Relative Bioavailability of Cenobamate Administered as a Crushed Tablet, Either Orally or via Nasogastric Tube, versus an Intact Whole Tablet.

Cenobamate is approved for the treatment of focal seizures in adults and is currently available as an oral tablet. Alternative methods of drug administration are needed for patients who are unable to swallow whole intact tablets. This phase 1, open-label, randomized, single-dose, three-way crossover (3-period, 3-treatment, 6-sequence) study (NCT05572255), conducted in healthy volunteers, assessed the relative bioavailability of a crushed 200-mg cenobamate tablet administered orally or via nasogastric (NG) tube compared with an intact 200-mg tablet. Each treatment was separated by a 13-day washout period. Plasma samples for cenobamate concentration analysis were collected pre-dose and at multiple time points up to 264 h post-dose. Standard bioequivalence study criteria were applied to the relative bioavailability assessments. All 90% confidence intervals of test-to-reference geometric mean ratios for cenobamate pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, AUClast, and AUCinf) were within 85-110% (predefined limit, 80-125%), suggesting no difference in cenobamate exposures following administration of an intact tablet orally or a crushed tablet orally or via NG tube. All treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were classified as mild and resolved. There were no deaths or other serious AEs (SAEs), and no TEAEs led to discontinuation. Our results indicate that the administration of cenobamate as a crushed tablet taken orally or via an NG tube can provide additional flexibility when patients cannot swallow intact tablets. Based on the results of this study, cenobamate is now approved by FDA to be taken whole or the tablets can be crushed. The crushed tablet can be mixed with water and either administered by mouth as an oral suspension or administered via a nasogastric tube.

Reductions in concomitant antiseizure medication drug load during adjunctive cenobamate therapy: Post-hoc analysis of a subset of patients from a phase 3, multicenter, open-label study.

OBJECTIVE: Many patients with epilepsy require polytherapy, which increases their antiseizure medication (ASM) drug load, a measure that considers the doses of all ASMs a patient is taking. Changes in concomitant ASM drug load after adding cenobamate were evaluated post-hoc in a subset of the open-label, phase 3 study. METHODS: Patients 18-70 years old with uncontrolled focal seizures taking 1-3 ASMs were enrolled. Total concomitant ASM drug load (not including cenobamate) was calculated by dividing the patient's prescribed dose for each ASM by its defined daily dose, per the World Health Organization, then summing the ratios. Changes in concomitant ASM drug load were measured from baseline in 3-month intervals up to 24 months by both total and class-specific ASM drug load. Subgroups of interest included: older adults (65-70 years), prior epilepsy-related surgery vs none, and baseline seizure frequency < 3 vs ≥ 3 seizures/28 days. RESULTS: Data from 240 patients were available (mean age 41.8 years, mean baseline drug load 3.57). Following cenobamate initiation, the mean concomitant ASM drug load was reduced by 29.4 % at Month 12 % and 31.8 % at Month 24. Reductions occurred in all assessed ASM drug classes, with the largest reduction in benzodiazepines (55.2 % at Month 24). Each assessed subgroup exceeded a 30 % reduction in concomitant ASM drug load at Month 24. Over 24 months, maintenance of ≥ 50 % response occurred in 89.3 %, 86.4 %, and 90.6 % of patients with low (-0.25 to <0), moderate (-0.59 to -0.25), or high (-3.3 to -0.59) numerical reductions in concomitant ASM drug load from baseline, respectively, compared with 86.0 % in patients with no change in drug load; maintenance of 100 % response occurred in 80.7 %, 84.3 %, and 70.0 % of patients with low, moderate, or high numerical reductions in concomitant ASM drug load, compared with 82.0 % in patients with no change. CONCLUSIONS: Adding cenobamate led to reduced mean concomitant ASM drug loads during 1 and 2 years of treatment. Reductions occurred regardless of ASM drug class, patient age, or epilepsy disease characteristics and did not impact maintenance of response rates.

Cognitive and psychiatric adverse events during adjunctive cenobamate treatment in phase 2 and phase 3 clinical studies.

