Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 32
Filter
1.
Transbound Emerg Dis ; 67(6): 3005-3015, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32530134

ABSTRACT

This study describes the development and validation of a simplified enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection and discrimination of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) serotypes O, A, C and Asia 1. The multiplex ELISA was designed using selected, type-specific monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) coated onto ELISA plates as catching antibodies and a unique pan-FMDV MAb (1F10) as detector conjugate. Capture MAbs with the broadest intratypic reactivity were selected for each of the four FMDV serotypes by screening large panels of candidate MAbs with a wide spectrum of representative FMDV isolates. An additional pan-FMDV ELISA using 1F10 MAb for both capture and detection was used to complement the specific typing ELISAs to detect virus isolates, which might escape binding to the selected serotype-specific MAbs. This multiplex ELISA was prepared in a stabilized format, with immunoplates pre-coated with six MAbs and positive antigen controls already trapped by the relevant MAb, with the view to make available a diagnostic kit. Diagnostic performance of the MAbs-multiplex ELISA was analysed using 299 FMDV-positive epithelial suspensions representative of the antigenic and genomic variability within each serotype. Overall, the results provided evidence that the diagnostic performance of this assay platform is improved compared to the more complex polyclonal-based antigen detection ELISA; combining data from different serotypes and referring to the gold standard tests (i.e. virus isolation and/or RT-PCR), the MAbs-multiplex ELISA showed a sensitivity of 79% for the serotype-specific ELISA, compared to 72% for the polyclonal ELISA. The absence of reactivity of a minority of FMDV strains using the MAbs-multiplex ELISA can largely be attributed to deteriorated or low antigen concentration in the sample. This multiplex ELISA is simple, rapid and stable. FMDV antigenic diversity was adequately covered by the selected MAbs. Therefore, it can be used to replace existing polyclonal ELISAs for FMDV detection and serotyping.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/diagnosis , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/isolation & purification , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/diagnosis , Serotyping/methods , Swine Diseases/diagnosis , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal/analysis , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/virology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/virology , Serotyping/veterinary , Sus scrofa , Swine , Swine Diseases/virology
2.
PLoS One ; 9(10): e109322, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25313787

ABSTRACT

Foot-and-mouth disease Virus (FMDV) is an economically important, highly contagious picornavirus that affects both wild and domesticated cloven hooved animals. In developing countries, the effective laboratory diagnosis of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is often hindered by inadequate sample preservation due to difficulties in the transportation and storage of clinical material. These factors can compromise the ability to detect and characterise FMD virus in countries where the disease is endemic. Furthermore, the high cost of sending infectious virus material and the biosecurity risk it presents emphasises the need for a thermo-stable, non-infectious mode of transporting diagnostic samples. This paper investigates the potential of using FMDV lateral-flow devices (LFDs) for dry transportation of clinical samples for subsequent nucleic acid amplification, sequencing and recovery of infectious virus by electroporation. FMDV positive samples (epithelial suspensions and cell culture isolates) representing four FMDV serotypes were applied to antigen LFDs: after which it was possible to recover viral RNA that could be detected using real-time RT-PCR. Using this nucleic acid, it was also possible to recover VP1 sequences and also successfully utilise protocols for amplification of complete FMD virus genomes. It was not possible to recover infectious FMDV directly from the LFDs, however following electroporation into BHK-21 cells and subsequent cell passage, infectious virus could be recovered. Therefore, these results support the use of the antigen LFD for the dry, non-hazardous transportation of samples from FMD endemic countries to international reference laboratories.


Subject(s)
Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/genetics , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/virology , RNA, Viral/analysis , Specimen Handling/instrumentation , Animals , Cell Line , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/pathology , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/isolation & purification , Genome, Viral , Guinea Pigs , Humans , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sequence Analysis, RNA , Serotyping , Temperature
3.
J Virol Methods ; 187(2): 406-12, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23174161

