Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 6(5): 506-12, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11063379

ABSTRACT

Our purpose was to evaluate the outcome and costs of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation in patients with the inability to mobilize sufficient numbers of PBPCs to allow rapid engraftment after PBPC transplantation. We treated 172 consecutive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients with cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor followed by apheresis to collect PBPCs. The cells were separated on a Percoll gradient and purged with monoclonal antibodies and complement. The patients were categorized as "good" mobilizers if a collection of > or =2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg was obtained (n = 138, 80%) or "poor" mobilizers if <2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg were obtained (n = 34, 20%). With a median follow-up of 3.5 years, there is no statistically significant difference in actuarial event-free survival, overall survival, or relapse for good mobilizers compared with poor mobilizers. However, there was a trend toward increasing nonrelapse, transplantation-related mortality of 11.8% for poor mobilizers versus 3.6% for good mobilizers (P = .08) and early death from all causes including relapse within 120 days (poor 20.6% versus good 8.7%, P = .06). The total cost for bone marrow transplantation-related care was significantly higher, at $140,264 for poor mobilizers versus $80,833 for good mobilizers (P = .0001). The population of patients with NHL who mobilize PBPCs poorly into the circulation have a higher cost for posttransplant support. However, there is no significant difference in relapse, event-free survival, or overall survival for such patients compared with those who mobilize PBPCs easily.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/therapy , Adult , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Blood Cell Count , California/epidemiology , Carmustine/administration & dosage , Costs and Cost Analysis , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Disease-Free Survival , Etoposide/administration & dosage , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Survival , Health Care Costs , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization/economics , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/economics , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/mortality , Humans , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/drug therapy , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/economics , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Remission Induction , Treatment Outcome , Whole-Body Irradiation
2.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 6(1): 58-69, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10708000

ABSTRACT

Multiple-cycle high-dose therapy with autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell (AHPC) support has been used to deliver dose-intensive therapy. We have used this approach as well as single-cycle high-dose therapy in treating patients with metastatic breast cancer. We present the outcomes of multiple-cycle high-dose therapies and compare them with those resulting from single-course high-dose therapies performed at a single institution. Fifty-five patients received 4 cycles of intensive chemotherapy with AHPC support. Three multicycle regimens were sequentially applied. Twenty patients were enrolled to receive 4 cycles of high-dose mitoxantrone, thiotepa, and cyclophosphamide. Nineteen subsequent patients received this regimen modified by the incorporation of paclitaxel. Sixteen patients received 2 cycles of high-dose melphalan, thiotepa, and paclitaxel and 2 cycles of mitoxantrone, thiotepa, and paclitaxel. The results of all 3 multiple-cycle therapies are compared with those of 55 contemporaneous patients with metastatic breast cancer who received a single course of high-dose cyclophosphamide and thiotepa or cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and BCNU (carmustine) with hematopoietic cell rescue. Multiple-cycle therapy was associated with more infectious complications, increased transfusion requirements, and increased hospital admissions. However, there were no significant differences in outcomes between the groups. For 55 patients who received multiple-cycle therapy, the actuarial 3-year overall survival rate was 36% (95% confidence interval [CI] 23%-49%); freedom from progression and event-free survival were both 15% (CI 5%-25%). The median time to disease progression and median survival were 1.0 and 1.6 years, respectively. For the 55 patients who underwent a single course of high-dose therapy, the 3-year overall survival was also 36% (CI 18%-54%), whereas freedom from progression and event-free survival were both 19% (CI 7%-31%). The median time to progression and median survival were 0.8 and 2.2 years, respectively. Within the constraints of this patient population, the outcomes of 4 cycles of high-dose therapy with AHPC support were not superior to those resulting from single courses of high-dose therapy in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic/therapeutic use , Adult , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/toxicity , Blood Transfusion , Breast Neoplasms/secondary , Carmustine/administration & dosage , Carmustine/toxicity , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Cisplatin/toxicity , Combined Modality Therapy , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Cyclophosphamide/toxicity , Disease Progression , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Infections/etiology , Melphalan/administration & dosage , Melphalan/toxicity , Middle Aged , Mitoxantrone/therapeutic use , Mitoxantrone/toxicity , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Paclitaxel/toxicity , Survival Rate , Thiotepa/therapeutic use , Thiotepa/toxicity , Time Factors , Transplantation, Autologous/adverse effects
5.
Exp Hematol ; 11(5): 410-7, 1983 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6343108

ABSTRACT

We investigated the effects of fractionated total lymphoid irradiation (TLI) and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation on murine granulopoiesis in order to evaluate the hemopoietic microenvironment of radiation chimeras (RC). BALB/c mice received 3400 rad TLI (17 daily 200 rad fractions) with or without 3 X 10(7) C57Bl/Ka marrow cells injected intravenously. Radiation resulted in prolonged depression of granulocyte-macrophage progenitor cells (CFU-GM) and endosteal colony-stimulating-activity (CSA) production in irradiated humeri. Allogeneic marrow transplantation partially restored endosteal CSA production and led to complete, although delayed, restoration of CFU-GM. Major compensatory granulopoiesis occurred in the spleen. Marrow fat-laden adherent cells (FLAC) were cultured in vitro from RC 30 weeks post TLI and transplantation. As determined by indirect immunofluorescence utilizing anti-H-2 antibodies, 23-25% of these cells reacted with antibodies possessing donor specificity. These findings suggest that the hemopoietic microenvironment, represented functionally by endosteal CSA production and morphologically by cultured FLAC, is transplantable by the intravenous route.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow Transplantation , Granulocytes/immunology , Hematopoiesis , Lymphatic System/radiation effects , Adipose Tissue/immunology , Animals , Antibody Specificity , Cell Adhesion , Cells, Cultured , Colony-Forming Units Assay , Colony-Stimulating Factors/isolation & purification , Fluorescent Antibody Technique , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL