Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Dutch Children Diagnosed with Oligodontia. A Cross-Sectional Study.

There is need to get insight into condition-specific oral health-related quality of life in Dutch children with oligodontia. Between October 2014 and March 2017, 11-17-year-old oligodontia patients were approached to join a study assessing the impact of oligodontia on condition-specific oral health-related quality of life (OHrQoL). The patients received a condition-specific OHrQoL questionnaire prior to the start of orthodontic treatment. Non-oligodontia children in the same age group, but also requiring orthodontic treatment, were approached to serve as a control. The Fisher's Exact Test was used for comparison purposes with the control group because of the small group sizes. Furthermore, subgroup analyses were performed for gender, age, number of congenitally missing teeth, tooth agenesis in the aesthetic region, orthodontic classification and microdontia via independent t-tests. p-values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Twenty-eight oligodontia patients and 23 controls agreed to participate. The oligodontia patients' scores were comparable to the controls except for the items about dental appearance and treatment complexity. The impact of oligodontia on OHrQoL in youngsters is limited and mainly concerns dental appearance and the complexity of the treatment.

Effect of implant therapy on oral health-related quality of life (OHIP-49), health status (SF-36), and satisfaction of patients with several agenetic teeth: Prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Effect of fixed prosthodontics on patients with several agenetic teeth is not well understood. PURPOSE: To assess the effect of implant-based fixed prosthodontics on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), general health status, and satisfaction regarding dental appearance, ability to chew and speech in patients with several agenetic teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this prospective cohort study, all patients (≥18 years) with several agenetic teeth who were scheduled for treatment with fixed dental implants between September 2013 and July 2015 at our department were approached. Participants received a set of questionnaires before and 1 year after implant placement to assess OHRQoL (OHIP-NL49), general health status (SF-36), and satisfaction regarding dental appearance, ability to chew and speech. RESULTS: About 25 out of 31 eligible patients (10 male, 15 female; median age: 20 [19;23] years; agenetic teeth: 7 [5;10]) were willing to participate. Pre- and post-treatment OHIP-NL49 sum-scores were 38 [28;56] and 17 [7;29], respectively (P < .001). Scores of all OHIP-NL49 subdomains decreased tool, representing an improved OHRQoL (P < .05) as well as that satisfaction regarding dental appearance, ability to chew and speech increased (P < .001). General health status did not change with implant treatment (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with implant-based fixed prosthodontics improves OHRQoL and satisfaction with dental appearance, ability to chew and speech, while not affecting general health status.

Dental implants with fixed prosthodontics in oligodontia: A retrospective cohort study with a follow-up of up to 25 years.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Long-term assessments of implant survival and treatment outcome in patients with oligodontia are lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective clinical study was to assess which factors determine a long-term implant survival and treatment outcome of up to 25 years in a cohort of patients with oligodontia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The medical records of all patients with oligodontia treated with fixed implant prosthodontics between January 1991 and December 2015 in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at the University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands, were assessed. Specifically, this involved the retrieval of records on the need for and mode of bone augmentation, implant survival, and survival of and adverse events associated with the prosthodontics. The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to analyze implant and superstructure survival. Log-rank tests were used to compare the survival of subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients with oligodontia were treated with dental implants. Of the 777 implants in total, 56 were lost, resulting in a 5-year cumulative survival of 95.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94.2% to 97.2%) and a 10-year cumulative survival of 89.2% (95% CI, 86.2% to 92.2%). The survival of implants placed in regions where bone augmentation surgery had been performed was significantly lower. The 5-year cumulative superstructure survival was 90.5% (95% CI, 87.6% to 93.5%), and the 10-year cumulative superstructure survival was 80.3% (95% CI, 75.3% to 85.3%). The performance of the screw-retained and cemented superstructures was comparable, but the survival of single crowns was significantly higher than the survival of fixed partial dentures (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Implant treatment is a predictable treatment option for patients with oligodontia with a favorable long-term outcome. Survival of implants in augmented areas is lower.

Long-term implant performance and patients' satisfaction in oligodontia.