ABSTRACT

Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) is a significant economically and distributed globally pathogen of Artiodactyla. Current vaccines are chemically inactivated whole virus particles that require large-scale virus growth in strict bio-containment with the associated risks of accidental release or incomplete inactivation. Non-infectious empty capsids are structural mimics of authentic particles with no associated risk and constitute an alternate vaccine candidate. Capsids self-assemble from the processed virus structural proteins, VP0, VP3 and VP1, which are released from the structural protein precursor P1-2A by the action of the virus-encoded 3C protease. To date recombinant empty capsid assembly has been limited by poor expression levels, restricting the development of empty capsids as a viable vaccine. Here expression of the FMDV structural protein precursor P1-2A in insect cells is shown to be efficient but linkage of the cognate 3C protease to the C-terminus reduces expression significantly. Inactivation of the 3C enzyme in a P1-2A-3C cassette allows expression and intermediate levels of 3C activity resulted in efficient processing of the P1-2A precursor into the structural proteins which assembled into empty capsids. Expression was independent of the insect host cell background and leads to capsids that are recognised as authentic by a range of anti-FMDV bovine sera suggesting their feasibility as an alternate vaccine.


Subject(s)
Biotechnology/methods , Capsid/immunology , Cysteine Endopeptidases/biosynthesis , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/isolation & purification , Gene Expression , Technology, Pharmaceutical/methods , Viral Proteins/biosynthesis , Viral Vaccines/isolation & purification , 3C Viral Proteases , Animals , Cell Line , Cysteine Endopeptidases/genetics , Down-Regulation , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/genetics , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/immunology , Insecta , Viral Proteins/genetics , Viral Vaccines/genetics , Viral Vaccines/immunology
4.
J Virol Methods ; 183(2): 125-31, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22561986

ABSTRACT

The solid-phase competition ELISA (SPCE) has been evaluated in both screening and titration assay formats for detecting antibodies against foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) for the six non-O serotypes A, C, SAT 1, SAT 2, SAT 3 and Asia 1. Cut-off values were determined as a percentage inhibition of 40 for the SAT serotypes and 50 for serotypes A, C and Asia 1, which gave rise to specificity values ranging from 99.41% to 99.9% for the different serotypes. The relative sensitivity between the SPCE and LPBE/virus neutralisation test was 100%/109%. Antiserum titres derived by the SPCE for samples of serotypes O, A(22) and Asia 1 were more than 11, 1 and 5 times of those determined by virus neutralisation test, respectively. This study indicated that the non-type O SPCEs have sufficient sensitivities and specificities for use as serological diagnostic tests for the qualitative and quantitative detection of antibodies against FMDV.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Cattle Diseases/immunology , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/immunology , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/immunology , Animals , Antibodies, Neutralizing/chemistry , Antibodies, Viral/chemistry , Antibodies, Viral/isolation & purification , Binding, Competitive , Cattle/immunology , Cattle Diseases/prevention & control , Cattle Diseases/virology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/standards , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/prevention & control , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/virology , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sheep/immunology , Sheep Diseases/immunology , Sheep Diseases/virology , Swine/immunology , Swine Diseases/immunology , Swine Diseases/virology , Vaccination
5.
J Virol Methods ; 180(1-2): 96-100, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22230813

ABSTRACT

Two lateral flow devices (LFD) for the detection of vesicular stomatitis (VS) virus (VSV), types Indiana (VSV-IND) and New Jersey (VSV-NJ) were developed using monoclonal antibodies C1 and F25VSVNJ-45 to the respective VSV serotypes. The performance of the LFDs was evaluated in the laboratory on suspensions of vesicular epithelia and cell culture passage derived supernatants of VSV. The collection of test samples included 105 positive for VSV-IND (92 vesicular epithelial suspensions and 13 cell culture antigens; encompassing 93 samples of subtype 1 [VSV-IND-1], 9 of subtype 2 [VSV-IND-2] and 3 of subtype 3 [VSV-IND-3]) and 189 positive for VSV-NJ (162 vesicular epithelial suspensions and 27 cell culture antigens) from suspected cases of vesicular disease in cattle and horses collected from 11 countries between 1937 and 2008 or else were derived from experimental infection and 777 samples that were either shown to be positive or negative for foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus (FMDV) and swine vesicular disease virus (SVDV) or else collected from healthy cattle or pigs and collected from 68 countries between 1965 and 2011. The diagnostic sensitivity of the VSV-IND (for reaction with VSV-IND-1) and VSV-NJ LFDs was either similar or identical at 94.6% (VSV-IND) and 97.4% (VSV-NJ) compared to 92.5% and 97.4% obtained by the reference method of antigen ELISA. The VSV-IND LFD failed to react with viruses of VSV-IND-2 and 3, while the VSV-NJ device recognized all VSV-NJ virus strains. The diagnostic specificities of the VSV-IND and VSV-NJ LFDs were 99.1% and 100, respectively, compared to 99.6% and 99.8% for the ELISA. Reactions with FMDV which can produce indistinguishable syndromes clinically in cattle, pigs and sheep and SVDV (vesicular disease in pigs) did not occur. These data illustrate the potential for the LFDs to be used next to the animal for providing rapid and objective support to veterinarians in their clinical judgment of vesicular disease and for the subtype (VSV-IND-1) and type-specific (VSV-NJ) pen-side diagnosis of VS and differential diagnosis from FMD.


