ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate procedures performed during primary debulking surgery (PDS) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) for ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients surgically treated at our institution for newly diagnosed stage IIIC/IV epithelial ovarian cancer between 6/1/2015-12/31/2021 were identified using a prospectively collected database. Patients were triaged to PDS or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by IDS using an institutional algorithm. Data on specific procedures performed, including consultants called, were collected from operative and pathology reports. Appropriate statistical analyses were applied. RESULTS: Overall, 467 patients underwent PDS and 434 underwent IDS; 76% (PDS) and 71% (IDS) of cases achieved complete gross resection. Comparing PDS vs IDS cohorts, median age was 63 years (range, 23-86) vs 67 years (range, 35-95), 79% vs 86% of patients had high-grade serous histology, and 38% vs 70% had stage IV disease. Most procedures (except ostomy, distal pancreatectomy) were more common during PDS (P < .05). Bowel surgery was performed during 65% of PDS and 33% of IDS, and upper abdominal surgery during 72% of PDS and 52% of IDS; both were more common during PDS (P < .001). Estimated blood loss (median, 500 mL [PDS] vs 300 mL [IDS]) and operative time (median, 362 min [PDS] vs 267 min [IDS]) were higher for PDS (P < .001). A consulting surgeon was utilized during 31% of PDS and 18% of IDS, with hepatopancreaticobiliary as the most commonly called service (61% and 65%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In our study of patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer, while most procedures were more often performed during PDS, NACT did not obviate the need for radical surgical resection. Thus, advanced surgical skills remain essential.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/methods , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Aged , Adult , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/surgery , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/pathology , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/drug therapy , Young Adult , Neoadjuvant Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasm Staging , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical and pathologic characteristics of women with surgical stage I endometrial carcinoma by location of first recurrence and describe characteristics of isolated vaginal recurrence. METHODS: Patients with 2009 International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) stage I endometrial carcinoma treated at two large cancer centers from 1/1/2009-12/31/2017 were identified. Sarcoma histology was excluded. Recurrences were grouped into isolated vaginal or extravaginal. Isolated vaginal recurrences were localized by anatomic location within the vaginal vault. Clinical and pathologic variables were compared with chi-square analysis, and Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests. RESULTS: Of 2815 women identified, 278 (10%) experienced a recurrence. Sixty-one patients (2%) had an isolated vaginal recurrence, including 42 (69%) at the vaginal apex; 217 (8%) had an extravaginal recurrence, including 18 with a vaginal component. Median time to recurrence was 11 months (range, 1-68) for isolated vaginal recurrence and 20 months (range, 1-98) for extravaginal recurrence (P < .004). Of 960 patients (34%) treated with adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy (VBT), 156 (16%) recurred; 19 (2%) had an isolated vaginal recurrence, including 16 (84%) at the vaginal apex. Three-year PFS rates for isolated vaginal recurrence were 97.6% (SE ± 0.4%) with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus 96.9% (SE ± 1.1%) with open (P = .8), and for extravaginal recurrence were 91.8% (SE ± 0.7%) with MIS versus 90.8% (SE ± 1.8%) with open (P = .8). CONCLUSIONS: Isolated vaginal recurrences in stage I endometrial cancer are detected earlier than non-vaginal recurrences. Surgical approach does not appear to impact recurrence. Adjuvant VBT after primary surgery carries a 1%-2% risk of isolated vaginal apex recurrence.
Subject(s)
Brachytherapy , Endometrial Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Endometrial Neoplasms/surgery , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Vagina/surgery , Vagina/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate postoperative and oncologic outcomes associated with pelvic exenteration for non-ovarian gynecologic malignancies. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent pelvic exenteration for non-ovarian gynecologic malignancies at our institution from 1/1/2010-12/31/2019. Palliative exenteration cases were excluded from survival analysis. Postoperative complications were early (≤30 days) or late (31-180 days). Complications were graded using a validated institutional scale. Major complications were considered grade ≥ 3. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. RESULTS: Of 100 patients identified, 89 underwent pelvic exenteration for recurrent disease, 5 for palliation, 5 for primary disease, and 1 for persistent disease. Thirty percent had cervical, 27% vulvar, 24% uterine, and 19% vaginal cancer. Sixty-two percent underwent total, 30% anterior, and 8% posterior exenteration. No deaths occurred intraoperatively or within 30 days of surgery. Six patients died after 30 days. Ninety-seven experienced a perioperative complication-49 early, 1 late, and 47 both. Fifty experienced a major complication-22 (44%) early, 19 (38%) late, and 9 (18%) both. No variables were statistically associated with complication development. The 3-year progression-free survival rate was 61.0%; the 3-year overall survival rate was 61.6%. Of 58 surviving patients, 16 (28%) and 4 (7%) were alive after 5 and 10 years, respectively. CONCLUSION: The overall complication rate for pelvic exenteration remains high. No variables demonstrated association with complication development as the rate was nearly 100%. The low rate of perioperative mortality is likely due to improved perioperative care.
