[Evolution of the perception of the safety culture of healthcare professionals in a pediatric emergency department]. / Evolución de la percepción de la cultura de seguridad de los profesionales sanitarios en una urgencia pediátrica.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Safety culture (SC) is a fundamental tool for minimizing adverse events and improving safety and quality of care. Our objective, therefore was to analyze the evolution of the SC of healthcare professionals in a pediatric emergency department (PED) after the implementation of a risk management system for patient safety based on the UNE:EN:ISO 179003 Standard and the execution of new safe practices for Joint Commission International accreditation. At the same time describe the current strengths and weaknesses. METHODS: Quasi-experimental, single-center study. All PED professionals participated in the study. An initial measurement of SC was performed through the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPS) questionnaire of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality adapted to Spanish in 2014. Pro-patient safety strategies were implemented between 2015 and 2022. A subsequent measurement was performed in 2022. RESULTS: The response rate in 2014 was 55% and 78% in 2022. On both occasions the group with the highest participation was nurses with 35.1% and 34.8%, respectively. Five dimensions improved after the interventions: frequency of adverse events (25.2%, p<0.001), organizational learning (25%, p<0.001), feedback and communication about errors (22.3%, p<0.001), non-punitive response to errors (6.5%, p = 0.176), and management support (4%, p = 0.333). CONCLUSIONS: The actions carried out had a positive influence on organizational learning and the frequency of adverse events reported and communication within the team. In contrast, the perception of SC did not increase.

Simple and complex febrile seizures: is there such a difference? Management and complications in an emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to analyse the prevalence, characteristics, and management of simple and complex febrile seizures. The secondary objective was to compare the risk of underlying organic lesion and epilepsy in both types of seizures, with a particular focus on the different subtypes defining a complex febrile seizure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study including patients aged 0--16 years who were treated for febrile seizures in the paediatric emergency department of a tertiary hospital over a period of 5 years. Epidemiological and clinical variables were collected. Patients were followed up for at least 2 years to confirm the final diagnosis. RESULTS: We identified 654 patients with febrile seizures, with a prevalence of 0.20% (95% CI, 0.18-0.22); 537 (82%) had simple febrile seizures and 117 (18%) had complex febrile seizures. The clinical and epidemiological characteristics of both types were similar. Significantly more complementary tests were requested for complex febrile seizures: blood tests (71.8% vs 24.2% for simple febrile seizures), urine analysis (10.3% vs 2.4%), lumbar puncture (14.5% vs 1.5%), and CT (7.7% vs 0%). Similarly, admission was indicated more frequently (41.0% vs 6.1%). Underlying organic lesions (central nervous system infection, metabolic disease, tumour/intracranial space-occupying lesion, intoxication) were diagnosed in only 11 patients, 5 of whom had complex forms (4.3%; 95% CI, 0.6-7.9). Risk factors for developing epilepsy, identified in the multivariate analysis, were complex forms with recurrent seizures in a single attack (odds ratio [OR]: 4.94; 95% CI, 1.29-18.95), history of seizures (OR: 17.97; 95% CI, 2.26--143.10), and seizures presenting at atypical ages (OR: 11.69; 95% CI, 1.99-68.61). CONCLUSIONS: The systematic indication of complementary tests or hospital admission of patients with complex febrile seizures is unnecessary. The risk of epilepsy in patients with complex forms gives rise to the need for follow-up in paediatric neurology departments.

Convulsiones febriles simples y complejas, ¿son tan diferentes? Manejo y complicaciones en urgencias / Simple and complex febrile seizures: is there such a difference? Management and complications in an emergency department

Objetivo: Analizar la prevalencia, características y manejo de las convulsiones febriles simples y complejas. Secundariamente, comparar el riesgo de lesión orgánica subyacente y epilepsia entre ambos tipos de crisis y particularmente de cada subtipo que define una convulsión febril compleja. Material y método: Estudio de cohortes retrospectivo que incluye pacientes de 0-16 años que consultan por convulsión febril en urgencias pediátricas de un hospital terciario durante 5 años. Se recogen variables epidemiológicas y clínicas. Se realiza un seguimiento posterior mínimo de 2 años para confirmar el diagnóstico final. Resultados: Se incluyeron 654 convulsiones febriles, con una prevalencia del 0,20% (IC 95%: 0,18-0,22%); 537 fueron simples (82%) y 117 complejas (18%). Las características clínico-epidemiológicas de ambos tipos fueron similares. En las formas complejas se solicitaron significativamente más pruebas complementarias en forma de analíticas (71,8% vs. 24,2%), tóxicos (10,3% vs. 2,4%), punción lumbar (14,5% vs. 1,5%) y TAC (7,7% vs. 0%). Igualmente se indicó ingreso con mayor frecuencia (41,0% vs. 6,1%). No se diagnosticó ninguna lesión orgánica subyacente (infección del sistema nervioso central, enfermedad metabólica, tumor/lesión intracraneal ocupante de espacio, intoxicación) excepto 11 casos de epilepsia, 5 de ellas en las formas complejas (4,3%; IC 95%: 0,6-7,9%). En el análisis multivariable presentaron mayor riesgo de desarrollar epilepsia las formas complejas por ser recurrentes en el mismo proceso febril (odds ratio [OR]: 4,94; IC 95%: 1,29-18,95), aquellos con antecedentes de crisis previas (OR: 17,97; IC 95%: 2,26-143,10) y las manifestadas a edades atípicas (OR: 11,69; IC 95%: 1,99-68,61). Conclusiones: No está justificada la indicación sistemática de pruebas complementarias o ingreso en las convulsiones febriles complejas. El riesgo de epilepsia en las formas complejas hace necesario el seguimiento en neuropediatría. (AU)

Objective: We aimed to analyse the prevalence, characteristics, and management of simple and complex febrile seizures. The secondary objective was to compare the risk of underlying organic lesion and epilepsy in both types of seizures, with a particular focus on the different subtypes defining a complex febrile seizure. Material and methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study including patients aged 0-16 years who were treated for febrile seizures in the paediatric emergency department of a tertiary hospital over a period of 5 years. Epidemiological and clinical variables were collected. Patients were followed up for at least 2 years to confirm the final diagnosis. Results: We identified 654 patients with febrile seizures, with a prevalence of 0.20% (95% CI, 0.18-0.22); 537 (82%) had simple febrile seizures and 117 (18%) had complex febrile seizures. The clinical and epidemiological characteristics of both types were similar. Significantly more complementary tests were requested for complex febrile seizures: blood tests (71.8% vs 24.2% for simple febrile seizures), urine analysis (10.3% vs 2.4%), lumbar puncture (14.5% vs 1.5%), and CT (7.7% vs 0%). Similarly, admission was indicated more frequently (41.0% vs 6.1%). Underlying organic lesions (central nervous system infection, metabolic disease, tumour/intracranial space-occupying lesion, intoxication) were diagnosed in only 11 patients, 5 of whom had complex forms (4.3%; 95% CI, 0.6-7.9). Risk factors for developing epilepsy, identified in the multivariate analysis, were complex forms with recurrent seizures in a single attack (odds ratio [OR]: 4.94; 95% CI, 1.29-18.95), history of seizures (OR: 17.97; 95% CI, 2.26-143.10), and seizures presenting at atypical ages (OR: 11.69; 95% CI, 1.99-68.61). Conclusions: The systematic indication of complementary tests or hospital admission of patients with complex febrile seizures is unnecessary. [...] (AU)

Simple and complex febrile seizures: is there such a difference? Management and complications in an emergency department. / Convulsiones febriles simples y complejas, ¿son tan diferentes? Manejo y complicaciones en urgencias.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to analyse the prevalence, characteristics, and management of simple and complex febrile seizures. The secondary objective was to compare the risk of underlying organic lesion and epilepsy in both types of seizures, with a particular focus on the different subtypes defining a complex febrile seizure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study including patients aged 0-16 years who were treated for febrile seizures in the paediatric emergency department of a tertiary hospital over a period of 5 years. Epidemiological and clinical variables were collected. Patients were followed up for at least 2 years to confirm the final diagnosis. RESULTS: We identified 654 patients with febrile seizures, with a prevalence of 0.20% (95% CI, 0.18-0.22); 537 (82%) had simple febrile seizures and 117 (18%) had complex febrile seizures. The clinical and epidemiological characteristics of both types were similar. Significantly more complementary tests were requested for complex febrile seizures: blood tests (71.8% vs 24.2% for simple febrile seizures), urine analysis (10.3% vs 2.4%), lumbar puncture (14.5% vs 1.5%), and CT (7.7% vs 0%). Similarly, admission was indicated more frequently (41.0% vs 6.1%). Underlying organic lesions (central nervous system infection, metabolic disease, tumour/intracranial space-occupying lesion, intoxication) were diagnosed in only 11 patients, 5 of whom had complex forms (4.3%; 95% CI, 0.6-7.9). Risk factors for developing epilepsy, identified in the multivariate analysis, were complex forms with recurrent seizures in a single attack (odds ratio [OR]: 4.94; 95% CI, 1.29-18.95), history of seizures (OR: 17.97; 95% CI, 2.26-143.10), and seizures presenting at atypical ages (OR: 11.69; 95% CI, 1.99-68.61). CONCLUSIONS: The systematic indication of complementary tests or hospital admission of patients with complex febrile seizures is unnecessary. The risk of epilepsy in patients with complex forms gives rise to the need for follow-up in paediatric neurology departments.

