Early outcomes of kidney transplantation from elderly donors after circulatory death (GEODAS study).

BACKGROUND: Spain has dramatically increased the number of controlled circulatory death donors (cDCD). The initial selection criteria for considering cDCD for kidney transplantation (KT) have been expanded progressively, with practically no limits in donor age during the last years. We aimed to analyze the early clinical outcomes using expanded (> 65 years) cDCD in comparison with standard ones. METHODS: Observational multicenter study including 19 transplant centers in Spain. We performed a systematic inclusion in a central database of every KT from expanded cDCD at each participant unit from January-2012 to January-2017. Surgical procedures and immunosuppressive protocols were based on local practices. Data was analyzed in the central office using logistic and Cox regression or competitive-risk models for multivariate analysis. Median time of follow-up was 18.1 months. RESULTS: 561 KT were performed with kidneys from cDCD, 135 from donors older than 65 years. As expected, recipients from older cDCD were also older (65.8 (SD 8.8) vs 53.7 (SD 11.4) years; p < 0.001) and with higher comorbidity. At 1 year, no differences were found amongst older and younger cDCD KT recipients in terms of serum creatinine (1.6 (SD 0.7) vs 1.5 (SD 0.8) mg/dl; p = 0.29). Non-death censored graft survival was inferior, but death-censored graft survival was not different (95.5 vs 98.2% respectively; p = 0.481). They also presented a trend towards higher delayed graft function (55.4 vs 46.7%; p = 0.09) but a similar rate of primary non-function (3.7 vs 3.1%; p = 0.71), and acute rejection (3.0 vs 6.3%; p = 0.135). In the multivariate analysis, in short follow-up, donor age was not related with worse survival or poor kidney function (eGFR < 30 ml/min). CONCLUSIONS: The use of kidneys from expanded cDCD is increasing for older and comorbid patients. Short-term graft outcomes are similar for expanded and standard cDCD, so they constitute a good-enough source of kidneys to improve the options of KT wait-listed patients.

Trasplante renal con órganos procedentes de donación tras parada circulatoria controlada: resultados del estudio multicéntrico GEODAS-3 / Kidney transplant from controlled donors following circulatory death: Results from the GEODAS-3 multicentre study

Introducción: Varios países eu:ropeos disponen de programas de donación tras parada cardiaca controlada (cDCD). Veintidós centros participan en el grupo GEODAS, cuyos resultados clínicos presentamos desde una perspectiva nefrológica. Métodos: Estudio multicéntrico retrospectivo observacional con inclusión sistemática de todos los trasplantes renales (TR) procedentes de cDCD, siguiendo protocolos locales de extracción e inmunosupresión. Resultados: Se incluyó a 335 donantes tras cDCD (edad media 57,2 años) fallecidos mayoritariamente por eventos cardiovasculares. Se analizan 566 receptores (edad media de 56,5 años; el 91,9% con primer trasplante renal), con una mediana de seguimiento de 1,9 años. La terapia de inducción fue casi universal (timoglobulina 67,4%; simulect 32,8%) con mantenimiento con prednisona-MMF-tacrolimus (91,3%) o combinaciones con mTOR (6,5%). El tiempo medio de isquemia fría (CIT) fue 12,3 h. Hubo un 3,4% de fallo primario del injerto (n = 19), asociado fundamentalmente al tiempo de isquemia fría (solo el CIT ≥ 14 h se asoció a fallo primario del injerto). La función retrasada del injerto (DGF) fue 48,8%. Los factores de riesgo para la DGF fueron: CIT ≥ 14 h OR 1,6, procedencia de hemodiálisis (vs. diálisis peritoneal) OR 2,1 y edad del donante OR 1,01 (por año). Veintiún pacientes fallecieron con injerto funcionante (3,7%), con una supervivencia de paciente e injerto (censurada para muerte) al segundo año del 95% y del 95,1%, respectivamente. El filtrado glomerular estimado al año de seguimiento fue 60,9ml/min. Conclusiones: El CIT es un factor modificable para mejorar la incidencia del fallo primario del injerto en trasplante renal procedente de cDCD. El trasplante renal con cDCD tiene mayor incidencia en la función retrasada del injerto, pero igual supervivencia de paciente e injerto que la referencia histórica para donación en muerte encefálica. Los resultados son satisfactorios para continuar promoviendo este tipo de donación. Conclusiones: El CIT es un factor modificable para mejorar la incidencia del fallo primario del injerto en trasplante renal procedente de cDCD. El trasplante renal con cDCD tiene mayor incidencia en la función retrasada del injerto, pero igual supervivencia de paciente e injerto que la referencia histórica para donación en muerte encefálica. Los resultados son satisfactorios para continuar promoviendo este tipo de donación

Introduction: Many European countries have transplant programmes with controlled donors after cardiac death (cDCD). Twenty-two centres are part of GEODAS group. We analysed clinical results from a nephrological perspective. Methods: Observational, retrospective and multicentre study with systematic inclusion of all kidney transplant recipients from cDCD, following local protocols regarding extraction and immunosuppression. Results: A total of 335 cDCD donors (mean age 57.2 years) whose deaths were mainly due to cardiovascular events were included. Finally, 566 recipients (mean age 56.5 years; 91.9% first kidney transplant) were analysed with a median of follow-up of 1.9 years. Induction therapy was almost universal (thymoglobulin 67.4%; simulect 32.8%) with maintenance with prednisone-MMF-tacrolimus (91.3%) or combinations with mTOR (6.5%). Mean cold ischaemia time (CIT) was 12.3 h. Approximately 3.4% (n = 19) of recipients experienced primary non-function, essentially associated with CIT (only CIT ≥ 14 h was associated with primary non-function). Delayed graft function (DGF) was 48.8%. DGF risk factors were CIT ≥ 14 h OR 1.6, previous haemodialysis (vs. peritoneal dialysis) OR 2.1 and donor age OR 1.01 (per year). Twenty-one patients (3.7%) died with a functioning graft, with a recipient and death-censored graft survival at 2-years of 95% and 95.1%, respectively. The estimated glomerular filtration rate at one year of follow-up was 60.9 ml/min. Conclusions: CIT is a modifiable factor for improving the incidence of primary non-function in kidney transplant arising from cDCD. cDCD kidney transplant recipients have higher delayed graft function rate, but the same patient and graft survival compared to brain-dead donation in historical references. These results are convincing enough to continue fostering this type of donation

Kidney transplant from controlled donors following circulatory death: Results from the GEODAS-3 multicentre study. / Trasplante renal con órganos procedentes de donación tras parada circulatoria controlada: resultados del estudio multicéntrico GEODAS-3.

INTRODUCTION: Many European countries have transplant programmes with controlled donors after cardiac death (cDCD). Twenty-two centres are part of GEODAS group. We analysed clinical results from a nephrological perspective. METHODS: Observational, retrospective and multicentre study with systematic inclusion of all kidney transplant recipients from cDCD, following local protocols regarding extraction and immunosuppression. RESULTS: A total of 335 cDCD donors (mean age 57.2 years) whose deaths were mainly due to cardiovascular events were included. Finally, 566 recipients (mean age 56.5 years; 91.9% first kidney transplant) were analysed with a median of follow-up of 1.9 years. Induction therapy was almost universal (thymoglobulin 67.4%; simulect 32.8%) with maintenance with prednisone-MMF-tacrolimus (91.3%) or combinations with mTOR (6.5%). Mean cold ischaemia time (CIT) was 12.3h. Approximately 3.4% (n=19) of recipients experienced primary non-function, essentially associated with CIT (only CIT ≥ 14 h was associated with primary non-function). Delayed graft function (DGF) was 48.8%. DGF risk factors were CIT ≥ 14 h OR 1.6, previous haemodialysis (vs. peritoneal dialysis) OR 2.1 and donor age OR 1.01 (per year). Twenty-one patients (3.7%) died with a functioning graft, with a recipient and death-censored graft survival at 2-years of 95% and 95.1%, respectively. The estimated glomerular filtration rate at one year of follow-up was 60.9 ml/min. CONCLUSIONS: CIT is a modifiable factor for improving the incidence of primary non-function in kidney transplant arising from cDCD. cDCD kidney transplant recipients have higher delayed graft function rate, but the same patient and graft survival compared to brain-dead donation in historical references. These results are convincing enough to continue fostering this type of donation.

[Knowledge and attitudes toward organ donation among health professionals in a third level hospital]. / Conocimientos y actitudes ante la donación de órganos de los profesionales sanitarios de un hospital de tercer nivel.

OBJECTIVE: The Spanish model is the model adopted by many countries to increase their donation rate, being the implication of the healthcare professionals one of the keys to this success. The attitude of these before the donation is crucial for the hour of influence on the population. Organ transplantation has been established as an effective treatment that has been improving over the years. The objective was to determine the knowledge and attitudes of health professionals before the donation of organs. METHODS: Cross-sectional descriptive study. An ad hoc questionnaire was conducted and distributed among the health professionals (medical staff, nurses and nursing assistants) of a tertiary hospital during February 2015. A total of 615 potential participants were estimated in the different areas of the hospital. A total of 342 completed questionnaires were collected (55%). The statistical analysis with SPSS® Statistics for Windows. Version 20.0. A level of significance P lower than 0.05 was used in all the analyses. RESULTS: The average age of the respondents was 43.34 (SD = 10.37) years, being 86.6% women and 60% nurses. 35.5% showed good knowledge about the donation process, being higher in men (51.1% Vs 33.1%, p lower than 0.05), medical personnel (55% vs 34.3% vs 31.9%). %; p lower than 0.05) and lower in those services with a direct relationship with the donation process (36.8% vs 31.9%, p lower than 0.05). 71% of the professionals expressed their willingness to donate their organs, with special sensitivity towards donation those services in direct relation with the donation program (82.2% vs 65.9%, OR: 1.24, p lower than 0.001 ). 50% of the professionals would donate the organs of a family member; the medical group had the highest percentage (70% vs 50.7% vs 40.4%, OR: 3.8, p lower than 0.05). 74.5% knew some Spanish legal document about donation and transplants. CONCLUSIONS: Health professionals as a whole have a low level of knowledge; but a good attitude towards donation.

OBJETIVO: El modelo español es el modelo adoptado por numerosos países para aumentar su tasa de donación siendo una de las claves de este éxito la implicación de los trabajadores sanitarios. La actitud de estos ante la donación resulta crucial a la hora de influir sobre la población. El trasplante de órganos se ha establecido como un tratamiento efectivo que ha ido mejorando a lo largo de los años. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar los conocimientos y actitudes de los profesionales sanitarios ante la donación de órganos. METODOS: Estudio descriptivo transversal. Se realizó un cuestionario ad hoc y se distribuyó entre los profesionales sanitarios (personal médico, enfermería y auxiliares de enfermería) de un hospital de tercer nivel durante febrero 2015. Se estimó un total de 615 potenciales participantes en las diferentes áreas del hospital. Se recogieron un total de 342 cuestionarios cumplimentados en su totalidad (55%). El análisis estadístico se realizó con SPSS® versión 20.0 versión Windows. Se utilizó un nivel de significación P menor de 0.05 en todos los análisis. RESULTADOS: El promedio de edad de los encuestados fue de 43,34 (DT=10,37) años, siendo el 86,6% mujeres y el 60% enfermeras. El 35,5% mostraron buenos conocimientos sobre el proceso de donación, siendo mayor en hombres (51,1% Vs 33,1%;p menor de 0,05), personal médico (55% vs 34,3% vs 31,9%;p menor de 0,05) e inferior en aquellos servicios con una relación directa con el proceso de donación (36,8% vs 31,9%;p menor de 0,05). El 71% de los profesionales manifestaron estar dispuestos a donar sus órganos, con especial sensibilidad hacia la donación aquellos servicios en relación directa con el programa de donación (82,2% vs 65,9%; OR:1,24;p menor de 0,001). El 50% de los profesionales donarían los órganos de un familiar; siendo el colectivo médico el que presentaba un porcentaje mayor (70% vs 50,7% vs 40,4%; OR:3,8; p menor de 0,05). El 74,5% conocía algún documento legal español sobre donación y trasplantes. CONCLUSIONES: Los profesionales de la salud en su conjunto tienen un bajo nivel de conocimiento, pero una buena actitud hacia la donación.

Conocimientos y actitudes ante la donación de órganos de los profesionales sanitarios de un hospital de tercer nivel / Knowledge and attitudes toward organ donation among health professionals in a third level hospital

Fundamentos. El modelo español es el modelo adoptado por numerosos países para aumentar su tasa de donación siendo una de las claves de este éxito la implicación de los trabajadores sanitarios. La actitud de estos ante la donación resulta crucial a la hora de influir sobre la población. El trasplante de órganos se ha establecido como un tratamiento efectivo que ha ido mejorando a lo largo de los años. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar los conocimientos y actitudes de los profesionales sanitarios ante la donación de órganos. Método. Estudio descriptivo transversal. Se realizó un cuestionario ad hoc y se distribuyó entre los profesionales sanitarios (personal médico, enfermería y auxiliares de enfermería) de un hospital de tercer nivel durante febrero 2015. Se estimó un total de 615 potenciales participantes en las diferentes áreas del hospital. Se recogieron un total de 342 cuestionarios cumplimentados en su totalidad (55%). El análisis estadístico se realizó con SPSS® versión 20.0 versión Windows. Se utilizó un nivel de significación P < 0.05 en todos los análisis. Resultados. El promedio de edad de los encuestados fue de 43,34 (DT=10,37) años, siendo el 86,6% mujeres y el 60% enfermeras. El 35,5% mostraron buenos conocimientos sobre el proceso de donación, siendo mayor en hombres (51,1% Vs 33,1%;p< 0,05), personal médico (55% vs 34,3% vs 31,9%;p<0,05) e inferior en aquellos servicios con una relación directa con el proceso de donación (36,8% vs 31,9%;p<0,05). El 71% de los profesionales manifestaron estar dispuestos a donar sus órganos, con especial sensibilidad hacia la donación aquellos servicios en relación directa con el programa de donación (82,2% vs 65,9%; OR:1,24;p<0,001). El 50% de los profesionales donarían los órganos de un familiar; siendo el colectivo médico el que presentaba un porcentaje mayor (70% vs 50,7% vs 40,4%; OR:3,8; p<0,05). El 74,5% conocía algún documento legal español sobre donación y trasplantes. Conclusiones. Los profesionales de la salud en su conjunto tienen un bajo nivel de conocimiento, pero una buena actitud hacia la donación

Background. The Spanish model is the model adopted by many countries to increase their donation rate, being the implication of the healthcare professionals one of the keys to this success. The attitude of these before the donation is crucial for the hour of influence on the population. Organ transplantation has been established as an effective treatment that has been improving over the years. The objective was to determine the knowledge and attitudes of health professionals before the donation of organs. Method. Cross-sectional descriptive study. An ad hoc questionnaire was conducted and distributed among the health professionals (medical staff, nurses and nursing assistants) of a tertiary hospital during February 2015. A total of 615 potential participants were estimated in the different areas of the hospital. A total of 342 completed questionnaires were collected (55%). The statistical analysis with SPSS® Statistics for Windows. Version 20.0. A level of significance P <0.05 was used in all the analyses. Results. The average age of the respondents was 43.34 (SD = 10.37) years, being 86.6% women and 60% nurses. 35.5% showed good knowledge about the donation process, being higher in men (51.1% Vs 33.1%, p <0.05), medical personnel (55% vs 34.3% vs 31.9%). %; p <0.05) and lower in those services with a direct relationship with the donation process (36.8% vs 31.9%, p <0.05). 71% of the professionals expressed their willingness to donate their organs, with special sensitivity towards donation those services in direct relation with the donation program (82.2% vs 65.9%, OR: 1.24, p <0.001). 50% of the professionals would donate the organs of a family member; the medical group had the highest percentage (70% vs 50.7% vs 40.4%, OR: 3.8, p <0.05). 74.5% knew some Spanish legal document about donation and transplants. Conclusions. Health professionals as a whole have a low level of knowledge; but a good attitude towards donation

Liver transplantation from Maastricht category 2 non-heart-beating donors.

BACKGROUND: The demand for liver transplantation has increasingly exceeded the supply of cadaver donor organs. Non-heart-beating donors (NHBDs) may be an alternative to increase the cadaver donor pool. METHODS: The outcome of 20 liver transplants from Maastricht category 2 NHBDs is compared with 40 liver transplants from heart-beating donors (HBDs). After unsuccessful cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), cardiopulmonary support (CPS) with simultaneous application of chest and abdominal compression (n=6), and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB; n=14), which was hypothermic (n=7) or normothermic (n=7), were used to preserve the organs from NHBDs. Factors that may influence the outcome of livers from Maastricht category 2 NHBDs were also investigated. RESULTS: With a minimum follow-up of 2 years, actuarial patient and graft survivals with livers from Maastricht category 2 NHBDs were 80% and 55%, respectively. Transplantation of organs from these donors was associated with a significantly higher incidence of primary nonfunction, biliary complications, and more severe initial liver dysfunction compared with livers from HBDs. Graft survival was 83% in livers from NHBDs preserved with CPS and 42% in those maintained with CPB. No graft failed if the duration of warm ischemia did not exceed 130 min with CPR or CPS, and if the period of CPB did not surpass 150 min when this method was used after CPR, regardless if it was hypothermic or normothermic. CONCLUSION: Livers from Maastricht type 2 NHBDs may be used for transplantation if the period of warm ischemia during CPR or CPS does not exceed 130 min. Hypothermic or normothermic CPB after CPR preserves liver viability for an additional 150 min.