = 0.047). In addition to the clinical criteria of age, sex and distant metastases, the histological variables pTN stage, grade and tumor size showed a significant influence on tumor-specific and overall survival. However, in the multivariable Cox regression analysis no independent effect on tumor-specific mortality (HR 0.88, p = 0.515) and overall mortality (HR 1.00, p = 0.998) due to the histological subtype was found (c-index 0.86 and 0.77, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with chRCC and clear cell RCC differ significantly concerning the distribution of clinical and histopathological criteria. Patients with chRCC present with less advanced tumors which leads to better tumor-specific survival rates in general; however, this advantage could not be verified after adjustment for the established risk factors.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Databases, Factual , Kidney Neoplasms/mortality , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Nephrectomy/mortality , Registries , Aged , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/diagnosis , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Internationality , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Nephrectomy/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Prognosis , Risk Assessment , Survival Rate , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The 7th edition of TNM for renal cell carcinoma introduced a subdivision of pT2 tumors at a 10 cm cutoff. In the present multicenter study the influence of tumor size as well as further clinical and histopathological parameters on cancer specific survival in patients with pT2 tumors was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 670 consecutive patients with pT2 tumors (10.4%) of 6,442 surgically treated patients with all tumor stages were pooled (mean followup 71.4 months). Tumors were reclassified according to the current TNM classification, and subdivided in stages pT2a and pT2b. Cancer specific survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariable and multivariable analyses were used to assess the influence of several parameters on survival. RESULTS: Tumor size continuously applied and subdivided at 10 cm or alternative cutoffs did not significantly influence cancer specific survival. In addition to N/M stage, Fuhrman grade and collecting system invasion also had an independent influence on survival. Integration of a dichotomous variable subsuming Fuhrman grade and collecting system invasion (grade 3/4 and/or collecting system invasion present vs grade 1/2 and collecting system invasion absent) into multivariate models including established prognostic parameters resulted in improvement of predictive abilities by 11% (HR 2.3, p <0.001) for all pT2 cases and 151% (HR 3.1, p <0.001) for stage pT2N0M0 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor size did not have a significant influence on cancer specific survival in pT2 tumors, neither continuously applied nor based on various cutoff values. To enhance prognostic discrimination, multifactorial staging systems including pathological features should be implemented. The prognostic relevance of the variable subsuming Fuhrman grade and collecting system invasion should be considered for future evaluation.