Subject(s)
Foot-and-Mouth Disease/diagnosis , Laboratories/supply & distribution , Vesicular Stomatitis/diagnosis , Vesicular stomatitis Indiana virus/isolation & purification , Vesicular stomatitis New Jersey virus/isolation & purification , Animals , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/diagnosis , Cattle Diseases/virology , Diagnosis, Differential , Enterovirus B, Human/isolation & purification , Enterovirus Infections/diagnosis , Enterovirus Infections/virology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sheep , Sheep Diseases/diagnosis , Sheep Diseases/virology , Swine , Vesicular Stomatitis/virology
6.
Onderstepoort J Vet Res ; 79(2): 456, 2012 Jun 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23327376

ABSTRACT

Using foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) as an example, this review describes new tools that can be used to detect and characterise livestock diseases. In recent years, molecular tests that can detect and characterise pathogens in a diverse range of sample types have revolutionised laboratory diagnostics. In addition to use in centralised laboratories, there are opportunities to locate diagnostic technologies close to the animals with suspected clinical signs. Work in this area has developed simple-to-use lateral-flow devices for the detection of FMD virus (FMDV), as well as new hardware platforms to allow molecular testing to be deployed into the field for use by non-specialists. Once FMDV has been detected, nucleotide sequencing is used to compare field strains with reference viruses. Transboundary movements of FMDV are routinely monitored using VP1 sequence data, while higher resolution transmission trees (at the farm-to-farm level) can be reconstructed using full-genome sequencing approaches. New technologies such as next-generation sequencing technologies are now being applied to dissect the viral sequence populations that exist within single samples. The driving force for the use of these technologies has largely been influenced by the priorities of developed countries with FMD-free (without vaccination) status. However, it is important to recognise that these approaches also show considerable promise for use in countries where FMD is endemic, although further modifications (such as sample archiving and strain and serotype characterisation) may be required to tailor these tests for use in these regions. Access to these new diagnostic and sequencing technologies in sub-Saharan Africa have the potential to provide novel insights into FMD epidemiology and will impact upon improved strategies for disease control.Effective control of infectious diseases is reliant upon accurate diagnosis of clinical cases using laboratory tests, together with an understanding of factors that impact upon the epidemiology of the infectious agent. A wide range of new diagnostic tools and nucleotide sequencing methods are used by international reference laboratories to detect and characterise the agents causing outbreaks of infectious diseases. In the past, high costs (initial capital expenses, as well as day-to-day maintenance and running costs) and complexity of the protocols used to perform some of these tests have limited the use of these methods in smaller laboratories. However, simpler and more cost-effective formats are now being developed that offer the prospect that these technologies will be even more widely deployed into laboratories particularly those in developing regions of the world such as sub-Saharan Africa.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases/veterinary , Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Livestock , Sentinel Surveillance/veterinary , Africa South of the Sahara/epidemiology , Animals , Communicable Diseases/diagnosis , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/epidemiology , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/prevention & control , Vaccination/veterinary , Zoonoses
7.
J Virol Methods ; 175(2): 253-60, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21635921