OBJECTIVE: Cognitive and psychiatric adverse events in patients with epilepsy are important determinants of therapeutic outcomes and patient quality of life. We assessed the relationship between adjunctive cenobamate treatment and selected cognitive and psychiatric treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in adults with uncontrolled focal epilepsy. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of pooled populations of patients with focal epilepsy from two phase 2, randomized, double-blind clinical trials; two open-label extensions (OLEs) of those trials; and a long-term, open-label, phase 3 safety study. Occurrence of cognitive and psychiatric TEAEs in patients treated with adjunctive cenobamate or placebo during double-blind treatment were evaluated. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates of the cognitive and psychiatric TEAEs, defined as the number of TEAEs per patient-year of treatment, during up to 7 years of long-term adjunctive cenobamate treatment, were determined in the pooled OLE and phase 3 patient populations. RESULTS: The pooled randomized trials resulted in a population of 442 patients treated with cenobamate (100 mg/day: n = 108; 200 mg/day: n = 223; 400 mg/day: n = 111) and 216 placebo-treated patients. The combined open-label studies resulted in pooled populations of cenobamate-treated patients ranging from n = 1690 during Year 1 to n = 103 during Year 7. Among cenobamate-treated (all doses) and placebo-treated patients during double-blind treatment, cognitive TEAEs were reported by ≤ 1.9 % (range, 0 %-1.9 %) and ≤ 0.5 % (range, 0 %-0.5 %), respectively, and psychiatric TEAEs by ≤ 3.6 % (range, 0 %-3.6 %) and ≤ 3.2 % (range, 0 %-3.2 %), respectively. During up to 7 years of open-label adjunctive cenobamate treatment, exposure-adjusted incidence rates of cognitive and psychiatric TEAEs were < 0.018 and < 0.038 events per patient-year, respectively. Discontinuation of adjunctive cenobamate due to cognitive or psychiatric TEAEs assessed in this study during double-blind or open-label treatment occurred in ≤ 0.3 % and ≤ 1.7 % of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive and psychiatric TEAEs were reported by similar numbers of cenobamate- and placebo-treated patients during double-blind adjunctive cenobamate treatment (< 4 % of patients), and exposure-adjusted incidence rates of these TEAEs remained low during open-label cenobamate treatment for up to 7 years. Treatment discontinuations due to these TEAEs were rare. The results of this post-hoc analysis indicate that adjunctive cenobamate treatment exhibits a low incidence of cognitive or psychiatric TEAEs in patients with uncontrolled focal seizures.

Real-world analysis of retention on cenobamate in patients with epilepsy in the United States.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective, observational study used US claims data to assess retention rates on cenobamate compared with four branded antiseizure medications (ASMs) in patients with epilepsy. METHODS: Adults (≥18 years) with prevalent epilepsy (ICD-10 code G40.xx) and ≥ 1 prescription for cenobamate or any of the newer branded ASMs (brivaracetam, eslicarbazepine, lacosamide, or perampanel) between May 1, 2020 and December 31, 2021 were identified from the HealthVerity Marketplace database. At least 360 days of continuous enrollment was required before and after the index date (Day 1 of initiating cenobamate or branded ASM). Patients were followed until cessation of cenobamate or branded ASM or the end of data collection using Kaplan-Meier methods. Retention was compared between cenobamate and the branded ASMs (both as a group and individually) using Chi-square tests. RESULTS: In total, 4109 patients were included (195 cenobamate; 3914 branded ASMs). A higher proportion of patients in the cenobamate group compared with the branded ASMs group had concurrent focal and generalized epilepsy (65.6% vs 40.0%) and were on ≥ 3 concomitant ASMs (48.2% vs 12.8%) at the index date. Median time to discontinuation (i.e., the time that half the patients discontinued) was not quite reached after 12 months in the cenobamate group (50.3% of patients remained on cenobamate) and was 7.7 months in the branded ASMs group. Retention was significantly higher with cenobamate vs the branded ASMs group (p = 0.04545) and vs the individual ASMs lacosamide (p = 0.03044) and perampanel (p = 0.01558). Twelve-month retention rates (95% confidence intervals) were 50.3% (43.1%-57.0%) for cenobamate, 40.5% (38.9%-42.0%) for branded ASMs overall, 42.3% (38.6%-46.0%) for brivaracetam, 44.1% (39.2%-49.0%) for eslicarbazepine, 39.9% (38.0%-41.8%) for lacosamide, and 36.8% (31.9%-41.8%) for perampanel. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world analysis, retention was significantly higher with cenobamate vs a pooled group of four branded ASMs despite a greater frequency of patients in the cenobamate group having characteristics of more difficult-to-treat epilepsy.

Sustainability of seizure reduction and seizure control with adjunctive cenobamate: Post hoc analysis of a phase 3, open-label study.

OBJECTIVE: In this post hoc analysis of a subset of patients from a long-term, open-label phase 3 study, we assessed ≥50%, ≥75%, ≥90%, and 100% seizure reduction and sustainability of these responses with cenobamate using a time-to-event analytical approach. METHODS: Of 240 patients with uncontrolled focal seizures who had adequate seizure data available, 214 completed the 12-week titration phase and received ≥1 dose of cenobamate in the maintenance phase (max dose 400 mg/day) and were included in this post hoc analysis. Among patients who met an initial given seizure-reduction level (≥50%, ≥75%, ≥90%, or 100%), sustainability of that response was measured using a time-to-event methodology. An event was defined as the occurrence of a study visit at which the seizure frequency during the interval since the prior study visit exceeded the initially attained reduction level. Study visits during the maintenance phase occurred at 3-month intervals. RESULTS: Of the 214 patients analyzed, 188 (88%), 177 (83%), 160 (75%), and 145 (68%) met ≥50%, ≥75%, ≥90%, and 100% seizure-reduction responses, respectively, for at least one study visit interval during the maintenance phase. The median (95% confidence interval [CI]) time to first visit without a ≥50% seizure reduction was not reached by 30 months of follow-up (53% of patients maintained their initial ≥50% seizure reduction). Median (95% CI) time to first visit without sustaining the initial ≥75%, ≥90%, or 100% seizure reduction was 13.0 (7.5-21.9) months, 7.5 (5.4-11.6) months, and 7.0 (5.3-10.4) months, respectively. Among the 145 patients who had 100% seizure reduction during at least one study visit, 22% remained seizure-free for at least 30 months and 63% had ≤3 study visits with seizures. SIGNIFICANCE: Adjunctive treatment with cenobamate led to sustained seizure reductions during the maintenance phase of the phase 3 safety study.

Pharmacokinetics of cenobamate as monotherapy compared with adjunctive therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Cenobamate was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) based on studies of adjunctive therapy in patients with focal epilepsy. To support the use of cenobamate monotherapy, this pharmacokinetic (PK)-based simulation analysis evaluated the predicted PK exposure of cenobamate when used as monotherapy versus adjunctive therapy. METHODS: A population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model of cenobamate was developed using pooled human data from eight phase 1 studies in healthy subjects or special populations, and three phase 2 and 3 studies in patients with focal seizures (N = 960). Concomitant antiseizure medications (ASMs) with a statistically significant effect on the apparent systemic clearance (CL/F) of cenobamate in the PopPK model were used to compare simulated patient plasma exposures (area under the plasma concentration vs time curve [AUC]) following monotherapy versus adjunctive therapy. Treatment equivalence between monotherapy and adjunctive therapy was concluded if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric mean AUC ratio was within 0.8-1.25. RESULTS: In the PopPK model, statistically significant effects on cenobamate CL/F were shown for clobazam (decreased cenobamate CL/F by 19%) and carbamazepine (increased cenobamate CL/F by 15%); these differences were not considered clinically meaningful. Other ASMs (lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, and valproate) when coadministered with cenobamate did not have significant effects on the disposition (ie, PK or efficacy) of cenobamate. The geometric mean ratio (90% CIs) of cenobamate AUC for adjunctive therapy/monotherapy was 0.87 (0.816-0.925) for adjunctive carbamazepine and 1.24 (1.147-1.339) for adjunctive clobazam. The 90% CI was within the no-effect limits (90% CIs 0.8-1.25) for adjunctive carbamazepine and partially exceeding no-effect limits for adjunctive clobazam. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results from this PopPK analysis, cenobamate monotherapy can be expected to result in comparable exposures to those that have been demonstrated to be safe and effective when used as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of focal seizures, supporting the use of cenobamate as monotherapy in these patients.

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy during cenobamate clinical development.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed mortality, sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), and standardized mortality ratio (SMR) among adults treated with cenobamate during the cenobamate clinical development program. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed deaths among all adults with uncontrolled focal (focal to bilateral tonic-clonic [FBTC], focal impaired awareness, focal aware) or primary generalized tonic-clonic (PGTC) seizures who received ≥1 dose of adjunctive cenobamate in completed and ongoing phase 2 and 3 clinical studies. In patients with focal seizures from completed studies, median baseline seizure frequencies ranged from 2.8 to 11 seizures per 28 days and median epilepsy duration ranged from 20 to 24 years. Total person-years included all days that a patient received cenobamate during completed studies or up to June 1, 2022, for ongoing studies. All deaths were evaluated by two epileptologists. All-cause mortality and SUDEP rates were expressed per 1000 person-years. RESULTS: A total of 2132 patients (n = 2018 focal epilepsy; n = 114 idiopathic generalized epilepsy) were exposed to cenobamate for 5693 person-years. Approximately 60% of patients with focal seizures and all patients in the PGTC study had tonic-clonic seizures. A total of 23 deaths occurred (all in patients with focal epilepsy), for an all-cause mortality rate of 4.0 per 1000 person-years. Five cases of definite or probable SUDEP were identified, for a rate of .88 per 1000 person-years. Of the 23 overall deaths, 22 patients (96%) had FBTC seizures, and all 5 of the SUDEP patients had a history of FBTC seizures. The duration of exposure to cenobamate for patients with SUDEP ranged from 130 to 620 days. The SMR among cenobamate-treated patients in completed studies (5515 person-years of follow-up) was 1.32 (95% confidence interval [CI] .84-2.0), which was not significantly different from the general population. SIGNIFICANCE: These data suggest that effective long-term medical treatment with cenobamate may reduce excess mortality associated with epilepsy.

Post hoc analysis of a phase 3 study for treatment of uncontrolled focal seizures: Adjunctive cenobamate dose and seizure reduction by baseline seizure frequency.

This post hoc analysis (n = 240) of a subset of study sites (10 eligible US sites) from an open-label phase 3 study assessed whether baseline seizure frequency (<3 seizures/28 days vs ≥3 seizures/28 days) impacted mean cenobamate dose required to achieve 100% seizure reduction, duration of this response, and responder rates. Patients with uncontrolled focal seizures taking stable doses of 1-3 antiseizure medications were administered increasing doses of cenobamate (12.5, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200 mg/day) over 12 weeks at 2-week intervals. Further increases to 400 mg/day by 50-mg/day biweekly increments were allowed during the maintenance phase. Eligible patients were required to have consistent raw seizure data and good-quality data for ≥ 85% of the time spent in the study. Data were assessed until last visit and at data cut-off, on or after September 1, 2019. Among all 240 patients, 127 (52.9%) had < 3 seizures/28 days, and 113 (47.1%) had ≥ 3 seizures/28 days at baseline. Among patients continuing cenobamate at data cut-off (n = 177), 51% (90/177) and 49% (87/177) had < 3 and ≥ 3 seizures/28 days at baseline, respectively. Retention rate at data cut-off was 73.8% (177/240 patients), and these patients had a median time on study of 32.9 months (range: 22.1-43.0 months). 33.9% of patients continuing cenobamate (60/177) achieved 100% seizure reduction for ≥ 12 months at data cut-off, with 44.4% and 23.0% in patients with < 3 and ≥ 3 seizures/28 days at baseline, respectively. Regardless of baseline seizure frequency, responder rates at ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, and ≥ 90% during the maintenance phase were similar (∼81%, ∼62%, and ∼43%, respectively). Mean±SD cenobamate dose for patients continuing cenobamate was 254.0 ± 82.1 mg/day, with means of 237.9 ± 78.1 mg/day and 270.7 ± 83.1 mg/day in patients with < 3 and ≥ 3 seizures/28 days at baseline, respectively. Among patients who had 100% seizure reduction for ≥ 12 months at data cut-off (n = 60), the mean cenobamate dose was 226.4 ± 75.4 mg/day and 255.1 ± 93.7 mg/day in patients with < 3 and ≥ 3 seizures/28 days at baseline, respectively. The current data suggest that cenobamate was effective regardless of baseline seizure frequency, with both groups having a high number of patients reaching 100% seizure reduction. A higher percentage of patients with less vs more frequent seizures at baseline reached zero seizures, suggesting these patients may reach 100% seizure reduction at lower cenobamate doses than those with more frequent seizures. Cenobamate dose varied slightly (∼30 mg/day) across patients who were stratified by baseline seizure frequency, but future analyses are necessary to determine whether patients with more frequent seizures require higher doses of cenobamate to achieve zero seizures.

Incidence of mental health conditions by seizure control among adults with epilepsy in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Mental health conditions (MHCs) are frequent comorbidities among people with epilepsy; however, the influence of seizure control on the incidence of MHCs is not well reported. This retrospective observational cohort study based on claims data evaluated the effects of indicators of poor seizure control on the incidence of MHCs among MHC-naïve people with epilepsy. We hypothesized that poor seizure control is associated with new-onset MHC diagnoses and/or new prescription drugs for MHCs. METHODS: This study utilized a sample of patients from HealthVerity Marketplace, which includes more than 150 US commercial, Medicare, and Medicaid payers, to identify a cohort of adults (age ≥18 years) with prevalent epilepsy. Follow-up started on day 1 (January 1) after a 1-year eligibility assessment period occurring in calendar year 2017 or 2018. Patients were followed up until the occurrence of an incident MHC event (primary outcome), defined as a mental health diagnosis or psychotropic drug prescription. Time from follow-up to incident MHC diagnosis or to a drug prescription specific to depression or anxiety disorder was analyzed as a secondary outcome. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regressions were estimated with time-varying covariates, measured in 6-month intervals during follow-up. Time-varying covariates were based on the occurrence of 4 variables used as indicators of poor seizure control in the prior period: epilepsy-related emergent care admissions, epilepsy-related inpatient admissions, epilepsy electroencephalography referrals, and exposure to one or more new antiseizure medications (ASMs). RESULTS: From a random sample of 40,000 people with epilepsy, 2563 (mean age 46.1 years; 50.6% male) were included in the analysis. Incident MHC events were observed in 27.7% (incidence rate 24.4 events per 100 person-years over 2,915.7 total person-years of follow-up). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) time to event was 232.7 (186.3) days. Among the 4 variables, epilepsy-related emergent care admissions were associated with an increased risk of incident MHC events in the following 6-month period (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.676, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.386, 2.026, p < 0.001) as were prescriptions for new ASMs in the previous period (HR = 1.702, 95% CI: 1.359, 2.132, p < 0.001). Previous epilepsy-related emergent care admissions (HR = 1.650, 95% CI: 1.347, 2.021, p < 0.001) and new ASMs (HR = 1.632, 95% CI: 1.280, 2.081, p < 0.001) also predicted an increased risk of incident depression or anxiety in the following 6-month period. CONCLUSIONS: Previous indicators of poor seizure control, including epilepsy-related emergent care admissions and new ASMs, predicted increased risk of new MHC events, including depression and anxiety, during the following 6-month interval in MHC-naïve patients with prevalent epilepsy. These data suggest that poor seizure control can increase the subsequent risk of new mental health diagnoses and treatment among people with epilepsy.

Efficacy of cenobamate by focal seizure subtypes: Post-hoc analysis of a phase 3, multicenter, open-label study.

PURPOSE: To report post-hoc efficacy data by focal seizure subtypes from 10 US study sites from a large, global, open-label, phase 3 study of adjunctive cenobamate. METHODS: Patients 18-70 years old with uncontrolled focal seizures taking stable doses of 1-3 antiseizure medications were administered increasing daily doses of cenobamate (12.5, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200 mg/day) at 2-week intervals (target dose 200 mg/day). Further increases to 400 mg/day by 50-mg/day increments every other week were allowed. RESULTS: 240 patients were evaluated; 27 (11.3%), 224 (93.3%), and 56 (23.3%) patients had focal aware motor (FAM), focal impaired awareness (FIA), and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic (FBTC) seizures, respectively (patients may have had ≥ 1 seizure subtype). Median baseline seizure frequencies/28 days were 10.5, 2.3, and 0.9 for FAM, FIA, and FBTC seizure subtypes. Reductions in median percent seizure frequency/28 days from baseline were observed during Months 1-3 (55.0%, 52.4%, and 94.1% for FAM, FIA, and FBTC). Greater reductions were observed during Months 4-5 (88.2%, 81.0%, and 100%) and during Months 25-27 (98.1%, 100%, and 100%). The percentage of patients achieving 100% seizure reduction in the FAM, FIA, and FBTC seizure subtypes was 22.2% (6/27), 21.5% (48/223), and 50% (28/56) during Months 1-3 and increased to 47.8% (11/23), 54.3% (88/162), and 90.5% (38/42) during Months 25-27, respectively. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (≥ 20%) were fatigue, dizziness, and somnolence. No cases of DRESS were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Seizure reductions occurred in all focal seizure subtypes with cenobamate over time through Months 25-27, with the earliest onset in the FBTC group. Results from this subset analysis of the phase 3 study support the long-term efficacy of cenobamate across focal seizure types.

Efficacy of cenobamate for uncontrolled focal seizures: Post hoc analysis of a Phase 3, multicenter, open-label study.

OBJECTIVE: To report long-term post hoc efficacy and safety data from 10 US study sites from an open-label Phase 3 study of adjunctive cenobamate (NCT02535091). METHODS: Patients with uncontrolled focal seizures taking stable doses of 1-3 antiseizure medications (ASMs) were administered increasing daily doses of cenobamate (12.5, 25, 50, 100, 150, 200 mg/day) over 12 weeks at 2-week intervals (target dose = 200 mg/day). Further increases to 400 mg/day by 50-mg/day increments biweekly were allowed during the maintenance phase. Dose adjustments of cenobamate and concomitant ASMs were allowed. Data were assessed until the last clinic visit on or after September 1, 2019. RESULTS: Of 255 patients, 240 with focal aware motor, focal impaired awareness, or focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizure data while on treatment were evaluated (median [maximum] exposure = 30.2 [43.0] months across the entire study). Median baseline seizure frequency/28 days was 2.8 (mean = 18.1). Of the 240 patients, 177 (73.8%) were continuing cenobamate treatment at data cutoff. The ≥50% responder rate for the total treatment duration was 71.7% (172/240). During titration, the ≥50% responder rates were 48.1% during Weeks 1-4 (12.5-25 mg/day cenobamate) and 61.7% during Weeks 5-8 (50-100 mg/day cenobamate). Among all patients who received a dose of cenobamate in the maintenance phase (n = 214), 13.1% (28/214) and 40.2% (86/214) achieved 100% and ≥90% seizure reduction during their entire maintenance treatment duration (median = 29.5 months). Among all patients, 87 (36.3%) had any consecutive ≥12-month duration of 100% seizure reduction. Common treatment-emergent adverse events among all 240 patients included fatigue (34.6%), dizziness (32.1%), and somnolence (29.6%). SIGNIFICANCE: This post hoc analysis of a subset of patients from the long-term open-label study showed high rates of sustained 100% and ≥90% seizure reduction, with many achieving response early during titration. These findings suggest durable seizure frequency reduction with cenobamate in adults with uncontrolled focal seizures.