Subject(s)
Genital Neoplasms, Female , Pelvic Exenteration , Vaginal Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Genital Neoplasms, Female/surgery , Pelvic Exenteration/adverse effects , Pelvic Exenteration/methods , Survival Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Vaginal Neoplasms/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Antineoplastic agents can cause hypersensitivity reactions that may preclude further treatment, possibly compromising patient outcome if the tumor remains sensitive to such agent. Although desensitization protocols can be used to re-introduce agents after the development of a hypersensitivity reaction, these protocols vary across institutions. Our study evaluated the safety and efficacy of our desensitization protocol. METHODS: All patients who underwent desensitization to platinum, taxane, liposomal doxorubicin, or trastuzumab between November 2016 and May 2021 after a prior hypersensitivity reaction to the specific agent were included in a retrospective review. The 12-step, outpatient desensitization protocol included pretreatment with a leukotriene receptor antagonist, antihistamines, and corticosteroids, as well as extended infusion times. Successful desensitization was defined as the completion of ≥3 cycles without discontinuation of the agent due to a hypersensitivity reaction. RESULTS: A total of 186 eligible patients were included. Median age was 59.5 years (range 26-87). 155 (83%) patients were treated with platinum. 55 (30%) patients were treated for colorectal cancer and 52 (28%) for ovarian cancer. 104 (56%) patients completed ≥3 cycles of therapy during desensitization. The median infusion time was 380 min (range 325-360 min). The median number of desensitization cycles was 3, with 694 cycles completed among all patients. A total of 79 (42%) patients had a breakthrough hypersensitivity reaction during desensitization, 4 of whom required epinephrine, and 84 (45%) patients discontinued the agent undergoing desensitization due to progression of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our outpatient 12-step, institutional desensitization protocol for antineoplastic therapy proved safe and efficacious, with 56% of patients successfully completing ≥3 cycles and not requiring an inpatient admission.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To explore pre-operative factors and their impact on overall survival (OS) in a modern cohort of patients who underwent pelvic exenteration (PE) for gynecologic malignancies. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for all patients who underwent a PE from 1/1/2010 through 12/31/2018 at our institution. Inclusion criteria were exenteration due to recurrent or progressive carcinoma of the uterus, cervix, vagina or vulva, with histologically confirmed complete surgical resection of the malignancy. Exclusion criteria included PE for palliation of symptoms without recurrence, and for ovarian or rare histologic malignancies. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed to identify factors predicting prolonged survival. RESULTS: Overall, 71 patients met the inclusion criteria. Median age at time of exenteration was 62 years (range, 28-86 years). Vulvar cancer was the most common primary diagnosis (32%); 30% had cervical cancer; 23%, uterine cancer; 15%, vaginal cancer. Median OS was 55.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 36-not estimable) with a median follow-up time of 40.8 months (95% CI: 1-116.1). On univariable analysis, age > 62 years (hazard ratio (HR) 2.71, 95% CI 1.27-5.79), American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) 3-4 (HR: 3.41 (95% CI 1.03-11.29), and vulvar cancer (HR 4.19 (95% CI 1.17-14.96) predicted worse OS. Tumor size and prior progression-free interval (PFI) did not meet statistical significance in OS analyses. On multivariable analysis, there were no significant factors associated with worse OS. CONCLUSIONS: PE performed with curative intent may be considered a treatment option in well-counseled, carefully selected patients, irrespective of tumor size and PFI before exenteration.
