ABSTRACT
Purpose: Adaptive magnetic resonance (MR)-guided brachytherapy takes an important place as consolidation within the care of cervical malignancies, but may be impracticable in some unusual cases. This work aimed to present the case of adaptive MR-guided external beam radiation therapy (aMRgRT) used as a boost in a recurrence of cervical cancer. Methods and Materials: We report on a case of a parametrial recurrence in a 31-year-old patient who already underwent a trachelectomy as treatment for her primary growth. After concomitant radio-chemotherapy, a brachytherapy boost was performed. Because of its position in relation to the left uterine artery after trachelectomy, impeding interstitial catheters set up, the relapse was insufficiently covered. With the aim to refine the coverage of target volumes, aMRgRT treatment was undertaken to allow for achievement of the dosimetric goals. Results: In clinical circumstances where the brachytherapy step was hindered, aMRgRT presents many advantages. First, daily native MR-imaging outperforms usual x-ray imaging in the pelvis, refining repositioning. Second, its specific workflow allows for the performance of adaptive treatment, with consideration of both the inter- and intrafraction motions of organs at risk and target volumes. Conclusion: In nonfeasible brachytherapy situations, aMRgRT could be a satisfying substitute. Nevertheless, brachytherapy remains the standard of care as a boost in locally advanced cervical cancer.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a mesenchymal neoplasm that is characterized by its unique histological pattern and is most commonly found near the joints of the extremity. Stomach involvement is very rare. This work aimed to present the case of a patient with gastric SS. We also conducted a review of 39 gastric SS cases reported in the literature. PRESENTATION OF CASE: Here we report a case of primary gastric synovial sarcoma in a 32-year-old male patient revealed by gastric reflux. Partial gastrectomy was performed showing a 35 mm lesion with a high spindle cell component. Immunohistochemistry revealed 18q11.2 translocation expression in most of the cells asserting a diagnosis of SS. No local or distant recurrence occurred at 8 months post-operative follow-up. DISCUSSION: The majority of SS occurs in the extremities and is most often associated with tendons in the large articulations of young adults. Gastric SS are very scarce and a molecular biology approach to detect the SYT-SSX fusion gene is required for conclusive diagnosis. We carried out a clinical review of the 40 cases of primary gastric SS, including our case. They all underwent an excisional surgery, most of them by partial gastectomy or wedge resection. Recurrences were rare and early when they occurred. CONCLUSION: Gastric SS is a very uncommon neoplasia although it is henceforth a described entity. Immunohistochemical detection of a pathognomonic translocation is needed to make the diagnosis of SS. Best therapeutic approach for these tumors remains surgical resection with no specific excisional technique recommended.
