Prevalence of glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency in highly malaria-endemic municipalities in the Brazilian Amazon: A region-wide screening study.

Background: Difficulties associated with the assessment of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PDd), particularly in remote areas, hinders the safe use of 8-aminoquinolines such as primaquine (PQ) and tafenoquine against Plasmodium vivax malaria due to the risk of haemolysis. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 41 malaria-endemic municipalities of six states in the Brazilian Amazon, between 2014 and 2018. Male individuals were screened for G6PDd using the qualitative Fluorescent Spot Test using fingerpick-collected whole blood samples. Point and interval estimates of the G6PDd prevalence were calculated for each state. Deficient samples were genotyped for the most prevalent variants in the Amazon. Frequencies of P. vivax malaria recurrences were estimated for G6PDd and non-G6PDd patients. Interpretation: This is one of the largest surveys ever conducted in Latin America, covering the entire malaria endemic area in the Brazilian Amazon. These results indicate that an important proportion of the population is at risk of hemolysis if exposed to PQ and its congener drug tafenoquine. The adoption of G6PDd screening protocols is essential to ensure the safety of individuals treated with those drugs and should also be considered when implementing malaria elimination strategies. Findings: A total of 14,847 individuals were included, of which 5.6% presented G6PDd. The state of Acre had the highest G6PDd prevalence (8.3%), followed by Amapá (5.8%), Pará (5.7%), Rondônia (5.4%), Roraima (4.2%) and Amazonas (4.0%). From 828 genotyped samples, African A+ (6.2%), African A- (39.3%) and wild-type (non-African non-Mediterranean; 54.2%) variants were found. A greater proportion of malaria recurrences was found among G6PD deficient individuals [16.7% vs 4.1%, Risk ratio 3.52 (2.16-5.74) p < 0.01]. Funding: Brazilian Ministry of Health; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas (FAPEAM).

Methylprednisolone as Adjunctive Therapy for Patients Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19; Metcovid): A Randomized, Double-blind, Phase IIb, Placebo-controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Steroid use for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is based on the possible role of these drugs in mitigating the inflammatory response, mainly in the lungs, triggered by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of methylprednisolone (MP) among hospitalized patients with suspected COVID-19. METHODS: A parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, Phase IIb clinical trial was performed with hospitalized patients aged ≥18 years with clinical, epidemiological, and/or radiological suspected COVID-19 at a tertiary care facility in Manaus, Brazil. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to receive either intravenous MP (0.5 mg/kg) or placebo (saline solution) twice daily for 5 days. A modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis was conducted. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. RESULTS: From 18 April to 16 June 2020, 647 patients were screened, 416 were randomized, and 393 were analyzed as mITT, with 194 individuals assigned to MP and 199 to placebo. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in 81.3%. The mortality rates at Day 28 were not different between groups. A subgroup analysis showed that patients over 60 years old in the MP group had a lower mortality rate at Day 28. Patients in the MP arm tended to need more insulin therapy, and no difference was seen in virus clearance in respiratory secretion until Day 7. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that a short course of MP in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 did not reduce mortality in the overall population. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04343729.

Impact of Plasmodium vivax malaria and antimalarial treatment on cytochrome P450 activity in Brazilian patients.

AIMS: To investigate the impact of Plasmodium vivax malaria and chloroquine-primaquine chemotherapy on CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 activity in patients from the Brazilian Amazon. METHODS: Adult patients (n = 30) were given subtherapeutic doses of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 phenotypic probes metoprolol (10 mg) and omeprazole (2 mg) in three different stages of vivax malaria illness: acute disease (study phase 1), post chemotherapy (phase 2) and convalescence (stage 3). Plasma concentrations of probes and CYP-hydroxylated metabolites (α-OH metoprolol and 5-OH omeprazole) were measured using LC/MS/MS. Two pharmacokinetic metrics were used to estimate CYP activity: (a) ratio of plasma concentrations of probe/metabolite at 240 minutes after administration of the probes and (b) ratio of areas under the time-concentration curves for probe/metabolite (AUC0-12h ). For statistical analysis, the pharmacokinetic metrics were normalized to the respective values in phase 3. Taqman assays were used for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotyping. Cytokines levels were measured using cytometric bead array. RESULTS: Both pharmacokinetic metrics for metoprolol and omeprazole, and plasma concentrations of cytokines IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 varied significantly across the three study phases (ANOVA P < 0.0001). Post hoc tests showed greater metoprolol:α-OH metoprolol ratios in phases 1 and 2 compared to phase 3, larger omeprazole:5-OH omeprazole ratios in phase 1 than in phases 2 and 3, and higher circulating IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 in phase 1 than in phases 2 and 3. CONCLUSION: P. vivax malaria and treatment altered CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 metabolic phenotypes. CYP2C19 inhibition is attributed to a higher level of circulating proinflammatory cytokines, while suppression of CYP2D6 is ascribed mainly to chloroquine exposure.