Autologous fat transplantation to the velopharynx for treating mild velopharyngeal insufficiency: A 10-year experience.

BACKGROUND: For the last two decades, autologous fat transplantation has been used to treat mild velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI); however, there is still disagreement about its effectiveness. The aim of the study was to evaluate the procedure by using speech analysis and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective study of 47 non-syndromic patients with mild VPI who underwent autologous fat transplantation to the velopharynx between 2006 and 2015. Thirty-two patients had a cleft palate, all of which had been repaired before fat transplantation. Eight patients developed VPI after adenotonsillectomy, one after uvulo-palatoplasty and six had VPI of unknown etiology. Twelve patients underwent two procedures of fat transplantation. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative audio recordings were blinded for scoring independently by three senior speech therapists on a five-point scale. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative MRIs were obtained during phonation, measuring the velopharyngeal distance and the velopharyngeal gap area. Correlations between the speech outcomes and MRI were calculated. RESULTS: Audible nasal emission was the only speech parameter that improved significantly postoperatively (p = 0.005). A significant reduction in both velopharyngeal distance (p < 0.005) and the gap area (p < 0.005) was found after treatment. A significant improvement in the mobility of the velum was observed after treatment (p = 0.03). There was no significant correlation between speech outcomes and MRI. CONCLUSIONS: Autologous fat transplantation for the treatment of mild VPI, although significantly reducing audible nasal emission, made no significant improvement in hypernasality or nasal turbulence. No complications were observed.

Asymmetry of left versus right unilateral cleft impairments: an experimental study of face perception.

OBJECTIVE: Previous psychosocial studies of adults born with cleft lip and palate have provided circumstantial evidence that surgically repaired right-sided unilateral clefts may be more disfiguring than left-sided clefts. The present study asked if such asymmetries are physiognomic asymmetries or arise "in the eye of the beholder," representing perceptual processes in face recognition. DESIGN: Color slides of 160 children (6 years of age) and young teenagers (16 years of age) were rated by subjects for perceived disfigurement. Sixty of the subjects had unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (30 had a right-sided cleft and 30 had a left-sided cleft), 60 had unilateral cleft lip/alveolus (30 right-sided and 30 left-sided clefts), 32 children had bilateral cleft lip and palate, and 8 children had cleft palate only. Faces were shown in normal and in mirror-reversed versions; the order in which faces were shown was randomized, as were other stimulus factors such as cleft type, age, and gender. SETTING: The study was conducted as a classroom-type experiment at the Vision Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Oslo, Norway. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-seven students of psychology at the University of Oslo, who were ignorant of the purpose of the study, acted as subjects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Subjects rated perceived disfigurement using a visual analog scale. RESULTS: Modest but highly consistent hemifacial asymmetries in judged disfigurement were found, with left-sided unilateral clefts rated as less disfiguring than right-sided unilateral clefts. Unilateral clefts were judged as being less disfiguring than the bilateral clefts, and cleft lip/alveolus was judged as being less disfiguring than cleft lip and palate. The patterns of facial judgments were almost identical in the normal and reversed-slides conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Asymmetries between left- and right-sided clefts reside in physiognomic factors rather than in hemispheric asymmetries controlling the perceptual process of face judgment.