Efficacy of adjunctive cenobamate based on number of concomitant antiseizure medications, seizure frequency, and epilepsy duration at baseline: A post-hoc analysis of a randomized clinical study.

BACKGROUND: In an 18-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (YKP3089C017; NCT01866111), cenobamate was effective for the treatment of focal-onset seizures. This post-hoc analysis examined the effects of baseline clinical features on the efficacy of adjunctive cenobamate during the study. METHODS: Adults with uncontrolled focal seizures despite treatment with 1-3 antiepileptic drugs/antiseizure medications (AEDs/ASMs) were randomized 1:1:1:1 to placebo or cenobamate 100, 200, or 400 mg once daily. Median percent seizure frequency reduction/28 days and ≥50% responder rates were assessed during the 12-week maintenance phase (n = 397) by number of baseline (concomitant) ASMs (1, 2, >2), median baseline seizure frequency/28 days (≤9.5 vs >9.5), and median baseline duration of epilepsy (≤23 vs >23 years). RESULTS: For patients taking 1 concomitant ASM, median percent seizure frequency reductions ranged from 44.7% to 86.0% for cenobamate-treated patients vs 24.1% for placebo; for 2 concomitant ASMs, reductions were 41.4-57.9% with cenobamate vs 33.3% for placebo; and for >2 concomitant ASMs, reductions were 41.5-67.4% with cenobamate vs 26.4% for placebo. The highest reductions occurred in the 200- and 400-mg/day cenobamate groups. For patients with baseline seizure frequency ≤9.5, the greatest reduction in median percent seizure frequency occurred in the 200-mg/day cenobamate group (66.5%); for patients with baseline seizure frequency >9.5 the greatest reduction occurred in the 400-mg/day cenobamate group (70.7%). Similar improvements were observed when assessed by median duration of epilepsy at baseline. For cenobamate-treated patients taking 1, 2, or >2 ASMs respectively, ≥50% responder rates of up to 66.7% (400 mg), 62.2% (200 mg), and 66.0% (400 mg) were observed, vs 20.0%, 29.3%, and 23.9% for placebo, respectively; 100% seizure reductions were observed in up to 25.0% (400 mg/day), 22.2% (400 mg/day), and 19.1% (400 mg/day) of cenobamate-treated patients, vs 0%, 0%, and 2.2% for placebo, respectively. Incidence of common (≥10%) central nervous system adverse events (dizziness, somnolence, fatigue, and diplopia) were highest in the >2 ASM group, but the rates were within the range reported in the primary study. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically relevant reductions in seizure frequency including 100% seizure reductions occurred with adjunctive cenobamate regardless of number of concomitant ASMs, baseline seizure frequency, or disease duration. The greatest reductions occurred in the 200- and 400-mg/day groups.

Incremental burden of mental health conditions in adult patients with focal seizures.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical research has consistently established mental health conditions (MHCs) as frequent comorbidities of epilepsy. However, the extent of economic burden of comorbid MHC in patients with focal seizures has not been systematically investigated. This retrospective cohort analysis of health plan claims compared healthcare use and costs among adult patients with focal seizures with and without comorbid MHC. METHODS: We utilized the Inovalon Medical Outcomes Research for Effectiveness and Economics (MORE2) Registry, longitudinal data from over 150 commercial, Medicare Advantage, and managed Medicaid health plans for the analysis, and identified a cohort of patients with focal (partial-onset) seizure with relevant ICD9/10 diagnosis codes with and without MHC. Mental health conditions were defined as diagnoses for anxiety, bipolar condition/mania, attention-deficit conduct condition, major depression, schizophrenia, and other psychotic conditions, and patients without MHC were propensity score-matched to patients with preexisting MHC on baseline patient characteristics. The assessment examined a series of outcomes, including 1) direct healthcare resource utilization and 2) total provider reimbursement. RESULTS: Patients with preexisting MHC were more likely to receive adjunctive epilepsy therapy as well as broad-spectrum antiepileptic drugs/antiseizure medications (ASMs). Additionally, patients with focal seizures and MHC were significantly more likely to utilize high-cost healthcare services. The presence of MHC was associated with approximately 50% greater utilization of emergency department (ED), physician, and inpatient services. Consequently, healthcare expenditures were significantly higher among patients with MHC ($17,596 vs. $10,857; 62% higher, p < 0.001), with the trend consistent across all care settings. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis illustrates the health service utilization and cost implications of MHC among patients with focal seizures. The data suggest that patients with MHC have a greater overall clinical burden, which may be associated with higher healthcare resource use and expenditures. Because of the potential burden and costs associated with MHC, neurologists should consider screening patients with focal seizures for mental health disorders to identify and initiate treatment for comorbid mental health disorders.

