Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 101
Filter
1.
Schizophr Res ; 168(1-2): 168-73, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26189074

ABSTRACT

Schizophrenia is a complex disorder, and the knowledge about it can have a positive impact. The purpose of this study was to make the translation and cultural adaptation of the Knowledge About Schizophrenia Test (KAST) into Portuguese and determine the influence of clinical and socio-demographic factors on knowledge. The test was applied to 189 caregivers of patients enrolled in Schizophrenia Program of the Federal University of São Paulo, 30 caregivers of clinical patients of the General Outpatient Clinic of the same University, and 30 health professionals. The face and content validity of the test was established. The mean value (SD) obtained with the application of the final version to caregivers of schizophrenic patients was 12.96 (2.45) - maximum 17. Level of knowledge increased considering the following order: caregivers of clinical patients, caregivers of patients with schizophrenia and mental health professionals. The intraclass correlation coefficient (0.592) obtained in the test-retest was statistically significant. An influence of social class, race, gender and education of the caregiver on the test was observed, and the last two factors were more relevant. The KAST translated and adapted into Portuguese is a valid instrument and can be used as an evaluation tool on psychoeducational interventions.


Subject(s)
Caregivers/psychology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Personnel/psychology , Psychological Tests , Schizophrenia , Translating , Adult , Brazil , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Schizophrenia/therapy , Socioeconomic Factors
2.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 28(4): 490-7, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20810034

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The present study describes resource utilisation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) treated at a tertiary public health facility over a one-year period. It also investigates the direct and indirect costs for society associated with the treatment of AS. METHODS: Ninety AS patients were selected consecutively, and data was analysed retrospectively for one year. Resource utilisation was evaluated through systematic interviews with all patients. Demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical variables were recorded, and questionnaires evaluating quality of life, function, and disease activity were also applied (ASQoL, SF-36, HAQ-S, BASFI, and BASDAI). Estimates of indirect costs were performed using the human-capital approach based on the society perspective. RESULTS: Most of the patients were men (79%), with a mean age and disease duration of 40 and 16 years, respectively. The mean HAQ-S, BASFI and BASDAI scores were 1, 5, and 4, respectively. The mean ASQoL score for the sample was 8, and the mean Short-Form-36 scores were between 48 (body pain and general health) and 81 (emotional role). The average monthly household income for the group was US$ 520. The patients had an average of 6 outpatient visits, 6 physical therapy visits and 30 laboratory exams per patient, per year. The average total cost for society was US$ 4,597 per patient per year, of which 45% were direct costs and 55% were indirect costs. CONCLUSIONS: Ankylosing spondylitis is a disease that represents a considerable burden to Brazil. It is extremely important to carry out studies that assess the costs of chronic diseases, especially in developing nations, in order to determine the best manner of allocating the already scanty resources in such regions.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/economics , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/ethnology , Adult , Brazil/epidemiology , Costs and Cost Analysis , Data Collection , Female , Health Resources/economics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/epidemiology
3.
Diabet Med ; 27(1): 109-12, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20121897

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The objective of this cost-of-illness analysis was to quantify the annual costs associated with hospital admission for people with diabetes and foot ulcers in Brazil. METHODS: A hypothetical cohort was simulated using a decision tree model. Prevalence and incidence rates and clinical outcomes were estimated from published studies and applied to the general Brazilian population over 30 years. Costs were quoted in Brazilian real (BRL) and converted to US dollars ($US) at the 2008 currency exchange rate ($US1 = BRL 1.64). In the sensitivity analysis, we reduced and increased rates to assess the robustness of the cost estimates. RESULTS: In this hypothetical cohort there are 6.48 million (95% confidence interval 4.47-7.12) Brazilians citizens with Type 2 diabetes. Each year, approximately 323,000 (89,500-484,500) of these people develop foot ulcers and almost 97,200 (17,900-169,600) require hospital admission as a result. Each year, almost 46,300 (8500-80,900) limb amputations and 12,400 (2300-21,700) deaths occur as a result of diabetic foot disease in Brazil. The annual cost associated with these hospital admissions is estimated to be almost $US264m ($US51m-461m). The estimated cost for patients with amputation is nearly $US128m ($US24.5m-222.3m). CONCLUSIONS: Our model shows that the social and economic impact of diabetic foot disease in Brazil is high. Government decision makers should reflect on the current situation and provide organized foot care throughout the whole country.


Subject(s)
Amputation, Surgical/economics , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/economics , Diabetic Foot/economics , Brazil/epidemiology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/surgery , Diabetic Foot/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Prevalence
4.
Acta Reumatol Port ; 34(1): 44-51, 2009.
Article in Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19449475

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate in relation to diagnosis and treatment for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients Brazilian population, and compare the management offered to patients who are followed up in the public and private sectors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic questionnaire was sent to 650 rheumatologists, members of the Brazilian Rheumatology Society (SBR) and who were attending adult RA patients in the public and/or private sector, who had a contact e-mail address available in the SBR register and agreed to take part in the survey. RESULTS: The rheumatologists estimated that 51.7% of the patients had had their disease diagnosed and of these, 56.1% were undergoing treatment. It was also estimated that 53.9% of the RA patients that was under treatment were being followed up by rheumatologists. The mean time interval estimated by the rheumatologists, between the appearance of the first symptoms of RA and the diagnosis made by a doctor, was greater among the patients who sought attendance in public services (1.8 years). There was no difference in clinical and radiographic assessment measures between the two types of service, with the exception of the application of HAQ, which was used more in public services. The principal drug association reported in both types of services was methotrexate and chloroquine. The rate of usage of associations between biological agents and methotrexate ranged from 6 to 8%. The main treatment-related difficulties were: access to the health system (public services) and cost of medication (private services). CONCLUSION: Approximately 50% of RA patients are being diagnosed and half of these are under treatment. There was no great difference in attendance within the public and private systems for these patients, whereas the main difficulty for the public system was access to attendance, for the private system it was the cost of the medication.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/therapy , Rheumatology , Adult , Brazil , Female , Humans , Male , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Osteoporos Int ; 20(3): 399-408, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18597037

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: The Brazilian Osteoporosis Study (BRAZOS) is the first epidemiological study carried out in a representative sample of Brazilian men and women aged 40 years or older. The prevalence of fragility fractures is about 15.1% in the women and 12.8% in the men. Moreover, advanced age, sedentarism, family history of hip fracture, current smoking, recurrent falls, diabetes mellitus and poor quality of life are the main clinical risk factors associated with fragility fractures. INTRODUCTION: The Brazilian Osteoporosis Study (BRAZOS) is the first epidemiological study carried out in a representative sample of Brazilian men and women aged 40 years or older with the purpose of identifying the prevalence and the main clinical risk factors (CRF) associated with osteoporotic fracture in our population. METHODS: A total of 2,420 individuals (women, 70%) from 150 different cities in the five geographic regions in Brazil, and all different socio-economical classes were selected to participate in the present survey. Anthropometrical data as well as life habits, fracture history, food intake, physical activity, falls and quality of life were determined by individual quantitative interviews. The representative sampling was based on Brazilian National data provided by the 2000 and 2003 census. Low trauma fracture was defined as that resulting of a fall from standing height or less in individuals 50 years or older at specific skeletal sites: forearm, femur, ribs, vertebra and humerus. Sampling error was 2.2% with 95% confidence intervals. Logistic regression analysis models were designed having the fragility fracture as the dependent variable and all other parameters as the independent variable. Significance level was set as p < 0.05. RESULTS: The average of age, height and weight for men and women were 58.4 +/- 12.8 and 60.1 +/- 13.7 years, 1.67 +/- 0.08 and 1.56 +/- 0.07 m and 73.3 +/- 14.7 and 64.7 +/- 13.7 kg, respectively. About 15.1% of the women and 12.8% of the men reported fragility fractures. In the women, the main CRF associated with fractures were advanced age (OR = 1.6; 95% CI 1.06-2.4), family history of hip fracture (OR = 1.7; 95% CI 1.1-2.8), early menopause (OR = 1.7; 95% CI 1.02-2.9), sedentary lifestyle (OR = 1.6; 95% CI 1.02-2.7), poor quality of life (OR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.2-2.9), higher intake of phosphorus (OR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.2-2.9), diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.8; 95% CI 1.01-8.2), use of benzodiazepine drugs (OR = 2.0; 95% CI 1.1-3.6) and recurrent falls (OR = 2.4; 95% CI 1.2-5.0). In the men, the main CRF were poor quality of life (OR = 3.2; 95% CI 1.7-6.1), current smoking (OR = 3.5; 95% CI 1.28-9.77), diabetes mellitus (OR = 4.2; 95% CI 1.27-13.7) and sedentary lifestyle (OR = 6.3; 95% CI 1.1-36.1). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that CRF may contribute as an important tool to identify men and women with higher risk of osteoporotic fractures and that interventions aiming at specific risk factors (quit smoking, regular physical activity, prevention of falls) may help to manage patients to reduce their risk of fracture.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone/epidemiology , Osteoporosis/epidemiology , Aged , Brazil/epidemiology , Female , Fractures, Bone/etiology , Humans , Life Style , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Risk Factors
6.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 26(1): 24-31, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18328143

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe and analyze resource utilization in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated at a tertiary public health facility over a one-year period. Costs for the patient and for society associated with the treatment of RA were also investigated. METHODS: One hundred consecutively selected RA patients were included. Resource utilization was evaluated retrospectively for one year. Systematic interviews were used in all patients and demographic, socioeconomic and clinical variables were recorded. RESULTS: One hundred patients were included. Most of the patients were women (92%) and had mean age and disease duration of 51 and 11 years, respectively. The majority of the patients were Steinbroker functional class I (48%). Mean HAQ score for the sample was 0.95 and mean Short-Form-36 scores were between 49.64 (bodily pain) and 70.00 (social functioning). The average monthly household income for the group was US$ 359. The patients had on average 4 outpatient visits and 21 laboratory exams per year. Drugs accounted for 59% of the total cost associated with RA. The average total cost for society was US$ 424.14 per patient per year, of which 95% were direct and 5% indirect costs. CONCLUSION: The management of RA patients is an important financial burden in Brazil. The effort to couple resource utilization with the best available evidence, associated with the limited funds available in the healthcare system (particularly in a developing country), emphasizes the importance of studies that critically evaluate resource utilization and cost in these chronic patients. The systematic use of such studies may prove helpful to optimize the health system.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/economics , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Brazil , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Health Expenditures , Humans , Income , Male , Middle Aged
8.
Dis Esophagus ; 19(4): 289-93, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16866863

ABSTRACT

Gastrooesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is highly prevalent in the Western world but its true population prevalence is difficult to estimate without a validated instrument to detect it. The evaluation of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an useful tool in this assessment. The aims of this study are to translate and validate a GERD specific HRQoL questionnaire and evaluate HRQoL in a Brazilian population before and after GERD treatment. GERD patients with typical symptoms and Los Angeles Classes A to C esophagitis were included in the study. Two HRQoL questionnaires and upper digestive endoscopy were performed before and after 6 weeks treatment with pantoprazole 40 mg/day followed by 80 mg/day for another 8 weeks if healing did not occur. A generic (SF-36) and one disease-specific questionnaire (GERD score) were used. The latter was translated and validated for Brazilian Portuguese. From January 2002 to December 2003, 100 patients were enrolled. Of these, 78 patients were evaluated in a per protocol analysis (35 men, mean age: 40 years). The translated questionnaire (Brazilian GERD Score, BGERDS) demonstrated adequate psychometric properties (validity, responsiveness and reliability). SF-36 and BGERDS domains significantly improved after treatment (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001 respectively). The BGERDS was shown to be valid and reliable. Patients with esophagitis showed an impaired HRQoL that improved or normalized after treatment with pantoprazole.


Subject(s)
2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles/therapeutic use , Anti-Ulcer Agents/therapeutic use , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Gastroesophageal Reflux/psychology , Quality of Life , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Brazil , Endoscopy, Digestive System , Esophagitis/drug therapy , Esophagitis/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pantoprazole , Prospective Studies , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Reproducibility of Results , Sickness Impact Profile , Surveys and Questionnaires , Translating
9.
Qual Life Res ; 15(3): 565-70, 2006 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16547795

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To translate into Brazilian-Portuguese, culturally adapt and validate the DLQI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The DLQI was translated into Brazilian-Portuguese and cultural adaptation was performed following the methodology proposed by Falcão. Inter-observer reliability and validity were assessed. Seventy-one patients with lupus erythematosus with cutaneous lesions selected from the outpatient dermatology clinic had their quality of life assessed by DLQI and SF-36. The validity of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the DLQI was evaluated by the correlation of DLQI scores with SF-36 component scores and other outcome measures. RESULTS: In the translation and cultural adaptation process the basic structure of DLQI was kept. Very few questions have very slightly modifications. Of the 71 patients, 83% were women and the median (SD) age was 38 (12) years. The patients had a mean (SD) disease duration of 8(6) years. There were 46 patients with active cutaneous lesions and 37 patients with alopecia. The DLQI inter-observer reliability coefficient was 0.96 (p<0.001). The DLQI mean (SD) score was 6.5 (5.6) and most of the SF-36 domains were between 60 and 70. The domains that had the lowest scores were 'general health' (62) and 'mental health' (62). The Pearson correlation coefficient between DLQI and each SF-36 component score were highly statistically significant (p<0.001), despite of being only moderate. As expected there was no correlation between DLQI or each one of the SF-36 components and age, disease duration or number of ACR criteria. Patients with active cutaneous lesions presented statistically significant lower scores of DLQI and SF-36 when compared to patients without active cutaneous lesions. Patients with alopecia presented a statistically significant lower score in DLQI when compared to patients without alopecia. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the DLQI is a reliable and valid outcome measure to be used in LE clinical studies.


Subject(s)
Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Brazil , Female , Humans , Language , Male , Middle Aged
10.
Braz J Med Biol Res ; 38(2): 293-302, 2005 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15785841

ABSTRACT

The objective of the present study was to translate, adapt and validate a Brazilian Portuguese version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire. The study was carried out in two steps. The first was to translate the DASH into Portuguese and to perform cultural adaptation and the second involved the determination of the reliability and validity of the DASH for the Brazilian population. For this purpose, 65 rheumatoid arthritis patients of either sex (according to the classification criteria of the American College of Rheumatology), ranging in age from 18 to 60 years and presenting no other diseases involving the upper limbs, were interviewed. The patients were selected consecutively at the rheumatology outpatient clinic of UNIFESP. The following results were obtained: in the first step (translation and cultural adaptation), all patients answered the questions. In the second step, Spearman's correlation coefficients for interobserver evaluation ranged from 0.762 to 0.995, values considered to be highly reliable. In addition, intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.97 to 0.99, also highly reliable values. Spearman's correlation coefficients and the intraclass correlation coefficients obtained during intra-observer evaluation ranged from 0.731 to 0.937 and from 0.90 to 0.96, respectively, being highly reliable values. The Ritchie Index showed a weak correlation with Brazilian DASH scores, while the visual analog scale of pain showed a good correlation with DASH score. We conclude that the Portuguese version of the DASH is a reliable instrument.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/physiopathology , Pain Measurement/instrumentation , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Upper Extremity/physiopathology , Adolescent , Adult , Brazil , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Cultural Characteristics , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results , Translating
11.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 38(2): 293-302, fev. 2005. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-393651

ABSTRACT

The objective of the present study was to translate, adapt and validate a Brazilian Portuguese version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire. The study was carried out in two steps. The first was to translate the DASH into Portuguese and to perform cultural adaptation and the second involved the determination of the reliability and validity of the DASH for the Brazilian population. For this purpose, 65 rheumatoid arthritis patients of either sex (according to the classification criteria of the American College of Rheumatology), ranging in age from 18 to 60 years and presenting no other diseases involving the upper limbs, were interviewed. The patients were selected consecutively at the rheumatology outpatient clinic of UNIFESP. The following results were obtained: in the first step (translation and cultural adaptation), all patients answered the questions. In the second step, Spearman's correlation coefficients for interobserver evaluation ranged from 0.762 to 0.995, values considered to be highly reliable. In addition, intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.97 to 0.99, also highly reliable values. Spearman's correlation coefficients and the intraclass correlation coefficients obtained during intra-observer evaluation ranged from 0.731 to 0.937 and from 0.90 to 0.96, respectively, being highly reliable values. The Ritchie Index showed a weak correlation with Brazilian DASH scores, while the visual analog scale of pain showed a good correlation with DASH score. We conclude that the Portuguese version of the DASH is a reliable instrument.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/physiopathology , Pain Measurement/instrumentation , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Upper Extremity/physiopathology , Brazil , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Cultural Characteristics , Disability Evaluation , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results , Translating
12.
Support Care Cancer ; 11(6): 356-61, 2003 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12720070

ABSTRACT

The resource utilization and cost of 51 episodes of febrile neutropenia in children with leukemia and lymphomas who were admitted to the Pediatric Oncology Institute (GRAAC) of the Federal University of São Paulo were analyzed. Patients aged 60 days to 21 years with confirmed diagnoses of acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoid leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, or Hodgkins disease who presented axillary temperature above 38 degrees C at least once episode, or between 37.5 degrees C and 38 degrees C on three occasions during a 24-h period, neutrophil count below 500/mm(3), or between 500/mm(3)and 1,000/mm(3) but expected to fall below 500/mm(3) were included in the study. The patients' ages varied between 1 and 15.6 years, and 67% of the patients were male. The median cost per treated episode was US dollars 2,660 (2,039). Hospitalization costs accounted for 62% of the total cost of the treatment, antibacterials accounting for 23%. Episodes in patients with documented infections had a higher median direct cost than episodes in patients with fever of unknown origin (P=0.018). There was a trend for a higher median direct cost in episodes among patients with a worse prognostic factor, such as type of underlying disease, presence of documented infection, and longer duration of neutropenia. This is the first study to evaluate the economics of febrile neutropenia episodes in Brazil, and serves as a basis for resource utilization and costs incurred in the treatment of such patients in this country.


Subject(s)
Fever/economics , Fever/therapy , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Leukemia/complications , Lymphoma/complications , Neutropenia/economics , Neutropenia/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Brazil , Child , Child, Preschool , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Fever/etiology , Humans , Infant , Male , Neutropenia/etiology , Prognosis
13.
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992, Impr.) ; 47(4): 352-357, out.-dez. 2001. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, Sec. Est. Saúde SP | ID: lil-306472

ABSTRACT

A osteoporose é uma doença caracterizada por baixa massa óssea e deterioraçäo da microarquitetura do tecido ósseo, com conseqüente aumento da fragilidade óssea e suscetibilidade a fraturas . Os recursos utilizados no tratamento de fraturas por osteoporose säo siginificativos e com custos elevados. OBJETIVO: Dimensionar a utilizaçäo de recursos e custo anual por pacientes com osteoporose pós-menopausa. MÉTODOS: Cem pacientes foram consecutivamente selecionados do ambulatório de doenças osteometabólicas da Universidade Federal de Säo Paulo-Escola Paulista de Medicina (UNIFESP-EPM), entre abril de 1997 a agosto de 1998. Os critérios de inclusäo foram: osteoporose pós-menopausa (OMS, 1994) há pelo menos um ano; mínimo de um ano em acompanhamento ambulatorial; mínimas condiçöes de entendimento e expressäo verbal para responder aos questionários. Características socio-econômicas, clínicas, utilizaçäo de recursos e custos no último ano foram levantadas através de entrevistas empregando-se dois questionários. Os custos unitários dos recursos utilizados no Serviço Público de Assistência à Saúde basearam-se na Tabela SUS de agosto de 1998. RESULTADOS: A média de idade foi 65,85 anos e a renda familiar média-mensal, R$ 534,14. Foram realizadas em média sete consultas/paciente/ano. Das pacientes, 77 por cento usaram cálcio e 38 por cento estrógenos por algum período durante o último ano. Os custos médios totais anuais para o tratamento das pacientes com osteoporose pós-menopausa, sob a perspectiva da sociedade, no Sistema Público em Säo Paulo, foram de R$ 908,18/paciente/ano. CONCLUSÄO: Os custos com o tratamento de osteoporose pagos pelas pacientes representaram 11 por cento da renda familiar mensal média (R$ 534). Em funçäo do envelhecimento da populaçäo e aumento da incidência de osteoporose, políticas de alocaçäo racional de recursos basedas em análises econômicas devem ser implementadas


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Aged , Osteoporosis , Cost Allocation , Osteoporosis , Socioeconomic Factors , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal
14.
J Rheumatol ; 28(6): 1394-7, 2001 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11409136

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The socioeconomic effects of rheumatic fever (RF) in Brazil, including direct and indirect costs to patients and their families and to society, are largely unknown. We evaluated the utilization of resources and costs related to RF in a tertiary center caring for low income patients in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: One hundred patients with RF, younger than 18 yrs, with followup of at least one year, were sequentially selected to provide complete information on a questionnaire. Additional data were collected from patients' charts. The utilization of resources was evaluated for each patient throughout the entire disease course. Costs were determined for patients and their families as well as for the society, using variables from 3 different systems: the national public health system, used by most lower income groups; the Brazilian Medical Association, which regulates charges and fees utilized by health plans and insurance companies; and costs charged by private practitioners, paid directly by patients. RESULTS: The RF population studied belonged to a low socioeconomic level. The mean monthly family income was $625.20 US. The mean disease duration was 3.9 yrs (range 1-10). Patients had a total of 1657 medical consultations, 22 hospital admissions, and 4 admissions to intensive care unit. Work absenteeism among parents was calculated as 22.9%, equivalent to 901 days of missed work; about 5% of the parents lost their jobs. Patients showed a high rate of school failure (22%). Considering the public system as a reference, direct, indirect, and total costs to society per 100 patients throughout the entire disease duration were $105,860 US ($271/patient/yr), $18,803 US ($48/patient/yr), and $124,663 US (US $319/patient/yr), respectively. When health care plan and private systems were taken as reference, the total costs were $423,550 US and $684,351 US, respectively. CONCLUSION: RF and rheumatic heart disease have an important socioeconomic impact in Brazil; costs of RF made up roughly 1.3% of annual family income. The estimated annual cost of RF for society in Brazil is $51,144,347.00 US.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Rheumatic Fever/economics , Absenteeism , Adolescent , Brazil , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Health Resources/economics , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , National Health Programs/economics , Private Practice/economics , Public Health/economics , Social Class , Utilization Review
15.
Braz J Med Biol Res ; 34(3): 347-52, 2001 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11262585

ABSTRACT

The authors performed a study of bone mass in eutrophic Brazilian children and adolescents using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in order to obtain curves for bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) by chronological age and correlate these values with weight and height. Healthy Caucasian children and adolescents, 120 boys and 135 girls, 6 to 14 years of age, residents of São Paulo, Brazil, were selected from the Pediatric Department outpatient clinic of Hospital São Paulo (Universidade Federal de São Paulo). BMC, BMD and the area of the vertebral body of the L2-L4 segment were obtained by DXA. BMC and BMD for the lumbar spine (L2-L4) presented a progressive increase between 6 and 14 years of age in both sexes, with a distribution that fitted an exponential curve. We identified an increase of mineral content in female patients older than 11 years which was maintained until 13 years of age, when a new decrease in the velocity of bone mineralization occurred. Male patients presented a period of accelerated bone mass gain after 11 years of age that was maintained until 14 years of age. At 14 years of age the mean BMD values for boys and girls were 0.984 and 1.017 g/cm2, respectively. A stepwise multiple regression analysis of paired variables showed that the "vertebral area-age" pair was the most significant in the determination of BMD values and the introduction of a third variable (weight or height) did not significantly increase the correlation coefficient.


Subject(s)
Body Height/physiology , Body Weight/physiology , Bone Density/physiology , Lumbar Vertebrae/physiology , Absorptiometry, Photon , Adolescent , Age Distribution , Age Factors , Bone Development , Brazil , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Regression Analysis , Sex Distribution , Statistics, Nonparametric
16.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 34(3): 347-352, Mar. 2001. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-281615

ABSTRACT

The authors performed a study of bone mass in eutrophic Brazilian children and adolescents using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in order to obtain curves for bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) by chronological age and correlate these values with weight and height. Healthy Caucasian children and adolescents, 120 boys and 135 girls, 6 to 14 years of age, residents of São Paulo, Brazil, were selected from the Pediatric Department outpatient clinic of Hospital São Paulo (Universidade Federal de São Paulo). BMC, BMD and the area of the vertebral body of the L2-L4 segment were obtained by DXA. BMC and BMD for the lumbar spine (L2-L4) presented a progressive increase between 6 and 14 years of age in both sexes, with a distribution that fitted an exponential curve. We identified an increase of mineral content in female patients older than 11 years which was maintained until 13 years of age, when a new decrease in the velocity of bone mineralization occurred. Male patients presented a period of accelerated bone mass gain after 11 years of age that was maintained until 14 years of age. At 14 years of age the mean BMD values for boys and girls were 0.984 and 1.017 g/cm², respectively. A stepwise multiple regression analysis of paired variables showed that the "vertebral area-age" pair was the most significant in the determination of BMD values and the introduction of a third variable (weight or height) did not significantly increase the correlation coefficient


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Absorptiometry, Photon , Body Height/physiology , Body Weight/physiology , Bone Density , Lumbar Vertebrae , Absorptiometry, Photon/methods , Age Distribution , Age Factors , Bone Development , Lumbar Vertebrae/physiology , Regression Analysis , Sex Distribution , Statistics, Nonparametric
17.
Braz J Med Biol Res ; 34(2): 203-10, 2001 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11175495

ABSTRACT

The purpose of the present study was to translate the Roland-Morris (RM) questionnaire into Brazilian-Portuguese and adapt and validate it. First 3 English teachers independently translated the original questionnaire into Brazilian-Portuguese and a consensus version was generated. Later, 3 other translators, blind to the original questionnaire, performed a back translation. This version was then compared with the original English questionnaire. Discrepancies were discussed and solved by a panel of 3 rheumatologists and the final Brazilian version was established (Brazil-RM). This version was then pretested on 30 chronic low back pain patients consecutively selected from the spine disorders outpatient clinic. In addition to the traditional clinical outcome measures, the Brazil-RM, a 6-point pain scale (from no pain to unbearable pain), and its numerical pain rating scale (PS) (0 to 5) and a visual analog scale (VAS) (0 to 10) were administered twice by one interviewer (1 week apart) and once by one independent interviewer. Spearman's correlation coefficient (SCC) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were computed to assess test-retest and interobserver reliability. Cross-sectional construct validity was evaluated using the SCC. In the pretesting session, all questions were well understood by the patients. The mean time of questionnaire administration was 4 min and 53 s. The SCC and ICC were 0.88 (P<0.01) and 0.94, respectively, for the test-retest reliability and 0.86 (P<0.01) and 0.95, respectively, for interobserver reliability. The correlation coefficient was 0.80 (P<0.01) between the PS and Brazil-RM score and 0.79 (P<0.01) between the VAS and Brazil-RM score. We conclude that the Brazil-RM was successfully translated and adapted for application to Brazilian patients, with satisfactory reliability and cross-sectional construct validity.