ABSTRACT

A sandwich ELISA using recombinant integrin αvß6 as a capture ligand and serotype-specific monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) as detecting reagents has been compared with a polyclonal antibody based ELISA (using type-specific rabbit antibodies as capture and guinea pig antibodies as detectors), which is employed routinely at the FAO World Reference Laboratory for Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD), for the identification and serotyping of FMD virus (FMDV). The study used cell culture grown antigens (1351 FMDV positive) derived from suspected cases of vesicular disease collected from 86 countries between 1924 and 2011, those positive for the other vesicular diseases of swine vesicular disease (n = 25) and vesicular stomatitis (n = 45) and negative samples collected from uninfected cell cultures (n = 36). The diagnostic sensitivity of the assays was similar at 98.1% (polyclonal ELISA) compared to 97.9% (integrin/Mab ELISA) but the serotypic-specificity of the latter was vastly superior (96%) to that of the former (61.5%). Reactions with the viruses of swine vesicular disease and vesicular stomatitis, which produce clinically indistinguishable syndromes in pigs and cattle, did not occur. The integrin/Mab ELISA recognized FMDV strains of wide antigenic and molecular diversity of all seven serotypes and although some FMDV isolates were not detected, the greater specificity of the assay, while retaining test sensitivity comparable to the conventional assay, warrants its consideration for adoption for routine diagnostic use.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal , Antibodies, Viral , Antigens, Neoplasm , Antigens, Viral/analysis , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/isolation & purification , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/diagnosis , Animals , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/diagnosis , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/classification , Guinea Pigs , Integrins , Recombinant Proteins , Sensitivity and Specificity , Swine , Swine Diseases/diagnosis
8.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol ; 140(3-4): 259-65, 2011 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21329991

ABSTRACT

The ability to propagate foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) plays an important role in laboratory diagnosis and the production of vaccines to control the spread of the disease. Many established cell lines suffer from poor sensitivity for isolating virus from field samples. One possible factor that limits sensitivity to FMDV is the lack of expression of surface integrins, the primary class of cell receptor used by FMDV to initiate infection. In this study we have sequenced cDNAs encoding these molecules for pigs and subsequently developed quantitative real-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR assays to quantify underlying mRNA transcription of integrin molecules. These novel assays were used together with flow-cytometry to determine cell surface expression and of 4 different cell culture systems. These studies have identified a clear correlation of sensitivity to FMDV with expression of integrins αVß6 and αVß8. In contrast, cell surface expression of αVß3 or mRNA for the ß1, ß3 or ß5 subunits did not appear to contribute to sensitivity of cells to FMDV. These findings confirm the requirement for αV6 and αVß8 as receptors for isolating FMDV from clinical samples and provide important tools and information for the rational design of recombinant cell lines containing these ligands for improved FMDV diagnosis and vaccine production.


Subject(s)
Foot-and-Mouth Disease/diagnosis , Integrins/genetics , Animals , Base Sequence , Cattle , Cell Line , DNA Primers/genetics , DNA, Complementary/genetics , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/immunology , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/prevention & control , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/physiology , Gene Expression , Integrins/chemistry , Molecular Sequence Data , Protein Subunits , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Receptors, Virus/chemistry , Receptors, Virus/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Swine , Swine Diseases/diagnosis , Swine Diseases/immunology , Swine Diseases/prevention & control , Viral Vaccines/biosynthesis , Virus Cultivation/methods , Virus Replication
9.
J Virol Methods ; 163(2): 474-6, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19815031

ABSTRACT

A lateral flow device (LFD) for the detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) of the SAT 2 serotype was developed using a monoclonal antibody (Mab 2H6). The performance of the LFD was evaluated in the laboratory on suspensions of vesicular epithelia: 305 positive for FMDV type SAT 2 from suspected cases of vesicular disease collected from 30 countries and 1002 samples shown to be negative for FMDV type SAT 2 collected from 67 countries between 1968 and 2008. The diagnostic sensitivity of the LFD for FMDV type SAT 2 was higher at 88% compared to 79% obtained by the reference method of antigen ELISA, and the diagnostic specificity of the LFD was approximately 99% compared to 100% for the ELISA. The device recognized FMDV strains of wide diversity within the FMDV SAT 2 serotype and gave a superior performance for their detection compared to the 1F10 LFD which had been developed previously and shown to perform less well for the detection of FMDVs of this particular serotype. Reactions in the SAT 2 2H6 LFD with the viruses of other FMDV serotypes and swine vesicular disease (which produces a clinically indistinguishable syndrome in pigs), did not occur. These data illustrate the potential for the LFD to be employed to complement the 1F10 device next to the animal in the pen-side diagnosis of FMD, for providing rapid and objective support to veterinarians in their clinical judgment of the disease and for specific confirmation of a FMDV type SAT 2 infection.


Subject(s)
Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/isolation & purification , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/diagnosis , Swine Diseases/virology , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal , Antibodies, Viral , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/virology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Swine/virology
10.
J Virol Methods ; 163(2): 477-80, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19819260

ABSTRACT

A lateral flow device (LFD) for the detection of swine vesicular disease (SVD) virus (SVDV) and differential diagnosis from foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) was developed using a monoclonal antibody (Mab C70). The performance of the LFD was evaluated in the laboratory on suspensions of vesicular epithelia and cell culture passage derived supernatants of SVDV and porcine teschovirus (enterovirus; PEV). The collection of test samples included 157 which were positive for SVDV (84 vesicular epithelial suspensions and 73 cell culture antigens) from suspected cases of vesicular disease in pigs collected from 14 countries between 1966 and 2008 and 663 samples which were either shown to be negative for SVDV and FMD virus (FMDV) or else collected from healthy pigs or demonstrated to be positive for FMDV, PEV or vesicular exanthema (VEV) and collected from 16 countries between 1965 and 2008 or else were derived from experimental animals. Three further samples containing vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) were also tested. The diagnostic sensitivity of the LFD for SVDV was similar at 82% compared to 86% obtained by the reference method of antigen ELISA, and the diagnostic specificity was 100% compared to 99.7% for the ELISA. The device recognized virus strains of each of the known genotypes of the sole SVDV serotype. Reactions with FMDV, VEV, VSV and PEV which can produce clinically indistinguishable syndromes in pigs, did not occur. These data illustrate the potential for the LFD to be used next to the animal for providing rapid and objective support to veterinarians in their clinical judgment of vesicular disease in pigs and for the specific pen-side diagnosis of SVD and differential diagnosis from FMD.


Subject(s)
Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Enterovirus B, Human/isolation & purification , Swine Vesicular Disease/diagnosis , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal , Antibodies, Viral , Diagnosis, Differential , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/diagnosis , Sensitivity and Specificity , Swine/virology , Swine Vesicular Disease/virology
11.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 15(9): 1409-17, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19788808

ABSTRACT

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is endemic to sub-Saharan Africa. To further understand its complex epidemiology, which involves multiple virus serotypes and host species, we characterized the viruses recovered from FMD outbreaks in Ethiopia during 1981-2007. We detected 5 of the 7 FMDV serotypes (O, A, C, Southern African Territories [SAT] 1, and SAT 2). Serotype O predominated, followed by serotype A; type C was not recognized after 1983. Phylogenetic analysis of virus protein 1 sequences indicated emergence of a new topotype within serotype O, East Africa 4. In 2007, serotype SAT 1 was detected in Ethiopia and formed a new distinct topotype (IX), and serotype SAT 2 reappeared after an apparent gap of 16 years. The diversity of viruses highlights the role of this region as a reservoir for FMD virus, and their continuing emergence in Ethiopia will greatly affect spread and consequent control strategy of the disease on this continent.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus , Foot-and-Mouth Disease , Goat Diseases , Sheep Diseases , Animals , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Cattle Diseases/virology , Cell Line , Cricetinae , Disease Outbreaks , Ethiopia/epidemiology , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/epidemiology , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/virology , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/classification , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/genetics , Genetic Variation , Goat Diseases/epidemiology , Goat Diseases/virology , Goats , Molecular Sequence Data , Phylogeny , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Serotyping , Sheep , Sheep Diseases/epidemiology , Sheep Diseases/virology
12.
Clin Vaccine Immunol ; 16(11): 1660-4, 2009 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19726619