Retraso psicomotor, hipotonía y alteraciones del comportamiento: un caso de deficiencia de succínico semialdehído deshidrogenasa / Psychomotor delay, hypotonia, and behavioural disorders: A case of succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency

No disponible

Presencia de anticuerpos antifosfolípidos en niños con fiebre y petequias / Presence of antiphospholipid antibodies in children with fever and petechiae

Introducción: La presencia de un tiempo de cefalina (APTT) alargado en niños con fiebre y petequias es un hallazgo descrito en la bibliografía. La causa de esta alteración se desconoce, pero se postula que puede deberse a la formación de anticuerpos antifosfolípidos (Ac AFL). El objetivo de este estudio es determinar si el alargamiento del APTT se asocia con la formación Ac AFL. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio observacional, prospectivo, de casos y controles, realizado en niños que consultaron por fiebre y petequias en el servicio de urgencias de un hospital de tercer nivel durante un periodo de 13 meses. Se recogieron variables epidemiológicas, clínicas y analíticas. Se describieron las características de los grupos con APTT alargado y normal, y se comparó la asociación entre las concentraciones de los diferentes anticuerpos y el APTT. Resultados: Se incluyeron 36 pacientes, 12 casos y 24 controles. No se encontraron diferencias significativas respecto a la positividad de Ac AFL entre los casos y los controles (odds ratio [OR]= 1,67; intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%: 0,31-9,04). No se observó ninguna asociación entre los diferentes tipos de anticuerpos y el APTT, cuyos coeficientes de regresión fueron de 0,04 seg (IC del 95%: -0,31 a 0,40) para anticardiolipina IgG, de 1,11 seg (IC del 95%: -1,24 a 3,46) para la IgM, y de -0,02 seg (IC del 95%: -0,35 a 0,31) y 0,64 seg (IC del 95%: -1,40 a 2,68) para antibeta 2 GPI, IgG e IgM, respectivamente. Conclusión: Ante los resultados de nuestro estudio, no podemos concluir que el alargamiento de APTT se relacione con la presencia de Ac AFL (AU)

Introduction: The presence of a longer time of cephalin (APTT) extended in children who come to emergency department with fever and petechiae is a result previously described in the literature. The cause of this alteration in coagulation is unknown, it is presumed that may be due to the formation of antiphospholipids antibodies. The aim of this study is to determine if the length of APTT is associated to the formation of antiphospholipids antibodies. Patients and methods: Observational, prospective case-control study in children who consulted for fever and petechiae in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital over a 13-month period epidemiological; clinical and laboratory variables were collected. The characteristics of groups with elongated and normal APTT were described and the association between concentrations of different antibodies and APTT were compared. Results: 36 patients, 12 cases and 24 controls, were included. No significant differences were found regarding the positivity of antiphospholipid antibodies between cases and controls (OR= 1.67; 95%CI: 0.31 to 9.04). No association was observed between the different types of antibodies and APTT, resulting regression coefficients in 0.04 s (95%CI: -0.31 to 0.40) for cardiolipin IgG, 1.11 s (95%CI: -1.24 to 3.46) for IgM and -0.02 s (95%CI: -0.35 to 0.31) and 0,64 s (95%CI: -1.40 to 2.68) for antibeta 2 GPI, IgG and IgM, respectively. Conclusion: Given the results of our study we can not conclude that the elongation of APTT is related with the presence of antiphospholipids antibodies (AU)