Recessive SERPING1 Variant Leads to Kinin-Kallikrein System Control Failure in a Consanguineous Brazilian Family with Hereditary Angioedema.

Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a severe and potentially life-threatening disease. The most common forms are caused by variants in SERPING1, resulting in C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency (HAE-C1-INH). C1-INH is a serine protease inhibitor (SERPIN) that regulates multiple proteases pathways, including the kallikrein-kinin system (KKS) and its complement. In HAE-C1-INH patients, C1-INH deficiencies affect KKS control, resulting in the development of kallikrein activity in plasma and the subsequent release of bradykinin (BK). While the overwhelming majority of disease-causing SERPING1 variants are dominant, very few recessive variants have been described. We present a large Brazilian HAE-C1-INH family with a recessive form of HAE-C1-INH. Methods: Blood samples of family members were investigated for protein levels of C1-INH, C4, C1q, and C1-INH function. The SERPING1 gene was sequenced. Results: In two severely affected sisters, we identified a homozygous missense variant in SERPING1 (NM_000062.3:c.964G>A;p.Val322Met). Fourteen family members were asymptomatic heterozygous carriers of the variant. Data regarding C1-INH function in the plasma showed that homozygous p.Val322Met strongly impacts C1-INH function to inhibit C1s and kallikrein (PKa). When heterozygously expressed, it affects the C1-INH control of C1s more than that of PKa. Conclusions: These studies of the variant's effects on the structure-function relationship reinforce prior observations suggesting that C1-INH deficiency is a conformational disease.

Diretrizes brasileiras do angioedema hereditário 2022 ­ Parte 1: definição, classificação e diagnóstico / 2022 Brazilian guidelines for hereditary angioedema ­ Part 1: definition, classification, and diagnosis

O angioedema hereditário é uma doença autossômica dominante caracterizada por crises recorrentes de edema que acometem o tecido subcutâneo e o submucoso, com envolvimento de diversos órgãos. Os principais locais afetados são face, membros superiores e inferiores, as alças intestinais e as vias respiratórias superiores. Em decorrência da falta de conhecimento dessa condição por profissionais de saúde, ocorre atraso importante no seu diagnóstico, comprometendo a qualidade de vida dos indivíduos afetados. Além disso, o retardo no diagnóstico pode resultar em aumento da mortalidade por asfixia devido ao edema de laringe. A natureza errática das crises com variação do quadro clínico e gravidade dos sintomas entre diferentes pacientes, e no mesmo paciente ao longo da vida, se constitui em desafio no cuidado dos doentes que têm angioedema hereditário. O principal tipo de angioedema hereditário é resultante de mais de 700 variantes patogênicas do gene SERPING1 com deficiência funcional ou quantitativa da proteína inibidor de C1, porém nos últimos anos outras mutações foram descritas em seis outros genes. Ocorreram avanços importantes na fisiopatologia da doença e novas drogas para o tratamento do angioedema hereditário foram desenvolvidas. Nesse contexto, o Grupo de Estudos Brasileiro em Angioedema Hereditário (GEBRAEH) em conjunto com a Associação Brasileira de Alergia e Imunologia (ASBAI) atualizou as diretrizes brasileiras do angioedema hereditário. O maior conhecimento dos diversos aspectos resultou na divisão das diretrizes em duas partes, sendo nessa primeira parte abordados a definição, a classificação e o diagnóstico.

Hereditary angioedema is an autosomal dominant disease characterized by recurrent attacks of edema that affect the subcutaneous tissue and the submucosa, involving several organs. The main affected sites are the face, upper and lower limbs, gastrointestinal tract, and upper airways. Because health professionals lack knowledge about this condition, there is a significant delay in diagnosis, compromising the quality of life of affected individuals. Furthermore, delayed diagnosis may result in increased mortality from asphyxia due to laryngeal edema. The erratic nature of the attacks with variations in clinical course and severity of symptoms among different patients and in one patient throughout life constitutes a challenge in the care of patients with hereditary angioedema. The main type of hereditary angioedema results from more than 700 pathogenic variants of the SERPING1 gene with functional or quantitative deficiency of the C1 inhibitor protein, but in recent years other mutations have been described in six other genes. Important advances have been made in the pathophysiology of the disease, and new drugs for the treatment of hereditary angioedema have been developed. In this context, the Brazilian Study Group on Hereditary Angioedema (GEBRAEH) in conjunction with the Brazilian Association of Allergy and Immunology (ASBAI) updated the Brazilian guidelines on hereditary angioedema. Greater knowledge of different aspects resulted in the division of the guidelines into two parts, with definition, classification, and diagnosis being addressed in this first part.

Diretrizes brasileiras de angioedema hereditário 2022 ­ Parte 2: terapêutica / 2022 Brazilian guidelines for hereditary angioedema ­ Part 2: therapy

O tratamento do angioedema hereditário tem início com a educação dos pacientes e familiares sobre a doença, pois é fundamental o conhecimento da imprevisibilidade das crises, assim como os seus fatores desencadeantes. O tratamento medicamentoso se divide em terapia das crises e profilaxia das manifestações clínicas. As crises devem ser tratadas o mais precocemente possível com o uso do antagonista do receptor de bradicinina, o icatibanto ou o concentrado de C1-inibidor. É necessário estabeler um plano de ação em caso de crises para todos os pacientes. A profilaxia de longo prazo dos sintomas deve ser realizada preferencialmente com medicamentos de primeira linha, como concentrado do C1-inibidor ou o anticorpo monoclonal anti-calicreína, lanadelumabe. Como segunda linha de tratamento temos os andrógenos atenuados. Na profilaxia de curto prazo, antes de procedimentos que podem desencadear crises, o uso do concentrado de C1-inibidor é preconizado. Existem algumas restrições para uso desses tratamentos em crianças e gestantes que devem ser consideradas. Novos medicamentos baseados nos avanços do conhecimento da fisiopatologia do angioedema hereditário estão em desenvolvimento, devendo melhorar a qualidade de vida dos pacientes. O uso de ferramentas padronizadas para monitorização da qualidade de vida, do controle e da atividade da doença são fundamentais no acompanhamento destes pacientes. A criação de associações de pacientes e familiares de pacientes com angioedema hereditário tem desempenhado um papel muito importante no cuidado destes pacientes no nosso país.

The treatment of hereditary angioedema begins with the education of patients and their families about the disease, as it is essential to know the unpredictability of attacks as well as their triggering factors. Drug treatment is divided into attack therapy and prophylaxis of clinical manifestations. Attacks should be treated as early as possible with the bradykinin receptor antagonist icatibant or C1-inhibitor concentrate. An action plan needs to be established for all patients with attacks. Long-term prophylaxis of symptoms should preferably be performed with first-line drugs such as C1-inhibitor concentrate or the anti-kallikrein monoclonal antibody lanadelumab. Attenuated androgens are the second line of treatment. In short-term prophylaxis, before procedures that can trigger attacks, the use of C1-inhibitor concentrate is recommended. There are some restrictions for the use of these treatments in children and pregnant women that should be considered. New drugs based on advances in knowledge of the pathophysiology of hereditary angioedema are under development and are expected to improve patient quality of life. The use of standardized tools for monitoring quality of life and controlling disease activity is essential in the follow-up of these patients. The creation of associations of patients and families of patients with hereditary angioedema has played a very important role in the care of these patients in Brazil.

Acquired Angioedema due to C1-Inhibitor Deficiency: A Challenging Condition.

BACKGROUND: Acquired deficiency of C1 inhibitor (AAE-C1-INH) is a very rare cause of recurrent angioedema, with few cases reported in the literature. We aimed to describe a series of patients with AAE-C1-INH who were diagnosed and received care at angioedema reference centers in Brazil, affiliated to the Brazilian Group of Studies on Hereditary Angioedema. METHODS: Fourteen patients from 8 Brazilian Angioedema Reference Centers, diagnosed with AAE-C1-INH, were included in this study. Clinical data collected included sex, date of birth, date of onset of symptoms, date of diagnosis, plasma levels of antigenic and/or functional C1-INH, levels of C4 and C1q, location and treatment of angioedema attacks, long-term prophylaxis, associated diseases, and definitive treatment. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were identified with AAE-C1-INH. Most patients (10/14; 71.4%) were female. The median age at onset of symptoms was 56.5 years (range, 14-74 years; interquartile range [IQR], 32-64 years), and median age at diagnosis was 58.0 years (range, 20-76 years; IQR, 38-65 years), with a median time until diagnosis of 2 years (range, 0-6 years; IQR, 1-3 years). The most common manifestations were cutaneous (face, eyelids, lips, trunk, hands, feet, and genitals). Most patient had low levels of C4 (13/14; 92.8%) and of antigenic C1-INH (8/14; 57.1%). Four had decreased functional activity of C1-INH (4/7; 57.1%) and C1q levels were low in 5 patients (5/12; 41.6%). Underlying diseases were identified in all 14 patients, with lymphoma of the splenic marginal zone and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance being the most frequent. Nine patients (64.2%) needed long-term prophylactic treatment for recurrent angioedema and 5 patients (46.7%) required treatment for angioedema attacks. Most of them (12/14; 85.7%) had resolution of angioedema. CONCLUSION: Therapy of AAE-C1-INH aims to control symptoms; however, diagnosis and treatment of the underlying disease, when present, should be an important target and may lead to the resolution of angioedema in patients with AAE-C1-INH.

Efficacy of House Dust Mite Sublingual Immunotherapy in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Sensitization to house dust mites (HDMs) is frequent in patients with atopic dermatitis. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract in patients with atopic dermatitis sensitized to HDM. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we enrolled 91 patients 3 years or older, with SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) score greater than or equal to 15 and positive skin test result and/or IgE to D pteronyssinus. Patients were stratified according to age (<12 and ≥12 years) to receive HDM SLIT or placebo for 18 months. Primary outcome was a greater than or equal to 15-point decrease in SCORAD score. Secondary outcomes were decreases in SCORAD and objective SCORAD, Eczema Area and Severity Index, visual analog scale for symptoms, and pruritus scale scores; Investigator's Global Assessment 0/1; and decrease greater than or equal to 4 points in Dermatology Life Quality Index. Background therapy was maintained. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients completed the study (35 HDM SLIT, 31 placebo). After 18 months, 74.2% and 58% of patients in the HDM SLIT group and the placebo group, respectively, showed greater than or equal to 15-point decrease in SCORAD score (relative risk, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.89-1.83). Significant SCORAD score decreases from baseline of 55.6% and 34.5% in HDM SLIT and placebo groups (mean difference, 20.4; 95% CI, 3.89-37.3), significant objective SCORAD score decreases of 56.8% and 34.9% in HDM SLIT and placebo groups (mean difference, 21.3; 95% CI, 0.66-41.81), and more patients with Investigator's Global Assessment 0/1 in the HDM SLIT group as compared with the placebo group (14 of 35 vs 5 of 31; relative risk, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.09-6.39) were observed at 18 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that HDM SLIT may be effective in HDM-sensitized patients as an add-on treatment for atopic dermatitis.

Unnecessary Abdominal Surgeries in Attacks of Hereditary Angioedema with Normal C1 Inhibitor.

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is an autosomal dominant disease mostly due to the deficiency of C1 inhibitor (C1-INH). HAE with normal C1-INH was first described in 2000 and associated with mutations in the coagulation factor XII in 2006. Both diseases are associated with high bradykinin production, resulting in increased vascular permeability. Gastrointestinal edema due to HAE can be misdiagnosed as acute abdomen and unnecessary surgical procedures may be performed. The present study evaluates the prevalence of surgical procedures and/or acute abdomen in HAE patients with the coagulation factor XII mutation. It is a retrospective study where patients were diagnosed with recurrent angioedema without urticaria, normal C1-INH levels, and positive family history of angioedema. All patients were evaluated for the known mutations located at exon 9 of the F12 gene. Medical records were evaluated and questionnaires were applied to 52 patients with normal C1-INH levels (age range 13-76 years; 47/52, 90.38% women; 5/52, 9.61% men). F12 mutation was present in 32/52 patients (61.5%). Acute abdominal pain was diagnosed in 16/52 (30.76%) patients, appendicitis in 9/16 (56.2%), and undetermined diagnosis in 7/16 (43.7%). Among patients diagnosed with acute abdominal pain, 13/16 (81.2%) underwent surgery and 3/16 (18.7%) improved without surgical intervention. We conclude that many HAE patients with coagulation factor XII mutation were misdiagnosed with acute abdomen and subjected to unnecessary invasive procedures. It is critical to disseminate information about this rare mutation in patients with otherwise normal C1-INH activity, in order to speed up diagnosis and avoid misconduct.