Subject(s)
Genital Neoplasms, Female/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Pelvic Exenteration/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Genital Neoplasms, Female/pathology , Genital Neoplasms, Female/surgery , Humans , Margins of Excision , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control , Patient Selection , Progression-Free Survival , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Tumor BurdenABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Since the approval of pembrolizumab for advanced or recurrent PD-L1 positive (CPS > 1%) cervical cancer, the clinical characteristics associated with response have remained undefined. We sought to characterize the clinicopathologic features of patients with advanced cervical cancer at our institution who derived durable clinical benefit from treatment with pembrolizumab. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 14 patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer who received pembrolizumab monotherapy from August 2017 to November 2019 and were followed until November 1, 2020. Reviewed clinical data included age, histology, tumor molecular profiling results, stage at diagnosis, treatment history, baseline pattern of metastatic disease at initiation of anti-PD-1 therapy, and outcomes. Treatment response was evaluated by computed tomography using RECIST v1.1 criteria. RESULTS: The objective response rate was 21% (n = 3), including two partial responses and one complete response. Two patients (14%) had stable disease of six months or greater, for an observed durable clinical benefit rate of 36%. When stratified by those who derived clinical benefit, metastatic spread to lung and/or lymph node only at baseline was associated with improved response to pembrolizumab (n = 7, p = 0.02) and associated with significantly improved PFS and OS. Tumor mutational burden was higher in those with durable clinical benefit compared to non-responders (median 12.7 vs. 3.5 mutations/megabase, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight clinical features that may select for a population most likely to benefit from pembrolizumab monotherapy and underscores the need for identification of additional biomarkers of response.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the Memorial Sloan Kettering Frailty Index (MSK-FI) is associated with decision-making in older women surgically treated for advanced-stage ovarian cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively applied the MSK-FI to women ≥70 years with newly diagnosed advanced-stage ovarian cancer surgically treated at our institution from 01/2001-05/2017. MSK-FI components, including 10 comorbidities and functional assessment, were extracted from medical records. The MSK-FI ranges from 0 to 11, with higher scores indicating greater frailty. The primary outcome was the association between frailty and rate of primary debulking surgery (PDS), for which a multivariable logistic regression was used, adjusted for stage and histology. RESULTS: We identified 430 women treated with PDS (n = 231, 54%) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy/interval debulking (n = 199, 46%) with complete data. MSK-FI score distribution was: "0", 95 patients (22%); "1", 172 (40%); "2", 89 (21%); and "3+", 74 (17%). More-frail patients were less likely to have undergone PDS (OR for a unit increase of MSK-FI: 0.64; 95%CI, 0.53-0.77; p < 0.0001). Grade 3+ complications and unintended intensive care admission occurred in 40 (9%) and 38 (9%) women, respectively, but were not associated with frailty (OR 1.21; 95%CI, 0.96-1.52; p = 0.11). More-frail patients were more likely to delay postoperative chemotherapy (non-linear association p = 0.009) and less likely to enroll in research (OR 0.84; 95%CI, 0.70-1.00; p = 0.049). Greater frailty was associated with poorer overall survival (HR 1.16; 95%CI, 1.05-1.30; p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty, as calculated by the MSK-FI, is strongly associated with treatment approach in older women with advanced ovarian cancer, suggesting objective or subjective correlates of the MSK-FI influence decision-making.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/surgery , Frail Elderly , Frailty , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/mortality , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/pathology , Clinical Decision-Making , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures , Female , Humans , Neoplasm Metastasis , New York , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Survival AnalysisABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine if the mutational landscapes and genomic features of homologous recombination DNA repair defects (HRD) vary between younger and older patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). METHODS: Younger and older women were defined as bottom and top age quartiles, respectively. HGSOCs from 15 younger (median 49 years, range 35-53) and 15 older women (median 72 years, range 70-87) were subjected to whole-exome sequencing (WES). For validation, HGSOC WES data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), including 38 younger (median 45 years, range 34-50) and 30 older women (median 74 years, range 68-84). Mutational profiles, BRCA1/2 status, genomic HRD features, and for TCGA cases RNA-sequencing-based HRD transcriptomic signatures were assessed. RESULTS: In the institutional cohort, pathogenic germline BRCA1/2 mutations were more frequent in younger (5/15) than older women (0/15, p = 0.042). No somatic BRCA1/2 mutations were identified. HGSOCs from older patients preferentially displayed aging-related mutational signatures and, in contrast to younger patients, harbored CCNE1 amplifications (3/15, 20%). In the TCGA cohort, pathogenic germline BRCA1 (younger 8/38, older 0/30, p = 0.007) but not BRCA2 mutations (young 3/38, older 4/30, p = 0.691) were more frequent in younger patients. Again, no somatic BRCA1/2 mutations were identified. HGSOCs from younger women more frequently displayed genomic features of HRD (all, p < 0.05), a significant HRD gene-signature enrichment, but less frequently CCNE1 amplification (p = 0.05). Immunoreactive CLOVAR subtypes were more common in HGSOCs from younger women, and proliferative subtypes in HGSOCs from older women (p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: HGSOC patients diagnosed at an older age less frequently harbor pathogenic BRCA1 germline mutations and genomic features of HRD than younger women. Individualized treatment options, particularly pertaining to use of PARP inhibitors, in older women may be warranted.
