ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To determine risk factors (RFs) for hemorrhagic adverse events (AEs) associated with percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) and to develop a risk assessment model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, case control study between 2015 and 2020. Adults with an indication for PTBD were included. Patients who had undergone recent previous drainage procedures were excluded. Multiple variables were controlled. The exposure variables were the number of capsular punctures and passes (using the same puncture). A multivariate analysis was performed (logistic regression analysis). RESULTS: A total of 304 patients (mean age, 63 years ± 14 [range, 23-87 years]; female, 53.5%) were included. Hemorrhagic AEs occurred in 13.5% (n = 41) of the patients, and 3.0% (n = 9) of the cases were severe. Univariate analysis showed that the following variables were not associated with hemorrhagic AEs: age, sex, bilirubin and hemoglobin levels, type of pathology, portal hypertension, location of vascular punctures, ascites, nondilated bile duct, intrahepatic tumors, catheter features, blood pressure, antiplatelet drug use, and tract embolization. Multivariate analysis showed that number of punctures (odds ratio [OR], 2.5; P = .055), vascular punctures (OR, 4.1; P = .007), fatty liver or cirrhosis (OR, 3.7; P = .021), and intrahepatic tumor obstruction (Bismuth ≥ 2; OR, 2.4; P = .064) were associated with hemorrhagic AEs. Patients with corrected coagulopathies had fewer hemorrhagic AEs (OR, -5.5; P = .026). The predictability was 88.2%. The area under the curve was 0.56 (95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.61). CONCLUSIONS: Preprocedural and intraprocedural RFs were identified in relation to hemorrhage with PTBD. AE risk assessment information may be valuable for prediction and management of hemorrhagic AEs.
Subject(s)
Drainage , Hemorrhage , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Drainage/adverse effects , Drainage/methods , Female , Hemorrhage/etiology , Humans , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Background: The relationship between obesity with common bile duct stone (CBDS) is close and increases after a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Due to the anatomical modification, direct endoscopic access is not always possible. For this reason, image-guided surgery (IGS) by percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) of the common bile duct (CBD) could be a first-line approach for the treatment of post-RYGB choledocholithiasis. The aim of this study was to analyze the feasibility and safety of CBDS treatment after RYGB with IGS. Materials and Methods: We present a descriptive retrospective observational multicentric study on the treatment of choledocholithiasis in patients operated on for RYGB using IGS through a minimally invasive approach by PTBD. The diagnosis of CBDS was made according to the symptoms of the patients, supported by blood tests, and medical images. Treatment was planned in two stages: in the first step, a PTBD was performed, and in the second step the choledocholithiasis was removed. Results: Of a total of 1403 post-RYGB patients, 21 presented choledocholithiasis. Of these, n = 18 were included. Symptoms were reported in n = 15 (8 cholestatic jaundice, 7 cholangitis), whereas n = 3 were asymptomatic. Percutaneous treatment was performed in all these patients, treated with a balloon and stone basket. A hyperamylasemia without pancreatitis was observed in 3 patients. No complications or deaths associated with the procedure were reported. The average hospital stay was 8.6 days. Conclusion: IGS is an interesting option for the treatment CBDS after RYGB. For these patients, PTBD is feasible and safe.
Subject(s)
Choledocholithiasis/surgery , Common Bile Duct/surgery , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Adult , Aged , Female , Gastric Bypass , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity, Morbid/complications , Retrospective Studies , Surgery, Computer-Assisted , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery offers the only effective long-term weight loss therapy for morbidly obese patients. Numerous studies have demonstrated a mortality and morbidity reduction associated with weight loss surgery, but these interventions also have significant rates of complications. It is important for the bariatric surgeons to recognize these complications and acknowledge which of them can be solved in a minimally invasive manner in order to offer to patients the best treatment. The aim of this article was to review factors and success rates associated with percutaneous image guide abdominal interventions to treat the complications of bariatric surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective descriptive study. Eighty-two patients with complications after bariatric surgery were included. Of these, 56 presented fistula with or without abdominal collection. RESULTS: Of the total patients, 54% are male and 46% female. The average age was 49.4 (range 16-62). Of the 56 cases, 37 (66.1%) occurred after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, and 19 (33.9%) post-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The fistula was resolved by percutaneous image guide abdominal interventions in 49 opportunities, of which 67% required only conservative treatment afterwards, the remaining 33% required endoscopic treatment with prostheses, fibrin sealants, and/or clips. No mortality was reported in the series. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous image-guided abdominal interventions play a significant role in the treatment of complications following bariatric surgery. The minimally invasive treatment of fistula after bariatric surgery is safe and effective.