The Challenges in the Follow-Up and Treatment of Brazilian Children with Hereditary Angioedema.

INTRODUCTION: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) with C1 inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency is a rare autosomal dominant disease. Although the first symptoms can appear in childhood, the diagnosis's delay has a strong impact on the patient's quality of life. We analyzed clinical and laboratory characteristics and the drug therapy of pediatric patients with HAE in Brazil. METHODS: Medical records from 18 reference centers of HAE patients under 18 years of age were evaluated after confirmed diagnosis was performed by quantitative and/or functional C1-INH. RESULTS: A total of 95 participants (51 M:44 F; mean age: 7 years old) out of 17 centers were included; 15 asymptomatic cases were identified through family history and genetic screening. Angioedema attacks affected the extremities (73.5%), gastrointestinal tract (57%), face (50%), lips (42.5%), eyelids (23.7%), genitals (23.7%), upper airways (10%), and tongue (6.3%). Family history was present in 84% of patients, and the mean delay in the diagnosis was 3.9 years. Long-term prophylaxis (51/80) was performed with tranexamic acid (39/80) and androgens (13/80); and short-term prophylaxis (9/80) was performed with tranexamic acid (6/80) and danazol (3/80). On-demand therapy (35/80) was prescribed: icatibant in 7/35, fresh frozen plasma in 16/35, C1-INH plasma-derived in 11/35, and tranexamic acid in 12/35 patients. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study on HAE pediatric patients in Latin America. Clinical manifestations were similar to adults. Drugs such as androgens and tranexamic acid were indicated off-label, probably due to restricted access to specific drugs. Educational programs should address pediatricians to reduce late diagnosis and tailored child therapy.

Acquired Angioedema due to C1 Inhibitor Deficiency Preceding Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma: Further Insights from Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: Acquired angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency (AAE-C1-INH) is a very rare disease. In clinical practice, it may be difficult to differentiate AAE-C1-INH from hereditary angioedema due to C1-INH deficiency (HAE-C1-INH). In both conditions, patients are at an increased risk of death from asphyxiation due to upper airway obstruction. The association of AAE-C1-INH with lymphoproliferative and autoimmune diseases, and with presence of anti-C1-INH antibodies has been well documented, and treatment of the underlying condition may result in complete remission of angioedema. OBJECTIVES: To discuss the clinical evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment outcomes of AAE-C1-INH in the context of the care of 2 patients with recurrent isolated angioedema. METHODS: Two patients were followed up prospectively at our clinic. Measurements of C3, C4, C1-INH, and C1q levels were carried out by nephelometry, and the functional activity of C1-INH was determined by a chromogenic assay. Hematological investigation included morphological and immunophenotyping analysis of peripheral blood, bone marrow, and spleen histopathology. Sequencing of the 8 exons and adjacent intronic regions of the SERPING1 gene was performed using the Sanger method. RESULTS: Two patients were diagnosed with AAE-C1-INH associated with splenic marginal zone lymphoma during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Close follow-up, including detailed clinical history, physical examination, and laboratory tests, of our patients with AAE-C1-INH was essential for the early diagnosis and successful treatment of the lymphoproliferative disease, leading to the resolution of the angioedema attacks.