ABSTRACT

A simple lateral-flow assay (LFA) based on a monoclonal antibody (MAb 70-17) was developed for the detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) under nonlaboratory conditions. The LFA was evaluated with epithelial suspensions (n = 704) prepared from current and historical field samples which had been submitted to the Pirbright Laboratory (United Kingdom) and from negative samples (n = 100) collected from naïve animals in Korea. Four FMDV serotypes (type O, A, Asia 1, and C) were detected in the LFA, but not the remaining three FMDV serotypes (SAT 1, SAT 2, and SAT 3). The diagnostic sensitivity of the LFA for FMDV types O, A, C, and Asia 1 was similar, at approximately 87.3%, to that of 87.7% obtained with antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Ag-ELISA). The diagnostic specificity of the LFA was 98.8%, compared to 100% for the Ag-ELISA. These results demonstrate that the LFA using the FMDV MAb 70-17 to detect FMDV is a supportive method for taking rapid measurements at the site of a suspected foot-and-mouth disease outbreak in Asia before diagnosing the disease in the laboratory, thereby offering the possibility of implementing control procedures more rapidly.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal , Antibodies, Viral , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/isolation & purification , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/diagnosis , Immunoassay/methods , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal/isolation & purification , Antibodies, Viral/isolation & purification , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/immunology , Korea , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Sensitivity and Specificity , United Kingdom
13.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 15(7): 1046-51, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19624919

ABSTRACT

We investigated the molecular epidemiology of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) serotype Asia 1, which caused outbreaks of disease in Asia during 2003-2007. Since 2004, the region affected by outbreaks of this serotype has increased from disease-endemic countries in southern Asia (Afghanistan, India, Iran, Nepal, Pakistan) northward to encompass Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, several regions of the People's Republic of China, Mongolia, Eastern Russia, and North Korea. Phylogenetic analysis of complete virus capsid protein 1 (VP1) gene sequences demonstrated that the FMDV isolates responsible for these outbreaks belonged to 6 groups within the Asia 1 serotype. Some contemporary strains were genetically closely related to isolates collected historically from the region as far back as 25 years ago. Our analyses also indicated that some viruses have spread large distances between countries in Asia within a short time.


Subject(s)
Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/genetics , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/epidemiology , Afghanistan/epidemiology , Animals , Asia/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , DNA, Viral/genetics , Disease Outbreaks , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/classification , Geography , Humans , India/epidemiology , Nepal/epidemiology , Pakistan/epidemiology , Phylogeny , RNA, Viral/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Serotyping
14.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 21(3): 321-30, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19407083

ABSTRACT

Rapid and accurate diagnosis is essential for effective control of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD). The present report describes the practical steps undertaken to deploy a real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (real-time RT-PCR) to process the samples received during the outbreaks of FMD in the United Kingdom in 2007. Two independent real-time RT-PCR assays targeting different regions (5'UTR and 3D) of the FMD virus (FMDV) genome were used to confirm the presence of FMDV in clinical samples collected from the first infected premises. Once the FMDV strain responsible had been sequenced, a single real-time RT-PCR assay (3D) was selected to test a total of 3,216 samples, including material from all 8 infected premises. Using a 96-well automated system to prepare nucleic acid template, up to 84 samples could be processed within 5 hr of submission, and up to 269 samples were tested per working day. A conservative cut-off was used to designate positive samples, giving rise to an assay specificity of 99.9% or 100% for negative control material or samples collected from negative premises, respectively. For the first time, real-time RT-PCR results were used to recognize preclinical FMD in a cattle herd. Furthermore, during the later stages of the outbreaks, the real-time RT-PCR assay supported an active surveillance program within high-risk cattle herds. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first documented use of real-time RT-PCR as a principal laboratory diagnostic tool following introduction of FMD into a country that was FMD-free (without vaccination) and highlights the advantages of this assay to support control decisions during disease outbreaks.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/epidemiology , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Animals , Cattle , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/diagnosis , Reproducibility of Results , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , United Kingdom/epidemiology
15.
Vet Microbiol ; 137(1-2): 178-83, 2009 May 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19181459

ABSTRACT

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) causes sporadic disease outbreaks in the Lao People's Democratic Republic (Lao PDR) and appears to be endemic within a livestock population largely susceptible to infection. As Lao PDR is a major thoroughfare for transboundary animal movement, regular FMD outbreaks occur causing economic hardship for farmers and their families. The dominant serotype causing outbreaks between 1998 and 2006 was type O. Using phylogenetic analysis, type O isolated viruses were divided into two topotypes: South East Asia (SEA) and the Middle East-South Asia (ME-SA). Type A virus was reported only in 2003 and 2006 and type Asia 1 only in 1996 and 1998.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/virology , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/genetics , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/epidemiology , Molecular Epidemiology , Swine Diseases/virology , Animals , Asia, Southeastern/epidemiology , Capsid Proteins/genetics , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/virology , Phylogeny , Swine , Swine Diseases/epidemiology
16.
J Virol Methods ; 155(1): 10-7, 2009 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18848845

ABSTRACT

A lateral flow device (LFD) for the detection of all seven serotypes of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) was developed using a monoclonal antibody (Mab 1F10) shown to be pan-reactive to FMDV strains of each serotype by ELISA. The performance of the LFD was evaluated in the laboratory on suspensions of vesicular epithelia (304 positive and 1003 negative samples) from suspected cases of vesicular disease collected from 86 countries between 1965 and 2008 and negative samples collected from healthy animals. The diagnostic sensitivity of the LFD for FMDV was similar at 84% compared to 85% obtained by the reference method of antigen ELISA, and the diagnostic specificity of the LFD was approximately 99% compared to 99.9% for the ELISA. The device recognized FMDV strains of wide diversity of all seven serotypes but weaker reactions were often evident with those of type SAT 2, several viruses of which were not detected. Reactions with the viruses of swine vesicular disease and vesicular stomatitis that produce clinically indistinguishable syndromes in pigs and cattle, did not occur. The test procedure was simple and rapid, and typically provided a result within 1-10min of sample addition. Simple homogenizers that could be used in field conditions for preparing epithelial suspensions were demonstrated to be effective for LFD application. These data illustrate the potential for the LFD to be used next to the animal in the pen-side diagnosis of FMD and for providing rapid and objective support to veterinarians in their clinical judgment of the disease.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal , Antigens, Viral/analysis , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/isolation & purification , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/diagnosis , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/veterinary , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Cattle , Chromatography/methods , Chromatography/veterinary , Collodion , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/virology , Goats , Humans , Micropore Filters , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sheep , Swine
17.
PLoS Pathog ; 4(4): e1000050, 2008 Apr 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18421380

ABSTRACT

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus causes an acute vesicular disease of domesticated and wild ruminants and pigs. Identifying sources of FMD outbreaks is often confounded by incomplete epidemiological evidence and the numerous routes by which virus can spread (movements of infected animals or their products, contaminated persons, objects, and aerosols). Here, we show that the outbreaks of FMD in the United Kingdom in August 2007 were caused by a derivative of FMDV O(1) BFS 1860, a virus strain handled at two FMD laboratories located on a single site at Pirbright in Surrey. Genetic analysis of complete viral genomes generated in real-time reveals a probable chain of transmission events, predicting undisclosed infected premises, and connecting the second cluster of outbreaks in September to those in August. Complete genome sequence analysis of FMD viruses conducted in real-time have identified the initial and intermediate sources of these outbreaks and demonstrate the value of such techniques in providing information useful to contemporary disease control programmes.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/genetics , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/transmission , Genome, Viral , Animals , Base Sequence , Cluster Analysis , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/epidemiology , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/virology , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/classification , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/isolation & purification , Molecular Epidemiology , Molecular Sequence Data , RNA, Viral/analysis , Sequence Analysis, DNA , United Kingdom/epidemiology
18.
J Clin Microbiol ; 46(3): 1081-9, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18216216

