Primary Care Clinicians' Prescribing Patterns of Reduced-Dose Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Extended-Phase Venous Thromboembolism Treatment.

The direct anticoagulants (DOACs), apixaban and rivaroxaban, are used for extended-phase treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and have labeling for dose reduction for this indication. The objective of this study was to better understand primary care clinician prescribing patterns of apixaban and rivaroxaban for extended-phase anticoagulation. We conducted a 21-question survey targeting members of the American College of Physicians and United States Veterans Administration anticoagulation management services. Survey questions covered prescribing behaviors for dose reduction of apixaban and rivaroxaban for extended VTE treatment, as well as questions related to the respondent's practice setting. We used logistic regression to assess associations between demographics and prescribing behaviors. We used k-means clustering to identify distinct groups of prescribing patterns. Among 227 respondents, most were attending physicians (60%) and one-third (34%) practiced in internal medicine or primary care. Most (59%) indicated they dose-reduced DOACs. Hospitalists (no outpatient care) were least likely to dose-reduce (OR 0.09 [95% CI 0.03-0.22]), as well as early-career clinicians (0.53 [0.30-0.91]). Pharmacists and clinicians who treat over 500 VTE patients annually were most likely to dose reduce (6.4 [2.9-16.3]), (2.9 [1.5-6.0]), respectively. We identified five clusters of dosing behaviors and characterized clinician makeup. Clusters were primarily differentiated by frequency of dose reduction, DOAC preference, and temporary re-escalation of doses. We identified clinician characteristics that are associated with dose-reduction prescribing behaviors; these analyses provide insight into where targeted interventions, such as protocolization and education, would be most beneficial.

Feasibility of a tailored home-based exercise intervention during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of a home-based moderate-to-vigorous intensity, phased (introduction, intermediate, maintenance), exercise prescription in breast cancer patients receiving cardiotoxic neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Nineteen breast cancer patients were randomized to intervention or control for the duration of chemotherapy (16-24 weeks). The intervention was one aerobic exercise session at 80-90% VO2max for 25 min/week and 65%-75% VO2max for ≥ 50 min/week. Adherence to the tailored home-based program was assessed by heart rate monitors. Acceptability, tolerability, feasibility, efficacy, change in VO2max, and patient reported outcomes, safety, and clinical events were assessed. RESULTS: 25.7% of eligible women consented (acceptability). Adherence was 87.6%. Women were not able to maintain exercise intensity as chemotherapy progressed (23.7% of exercise minutes were completed at prescribed heart rate during maintenance). Efficacy of the intervention was demonstrated by maintenance of VO2max (-1.0 ± 13.2%) compared to (-27.5 ± 7.4%) the control group. Further, during and after therapy, patients in the intervention arm reported less fatigue (control-baseline: 14.4 ± 15.9; midpoint: 19.0 ± 11.4; follow-up: 29.4 ± 20.0; intervention-baseline: 29.2 ± 24.6; midpoint: 24.6 ± 14.4; follow-up: 23.6 ± 11.9), impairment in activities (control-baseline: 13.7 ± 16.0; midpoint: 32.8 ± 17.0; follow-up: 58.6 ± 27.9; intervention-baseline: 38.7 ± 31.8; midpoint: 47.1 ± 27.5; follow-up: 47.5 ± 31.0), and pain (control-baseline: 80.8 ± 17.1; midpoint: 73.9 ± 20.7; follow-up: 50.7 ± 25.7; intervention-baseline: 68.7 ± 28.4; midpoint: 61.4 ± 22.5; follow-up: 65.3 ± 22.4). There were no differences in adverse events, treatment delays, or pathological complete response. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant breast cancer patients maintained approximately one hour/week of moderate-intensity exercise over the course of their treatment. Further, this volume of exercise was sufficient to maintain fitness capacity and quality of life compared to the control group. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03280836, prospectively registered 9/13/2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03280836 .

Post-transfusion hemoglobin response in patients with cirrhosis: Can we expect a 1 g/dL rise per unit transfused?

BACKGROUND: A patient's hemoglobin is typically expected to rise by 1 g/dL/unit transfused PRBCs. However, it has been theorized that mechanisms such as hyperbilirubinemia and splenomegaly might lead to either a direct lysis or sequestration of red blood cells that could decrease this proportionate response. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with resolved GI bleeding but still requiring transfusion to correct anemia were compared in cirrhosis and control groups. A retrospective chart review between 2015 and 2020 was conducted at a single institution. Data collected included age, sex, BMI, GI bleed diagnosis, number of PRBCs transfused, presence of splenomegaly and spleen size, alcohol use history, type of cirrhosis, MELD-Na at admission, GFR, and pre-and post-transfusion labs: total bilirubin, ALT, hemoglobin, hematocrit. A logic regression was performed for each group looking at which factors were associated with a successful response (defined as >0.9 g/dL hemoglobin per unit transfused). RESULTS: Mean change in hemoglobin was 0.77 g/dL in patients with cirrhosis compared to 1.46 g/dL in patients without (P < .001, N = 103). Odds ratios for presence of splenomegaly (0.22, N = 78) and female sex (4.39, N = 102) in predicting adequate response (>0.9 g/dL/unit) were both significant (P = .002) as well as portal hypertensive bleed diagnosis (0.28, N = 85, P = .0015). Factors that did not contribute included: age, race, BMI, alcohol use, GFR, change in ALT, and change in total bilirubin. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cirrhosis have an approximately 50% decreased response to transfusion with PRBCs after resolution of a gastrointestinal bleed in comparison to patients without cirrhosis. Risk factors included splenomegaly, portal hypertension, and male sex.

High risk of thrombosis recurrence in patients with homozygous and compound heterozygous factor V R506Q (Factor V Leiden) and prothrombin G20210A.

OBJECTIVE: Heterozygous Factor V R506Q [Factor V Leiden (FVL)] and prothrombin G20210A (PGM), the most common inherited thrombotic disorders in the Caucasian population, confer a low-moderate risk for first venous thromboembolic (VTE) event. We investigated the thrombotic complications of rare homozygous and compound heterozygous FVL and PGM. METHODS: A cohort of patients with homozygous and compound heterozygous FVL and PGM were evaluated at a major referral center in Central Pennsylvania, USA between June 2001 and March 2019. Data including incidence of first and recurrent thrombosis, associated risk factors, family history and demographics were collected. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were eligible for analysis: 47 had homozygous FVL, three had homozygous PGM, 19 had compound heterozygous FVL and PGM, five had compound homozygous FVL and heterozygous PGM, and one had compound heterozygous FVL and homozygous PGM. Fifty-nine patients experienced 111 thromboembolic events. Forty-seven percent of first thrombotic events occurred in patients without clinical or surgical conditions predisposing to thrombosis. The rate of recurrent thromboembolism was 59%. The mean time to recurrence was 8.5 years. Ninety percent of recurrent events occurred during times when patients were not treated with anticoagulation. CONCLUSION: Persons with homozygous and compound heterozygous FVL and PGM are at a significantly increased risk of first unprovoked and recurrent VTE. Patients with first thromboembolic events should be considered for long-term anticoagulation.