OBJECTIVES: To assess long-term (≥10 years) implant survival, peri-implant health, patients' satisfaction and oral health related quality of life (OHQoL) in oligodontia patients rehabilitated with implant-based fixed prosthodontics. METHODS: All oligodontia patients treated ≥10 years previously with implant-based fixed prosthodontics at the University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands, were approached to participate. Clinical (plaque index, bleeding index, pocket probing depth) and radiographic (marginal bone level) data were collected between February and May 2016. Surgical implant details (e.g., bone augmentation) and implant loss were recalled from the medical records. Patients completed a satisfaction questionnaire (maximum score 10, high score favourable satisfaction) and the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-NL49, maximum score 196, low score favourable satisfaction) to rate OHQoL. Implant survival was expressed according to Kaplan Meier. The Mann-Whitney U Test was used for the other analyses. RESULTS: Forty-one patients had been treated with implant-based fixed prosthodontics (n = 258) ≥10 years previously. Cumulative 10-year implant survival of these 41 patients was 89.1% (95%CI 85.2-93.0%). Twenty-eight of them (n = 163 implants) were willing to visit us for additional clinical and radiographic assessments. In these 28 patients, highest peri-implant bone loss was observed for implants placed in augmented bone (p < 0.001). Peri-implant mucositis (65.4%) and peri-implantitis (16.1%) were rather common. Patients' satisfaction (8.3 ±â€¯1.5) and OHIP-NL49 scores (32.6 ±â€¯30.1) were favourable and not associated with number of agenetic teeth (≤10 versus >10). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival, satisfaction and OHQoL results reveal that implant treatment is a predictable and satisfactory treatment modality for oligodontia, although peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis are common. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study showed unique long-term (≥10 years) results about implant survival, peri-implant health, patients' satisfaction and OHQoL in oligodontia patients rehabilitated with implant-based fixed prosthodontics.

Three-dimensional computer-guided implant placement in oligodontia.

BACKGROUND: The aim of computer-designed surgical templates is to attain higher precision and accuracy of implant placement, particularly for compromised cases. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to show the benefit of a full three-dimensional virtual workflow to guide implant placement in oligodontia cases where treatment is challenging due compromised bone quantity and limited interdental spaces. PATIENT AND METHODS: A full, digitalized workflow was performed for implant placement in two oligodontia patients. Accuracy was assessed by calculating the coordinates of the entry point (shoulder) and apex (tip) as well as the angular deviation of the planned and actual implants. RESULTS: Implant placement could be well performed with the developed computer-designed templates in oligodontia. Mean shoulder deviation was 1.41 mm (SD 0.55), mean apical deviation was 1.20 mm (SD 0.54) and mean angular deviation was 5.27° (SD 2.51). CONCLUSION: Application of computer-designed surgical templates, as described in this technical advanced article, aid in predictable implant placement in oligodontia where bone quantity is scarce and interdental spaces are limited.

Implant-retained overdentures for young children with severe oligodontia: a series of four cases.

PURPOSE: The treatment need is high in children with severe oligodontia and anodontia, because they often have functional and esthetic problems owing to missing teeth. Because the intraforaminal region barely grows after eruption of the permanent mandibular incisors, dental implant treatment should be considered a treatment option for these children. The purpose of our study was to assess the treatment outcomes regarding satisfaction and the care and aftercare of implant-retained mandibular overdentures in a series of 4 young children without erupted mandibular teeth from either severe oligodontia (n = 3) or anodontia (n = 1). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four children without erupted mandibular teeth, aged 6 to 13 years, were provided with an implant-retained overdenture on 2 implants. The surgical and prosthetic care and aftercare were scored by the clinicians. Also, the patients and their parents were queried about how satisfied they were with the overdenture. RESULTS: The median follow-up of the patients was 5.2 years (range 3.2 to 8.4). No implants were lost, no cases of peri-implantitis occurred, and the need for treatment and aftercare was low. Patient and parent satisfaction with this treatment was high. CONCLUSIONS: A 2-implant, retained overdenture in children with no erupted mandibular teeth is a safe treatment modality when appropriate treatment and aftercare can be provided.