Subject(s)
Disability Evaluation , Low Back Pain/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Translating , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Cultural Characteristics , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Statistics, Nonparametric
18.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 34(2): 203-210, Feb. 2001.
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-281597

ABSTRACT

The purpose of the present study was to translate the Roland-Morris (RM) questionnaire into Brazilian-Portuguese and adapt and validate it. First 3 English teachers independently translated the original questionnaire into Brazilian-Portuguese and a consensus version was generated. Later, 3 other translators, blind to the original questionnaire, performed a back translation. This version was then compared with the original English questionnaire. Discrepancies were discussed and solved by a panel of 3 rheumatologists and the final Brazilian version was established (Brazil-RM). This version was then pretested on 30 chronic low back pain patients consecutively selected from the spine disorders outpatient clinic. In addition to the traditional clinical outcome measures, the Brazil-RM, a 6-point pain scale (from no pain to unbearable pain), and its numerical pain rating scale (PS) (0 to 5) and a visual analog scale (VAS) (0 to 10) were administered twice by one interviewer (1 week apart) and once by one independent interviewer. Spearman's correlation coefficient (SCC) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were computed to assess test-retest and interobserver reliability. Cross-sectional construct validity was evaluated using the SCC. In the pretesting session, all questions were well understood by the patients. The mean time of questionnaire administration was 4 min and 53 s. The SCC and ICC were 0.88 (P<0.01) and 0.94, respectively, for the test-retest reliability and 0.86 (P<0.01) and 0.95, respectively, for interobserver reliability. The correlation coefficient was 0.80 (P<0.01) between the PS and Brazil-RM score and 0.79 (P<0.01) between the VAS and Brazil-RM score. We conclude that the Brazil-RM was successfully translated and adapted for application to Brazilian patients, with satisfactory reliability and cross-sectional construct validity


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Disability Evaluation , Low Back Pain/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Translating , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Cultural Characteristics , Reproducibility of Results , Statistics, Nonparametric
19.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 47(4): 352-7, 2001.
Article in Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11813052

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is characterized by low bone mass, deterioration of the microarchitecture of the bone tissue and increase susceptibility to fractures. Clinical manifestations are fractures and their complications. The most common fractures are hip,spine and wrist, although any bone is susceptible. OBJECTIVES: To assess the resource utilization and the annual costs incurred by patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients were studied in the Universidade Federal de São Paulo. The inclusion criteria were: postmenopausal osteoporosis (WHO 1994) for at least one year b) at least one year attending the outpatient clinic, minimal comprehensive and speaking conditions. The socioeconomic and clinical characteristics, the resource utilization and costs in the last year were assessed using 2 questionnaires. The unitary costs were based in the Public Healthcare System Index (1998). RESULTS: The mean age was 66 years and the monthly family income was R$ 534.14 (US$ 456 - in 1998). There was a mean of 7 visits/patient/ year. 77% of the patients used calcium and 38% used estrogens. The mean total annual costs for osteoporosis treatment, considering societal perspective, were R$ 908.18 (US$ 776-in 1998) per patient per year. CONCLUSION: The costs related to osteoporosis treatment represented 11% of the mean monthly household income from the patients' perspective (R$ 534=US$ 456). As the population is ageing and the osteoporosis incidence is increasing, health policy should be implemented to rationally allocate the scarce resources available, based on economic analysis.


Subject(s)
Cost Allocation , Osteoporosis/economics , Aged , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Humans , Osteoporosis/therapy , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/economics , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/therapy , Socioeconomic Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL