Análisis de la demanda asistencial desde atención primaria a traumatología: propuestas para la mejora del continuo asistencial / Analysis of the demand of care from Primary Care to Traumatology: Proposals for the improvement of the continuous care

Objetivo: Analizar las derivaciones dirigidas desde Atención Primaria a Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología. Como objetivo secundario, establecer 2escenarios de derivación, con el fin de conocer el impacto de la variabilidad en la derivación. Material y métodos: Estudio observacional de carácter transversal de análisis de las derivaciones de Atención Primaria a Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología durante el primer semestre de los años 2018, 2019 y 2021. Se ha examinado el número de derivaciones que emite cada facultativo y cada centro de salud de Atención Primaria, atendiendo a la clasificación de las distintas zonas básicas de salud. Resultados: Existe una gran variabilidad en el número de derivaciones, tanto según el tipo de zona básica de salud (p < 0,001) como por cada facultativo (p < 0,001). Las ratios de derivación se comportan de forma uniforme en el tiempo (p < 0,001). Debido al alto número de derivaciones, se han construido dosescenarios: en el primero de ellos la ratio de derivación se situaría en la zona media del espectro de la tasa de derivación. En el segundo escenario, se han tomado como referencia las menores ratios de derivación registradas. La reducción de la variabilidad en los 2escenarios supuestos proporciona una disminución importante de la demanda asistencial. Conclusiones: La reducción de la variabilidad tendría un efecto beneficioso sobre la capacidad asistencial del servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología.

Objective: To analyze referrals from Primary Care consultation to Orthopaedic Surgery reference department. As a secondary objective, to establish 2referral scenarios in order to determine the impact of variability on referral. Material and methods: Cross-sectional observational study, analyzing referrals from Primary Care to Orthopaedic Surgery during the first half of the years 2018, 2019, and 2021. The number of referrals issued by each doctor and each Primary Care Healthcare Center was examined, according to the classification of the different Basic Healthcare Zones. Results: There is great variability in the number of referrals, both according to the type of Basic Healthcare Zone and by each Primary Care facultative. The referral ratios behaved uniformly over time (P<0.001). Due to a large number of referrals, 2scenarios have been constructed: In the first scenario, the referral ratio would be in the middle of the referral rate spectrum. In the second scenario, the lowest referral ratios recorded have been taken as a reference. The reduction of variability in the 2scenarios assumed provides a significant reduction in the demand for care. Conclusion: Reducing variability would have a beneficial effect on the capacity of the Orthopaedic Surgery service to provide care.(AU)

[Translated article] Analysis of the demand of care from Primary Care to Traumatology: Proposals for the improvement of the continuous care / Análisis de la demanda asistencial desde atención primaria a traumatología: propuestas para la mejora del continuo asistencial

Objetivo: Analizar las derivaciones dirigidas desde Atención Primaria a Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología. Como objetivo secundario, establecer 2escenarios de derivación, con el fin de conocer el impacto de la variabilidad en la derivación. Material y métodos: Estudio observacional de carácter transversal de análisis de las derivaciones de Atención Primaria a Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología durante el primer semestre de los años 2018, 2019 y 2021. Se ha examinado el número de derivaciones que emite cada facultativo y cada centro de salud de Atención Primaria, atendiendo a la clasificación de las distintas zonas básicas de salud. Resultados: Existe una gran variabilidad en el número de derivaciones, tanto según el tipo de zona básica de salud (p < 0,001) como por cada facultativo (p < 0,001). Las ratios de derivación se comportan de forma uniforme en el tiempo (p < 0,001). Debido al alto número de derivaciones, se han construido dosescenarios: en el primero de ellos la ratio de derivación se situaría en la zona media del espectro de la tasa de derivación. En el segundo escenario, se han tomado como referencia las menores ratios de derivación registradas. La reducción de la variabilidad en los 2escenarios supuestos proporciona una disminución importante de la demanda asistencial. Conclusiones: La reducción de la variabilidad tendría un efecto beneficioso sobre la capacidad asistencial del servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología.

Objective: To analyze referrals from Primary Care consultation to Orthopaedic Surgery reference department. As a secondary objective, to establish 2referral scenarios in order to determine the impact of variability on referral. Material and methods: Cross-sectional observational study, analyzing referrals from Primary Care to Orthopaedic Surgery during the first half of the years 2018, 2019, and 2021. The number of referrals issued by each doctor and each Primary Care Healthcare Center was examined, according to the classification of the different Basic Healthcare Zones. Results: There is great variability in the number of referrals, both according to the type of Basic Healthcare Zone and by each Primary Care facultative. The referral ratios behaved uniformly over time (P<0.001). Due to a large number of referrals, 2scenarios have been constructed: In the first scenario, the referral ratio would be in the middle of the referral rate spectrum. In the second scenario, the lowest referral ratios recorded have been taken as a reference. The reduction of variability in the 2scenarios assumed provides a significant reduction in the demand for care. Conclusion: Reducing variability would have a beneficial effect on the capacity of the Orthopaedic Surgery service to provide care.(AU)

Effect of hip hemiarthroplasty dislocation on mortality after hip fracture surgery / Efecto de la luxación de la prótesis parcial de cadera en la mortalidad tras la cirugía de fractura de cadera

Introduction: Hip arthroplasty is the treatment of choice for displaced femoral neck fractures among the older population. The hip prosthesis dislocation is one of the most pointed potential complications after hip arthroplasty, but there is a lack of updated information on the effect of dislocation on the survival of older hip fracture patients so treated by hip hemiarthroplasty. We aim to evaluate the standalone effect of hip prosthesis dislocation after hip fracture hemiarthroplasty on patients’ survival outcomes. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study, including 6631 femoral neck fracture patients over 65 surgically treated by hemiarthroplasty. We made follow-up cut-offs 30-days, 6 weeks, 90-days, and one year after hospital discharge determining hip dislocation rate and patients’ survival. Results: The women population represented 78.7%, and the mean age of the population was 85.2±6.7 years. Hip prosthesis dislocation incidence was 1.9% in the first 90-days after discharge, representing 91.54% of primary dislocations yearly noted. We reported statistically significant increased mortality rates of patients presenting at least one hip prosthesis dislocation event (from 16.0% to 24.6% at 90-day after discharge, and 29.5% to 44.7% at one year), and also significantly decreasing patient survival function at 90-day (p=0.016) and one-year follow-up (p<0.001). The recurrent dislocation events (26.15%) showed even higher mortality rates (up to 60.6%, p<0.001). The multivariate Cox regression model determined that prosthesis dislocation was the only significant variable (p=0.035) affecting patient survival, increasing the risk of dying before one year of follow-up by 2.7 times. Discussion: Our study stands for the standalone hip prosthesis dislocation entailing a higher risk of death after hip fracture hemiarthroplasty in the older population.(AU)

Introducción: La artroplastia de cadera es el tratamiento de elección para las fracturas desplazadas del cuello de fémur en la población de edad avanzada. La luxación de la prótesis de cadera es una de las complicaciones potenciales tras la artroplastia de cadera, pero falta información actualizada sobre el efecto de la luxación en la supervivencia de los pacientes mayores con fractura de cadera tratados mediante hemiartroplastia de cadera. Nuestro objetivo es evaluar el efecto de la luxación de la prótesis de cadera (hemiartroplastia) como factor aislado, en la función de supervivencia de los pacientes. Materiales y métodos: Realizamos un estudio multicéntrico retrospectivo, que incluyó a 6.631 pacientes mayores de 65 años con fractura de cuello de fémur tratados quirúrgicamente mediante hemiartroplastia. Se realizaron cortes de seguimiento a los 30 días, 6 semanas, 90 días y un año del alta hospitalaria, determinando la tasa de luxación de cadera y la supervivencia de los pacientes. Resultados: La población femenina representó el 78,7%, y la edad media de la población fue de 85,2±6,7 años. La incidencia de luxación de la prótesis de cadera fue del 1,9% en los primeros 90 días tras el alta, lo que representa el 91,54% de las luxaciones primarias observadas anualmente. Se registró un aumento estadísticamente significativo de las tasas de mortalidad de los pacientes que presentaban al menos un evento de luxación de la prótesis de cadera (del 16,0 al 24,6% a los 90 días del alta, y del 29,5 al 44,7% al año), y también una disminución significativa de la función de supervivencia de los pacientes a los 90 días (p=0,016) y al año de seguimiento (p<0,001). Los eventos de luxación recurrente (26,15%) mostraron tasas de mortalidad aún más altas (hasta el 60,6%, p<0,001). El modelo multivariante de regresión de Cox determinó que la luxación de la prótesis de cadera es la única variable significativa (p=0,035) que afecta a la...(AU)

[Artículo traducido] Efecto de la luxación de la prótesis parcial de cadera en la mortalidad tras la cirugía de fractura de cadera / Effect of hip hemiarthroplasty dislocation on mortality after hip fracture surgery

Introducción: La artroplastia de cadera es el tratamiento de elección para las fracturas desplazadas del cuello de fémur en la población de edad avanzada. La luxación de la prótesis de cadera es una de las complicaciones potenciales tras la artroplastia de cadera, pero falta información actualizada sobre el efecto de la luxación en la supervivencia de los pacientes mayores con fractura de cadera tratados mediante hemiartroplastia de cadera. Nuestro objetivo es evaluar el efecto de la luxación de la prótesis de cadera (hemiartroplastia) como factor aislado, en la función de supervivencia de los pacientes. Materiales y métodos: Realizamos un estudio multicéntrico retrospectivo, que incluyó a 6.631 pacientes mayores de 65 años con fractura de cuello de fémur tratados quirúrgicamente mediante hemiartroplastia. Se realizaron cortes de seguimiento a los 30 días, 6 semanas, 90 días y un año del alta hospitalaria, determinando la tasa de luxación de cadera y la supervivencia de los pacientes. Resultados: La población femenina representó el 78,7%, y la edad media de la población fue de 85,2±6,7 años. La incidencia de luxación de la prótesis de cadera fue del 1,9% en los primeros 90 días tras el alta, lo que representa el 91,54% de las luxaciones primarias observadas anualmente. Se registró un aumento estadísticamente significativo de las tasas de mortalidad de los pacientes que presentaban al menos un evento de luxación de la prótesis de cadera (del 16,0 al 24,6% a los 90 días del alta, y del 29,5 al 44,7% al año), y también una disminución significativa de la función de supervivencia de los pacientes a los 90 días (p=0,016) y al año de seguimiento (p<0,001). Los eventos de luxación recurrente (26,15%) mostraron tasas de mortalidad aún más altas (hasta el 60,6%, p<0,001). El modelo multivariante de regresión de Cox determinó que la luxación de la prótesis de cadera es la única variable significativa (p=0,035) que afecta a la...(AU)

Introduction: Hip arthroplasty is the treatment of choice for displaced femoral neck fractures among the older population. The hip prosthesis dislocation is one of the most pointed potential complications after hip arthroplasty, but there is a lack of updated information on the effect of dislocation on the survival of older hip fracture patients so treated by hip hemiarthroplasty. We aim to evaluate the standalone effect of hip prosthesis dislocation after hip fracture hemiarthroplasty on patients’ survival outcomes. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study, including 6631 femoral neck fracture patients over 65 surgically treated by hemiarthroplasty. We made follow-up cut-offs 30-days, 6 weeks, 90-days, and one year after hospital discharge determining hip dislocation rate and patients’ survival. Results: The women population represented 78.7%, and the mean age of the population was 85.2±6.7 years. Hip prosthesis dislocation incidence was 1.9% in the first 90-days after discharge, representing 91.54% of primary dislocations yearly noted. We reported statistically significant increased mortality rates of patients presenting at least one hip prosthesis dislocation event (from 16.0% to 24.6% at 90-day after discharge, and 29.5% to 44.7% at one year), and also significantly decreasing patient survival function at 90-day (p=0.016) and one-year follow-up (p<0.001). The recurrent dislocation events (26.15%) showed even higher mortality rates (up to 60.6%, p<0.001). The multivariate Cox regression model determined that prosthesis dislocation was the only significant variable (p=0.035) affecting patient survival, increasing the risk of dying before one year of follow-up by 2.7 times. Discussion: Our study stands for the standalone hip prosthesis dislocation entailing a higher risk of death after hip fracture hemiarthroplasty in the older population.(AU)

Analysis of the demand of care from Primary Care to Traumatology: Proposals for the improvement of the continuous care. / Análisis de la demanda asistencial desde atención primaria a traumatología: propuestas para la mejora del continuo asistencial.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze referrals from Primary Care consultation to Orthopaedic Surgery reference department. As a secondary objective, to establish 2referral scenarios in order to determine the impact of variability on referral. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study, analyzing referrals from Primary Care to Orthopaedic Surgery during the first half of the years 2018, 2019, and 2021. The number of referrals issued by each doctor and each Primary Care Healthcare Center was examined, according to the classification of the different Basic Healthcare Zones. RESULTS: There is great variability in the number of referrals, both according to the type of Basic Healthcare Zone and by each Primary Care facultative. The referral ratios behaved uniformly over time (P<0.001). Due to a large number of referrals, 2scenarios have been constructed: In the first scenario, the referral ratio would be in the middle of the referral rate spectrum. In the second scenario, the lowest referral ratios recorded have been taken as a reference. The reduction of variability in the 2scenarios assumed provides a significant reduction in the demand for care. CONCLUSION: Reducing variability would have a beneficial effect on the capacity of the Orthopaedic Surgery service to provide care.