Anafilaxia a cloridrato de benzidamina: relato de caso / Anaphylaxis to benzydamine hydrochloride: a case report

Reações de hipersensibilidade a medicamentos (RHM) podem induzir manifestações clínicas heterogêneas, desde leves até graves. São classificadas em imunológicas ou alérgicas quando mediadas por anticorpos ou linfócitos T, e não imunológicas quando decorrentes de efeitos farmacológicos da droga, incluindo inibição da enzima cicloxigenase (Cox). Os dois grupos mais frequentemente implicados nas RHM são os anti-inflamatórios não esteroidais (AINEs), e os antibióticos betalactâmicos. O manejo adequado das reações aos AINEs depende da identificação do mecanismo fisiopatológico envolvido, que permitirá classificar em reator seletivo (indivíduo que reage a um único fármaco e a outros com estrutura química similar), ou reator múltiplo ou intolerante cruzado (aquele que reage a múltiplos fármacos de estrutura química não relacionada). O cloridrato de benzidamina (CBZ) é um AINE de uso frequente e relativamente seguro, sem descrições de reações graves associadas ao seu uso. Atua inibindo as enzimas Prostaglandina Endoperoxidase H Sintase 1 e/ou 2, e a Fosfolipase A2. Em pacientes com história de reações aos AINEs, o teste de provocação é a ferramenta diagnóstica padrão ouro para confirmar ou excluir a reatividade cruzada a outros AINEs e definir um fármaco alternativo seguro. Descreveremos um caso raro de anafilaxia ao CBZ durante teste de provocação oral.

Hypersensitivity drug reactions (HDRs) may induce mild to severe heterogeneous clinical manifestations. They are classified as immunological or allergic when mediated by antibodies or T lymphocytes, and non-immunological when resulting from pharmacological effects of the drug, including inhibition of the cyclooxygenase (Cox) enzyme. The two groups of drugs most frequently implicated in HDRs are non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and beta-lactam antibiotics. Appropriate management of NSAID reactions depends on identification of the pathophysiological mechanism involved, which will allow to classify the patient as selective reactor (patient reacting to a single drug and others with similar chemical structure) or multiple or cross-intolerant reactor (patient reacting to multiple drugs with unrelated chemical structure). Benzydamine hydrochloride (BZH) is a frequently used, relatively safe NSAID for which descriptions of severe reactions are not available. BZH acts inhibiting the enzymes prostaglandin endoperoxide H synthase (PGHS) 1 and/ or 2 and phospholipase A2. In patients with a history of NSAID reactions, the challenge test is the gold standard diagnostic tool to confirm or exclude cross-reactivity to other NSAIDs, and to define a safe alternative drug. In this paper, we describe a rare case of anaphylaxis to BZH during an oral drug provocation test.

Uveitis in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus patients: a multicenter survey.

The aim of this study is to assess uveitis prevalence in a large cohort of childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) patients. A retrospective multicenter cohort study including 852 cSLE patients was performed in ten pediatric rheumatology centers (Brazilian cSLE group). An investigator meeting was held and all participants received database training. Uveitis was diagnosed through clinical assessment by the uveitis expert ophthalmologist of each center. Patients with and without uveitis were assessed for lupus clinical/laboratory features and treatments. Uveitis was observed in 7/852 cSLE patients (0.8%). Two of them had ocular complications: cataract and irreversible blindness in one patient and retinal ischemia with subsequent neovascularization and unilateral blindness in another. Uveitis was identified within the first 6 months of cSLE diagnosis in 6/7 patients (86%). Comparison of a subgroup of cSLE patients with (n = 7) and without uveitis (n = 73) and similar length of disease duration showed that patients with uveitis had increased SLEDAI-2K score (19 vs. 6; p < 0.01). In addition, fever (71 vs. 12%; p < 0.01), lymphadenopathy (29 vs. 1.4%; p = 0.02), arthritis (43 vs. 7%; p = 0.02), and use of intravenous methylprednisolone (71 vs. 22%; p = 0.01) were higher in cSLE patients with uveitis, as compared to those without this manifestation, respectively. Presence of fever was significantly associated with uveitis, independently of SLEDAI scores or use of intravenous methylprednisolone pulses, as shown by adjusted regression analysis (adjusted prevalence ratio 35.7, 95% CI 2.4-519.6; p < 0.01). Uveitis was a rare and initial manifestation of active cSLE patients. Early recognition is essential due to the possibility of irreversible blindness.

Characterization of chronic arthritis in a multicenter study of 852 childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus patients.

Chronic arthritis (CA) is an unusual condition in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) and data in children is very limited. The aim of the study is to assess CA in a large population of cSLE patients, in a multicenter cross-sectional study including 852 cSLE patients followed in ten Pediatric Rheumatology referral services in state of São Paulo, Brazil. CA was observed in 32/852 (3.7 %) cSLE patients mostly in hands and ankles. Chronic monoarthritis was diagnosed in four cSLE patients, oligoarthritis in nine and polyarthritis in 19. In the latter group, six had rhupus syndrome. Two oligoarticular patients had Jaccoud's arthropathy. CA was an isolated manifestation observed at disease onset in 13/32 (41 %) cSLE patients, and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) was the first diagnosis in 18/32 (56 %). The comparison of last visit of patients with CA and without this manifestation revealed higher frequency of splenomegaly (28 vs. 11 %, p = 0.002). The median of SLICC/ACR-DI score [1(0-9) vs. 0(0-7), p = 0.003] was significantly higher in CA patients compared to patients without this manifestation, likewise the frequency of musculoskeletal damage (31 vs. 9 % p = 0.001). Frequencies of treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (75 vs. 26 %, p < 0.0001), hydroxychloroquine sulfate (87 vs. 59 %, p = 0.001) and methotrexate (47 vs. 22 %, p = 0.001) were significantly higher in CA patients. This large multicenter study allowed us to characterize CA as a rare and early manifestation of cSLE, frequently mimicking JIA at disease onset. It is predominantly polyarticular, involving more often hands and ankles and it is associated with significant musculoskeletal accrual damage.

Evans Syndrome at Childhood-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Diagnosis: A Large Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Evans syndrome (ES) in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) patients has been rarely reported and limited to small populations. PROCEDURES: A retrospective multicenter cohort study (Brazilian cSLE group) was performed in 10 Pediatric Rheumatology services including 850 patients with cSLE. ES was assessed at disease diagnosis and defined by the combination of immune thrombocytopenia and autoimmune hemolytic anemia. RESULTS: ES was observed in 11 of 850 (1.3%) cSLE patients. The majority of them had hemorrhagic manifestations (91%) and active disease (82%). All patients with ES were hospitalized and none died. Comparisons of cSLE patients with and without ES at diagnosis revealed similar frequencies of female gender, multiorgan involvement, autoantibodies profile, and low complement (P > 0.05). Patients with ES had a lower frequency of malar rash (9% vs. 53%, P = 0.003) and musculoskeletal involvement (18% vs. 69%, P = 0.001) than those without this complication. The frequencies of intravenous methylprednisolone (82% vs. 43%, P = 0.013) and intravenous immunoglobulin use (64% vs. 3%, P < 0.0001) were significantly higher in the ES group, with similar current prednisone dose between groups (1.1 [0.76-1.5] vs. 1.0 mg/kg/day [0-30], P = 0.195). CONCLUSIONS: Our large multicenter study identified ES as a rare and severe initial manifestation of active cSLE with good outcome. Diagnosis is challenging due to the lack of typical signs and symptoms of lupus and the requirement to exclude infection and primary immunodeficiency.

Urticária crônica espontânea em pacientes com lúpus eritematoso sistêmico juvenil / Chronic spontaneous urticaria in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus patients

Estudos avaliando a prevalência de urticária crônica espontânea (UCE) no lúpus eritematoso sistêmico juvenil (LESJ), assim como possíveis fatores associados são restritos a poucos relatos de caso. Objetivos: Avaliar a prevalência de UCE em uma população expressiva de LESJ, assim como sua possível associação com dados demográficos, manifestações clínicas, alterações laboratoriais, atividade/dano cumulativo da doença e tratamento. Métodos: Um estudo de coorte multicêntrico retrospectivo foi realizado em 10 serviços de Reumatologia Pediátrica provenientes do Grupo Brasileiro de Lúpus e incluiu 852 pacientes com LESJ. UCE foi diagnosticada de acordo com o guideline do EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO. Os pacientes foram divididos em dois grupos para a avaliação das manifestações clínicas atuais, assim como parâmetros laboratoriais e tratamento: pacientes que tiveram UCE (avaliados durante o diagnóstico da urticária) e pacientes sem UCE (avaliados na última consulta). Resultados: A presença de urticária foi observada em 10/852 (1,17%) pacientes com LESJ. A comparação entre os pacientes com LESJ com e sem UCE revelou uma maior frequência de sintomas constitucionais (40% vs. 8%, p=0,005), envolvimento do sistema reticuloendotelial (30% vs. 3%, p=0,003), sintomas mucocutâneos (90% vs. 28%, p < 0,0001), manifestações musculoesqueléticas (50% vs. 6%, p < 0,0001) e necessidade de pulso de metilprednisolona (60% vs. 8%, p < 0,0001) no grupo com UCE. A frequência do uso de imunossupressor foi menor nos pacientes com UCE (20% vs. 61%, p=0,017). As medianas do SLEDAI-2K (12 vs. 2, p < 0,0001) e do VHS (40 vs. 19 mm/1a hora, p=0,024), foram maiores nos pacientes com UCE. Conclusões: Este foi o primeiro estudo que evidenciou a possível relação da UCE com LESJ. A UCE aconteceu predominantemente no início do curso do LESJ e esteve associada com uma atividade de doença moderada/alta e sem envolvimento de órgãos nobres...

Data regarding the prevalence of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) patients and possible associated factors are limited to few case reports. The objectives of the present study were to assess CSU in a large cSLE population evaluating demographic data, clinical manifestations, disease activity/damage, laboratory abnormalities and treatment. Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort study (Brazilian cSLE group) was performed in 10 Pediatric Rheumatology services including 852 cSLE patients. CSU was diagnosed according to EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO Guidelines. Patients with CSU (evaluated at urticaria diagnosis) and patients without CSU (evaluated at last visit) were assessed for lupus clinical/laboratory features and treatment. Results: CSU was observed in 10/852 (1.17%) cSLE patients. Comparison of cSLE patients with and without CSU revealed a higher frequency of constitutional (40% vs. 8%, p=0.006), reticuloendothelial system involvement (30% vs. 3%, p=0.003), mucocutaneous (90% vs. 28%, p < 0.0001) and musculoskeletal manifestations (50% vs. 6%, p < 0.0001) and methylprednisolone pulse therapy use (60% vs. 8%, p < 0.0001) in the former group. The frequency of immunosuppressive treatment was lower in patients with CSU(p=0.017). The median SLEDAI-2K (12 vs. 2, p < 0.0001) and ESR (40 vs. 19 mm/1sthour, p=0.024), was higher in patients with CSU. Conclusions: To our knowledge this was the first study that evidenced that CSU may be linked to cSLE. We also demonstrated that this particular skin manifestation occurs predominantly at disease onset and it was associated with lupus moderate/high disease activity without major organ involvement...

Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Survey of 852 Cases of Childhood-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the prevalence of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) patients and possible associated factors are limited to a few case reports. The objectives of this study were to assess CSU in a large cSLE population, in order to evaluate the demographic data, clinical manifestations, disease activity/damage, laboratory abnormalities and treatment. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter cohort study (Brazilian cSLE group) was performed in 10 Pediatric Rheumatology services and included 852 cSLE patients. CSU was diagnosed according to the guidelines of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network, the European Dermatology Forum and the World Allergy Organization. Patients with CSU (evaluated at urticaria diagnosis) and patients without CSU (evaluated at the last visit) were assessed for lupus clinical/laboratory features and treatment. RESULTS: CSU was observed in 10/852 cSLE patients (1.17%). The median of cSLE duration at urticaria diagnosis was 0 (-3 to 5) years. Comparison of cSLE patients with and without CSU revealed a greater frequency of constitutional symptoms (40 vs. 8%, p = 0.006), reticuloendothelial system involvement (30 vs. 3%, p = 0.003), mucocutaneous (90 vs. 28%, p < 0.0001) and musculoskeletal manifestations (50 vs. 6%, p < 0.0001) and methylprednisolone pulse therapy use (60 vs. 9%, p < 0.0001) in the former group. The frequency of immunosuppressive treatment was lower in patients with CSU (p = 0.018). The median SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (12 vs. 2, p < 0.0001) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (40 vs. 19 mm/1st hour, p = 0.024), was higher in patients with CSU. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study with evidence that CSU may be linked to cSLE. We also demonstrated that this particular skin manifestation occurs predominantly at disease onset and is associated with lupus moderate/high disease activity without major organ involvement.