An Ex Vivo Evaluation of Cenobamate Administered via Enteral Tubes.

BACKGROUND: Cenobamate is a new, Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved oral antiepileptic drug for treatment of focal seizures in adults. This study examined recovery of cenobamate from suspensions administered through ex vivo enteral feeding tubes. METHODS: Suspensions containing 100 and 200 mg of cenobamate were prepared (five duplicates for each dose), passed through five vertically standing tubes, and collected into flasks. The flasks containing the suspensions were rinsed with deionized water, and this content was also injected into the tubes and collected in the flasks. Acetonitrile, isopropyl alcohol, and trifluoroacetic acid were added to the flasks, followed by deionized water to a concentration of 500 (100-mg cenobamate) and 400 (200-mg cenobamate) µg/mL. A 3-mL aliquot from each suspension was placed into a 10-mL flask, diluted to volume, and mixed, resulting in final concentrations of 150 and 120 µg/mL, respectively. All suspensions were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (LC). The % LC recovery of cenobamate was calculated for each suspension, and mean % LC for duplicates. RESULTS: The % LC recovery of cenobamate from the 100-mg suspensions ranged from 96.2 to 99.1%, with mean % LC recovery between 96.3 and 98.3%. The % LC recovery of cenobamate from the 200-mg suspensions ranged from 97.1 to 102.6%, with mean % LC recovery between 98.5 and 101.7%. CONCLUSION: The mean % LC recovery of cenobamate was within the predetermined acceptable range of 90.0-110.0%, suggesting no adhesion or adsorption of cenobamate to enteral feeding tubes. Delivery of cenobamate suspension via enteral feeding tubes may be a viable route of administration for patients who cannot swallow tablets.

Reimplantation of an extruded osteoarticular segment of the distal tibia in a 14-year-old girl. Case report and review of the literature.

This case report describes the reimplantation of a 15-cm osteoarticular segment of the distal tibia in a 14-year-old girl who was hit by a truck. The bone fragment was debrided and reimplanted on the day of injury. A free flap was performed within 1 week. Bony union was achieved without complication. At 5-year follow-up, the patient is able to ambulate for several hours at a time without an assistive device, although arthritis of the ankle joint is present. She scores 43.8 on the physical component of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey and 49.0 on the mental component. The patient states that she is very pleased with her outcome. This seems to be the first description of an osteoarticular segment reimplantation of a long bone in the orthopaedic literature.

Intramuscular lipoma of the supraspinatus causing impingement syndrome.

Impingement syndrome is a common ailment of the shoulder, particularly in individuals who perform repetitive overhead activities, such as athletes and laborers. Patients typically report progressive shoulder pain often exacerbated by flexion and abduction and may demonstrate a classic painful arc of motion. This article describes a case of a 45-year-old man with signs and symptoms consistent with impingement syndrome. Workup revealed a well-circumscribed, homogeneous lesion within the supraspinatus muscle on magnetic resonance imaging. The patient underwent uncomplicated marginal excision of the mass with a final diagnosis of benign lipoma. Lipomas represent one of the most common soft tissue tumors, although there are no reports of an intramuscular supraspinatous lipoma causing impingement syndrome. In our case, there were no findings on history, physical examination, or radiographs that would place neoplasm high on a differential. Magnetic resonance imaging provided the crucial information necessary to narrow the differential diagnosis and formulate a preoperative plan. Marginal resection of the mass was curative in this patient, as he remained pain free and regained excellent motion postoperatively.