ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Different patterns of liver injury have been reported in association with the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. The aim of this study was to describe a nationwide cohort of patients with SARS CoV-2 vaccine-induced liver injury, focusing on treatment and the evolution after further booster administration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: multicentre, retrospective-prospective study, including subjects who developed abnormal liver tests within 90 days after administration of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. RESULTS: 47 cases were collected: 17 after prime dose and 30 after booster. Age was 57 years, 30 (63.8 %) were female, and 7 (14.9 %) had a history of prior autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Most cases were non-severe, though 9 (19.1 %) developed acute liver injury or failure (ALF). Liver injury tended to be more severe in those presenting after a booster (p=0.084). Pattern of liver injury was hepatocellular (80.9 %), mixed (12.8 %) and 3 (6.4 %) cholestatic. Liver biopsy was performed on 33 patients; 29 showed findings of AIH. Forty-one (87.2 %) patients received immunosuppressants, mostly corticosteroids (35/41). One required liver transplantation and another died due to ALF. Immunosuppression was discontinued in 6/41 patients without later rebound. Twenty-five subjects received at least one booster and 7 (28.0 %) relapsed from the liver injury, but all were non-severe. Recurrence was less frequent among patients on immunosuppressants at booster administration (28.6 % vs. 88.9 %, p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: SARS CoV-2 vaccine-induced liver injury is heterogeneous but mostly immune-mediated. Relapse of liver injury after re-exposure to vaccine is frequent (28.0 %) but mild. Immunosuppression at booster administration is associated with a lower risk of liver injury.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Recurrence , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury/etiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Aged , Adult , Immunization, Secondary , Risk Factors , Liver Transplantation , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Numerous scores are designed to predict outcomes of patients with liver cirrhosis. Our study aimed to evaluate the ability of the Liver Disease Undernutrition Screening Tool (LDUST) in predicting mortality and decompensation in outpatients with clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). We hypothesized that LDUST could help identify patients in need of nutritional supplementation and intervention. METHODS: A prospective study of 57 CSPH patients (36.8% female, mean age: 63.5 ± 9.9 years) with a median follow-up of 41 months was conducted. Baseline liver function, nutrition, and sarcopenia were assessed, alongside LDUST. During follow-up, the occurrence of liver decompensation, hospital admission, need for emergency care, and mortality were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 56.1% of patients were Child A, and the most frequent etiology was alcohol (50.9%). Malnutrition risk according to LDUST raised mortality (HR: 25.96 (1.47-456.78)), decompensation (HR 9.78 (2.08-45.89)), and admission (HR 4.86 (1.09-21.61)) risks in multivariate Cox analysis. Combining LDUST with Child and MELD scores improved their decompensation prediction (0.936 vs. 0.811 and 0.866 vs. 0.700). CONCLUSIONS: The LDUST has a solid ability to predict complications in cirrhosis outpatients with CSPH, and its integration with Child and MELD models enhances their predictive power. LDUST implementation could identify individuals necessitating early nutritional support.
Subject(s)
Hypertension, Portal , Liver Cirrhosis , Malnutrition , Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , Malnutrition/diagnosis , Liver Diseases , Prospective Studies , Hypertension, Portal/complications , Hypertension, Portal/mortality , Male , Female , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/mortality , OutpatientsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) produces changes at multiple levels in host metabolism, especially in lipid profile and cardio-metabolic risk. It is unclear how HCV eradication by direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) modifies those changes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of DAA treatment on different risk factors associated with cardiovascular disease. METHODS: Prospective study with two-year follow-up. All patients treated with DAAs in the Liver Clinic of a tertiary hospital were included. Patients co-infected with HBV or HIV, with other causes of liver disease, on lipid-lowering treatment, pregnant, or with previous HCV treatment were excluded. The results were analyzed using linear mixed models. RESULTS: 167 patients (53% female, 9.6% cirrhosis) were included. Low plasma lipid levels were observed before initiating HCV eradication. During the first year after treatment with DAA, we observed a sustained increase in cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol (only in men), and LDL-cholesterol levels. An ameliorated glycemic control was also observed with a decrease in fasting insulin and reduced HOMA. Iron metabolism and coagulation function also improved with lower levels of serum ferritin and prothrombin activity; these biochemical changes resulted in a new diagnosis of hypercholesterolaemia in 17.4% of patients, requiring initiation of statins in 15%. Two non-fatal cardiovascular events were observed during the first 2 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: DAA treatments returned plasma lipids to the normal range without increasing either the occurrence of cardiovascular events or the consumption of lipid-lowering medication beyond what is normal in a sex- and age-matched population.
ABSTRACT
We present the case of a 37-year-old Caucasian woman, with no history of interest, who came to the emergency room for an occlusive condition of 24 hours' evolution. The patient reported a weight loss of 12 kg in the last month, as well as the appearance of a lump in the left breast in the last week. A chest-abdominal CT scan revealed multiple solid-appearing nodules in the left breast, a metastatic liver lesion, and a tumor-like mass in the right iliac fossa measuring 90x60 mm. A biopsy of the breast lesion revealed a diffuse architectural pattern with destruction of the parenchyma and irregular medium-large cellularity with intense and diffuse expression of CD20, CD10 and Bcl6 and a proliferative index of practically 100%, consistent with lymphoma. Burkitt stage IV. Intestinal obstruction constitutes about 15% of hospital admissions for abdominal pain, representing a significant cause of hospital mortality. Although the most common causes of small bowel obstruction are benign (adhesions, hernias), intraluminal lesions such as inflammatory bowel disease or neoplasms are well-established causes associated with this clinical picture. Lymphomas constitute 25% of cases of intestinal obstruction of neoplastic origin; among them, Burkitt lymphoma is a rare type of B-cell lymphoma characterized by rapid and aggressive cell growth, the most common initial involvement of which is located at the abdominal and extra-nodal level.
Subject(s)
Burkitt Lymphoma , Intestinal Obstruction , Lymphoma, B-Cell , Female , Humans , Adult , Burkitt Lymphoma/complications , Burkitt Lymphoma/diagnostic imaging , Lymphoma, B-Cell/pathology , Intestinal Obstruction/diagnostic imaging , Intestinal Obstruction/etiology , Abdominal Pain/etiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Obeticholic acid (OCA) and fibrates therapy results in biochemical improvement in placebo-controlled trials in patients with primary biliary cholangitis and insufficient response to ursodeoxycholic acid. There is scarce information outside of clinical trials. Therefore, we have assessed the effectiveness and adverse events of these treatments. METHODS: Data from patients included in the ColHai registry treated with OCA, fibrates, or both were recorded during a year, as well as adverse events and treatment discontinuation. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients were treated with OCA, 250 with fibrates (81% bezafibrate; 19% fenofibrate), and 15 with OCA plus fibrates. OCA group had baseline significantly higher alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (P = 0.01) and lower platelets (P = 0.03) than fibrates. Both treatments significantly decreased ALP, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), and transaminases and improved Globe score. Albumin and immunoglobulin type M improved in the fibrates group. ALP decrease was higher under fibrates, whereas alanine aminotransferase decline was higher under OCA. Although baseline transaminases and GGT were higher in patients with OCA plus fibrates, significant ALP, GGT, alanine aminotransferase, and Globe score improvement were observed during triple therapy. Adverse events were reported in 14.7% of patients (21.3% OCA; 17.6% fenofibrate; 10.7% bezafibrate), mainly pruritus (10.1% with OCA). Discontinuation was more frequent in fenofibrate treatment mainly because of intolerance or adverse events. DISCUSSION: Second-line therapy with OCA or fibrates improves hepatic biochemistry and the GLOBE score in primary biliary cholangitis patients with suboptimal response to ursodeoxycholic acid. Simultaneous treatment with OCA and fibrates improved ALP as well.
Subject(s)
Bezafibrate/therapeutic use , Chenodeoxycholic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Fenofibrate/therapeutic use , Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary/drug therapy , Chenodeoxycholic Acid/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The use of nutrition-screening tools in cirrhotic patients is not systematized. Recently, specific tools have been proposed for patients with cirrhosis, but their diagnostic capabilities have been scarcely studied. METHODS: This was a prospective study that includes outpatients with liver cirrhosis undergoing follow-up in the hepatology consultations of a tertiary-care university hospital. A trained gastroenterologist applied the screening tools: Liver Disease Universal Screening Tool (LDUST), Royal Free Hospital-Nutrition Prioritizing Tool (RFH-NPT), and Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF). Subsequently, the diagnosis of malnutrition was made according to Global Leadership Initiative for Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria by an endocrinologist, who was blind to the results of the screening tools. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients (38.1% women, mean age 63.1 ± 9.9 years) with cirrhosis (60.3% Child-Pugh A, 34.9% Child-Pugh B, and 4.8% Child-Pugh C) were evaluated. The prevalence of malnutrition was 38.1% (15.9% moderate, 22.2% severe). Advanced stages of cirrhosis were associated with a higher prevalence of malnutrition (P = .021). MNA-SF was the most accurate screening tool, being superior to RFH-NPT and LDUST. It presented better sensitivity than RFH-NPT (88% [0.68-0.97] vs 67% [0.45-0.84], P = .031) and better specificity than both LDUST (97% [0.87-0.99] vs 62% [0.45-0.77], P < .001) and RFH-NPT (97% [0.87-0.99] vs 82% [0.67-0.93], P = .016). CONCLUSIONS: According to the GLIM criteria, malnutrition affected 38.1% of patients with cirrhosis, being severe in 22% of the patients. MNA-SF is the most accurate screening test, superior even to tools specifically designed for cirrhotic patients (LDUST).
Subject(s)
Malnutrition , Nutrition Assessment , Aged , Female , Humans , Leadership , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/diagnosis , Liver Cirrhosis/epidemiology , Male , Malnutrition/diagnosis , Malnutrition/epidemiology , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , Nutritional Status , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
Introducción: Los inhibidores del punto de control inmunitario (immune checkpoint inhibitors [ICI]) son fármacos eficaces en el tratamiento de diversas neoplasias. Sin embargo, se han relacionado con eventos adversos inmunomediados (EAI) gastrointestinales y hepáticos que pueden desencadenar su interrupción temporal o definitiva. Objetivo: Evaluar, en condiciones de práctica real, la eficacia y la toxicidad gastrointestinal y hepática de los ICI en tratamientos oncológicos. Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo con inclusión de pacientes con diagnóstico de neoplasia avanzada que habían recibido al menos una dosis de ICI entre mayo de 2015 y septiembre de 2018. Resultados: Se incluyeron 132 pacientes con neoplasia de pulmón no microcítico (65,15%, n=86), melanoma (22,7%, n=30), carcinoma renal (9,09%, n=12) y otros tumores (3%, n=4). Los fármacos empleados fueron nivolumab (n=82), pembrolizumab (n=28), atezolizumab (n=13), durvalumab (n=2), ipilimumab (n=1) y la combinación anti-CTLA-4/PD-1 (n=6). El 38,6% (n=51) desarrollaron EAI, de tipo gastrointestinal en el 12,9% (n=17). De ellos, el 47% (n=8) requirieron esteroides, y un paciente precisó cirugía por perforación intestinal. En el 3,03% (n=4) se objetivaron EAI hepáticos gradoI: el 50% (n=2) requirieron corticoterapia y en un paciente fue preciso interrumpir el tratamiento. Entre los pacientes con tratamiento combinado, el 66,6% (n=4) presentaron EAI gastrointestinales. La incidencia de EAI no se relacionó con la edad, ni con el sexo, ni con la respuesta al fármaco empleado. Conclusiones: Los EAI gastrointestinales figuran entre los más frecuentemente observados en pacientes en tratamiento con ICI. El manejo multidisciplinar y un mayor conocimiento de dichos eventos podrían ayudarnos a reducir su morbilidad, así como las interrupciones del tratamiento.(AU)
Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective agents against several malignancies. However, they are associated with gastrointestinal and liver immune-related adverse events (GI-IrAEs and LI-IrAEs), which can lead to their temporary or permanent discontinuation. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and gastrointestinal and liver toxicity of ICIs in oncological treatments in actual clinical practice. Material and methods: Patients with advanced cancer who received at least 1ICI dose between May 2015 and September 2018 were retrospectively assessed. Results: 132 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (65.15%, n=86); melanoma (22.7%, n=30); renal carcinoma (9.09%, n=12); and other tumours (3%, n=4) were included. The treatments administered were nivolumab (n=82), pembrolizumab (n=28), atezolizumab (n=13), durvalumab (n=2), ipilimumab (n=1) and the antiCTLA-4/PD-1 combination (n=6). In total, 51 patients (38.6%) developed IrAEs, 17 (12.9%) of which experienced GI-IrAEs. Of these, 8 (47%) needed steroids and 1patient required surgery due to intestinal perforation. Grade I Li-IrAEs were observed in 4 patients (3.03%): 2 (50%) required corticosteroids and 1 patient had to discontinue treatment. Four patients (66.6%) who received combination therapy experienced GI-IrAEs. IrAE incidence were not associated with age, gender or drug response. Conclusions: GI-IrAEs are one of the most common adverse events in patients receiving ICIs. A multidisciplinary approach and a greater understanding of these events could help to reduce morbidity and therapy discontinuation.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Gastrointestinal Diseases/immunology , Melanoma , Treatment Outcome , Lung Neoplasms , Long Term Adverse Effects , Retrospective Studies , Epidemiology, Descriptive , SpainABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective agents against several malignancies. However, they are associated with gastrointestinal and liver immune-related adverse events (GI-IrAEs and LI-IrAEs), which can lead to their temporary or permanent discontinuation. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and gastrointestinal and liver toxicity of ICIs in oncological treatments in actual clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with advanced cancer who received at least 1ICI dose between May 2015 and September 2018 were retrospectively assessed. RESULTS: 132 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (65.15%, n=86); melanoma (22.7%, n=30); renal carcinoma (9.09%, n=12); and other tumours (3%, n=4) were included. The treatments administered were nivolumab (n=82), pembrolizumab (n=28), atezolizumab (n=13), durvalumab (n=2), ipilimumab (n=1) and the antiCTLA-4/PD-1 combination (n=6). In total, 51 patients (38.6%) developed IrAEs, 17 (12.9%) of which experienced GI-IrAEs. Of these, 8 (47%) needed steroids and 1patient required surgery due to intestinal perforation. Grade I Li-IrAEs were observed in 4 patients (3.03%): 2 (50%) required corticosteroids and 1 patient had to discontinue treatment. Four patients (66.6%) who received combination therapy experienced GI-IrAEs. IrAE incidence were not associated with age, gender or drug response. CONCLUSIONS: GI-IrAEs are one of the most common adverse events in patients receiving ICIs. A multidisciplinary approach and a greater understanding of these events could help to reduce morbidity and therapy discontinuation.
Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Diseases/immunology , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Liver Diseases/immunology , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
No disponible
