Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 239
Filter
1.
Nat Rev Urol ; 21(4): 194, 2024 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38365894
2.
Nat Rev Urol ; 21(2): 62, 2024 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38253818
4.
Nat Rev Urol ; 20(7): 405, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37308541
5.
BJU Int ; 131(5): 581-587, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36308456

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate alterations in depicted penis size by evaluating nude male paintings from the 15th to 21st centuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nude-male paintings were identified from various art history websites and analysed to determine changes in penis size over time. Two observers organised the paintings according to the century in which they were created and made the calculations. Penile length to ear length (PtEL) or penile length to nose length (PtNL) were calculated to standardise the measurements using professional image analysis software. PtEL was first attempted for all paintings; if PtEL could not be ascertained, then nose length was used instead of the ear, as the nose length is defined as equal to ear length according to the golden ratio. Thus, PtNL was ensured and both ratios were then referred to using a common term: penis depiction ratio (PDR). Further analysis was performed by dividing the paintings into three groups according to the historical development of art: Renaissance Period (1400-1599; 15th-16th centuries), Baroque-Rococo and Impressionism Period (1600-1899; 17th-19th centuries) and Contemporary Art Period (1900-2020; 20th and 21st centuries). RESULTS: Of 232 identified paintings, 72 (31.1%) were excluded because they depicted images of adolescents or an erect penis. The PDR was found to differ significantly between paintings created in different centuries (P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that paintings from the 21st century demonstrated significantly higher PDRs than paintings from previous centuries (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In paintings depicting nude males, the size of the penis has gradually increased throughout the past seven centuries, and especially after the 20th century. This observation illustrates the changing sociocultural inputs into male body image and emphasises the need for improved understanding of the sociocultural factors associated with the perception of penis size in men.


Subject(s)
Amyloidosis, Familial , Paintings , Humans , Male , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , Adolescent , Penis , Pelvis , Paintings/history
6.
Nat Rev Urol ; 19(12): 694, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36369388

Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans
9.
Nat Rev Urol ; 19(11): 634, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36195723
11.
Nature ; 609(7927): S32-S33, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36104418
12.
Nat Rev Urol ; 19(9): 514, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35821309
14.
Nat Rev Urol ; 19(5): 256, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35393567
17.
Nat Rev Urol ; 19(3): 131, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35091722

Subject(s)
Patient Selection , Humans
20.
Nat Rev Urol ; 18(9): 510, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34312529
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...