Subject(s)
Anastomotic Leak/surgery , Catheter Ablation , Fistula/surgery , Gastrectomy/adverse effects , Gastric Bypass/adverse effects , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Abdomen/diagnostic imaging , Abdomen/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Anastomotic Leak/epidemiology , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Catheter Ablation/methods , Catheter Ablation/statistics & numerical data , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Female , Fistula/epidemiology , Fistula/etiology , Gastrectomy/methods , Gastrectomy/statistics & numerical data , Gastric Bypass/methods , Gastric Bypass/statistics & numerical data , Gastrointestinal Diseases/epidemiology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/etiology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/surgery , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/methods , Laparoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity, Morbid/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Reoperation/adverse effects , Reoperation/methods , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/adverse effects , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome , Weight Loss , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aeronautical industry is one of the disciplines that most use control systems. Its purpose is to avoid accidents and return safer flights. The flight of an airplane, from its takeoff to its landing is a process divided into stages under strict control. A surgical procedure has the same characteristics. We try to identify and develop the stages of the surgical process using the experience of the aviation industry in order to optimize the results and reduce surgical complications. AIM: To identify and develop the stages of the surgical process so that they could be applied to surgery departments. METHODS: A search, review and bibliographic analysis of the application of aeronautical control and safety to medical practice in general and to surgery, in particular, were carried out. RESULTS: Surgical process comprises the perioperative period. It is composed of Preoperative Stage (it is divided into 2 "sub-steps": hospital admission and control of preoperative studies) Operative Stage (it is divided into 3 "sub-steps": anesthetic induction, surgery, and anesthetic recovery) and Postoperative Stage (it is divided into 2 "sub-steps": control during hospitalization and ambulatory control). Two checkpoints must be developed. Checkpoint #1 would be located between the preoperative and operative stages, and checkpoint #2 would be located between the operative and postoperative stages. Surgical factors are surgeons, instrumental and technology, anesthesiology and operating room environment. CONCLUSION: It is possible and necessary to develop a systematic surgical procedure. Its application in the department of surgery could optimize the results and reduce the complications and errors related to daily practice.
Subject(s)
Checklist , Perioperative Period/standards , Safety , Surgical Procedures, Operative/standards , Humans , Perioperative Period/methodsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The present study aimed to determine whether the percentage of bleeding complications differs between the right and the left approaches in percutaneous biliary drainage (PBD) in adult patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, descriptive, nonrandomized comparative and longitudinal study. We included adult patients over 18 years of age who underwent a PBD. We excluded those with a bilateral PBD for the comparative study. Usually, but not exclusively, we performed the right approach under fluoroscopic guidance and the left one under ultrasound and fluoroscopy. RESULTS: Of 150 cases, 63 were performed using the right approach and 61 with the left; 26 were performed with the bilateral. The right approach faced less dilated biliary ducts and more benign diseases. We experienced 20 bleeding complications (13.33%, confidence intervals of 95%=8.3-19.8), 7 in the bilateral approach, 10 in the right approach, and 3 in the left one. The difference between the right and the left approaches was statistically significant (Fisher P=0,04). No procedures were required to obtain hemostasis, and only one patient (0.66%, confidence intervals of 95%=0.009-3.66) (in the right side) required a red blood cell transfusion. We found no related mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Global bleeding complications are more likely to appear in the right approach in which less dilated biliary ducts and more benign diseases probably contributed to a higher number of needle passes, portal and hepatic vein punctures, and, therefore, to an increase in the risk of bleeding complications. The significant bleeding complication rate was low (0.66%).
Subject(s)
Blood Loss, Surgical , Cholestasis/surgery , Drainage/adverse effects , Drainage/methods , Female , Hematoma/etiology , Hemobilia/etiology , Hemoperitoneum/etiology , Humans , Intraoperative Complications/etiology , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Wounds, Penetrating/etiologyABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Background: The aeronautical industry is one of the disciplines that most use control systems. Its purpose is to avoid accidents and return safer flights. The flight of an airplane, from its takeoff to its landing is a process divided into stages under strict control. A surgical procedure has the same characteristics. We try to identify and develop the stages of the surgical process using the experience of the aviation industry in order to optimize the results and reduce surgical complications. Aim: To identify and develop the stages of the surgical process so that they could be applied to surgery departments. Methods: A search, review and bibliographic analysis of the application of aeronautical control and safety to medical practice in general and to surgery, in particular, were carried out. Results: Surgical process comprises the perioperative period. It is composed of Preoperative Stage (it is divided into 2 "sub-steps": hospital admission and control of preoperative studies) Operative Stage (it is divided into 3 "sub-steps": anesthetic induction, surgery, and anesthetic recovery) and Postoperative Stage (it is divided into 2 "sub-steps": control during hospitalization and ambulatory control). Two checkpoints must be developed. Checkpoint #1 would be located between the preoperative and operative stages, and checkpoint #2 would be located between the operative and postoperative stages. Surgical factors are surgeons, instrumental and technology, anesthesiology and operating room environment. Conclusion: It is possible and necessary to develop a systematic surgical procedure. Its application in the department of surgery could optimize the results and reduce the complications and errors related to daily practice.
RESUMO Racional: A indústria aeronáutica é uma das disciplinas que mais utiliza sistemas de controle. Sua finalidade é evitar acidentes e retornar voos mais seguros. O voo de um avião, desde a decolagem até a aterrissagem, é processo dividido em etapas com estrito controle. Um procedimento cirúrgico tem as mesmas características. Tentar identificar e desenvolver etapas no processo cirúrgico, utilizando a experiência da indústria aeronáutica, poderá otimizar os resultados e reduzir as complicações cirúrgicas. Objetivo: Identificar e desenvolver etapas no processo cirúrgico para que possam ser aplicadas nos serviços de cirurgia. Métodos: Foram realizadas pesquisas, revisão e análise bibliográfica sobre o controle e segurança aeronáutica e aplicando-as na prática médica em geral e à cirurgia em particular. Resultados: O processo cirúrgico compreende o período perioperatório. É composto de pré-operatório (dividido em duas sub-etapas: admissão hospitalar e controle de estudos pré-operatórios); fase operatória (dividida em três sub-etapas: indução anestésica, operação e recuperação anestésica) e fase pós-operatória (dividida em duas "sub-etapas": controle durante a hospitalização e controle ambulatorial). Dois pontos de verificação devem ser desenvolvidos. O ponto de checagem nº 1 estaria localizado entre os estágios pré-operatório e operatório, e o ponto de checagem nº 2 entre os estágios operatório e pós-operatório. Fatores cirúrgicos são cirurgiões, instrumental e tecnologia, anestesiologia e ambiente de sala de cirurgia. Conclusão: É possível e necessário desenvolver um procedimento cirúrgico sistemático. Sua aplicação no departamento de cirurgia poderia otimizar os resultados e reduzir as complicações e erros relacionados à prática diária.
Subject(s)
Humans , Safety , Surgical Procedures, Operative/standards , Checklist , Perioperative Period/standards , Perioperative Period/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The risk of bile duct injury (BDI) during cholecystectomy remains a concern, despite efforts proposed for increasing safety. The Critical View of Safety (CVS) has been adopted promoting to reduce its risk. AIM: To perform a survey to assess the awareness of the CVS, estimating the proportion of surgeons that correctly identified its elements and its relationship with BDI. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was sent to 2096 surgeons inquiring on their common practices during cholecystectomy and their knowledge of the CVS. RESULTS: A total of 446 surgeons responded the survey (21%). The percentage of surgeons that correctly identified the elements of CVS was 21.8% and 24.8% among surgeons claiming to know the CVS. The percentage of surgeons that reported BDI was higher among those that incorrectly identified the elements of the CVS (p=0.03). In the multivariate analysis, career length was the most significant factor related to BDI (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of surgeons that correctly identified the Critical View of Safety was low, even among those who claimed to know the CVS. The percentage of surgeons that reported BDI was higher among those that incorrectly identified the elements of the CVS.
Subject(s)
Bile Ducts/injuries , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , General Surgery/standards , Intraoperative Complications/prevention & control , Patient Safety , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: When a major hepatic resection is necessary, sometimes the future liver remnant is not enough to maintain sufficient liver function and patients are more likely to develop liver failure after surgery. AIM: To test the hypothesis that performing a percutaneous radiofrecuency liver partition plus percutaneous portal vein embolization (PRALPPS) for stage hepatectomy in pigs is feasible. METHODS: Four pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) both sexes with weights between 25 to 35 kg underwent percutaneous portal vein embolization with coils of the left portal vein. By contrasted CT, the difference between the liver parenchyma corresponding to the embolized zone and the normal one was identified. Immediately, using the fusion of images between ultrasound and CT as a guide, radiofrequency needles were placed percutaneouslyand then ablated until the liver partition was complete. Finally, hepatectomy was completed with a laparoscopic approach. RESULTS: All animals have survived the procedures, with no reported complications. The successful portal embolization process was confirmed both by portography and CT. In the macroscopic analysis of the pieces, the depth of the ablation was analyzed. The hepatic hilum was respected. On the other hand, the correct position of the embolization material on the left portal vein could be also observed. CONCLUSION: "Percutaneous radiofrequency assisted liver partition with portal vein embolization" (PRALLPS) is a feasible procedure.
Subject(s)
Catheter Ablation , Embolization, Therapeutic , Hepatectomy/methods , Portal Vein , Animals , Female , Male , SwineABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Background: The risk of bile duct injury (BDI) during cholecystectomy remains a concern, despite efforts proposed for increasing safety. The Critical View of Safety (CVS) has been adopted promoting to reduce its risk. Aim: To perform a survey to assess the awareness of the CVS, estimating the proportion of surgeons that correctly identified its elements and its relationship with BDI. Methods: An anonymous online survey was sent to 2096 surgeons inquiring on their common practices during cholecystectomy and their knowledge of the CVS. Results: A total of 446 surgeons responded the survey (21%). The percentage of surgeons that correctly identified the elements of CVS was 21.8% and 24.8% among surgeons claiming to know the CVS. The percentage of surgeons that reported BDI was higher among those that incorrectly identified the elements of the CVS (p=0.03). In the multivariate analysis, career length was the most significant factor related to BDI (p=0.002). Conclusions: The percentage of surgeons that correctly identified the Critical View of Safety was low, even among those who claimed to know the CVS. The percentage of surgeons that reported BDI was higher among those that incorrectly identified the elements of the CVS.
RESUMO Racional: O risco de lesão do ducto biliar (BDI) durante a colecistectomia continua a ser preocupante, apesar dos esforços propostos para aumentar a segurança. A Visão Crítica da Segurança (CVS) foi adotada e proposta para redução de seu risco. Objetivo: Realizar levantamento para avaliar a conscientização da CVS, e estimando a proporção de cirurgiões que identificaram corretamente seus elementos e sua relação com BDI. Métodos: Pesquisa online anônima foi enviada para 2096 cirurgiões perguntando sobre suas práticas comuns durante a colecistectomia e seu conhecimento da CVS. Resultados: Um total de 446 cirurgiões responderam a pesquisa (21%). A porcentagem que identificou corretamente os elementos da CVS foi de 21,8% e 24,8% entre os cirurgiões que afirmam conhecê-la. A porcentagem dos que relataram BDI foi maior entre os que incorretamente identificaram os elementos da CVS (p=0,03). Na análise multivariada, o tempo na carreira foi o fator mais significativo relacionado à BDI (p=0,002). Conclusões: A porcentagem de cirurgiões que identificaram corretamente a CVS foi baixa, mesmo entre aqueles que alegaram conhecê-la. A porcentagem de cirurgiões que relataram BDI foi maior entre aqueles que incorretamente identificaram os elementos da CVS.
Subject(s)
Humans , General Surgery/standards , Bile Ducts/injuries , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Patient Safety , Intraoperative Complications/prevention & control , Prospective Studies , Health Care SurveysABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Background: When a major hepatic resection is necessary, sometimes the future liver remnant is not enough to maintain sufficient liver function and patients are more likely to develop liver failure after surgery. Aim: To test the hypothesis that performing a percutaneous radiofrecuency liver partition plus percutaneous portal vein embolization (PRALPPS) for stage hepatectomy in pigs is feasible. Methods: Four pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) both sexes with weights between 25 to 35 kg underwent percutaneous portal vein embolization with coils of the left portal vein. By contrasted CT, the difference between the liver parenchyma corresponding to the embolized zone and the normal one was identified. Immediately, using the fusion of images between ultrasound and CT as a guide, radiofrequency needles were placed percutaneouslyand then ablated until the liver partition was complete. Finally, hepatectomy was completed with a laparoscopic approach. Results: All animals have survived the procedures, with no reported complications. The successful portal embolization process was confirmed both by portography and CT. In the macroscopic analysis of the pieces, the depth of the ablation was analyzed. The hepatic hilum was respected. On the other hand, the correct position of the embolization material on the left portal vein could be also observed. Conclusion: "Percutaneous radiofrequency assisted liver partition with portal vein embolization" (PRALLPS) is a feasible procedure.
RESUMO Racional: Quando grande ressecção hepática é necessária, às vezes, o fígado remanescente não é suficiente para manter a função hepática e os pacientes são mais propensos a desenvolver insuficiência hepática após a operação. Objetivo: Testar a hipótese de que a realização de uma divisão do fígado com radiofreqüência percutânea mais a embolização percutânea da veia porta (PROPS) para a hepatectomia regrada em porcos é viável. Métodos: Quatro porcos (Sus scrofa domesticus) ambos os sexos com pesos entre 25 a 35 kg foram submetidos à embolização percutânea da veia porta com espirais da veia porta esquerda. Por TC contrastada, a diferença entre o parênquima hepático correspondente à zona embolizada e a normal foi identificada. Imediatamente, usando a fusão de imagens entre ultrassom e CT guiada, as agulhas de radiofrequência foram colocadas percutaneamente e depois foram cortando até a partição do fígado estar completa. Finalmente, a hepatectomia foi completada com abordagem laparoscópica. Resultados: Todos os animais sobreviveram aos procedimentos, sem complicações. O sucesso do processo de embolização do portal foi confirmado por portografia e CT. Na análise macroscópica das peças, analisou-se a profundidade da ablação. O hilo hepático foi respeitado. Por outro lado, a posição correta do material de embolização na veia porta esquerda também pôde ser observada. Conclusão: "Partição do fígado assistida por radiofrequência percutânea com embolização da veia porta" (PRALLPS) é um procedimento viável.
Subject(s)
Animals , Male , Female , Portal Vein , Catheter Ablation , Embolization, Therapeutic , Hepatectomy/methods , SwineABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Once a biliary injury has occurred, repair is done by a hepaticojejunostomy. The most common procedure is to perform a dilatation with balloon with a success of 70 %. Success rates range using biodegradable stents is from 85% to 95%. Biodegradable biliary stents should change the treatment of this complication. AIM: To investigate the use of biodegradable stents in a group of patients with hepaticojejunonostomy strictures. METHODS: In a prospective study 16 biodegradable stents were placed in 13 patients with hepaticojejunostomy strictures secondary to bile duct repair of a biliary surgical injury. Average age was 38.7 years (23-67), nine were female and four male. All cases had a percutaneous drainage before at the time of biodegradable stent placement. RESULTS: In one case, temporary haemobilia was present requiring blood transfusion. In another, pain after stent placement required intravenous medication. In the other 11 patients, hospital discharge was the next morning following stent placement. During the patient´s follow-up, none presented symptoms during the first nine months. One patient presented significant alkaline phosphatase elevation and stricture recurrence was confirmed. One case had recurrence of cholangitis 11 months after the stent placement. 84.6% continued asymptomatic with a mean follow-up of 20 months. CONCLUSION: The placement of biodegradable stents is a safe and feasible technique. Was not observed strictures caused by the stent or its degradation. It could substitute balloon dilation in strictures of hepaticojejunostomy.
RACIONAL: Uma vez que lesão biliar ocorreu, o reparo é feito por hepaticojejunostomia. O procedimento mais comum é efetuar dilatação com balão com sucesso de 70%. As taxas de sucesso utilizando stents biodegradáveis ââé de 85% a 95%. Stents biliares biodegradáveis ââdevem mudar o tratamento desta complicação. OBJETIVO: Investigar o uso de stents biodegradáveis em um grupo de pacientes com estenose hepaticojejunal. MÉTODOS: Em estudo prospectivo 16 stents biodegradáveis ââforam colocados em 13 pacientes com estenose de hepaticojejunostomia secundárias usados para reparação do ductos biliares de lesão cirúrgica. A média de idade foi de 38,7 anos (23-67), nove pacientes eram homens e quatro mulheres. Todos os casos tiveram drenagem percutânea antes do momento da colocação de stent biodegradável. RESULTADOS: Em um caso, haemobilia temporária estava presente com necessidade de transfusão de sangue. Em outro, dor após a colocação do stent necessitou de medicação intravenosa. Nos outros 11 pacientes, alta hospitalar foi na manhã seguinte após o procedimento. Durante o seguimento, nenhum apresentou sintomas durante os primeiros nove meses. Um paciente apresentou significativa elevação da fosfatase alcalina por recidiva da estenose. Um caso teve recorrência de colangite 11 meses após a colocação do stent. Continuaram assintomáticos 84,6% com média de acompanhamento de 20 meses. CONCLUSÃO: A colocação de stents biodegradáveis ââé técnica segura e viável. Não foram observadas restrições causadas pelo stent ou pela sua degradação. Stent pode substituir dilatação com balão na estenose de hepaticojejunostomia.
Subject(s)
Absorbable Implants , Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic/surgery , Bile Ducts/injuries , Bile Ducts/surgery , Jejunum/surgery , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Stents , Adult , Aged , Anastomosis, Surgical , Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures , Constriction, Pathologic , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Background: Once a biliary injury has occurred, repair is done by a hepaticojejunostomy. The most common procedure is to perform a dilatation with balloon with a success of 70 %. Success rates range using biodegradable stents is from 85% to 95%. Biodegradable biliary stents should change the treatment of this complication. Aim: To investigate the use of biodegradable stents in a group of patients with hepaticojejunonostomy strictures. Methods: In a prospective study 16 biodegradable stents were placed in 13 patients with hepaticojejunostomy strictures secondary to bile duct repair of a biliary surgical injury. Average age was 38.7 years (23-67), nine were female and four male. All cases had a percutaneous drainage before at the time of biodegradable stent placement. Results: In one case, temporary haemobilia was present requiring blood transfusion. In another, pain after stent placement required intravenous medication. In the other 11 patients, hospital discharge was the next morning following stent placement. During the patient´s follow-up, none presented symptoms during the first nine months. One patient presented significant alkaline phosphatase elevation and stricture recurrence was confirmed. One case had recurrence of cholangitis 11 months after the stent placement. 84.6% continued asymptomatic with a mean follow-up of 20 months. Conclusion: The placement of biodegradable stents is a safe and feasible technique. Was not observed strictures caused by the stent or its degradation. It could substitute balloon dilation in strictures of hepaticojejunostomy.
RESUMO Racional: Uma vez que lesão biliar ocorreu, o reparo é feito por hepaticojejunostomia. O procedimento mais comum é efetuar dilatação com balão com sucesso de 70%. As taxas de sucesso utilizando stents biodegradáveis é de 85% a 95%. Stents biliares biodegradáveis devem mudar o tratamento desta complicação. Objetivo: Investigar o uso de stents biodegradáveis em um grupo de pacientes com estenose hepaticojejunal Métodos: Em estudo prospectivo 16 stents biodegradáveis foram colocados em 13 pacientes com estenose de hepaticojejunostomia secundárias usados para reparação do ductos biliares de lesão cirúrgica. A média de idade foi de 38,7 anos (23-67), nove pacientes eram homens e quatro mulheres. Todos os casos tiveram drenagem percutânea antes do momento da colocação de stent biodegradável. Resultados: Em um caso, haemobilia temporária estava presente com necessidade de transfusão de sangue. Em outro, dor após a colocação do stent necessitou de medicação intravenosa. Nos outros 11 pacientes, alta hospitalar foi na manhã seguinte após o procedimento. Durante o seguimento, nenhum apresentou sintomas durante os primeiros nove meses. Um paciente apresentou significativa elevação da fosfatase alcalina por recidiva da estenose. Um caso teve recorrência de colangite 11 meses após a colocação do stent. Continuaram assintomáticos 84,6% com média de acompanhamento de 20 meses. Conclusão: A colocação de stents biodegradáveis é técnica segura e viável. Não foram observadas restrições causadas pelo stent ou pela sua degradação. Stent pode substituir dilatação com balão na estenose de hepaticojejunostomia.