[Translated article] Analysis of the demand of care from Primary Care to Traumatology: Proposals for the improvement of the continuous care.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse referrals from Primary Care consultation to Orthopaedic Surgery reference department. As a secondary objective, to establish 2 referral scenarios in order to determine the impact of variability on referral. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study, analyzing referrals from Primary Care to Orthopaedic Surgery during the first half of the years 2018, 2019, and 2021. The number of referrals issued by each doctor and each Primary Care Healthcare Center was examined, according to the classification of the different Basic Healthcare Zones. RESULTS: There is great variability in the number of referrals, both according to the type of Basic Healthcare Zone and by each Primary Care facultative. The referral ratios behaved uniformly over time (p<0.001). Due to a large number of referrals, 2 scenarios have been constructed: In the first scenario, the referral ratio would be in the middle of the referral rate spectrum. In the second scenario, the lowest referral ratios recorded have been taken as a reference. The reduction of variability in the 2 scenarios assumed provides a significant reduction in the demand for care. CONCLUSION: Reducing variability would have a beneficial effect on the capacity of the Orthopaedic Surgery service to provide care.

Effect of hip hemiarthroplasty dislocation on mortality after hip fracture surgery. / [Artículo traducido] Efecto de la luxación de la prótesis parcial de cadera en la mortalidad tras la cirugía de fractura de cadera.

INTRODUCTION: Hip arthroplasty is the treatment of choice for displaced femoral neck fractures among the older population. The hip prosthesis dislocation is one of the most pointed potential complications after hip arthroplasty, but there is a lack of updated information on the effect of dislocation on the survival of older hip fracture patients so treated by hip hemiarthroplasty. We aim to evaluate the standalone effect of hip prosthesis dislocation after hip fracture hemiarthroplasty on patients' survival outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study, including 6631 femoral neck fracture patients over 65 surgically treated by hemiarthroplasty. We made follow-up cut-offs 30-days, 6 weeks, 90-days, and one year after hospital discharge determining hip dislocation rate and patients' survival. RESULTS: The women population represented 78.7%, and the mean age of the population was 85.2 ± 6.7 years. Hip prosthesis dislocation incidence was 1.9% in the first 90-days after discharge, representing 91.54% of primary dislocations yearly noted. We reported statistically significant increased mortality rates of patients presenting at least one hip prosthesis dislocation event (from 16.0% to 24.6% at 90-day after discharge, and 29.5% to 44.7% at one year), and also significantly decreasing patient survival function at 90-day (P = .016) and one-year follow-up (P < .001). The recurrent dislocation events (26.15%) showed even higher mortality rates (up to 60.6%, p < .001). The multivariate Cox regression model determined that prosthesis dislocation was the only significant variable (P = .035) affecting patient survival, increasing the risk of dying before one year of follow-up by 2.7 times. DISCUSSION: Our study stands for the standalone hip prosthesis dislocation entailing a higher risk of death after hip fracture hemiarthroplasty in the older population.

Effect of hip hemiarthroplasty dislocation on mortality after hip fracture surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Hip arthroplasty is the treatment of choice for displaced femoral neck fractures among the older population. The hip prosthesis dislocation is one of the most pointed potential complications after hip arthroplasty, but there is a lack of updated information on the effect of dislocation on the survival of older hip fracture patients so treated by hip hemiarthroplasty. We aim to evaluate the standalone effect of hip prosthesis dislocation after hip fracture hemiarthroplasty on patients' survival outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study, including 6631 femoral neck fracture patients over 65 surgically treated by hemiarthroplasty. We made follow-up cut-offs 30-days, 6 weeks, 90-days, and one year after hospital discharge determining hip dislocation rate and patients' survival. RESULTS: The women population represented 78.7%, and the mean age of the population was 85.2±6.7 years. Hip prosthesis dislocation incidence was 1.9% in the first 90-days after discharge, representing 91.54% of primary dislocations yearly noted. We reported statistically significant increased mortality rates of patients presenting at least one hip prosthesis dislocation event (from 16.0% to 24.6% at 90-day after discharge, and 29.5% to 44.7% at one year), and also significantly decreasing patient survival function at 90-day (p=0.016) and one-year follow-up (p<0.001). The recurrent dislocation events (26.15%) showed even higher mortality rates (up to 60.6%, p<0.001). The multivariate Cox regression model determined that prosthesis dislocation was the only significant variable (p=0.035) affecting patient survival, increasing the risk of dying before one year of follow-up by 2.7 times. DISCUSSION: Our study stands for the standalone hip prosthesis dislocation entailing a higher risk of death after hip fracture hemiarthroplasty in the older population.