Subject(s)
Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , BRCA1 Protein/genetics , BRCA2 Protein/genetics , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/pathology , Female , Germ-Line Mutation , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Recombinational DNA RepairABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Standard of care in patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) is upfront surgery followed by chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) is an alternative in selected patients. Most data exist with IDS following 3-4 cycles chemotherapy, however, some patients experience a delay of IDS. So far, the impact of a "delayed" interval debulking surgery (DID) is poorly defined. METHODS: We analyzed data from eight international gynecology-oncology referral centers. Patients were included if they had newly diagnosed AOC and were prone to DID (minimum 5 cycles of NACT) between 2011 and 2017. RESULTS: 308 patients underwent DID. 89.6% had a high-grade serous ovarian cancer. The median number of pre-op NACT was 6 cycles (range 5-9) and 6.1% of patients received additionally bevacizumab. The majority of patients had stage-IV disease (51.3%). Median duration of surgery was 210 min (range 34-561), the median surgical complexity score was 4 (range 1-16). Complete resection was achieved in 60.1%. The median number of post-op chemotherapy cycles was 2 (range 0-5). The rate of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo£3°) was 9.7% and 30 days post-op mortality was 0.3%. The median PFS and OS in patients with complete resection was 19.5 and 49.2 months compared to 14.8 and 33.0 months in patients with incomplete resection (p = 0.001), respectively. We did not observe any survival benefit for patients with cytoreduction to small residuals (1-10 mm) compared to residual disease >1 cm. CONCLUSION: Our data may suggest that offering surgery to patients with persistent disease after 5+ cycles could be associated with favorable outcome if a complete resection is achieved. Patients who had residual disease postoperatively may experience rather peri-operative treatment burden than any benefit from DID.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/therapy , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/therapy , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/methods , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/mortality , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/mortality , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm, Residual , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
The incidence of most cancers increases with age. Cancer is the second most common cause of death in older adults after cardiovascular disease. Many common cancers in older adults can be prevented from occurring or can be identified at an early stage and treated effectively. The prevention and identification of cancer in its early stages, in an attempt to reduce discomfort and disability associated with advanced cancer and cancer treatment, is also a priority. Overscreening for cancer in older adults can lead to unnecessary diagnostic testing and unnecessary treatment. Both older adults and their healthcare providers need guidance on the appropriate use of cancer prevention and screening interventions. This first of a two-part review addresses special considerations regarding cancer prevention for adults aged 65 and older. Screening decisions and the impact of limited life expectancy and an older adult's ability to tolerate cancer treatment are also addressed. Guidance is provided regarding the prevention and early identification of lung, colorectal, bladder, and kidney cancer in older adults. The prevention of breast, prostate, and female urogenital cancers are addressed in Part 2. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:2399-2406, 2020.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Early Detection of Cancer , Kidney Neoplasms/prevention & control , Lung Neoplasms/prevention & control , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/prevention & control , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Practice Guidelines as TopicABSTRACT
The incidence of most cancers increase with age. Cancer is the second most common cause of death in older adults after cardiovascular disease. Many common cancers in older adults can be prevented from occurring or can be identified at an early stage and treated effectively. Although cancer is feared primarily because of premature mortality, for many older adults, preventing and identifying cancer in its early stages, in an attempt to reduce discomfort and disability associated with advanced cancer and cancer treatment, is also a priority. Overscreening for cancer in older adults can lead to unnecessary diagnostic testing and unnecessary treatment. Both older adults and their healthcare providers need guidance on the appropriate use of cancer prevention and screening interventions. This is the second part of a two-part clinical review on cancer prevention and screening for adults aged 65 and older. Guidance is provided regarding the prevention and early identification of breast, prostate, cervical, ovarian, and endometrial cancer. The prevention of lung, colorectal, bladder, and kidney cancer is addressed in Part 1.
Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Genital Neoplasms, Female/diagnosis , Genital Neoplasms, Female/prevention & control , Mass Screening/methods , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Early Detection of Cancer/adverse effects , Female , Genital Neoplasms, Female/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Male , Mass Screening/adverse effects , Medical Overuse , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/prevention & control , Risk Factors , SEER Program/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: We assessed the utility of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) in defining extent of intrathoracic disease in advanced ovarian carcinoma with moderate-to-large pleural effusions. METHODS: Beginning in 2001, VATS was performed on all patients with suspected advanced ovarian carcinoma and moderate-to-large pleural effusions, evaluating for macroscopic intrathoracic disease. The algorithm recommended primary debulking surgery (PDS) for ≤1 cm, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)/interval debulking surgery (IDS) for >1 cm intrathoracic disease. We reviewed records of patients undergoing VATS from 10/01-01/19. Differences between treatment groups were tested using standard statistical techniques. RESULTS: One-hundred patients met eligibility criteria (median age, 60; median CA-125 level, 1158 U/mL; medium serum albumin, 3.8 g/dL). Macroscopic pleural disease was found in 70 (70%). After VATS, 50 (50%) underwent attempted PDS (PDS group), 50 (50%) received NACT (NACT/IDS group). Forty-seven (94%) underwent IDS. Median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort (n = 100) was 44.5 months (95% CI: 37.8-51.7). The PDS group had significantly longer survival than the NACT/IDS group [45.8 (95% CI: 40.5-87.8) vs. 37.4 months (95% CI: 33.3-45.2); p = .016]. On multivariable analysis, macroscopic intrathoracic disease (HR 2.18, 95% CI: 1.14-4.18; p = .019) and age ≥ 65 (HR 1.98, 95% CI: 1.16-3.40; p = .013) were independently associated with elevated death risk. Patients with the best outcome had no macroscopic disease at VATS and underwent PDS (median OS, 87.8 months). CONCLUSIONS: VATS is useful in therapeutic decision-making for PDS vs. NACT/IDS in advanced ovarian cancer with moderate-to-large pleural effusions.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/therapy , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Pleural Effusion, Malignant/therapy , Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cancer Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/secondary , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/statistics & numerical data , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Ovary/pathology , Ovary/surgery , Pleural Cavity/pathology , Pleural Cavity/surgery , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The spleen plays a role in the immune and coagulative responses, yet a splenectomy may be required during ovarian cancer surgery to achieve complete cytoreduction. The aim of the study was to correlate hematologic changes with the development of infection and venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing splenectomy. METHODS: This single-institution retrospective review includes all patients undergoing splenectomy during cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer, March 2001 to December 2016. We compared postoperative hematologic changes (evaluated daily before discharge) in patients developing infection within 30 days' post-surgery (Infection group) with those who did not (No-Infection group). We also compared patients developing venous thromboembolism with those without. RESULTS: A total of 265 patients underwent splenectomy. Median age was 64 years (range 22-88): 146 (55%) patients had stage IIIC and 114 (43%) patients had stage IV. The majority, 201 (76%) patients underwent splenectomy during primary debulking. A total of 132 (50%) patients comprised the Infection group (most common: urinary tract infection, 54%). Median time from surgery to infection was 8 days (range, 0-29). After initial rise in white blood cell count in both groups, the Infection group had a second peak on postoperative day 10 (median 16.6K/mcL, IQR 12.5-21.2) not seen in the No-Infection group (median 12K/mcL, IQR 9.3-16.3). A total of 40 (15%) patients developed venous thromboembolism, median time of 6.5 days (range, 1-43). All patients demonstrated a continuous rise in platelets during postoperative days 0-15. Thrombocytosis was present in 38/40 (95%) patients with venous thromboembolism vs 183/225 (81%) patients without (P=0.036). Median days with thrombocytosis was higher in venous thromboembolism (8 days, range 1-15) vs non groups (6 days, range 1-16, P=0.049). CONCLUSION: We identified initial leukocytosis after splenectomy in all patients. The Infection group had a second peak in white blood cell count on postoperative day 10, not present in the No-Infection group. Among patients with venous thromboembolism, thrombocytosis was more frequent and of longer duration.
Subject(s)
Infections/blood , Leukocytosis/blood , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Splenectomy/adverse effects , Thrombocytosis/blood , Venous Thromboembolism/blood , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures , Female , Humans , Infections/etiology , Leukocyte Count , Leukocytosis/etiology , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Platelet Count , Postoperative Complications/blood , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Period , Retrospective Studies , Thrombocytosis/etiology , Time Factors , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Delays from primary surgery to chemotherapy are associated with worse survival in ovarian cancer, however the impact of delays from neoadjuvant chemotherapy to interval debulking surgery is unknown. We sought to evaluate the association of delays from neoadjuvant chemotherapy to interval debulking with survival. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of stage III/IV ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy from July 2015 to December 2017 were included in our analysis. Delays from neoadjuvant chemotherapy to interval debulking were defined as time from last preoperative carboplatin to interval debulking >6 weeks. Fisher's exact/Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare clinical characteristics. The Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and multivariate Cox Proportional-Hazards models were used to estimate progression-free and overall survival and examine differences by delay groups, adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: Of the 224 women, 159 (71%) underwent interval debulking and 34 (21%) of these experienced delays from neoadjuvant chemotherapy to interval debulking. These women were older (median 68 vs 65 years, P=0.05) and received more preoperative chemotherapy cycles (median 6 vs 4, P=0.003). Delays from neoadjuvant chemotherapy to interval debulking were associated with worse overall survival (HR 2.4 95% CI 1.2 to 4.8, P=0.01), however survival was not significantly shortened after adjusting for age, stage, and complete gross resection, HR 1.66 95% CI 0.8 to 3.4, P=0.17. Delays from neoadjuvant chemotherapy to interval debulking were not associated with worse progression-free survival (HR 1.55 95% CI 0.97 to 2.5, P=0.062). Increase in number of preoperative cycles (P=0.005) and lack of complete gross resection (P<0.001) were the only variables predictive of worse progression-free survival. DISCUSSION: Delays from neoadjuvant chemotherapy to interval debulking were not associated with worse overall survival after adjustment for age, stage, and complete gross resection.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/therapy , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Neoadjuvant Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Carboplatin/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/mortality , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/pathology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Progression-Free Survival , Retrospective Studies , Time FactorsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Uterine cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy, although fortunately, 75% of women present with early-stage disease. A major area of controversy regarding the management of the disease concerns postoperative therapy for both women with early- and advanced-stage endometrial carcinoma. Here, we review landmark evidence that can help guide clinical decision-making in the treatment of women diagnosed with endometrial cancer. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we present the latest data driving decisions for both surgical management and postoperative therapy for women with endometrial carcinoma. Areas discussed include surgical staging, with a specific discussion on the role of sentinel lymph node mapping, and postoperative therapy, ranging from the data supporting observation for women with early-stage, low-risk disease to combination therapy for women with advanced disease. Less common histologies, such as serous and clear cell carcinoma, as well as carcinosarcoma, will also be covered. Furthermore, a section of the paper is dedicated to the current state of fertility-sparing surgery. EXPERT OPINION: We suggest several approaches for deciding on adjuvant therapy, based on stage and histology, after comprehensive surgical staging. The role that endometrial cancer molecular subtypes will play on postoperative therapy remains to be fully investigated.
Subject(s)
Clinical Decision-Making , Endometrial Neoplasms/therapy , Uterine Neoplasms/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Uterine Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe outcomes using a multimodal algorithm to triage patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) to primary debulking surgery (PDS) versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). METHODS: All patients with EOC treated at our institution from 04/2015-08/2018 were identified. We included patients without contraindication to PDS who underwent prospective calculation of a Resectability (R)-score. A low risk score for suboptimal cytoreduction was defined as ≤6, and a high risk score ≥7. Patients were triaged to laparotomy/PDS, laparoscopic evaluation of resectability (LSC), or NACT depending on R-score. RESULTS: Among 299 participants, 226 (76%) had a low risk score and 73 (24%) a high risk score. For patients with a low risk score, management included laparotomy/PDS, 181 (80%); LSC, 43 (19%) (with subsequent triage: PDS, 31; NACT, 12); and NACT, 2 (1%). For patients with a high risk score, management included laparotomy/PDS, 9 (12%); LSC, 51 (70%) (with subsequent triage: PDS, 28; NACT, 23); and NACT, 13 (18%). Overall, 83% underwent PDS, with a 75% CGR rate and 94% optimal cytoreduction rate. Use of the algorithm resulted in a 31% LSC rate and a 6% rate of suboptimal PDS. CONCLUSIONS: The multimodal algorithm led to excellent surgical results; 94% of patients achieved an optimal resection, with a very low rate of suboptimal cytoreduction.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/surgery , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Triage/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algorithms , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/pathology , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/methods , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) confers similar outcomes as primary debulking surgery and chemotherapy. Little is known about patients who receive NACT but do not undergo debulking surgery. Our aim was to characterize these patients. METHODS: We prospectively identified patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer treated with NACT from 7/1/15-12/1/17. Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare clinical characteristics by surgical status. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival outcomes. Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model were applied to assess the relationship of covariates to outcome, and time-dependent covariates were applied to variables collected after diagnosis. RESULTS: Of 224 women who received NACT, 162 (72%) underwent IDS and 62 (28%) did not undergo surgery. The non-surgical group was older (p<0.001), had higher Charlson comorbidity index (CCI; p<0.001), lower albumin levels (p=0.007), lower Karnofsky performance scores (p<0.001), and were more likely to have dose reductions in NACT (p<0.001). Reasons for no surgery included poor response to NACT (39%), death (15%), comorbidities (24%), patient preference (16%), and loss to follow-up (6%). The no surgery group had significantly worse overall survival (OS) than the surgery group (hazard ratio=3.34; 95% confidence interval=1.66-6.72; p<0.001), after adjustment for age, CCI, and dose reductions. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of women treated with NACT do not undergo IDS, and these women are older, frailer, and have worse OS. More studies are needed to find optimal therapies to maximize outcomes in this high-risk, elderly population.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/drug therapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/mortality , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/surgery , Case-Control Studies , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy/adverse effects , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To assess outcomes and patterns of recurrence in patients with high-grade serous ovarian/tubal/primary peritoneal cancers with radiographic supraclavicular lymphadenopathy at diagnosis. METHODS: We evaluated all patients with newly diagnosed high-grade serous ovarian cancers treated at our center between January 1, 2008 and May 1, 2013 who had supraclavicular lymphadenopathy (defined as ≥1 cm in short axis) on radiographic imaging (either computed tomography or positron emission tomography) at the time of diagnosis. RESULTS: Of 586 patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer receiving primary treatment during the study period, we identified 13 (2.2%) with supraclavicular lymphadenopathy diagnosed on pre-treatment imaging. The median age at diagnosis was 52.0 years (range 38.2-72.3). Five (31%) had clinically palpable nodes on physical examination. Four (31%) had a known BRCA mutation. All 13 patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by interval debulking surgery. Each patient received a median of four cycles of neoadjuvant intravenous chemotherapy (range 3-7). At interval debulking surgery, complete gross resection was achieved in nine (70%) patients, and optimal resection (0.1-1 cm residual disease) in four (30%). Eleven patients (85%) recurred; however, only one (8%) recurred in the supraclavicular lymph nodes. Median follow-up time was 44.3 months (range 22.4-95.0). Median progression-free survival for the cohort was 11.7 months (95% CI 9.2 to 14.1). Median overall survival was 44.3 months (95% CI 41.5 to 47.1). In patients obtaining complete gross resection at interval debulking surgery, median progression-free survival and overall survival were 13.9 months (95% CI 8.9 to 18.9) and 78.1 months (95% CI 11.1 to 145.1), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, approximately 2% of patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer presented with radiographic evidence of supraclavicular lymphadenopathy. Supraclavicular lymphadenopathy at diagnosis did not portend an unfavorable outcome when complete gross resection was achieved at interval debulking surgery.
Subject(s)
Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/pathology , Lymphadenopathy/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Aged , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Cohort Studies , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/drug therapy , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/surgery , Female , Humans , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Prognosis , Progression-Free Survival , Retrospective Studies , Survival RateABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess fitness and outcomes in older women undergoing cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer (OC). METHODS: A prospective study of OC patients referred to Geriatrics Clinic for preoperative evaluation. All completed the electronic Rapid Fitness Assessment (eRFA) and were followed by Geriatrics Service during inpatient postoperative course, co-managed by Surgical Service. Outcomes were 30-day Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission, emergency room (ER) visit, readmission, mortality, adverse surgical events. Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: Forty-two women (median age 79, range 74-88), 38 with newly diagnosed advanced OC, 4 with recurrent OC, underwent cytoreductive surgery between 5/2015 and 1/2018. Preoperative age-related impairments per eRFA: high level of distress (71%), functional dependency (59%), limited social activity (59%), depression (57%), slow Time Up and Go (54%), Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS)â¯≤â¯80 (41%), poor social support (43%), polypharmacy (35%), weight loss>10 lbs. (25%), fall history (244%), cognitive impairment (13%). Median number of comorbid conditionsâ¯=â¯3. Among 38 newly diagnosed women, 26 (68%) had stage IIIC, 11 (29%) stage IV. Sixteen (42%) underwent primary debulking surgery, 22 (58%) neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery. Median duration of surgeryâ¯=â¯245.5â¯min (range 95-621); median hospital length of stayâ¯=â¯6â¯days (range 0-22). Optimal debulking rateâ¯=â¯97%, complete gross resection rateâ¯=â¯63%. One patient was admitted to ICU, 26% had 30-day ER visit, 10% were readmitted. Any complication, minor complication, major complication occurred in 58%, 55%, 8%, respectively. Median time from surgery to postoperative chemotherapyâ¯=â¯34.5â¯days (range 19-66). Median follow-upâ¯=â¯15.7â¯months (range 3.7-38.0), 12-month survivalâ¯=â¯93.3%. There was no 180-day mortality. CONCLUSION: Cytoreductive surgery among older women with advanced OC and frailty can be performed safely in a tertiary care center with preoperative/postoperative geriatric and surgical co-management.
Subject(s)
Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/methods , Geriatrics/methods , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Geriatric Assessment , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Neoplasm Staging , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Prospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to determine the safety and efficacy of acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) to reduce the requirement for allogenic red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in patients undergoing primary cytoreduction for advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary cytoreduction for advanced ovarian cancer were enrolled in a prospective trial assessing ANH at time of surgery. Intraoperative blood withdrawal was performed to a target hemoglobin of 8.0â¯g/dL. A standardized transfusion protocol first using autologous then allogenic blood was applied intraoperatively and throughout hospitalization according to institutional guidelines. The primary endpoint was to determine the overall rate of allogenic RBC transfusions in the intra- and postoperative periods. A predetermined allogenic RBC transfusion rate <35% was deemed a meaningful reduction from a 50% transfusion rate in historical controls. RESULTS: Forty-one patients consented to participate. Median blood withdrawn during ANH was 1650â¯mL (range, 700-3000). Cytoreductive outcomes were as follows: 0â¯mm, 30 (73%); 1-10â¯mm, 8 (20%); and >10â¯mm, 3 (7%) residual disease. Estimated blood loss was 1000â¯mL (range, 150-2700). Fourteen patients (34%) received allogenic RBC transfusions intra- or postoperatively, meeting the primary endpoint. No patients were transfused outside protocol guidelines. The rate of ≥grade 3 complications (20%) and anastomotic leaks (7%) were similar to historical controls and met predefined safety thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with advanced ovarian cancer undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery, ANH appears to reduce allogenic RBC transfusion rates versus historical controls without increasing perioperative complications. Further evaluation of the technique is warranted.