ABSTRACT

A high-throughput multiplexed assay was developed for the differential laboratory detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) from viruses that cause clinically similar diseases of livestock. This assay simultaneously screens for five RNA and two DNA viruses by using multiplexed reverse transcription-PCR (mRT-PCR) amplification coupled with a microsphere hybridization array and flow-cytometric detection. Two of the 17 primer-probe sets included in this multiplex assay were adopted from previously characterized real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) assays for FMDV. The diagnostic accuracy of the mRT-PCR assay was evaluated using 287 field samples, including 247 samples (213 true-positive samples and 35 true-negative samples) from suspected cases of foot-and-mouth disease collected from 65 countries between 1965 and 2006 and 39 true-negative samples collected from healthy animals. The mRT-PCR assay results were compared to those of two singleplex rRT-PCR assays, using virus isolation with antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays as the reference method. The diagnostic sensitivity of the mRT-PCR assay for FMDV was 93.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.8 to 96.4%), and the sensitivity was 98.1% (95% CI, 95.3 to 99.3%) for the two singleplex rRT-PCR assays used in combination. In addition, the assay could reliably differentiate between FMDV and other vesicular viruses, such as swine vesicular disease virus and vesicular exanthema of swine virus. Interestingly, the mRT-PCR detected parapoxvirus (n = 2) and bovine viral diarrhea virus (n = 2) in clinical samples, demonstrating the screening potential of this mRT-PCR assay to identify viruses in FMDV-negative material not previously recognized by using focused single-target rRT-PCR assays.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/diagnosis , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/isolation & purification , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/diagnosis , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Swine Diseases/diagnosis , Animals , Bovine Virus Diarrhea-Mucosal Disease/diagnosis , Bovine Virus Diarrhea-Mucosal Disease/virology , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/virology , Diarrhea Viruses, Bovine Viral/isolation & purification , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/virology , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/genetics , Microspheres , Parapoxvirus/isolation & purification , Poxviridae Infections/veterinary , Poxviridae Infections/virology , RNA, Viral/analysis , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Swine Diseases/virology , Swine Vesicular Disease/diagnosis , Swine Vesicular Disease/virology
19.
Vet Microbiol ; 127(3-4): 227-36, 2008 Mar 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17897794

ABSTRACT

A novel proximity ligation assay (PLA) using a pan-serotype reactive monoclonal antibody was developed and evaluated for the detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) in clinical samples collected from field cases of disease. The FMDV-specific PLA was found to be 100 times more sensitive for virus detection than the commonly used antigen capture-ELISA (AgELISA). As few as five TCID50 were detected in individual assays, which was comparable with the analytical sensitivity of real-time RT-PCR. Although this assay was capable of detecting diverse isolates from all seven FMDV serotypes, the diagnostic sensitivity of the PLA assay was lower than real-time RT-PCR mainly due to a failure to detect some SAT 1, SAT 2 and SAT 3 FMDV strains. In conclusion, this new PLA format has high analytical sensitivity for the detection of FMDV in clinical samples and may prove valuable as a rapid and simple tool for use in FMD diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal , Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/isolation & purification , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/diagnosis , Immunoassay/veterinary , Animals , Antibody Specificity , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/virology , Immunoassay/methods , RNA, Viral/analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Sensitivity and Specificity , Serotyping , Time Factors
20.
Vet Microbiol ; 126(1-3): 101-10, 2008 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17728080

ABSTRACT

A study was conducted to evaluate the performance of a nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) assay for the detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV). Two detection methods: NASBA-electrochemiluminescence (NASBA-ECL) and a newly developed NASBA-enzyme-linked oligonucleotide capture (NASBA-EOC) were evaluated. The diagnostic sensitivity of these assays was compared with other laboratory-based methods using 200 clinical samples collected from different regions of the world. Assay specificity was also assessed using samples (n=43) of other viruses that cause vesicular disease in livestock and genetic relatives of FMDV. Concordant results were generated for 174/200 (87.0%) of suspect FMD samples between NASBA-ECL and real-time RT-PCR. In comparison with the virus isolation (VI) data, the sensitivity of the NASBA-ECL assay was 92.9%, which was almost identical to that of the real-time RT-PCR (92.4%) for the same set of samples. There was broad agreement between the results of the NASBA-ECL and the simpler NASBA-EOC detection method for 97.1% of samples. In conclusion, this study provides further data to support the use of NASBA as a rapid and sensitive diagnostic method for the detection and surveillance of FMDV.


Subject(s)
Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus/isolation & purification , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/veterinary , Electrochemistry/methods , Luminescent Measurements/veterinary , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...