Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 68
Filter
1.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 2024 Jul 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39034734

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is common. While topical minoxidil remains the only FDA-approved therapeutic for AGA, its efficacy is limited in stimulating clinically significant hair regrowth over the longer term. Oral minoxidil, which is used off-label, is a promising alternative; however, its effectiveness and underlying mechanisms warrant further investigation. AIMS: To elucidate the site of action and infer the physiological mechanisms underlying therapeutic responses to oral minoxidil in patients with AGA. METHODS: Forty-one patients with AGA underwent 6 months of low-dose oral minoxidil treatment. Minoxidil sulfotransferase (SULT) activity was assayed in plucked scalp hair follicles. The primary outcome was hair growth after low-dose oral minoxidil treatment for a minimum of 6 months, and the secondary outcome was SULT activity in hair follicles. RESULTS: After 6 months of treatment, 26 (63.4%) patients experienced a clinical improvement in alopecia symptoms. The response rate was higher in men (19/26 [73.1%]) than in women (6/15 [40.0%]). Patients with low hair follicle SULT activity demonstrated a higher minoxidil response rate than those with high enzyme activity (85% vs. 43%, p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that low SULT activity within the hair follicles is associated with a favorable response to oral minoxidil therapy in patients with AGA. Further elucidation of the underlying mechanisms could significantly improve personalized therapeutic approaches through improved patient selection and the rational design of adjuvant treatments.

2.
Int J Mol Sci ; 24(14)2023 Jul 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37511302

ABSTRACT

In the first wave of COVID-19, up to 20% of patients had skin lesions with variable characteristics. There is no clear evidence of the involvement of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in all cases; some of these lesions may be secondary to drug hypersensitivity. To analyze the possible cause of the skin lesions, we performed a complete allergology study on 11 patients. One year after recovery from COVID-19, we performed a lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) and Th1/Th2 cytokine secretion assays for PBMCs. We included five nonallergic patients treated with the same drugs without lesions. Except for one patient who had an immediate reaction to azithromycin, all patients had a positive LTT result for at least one of the drugs tested (azithromycin, clavulanic acid, hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir, and ritonavir). None of the nonallergic patients had a positive LTT result. We found mixed Th1/Th2 cytokine secretion (IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, and IFN-γ) in patients with skin lesions corresponding to mixed drug hypersensitivity type IVa and IVb. In all cases, we identified a candidate drug as the culprit for skin lesions during SARS-CoV-2 infection, although only three patients had a positive drug challenge. Therefore, it would be reasonable to recommend avoiding the drug in question in all cases.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Drug Hypersensitivity , Humans , Azithromycin/adverse effects , Lymphocyte Activation , SARS-CoV-2 , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Cytokines , COVID-19 Testing
3.
Clin Exp Dermatol ; 48(5): 495-503, 2023 Apr 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36637147

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The intestinal microbiota is altered in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) when compared with those of the healthy population. Some interventions with specific probiotic preparations already demonstrate a change in composition of this microbiota accompanied by improvement in the disease. OBJECTIVES: This research work was designed to evaluate clinical efficacy of the probiotic preparation, and to measure the effect of the intervention on the total dose of corticosteroids administered to subjects. METHODS: This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial including 70 participants with AD aged 4-17 years was designed to evaluate the clinical effect, compared with placebo, of a probiotic mixture of Bifidobacterium lactis, Bifidobacterium longum and Lactobacillus casei at a total daily consumption of 1 × 109 colony-forming units per capsule, over 12 weeks. After randomization and exclusion, 35 patients were allocated to probiotic and 35 to placebo. Clinical variables analysed were SCORAD (SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis) and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) indices; effect on the amount of topical corticosteroids used; and assessment of safety. RESULTS: Mean SCORAD index at 12 weeks showed a statistically significant difference of -5.43 (95% confidence interval -10.65 to -0.21) between probiotic (SCORAD 13.52) and placebo groups (SCORAD 18.96); P = 0.04. Comparison between groups showed a statistically significant difference in the number of patients with IGA score improvement over the 12-week intervention: 29 of 32 (90.5%) in the probiotic group vs. 17 of 30 (56.7%) in the placebo group (P < 0.002). A comparison between groups of the proportions of days using corticosteroids and the total dose (g) of corticosteroids between baseline and end of study showed no significant difference, but between weeks 6 and 12 there was a statistically significant reduction in the probiotic group when compared with the placebo group in both variables. Numbers of adverse events were similar in both groups of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The probiotic mix used in this clinical trial demonstrated efficacy on the change in activity index of AD compared with placebo. Furthermore, the total number of days and total amount of topical corticosteroids required by participants in the probiotic group showed a significant reduction compared with placebo between 6 and 12 weeks.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic , Dermatologic Agents , Probiotics , Humans , Child , Adolescent , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Dermatitis, Atopic/diagnosis , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Severity of Illness Index , Immunoglobulin A
6.
Biomedicines ; 10(12)2022 Dec 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36551974

ABSTRACT

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) treatment for multiple actinic keratosis (AK) has been found effective when lower doses of red light were used with methyl aminolaevulinic acid (MAL). The aim of this study was to compare the results of lower doses of red light conventional PDT (h-PDT, 16 J/cm2) with MAL and aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) in a long-term follow-up. Patients with more than five symmetrical AK on the scalp who were candidates for PDT were selected and divided randomly between MAL and ALA treatment and patients were followed at 3 and 12 months. The responses were assessed by counting the total AK and the AK per patient. Pain and adverse events were also compiled. A total of 46 patients were treated, 24 with MAL, and 22 with ALA. The two groups were comparable at baseline (p > 0.005). No significant differences were found in the results of both treatments at 12 months, despite ALA exhibiting slightly better results at 3 months. No differences in pain and adverse events were assessed. Both ALA and MAL were effective when lower doses of red light were used in c-PDT. Long term efficacy was also documented. Further studies are necessary to determine the inferior point of red-light illumination without losing efficacy.

12.
Aust J Gen Pract ; 502021 05 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33987629

ABSTRACT

A woman presented to the emergency department during the COVID-19 pandemic, reporting a slightly pruritic rash that had developed five days after the onset of fever, cough and malaise.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Exanthema , Exanthema/etiology , Female , Fever/etiology , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL