The Team Is Not Okay: Violence in Emergency Departments Across Disciplines in a Health System.

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare workers, particularly those in the emergency department (ED), experience high rates of injuries caused by workplace violence (WPV). OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to establish the incidence of WPV among multidisciplinary ED staff within a regional health system and assess its impact on staff victims. METHODS: We conducted a survey study of all multidisciplinary ED staff at 18 Midwestern EDs encompassing a larger health system between November 18-December 31, 2020. We solicited the incidence of verbal abuse and physical assault experienced and witnessed by respondents over the prior six months, as well as its impact on staff. RESULTS: We included responses from 814 staff (24.5% response rate) for final analysis with 585 (71.9%) indicating some form of violence experienced in the preceding six months. A total of 582 (71.5%) respondents indicated experiencing verbal abuse, and 251 (30.8%) indicated experiencing some form of physical assault. All disciplines experienced some type of verbal abuse and nearly all experienced some type of physical assault. One hundred thirty-five (21.9%) respondents indicated that being the victim of WPV has affected their ability to perform their job, and nearly half (47.6%) indicated it has changed the way they interact with or perceive patients. Additionally, 132 (21.3%) indicated experiencing symptoms of post-traumatic stress, and 18.5% reported they have considered leaving their position due to an incident. CONCLUSION: Emergency department staff suffer violence at a high rate, and there is no discipline that is spared. As health systems seek to prioritize staff safety in violence-prone areas such as the ED, it is imperative to recognize that the entire multidisciplinary team is impacted and requires targeted efforts for improvement in safety.

Improving Timely Antibiotic Administration for Pediatric Oncology Patients With Neutropenic Fever Seen in the Emergency Department.

Objective: To improve the care for pediatric oncology patients with neutropenic fever who present to the emergency department (ED) by administering appropriate empiric antibiotics within 60 minutes of arrival. Patients and Methods: We focused on improving the care for pediatric oncology patients at risk of neutropenia who presented to the ED with concern for fever. Our baseline adherence to the administration of empiric antibiotics within 60 minutes for this population was 53% (76/144) from January 1, 2010, to December 21, 2014. During 2015, we reviewed data monthly, finding 73% adherence. We used the Lean methodology to identify the process waste, completed a value-stream map with input from multidisciplinary stakeholders, and convened a root cause analysis to identify causes for delay. The 4 causes were as follows: (1) lack of staff awareness; (2) missing patient information in electronic medical record; (3) practice variation; and 4) lack of clear prioritization of laboratory draws. We initiated Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles to achieve our goal of 80% of patients receiving appropriate empiric antibiotics within 60 minutes of arrival in the ED. Results: Five Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were completed, focusing on the following: (1) timely identification of patients by utilizing the electronic medical record to initiate a page to the care team; (2) creation of a streamlined intravascular access process; (3) practice standardization; (4) convenient access to appropriate antibiotics; and (5) care team education. Timely antibiotic administration increased from 73%-95% of patients by 2018. More importantly, the adherence was sustained to greater than 90% through 2021. Conclusion: A structured and multifaceted approach using quality improvement methodologies can achieve and sustain improved patient care outcomes in the ED.

Characterization of emergency department abandonment using a real-time location system.

BACKGROUND: Patients who present to emergency departments (EDs) for evaluation but are noted to have left without being seen (LWBS) are potentially at great risk. Governmental agencies, such as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, as well as hospitals and health organizations, are examining the factors which drive LWBS, including accurately quantifying patient tolerance to wait times and targeting interventions to improve patient tolerance to waiting. OBJECTIVE: Compare traditional methods of estimating time to LWBS with an objective method using a real-time location tracking system (RTLS); examine temporal factors associated with greater LWBS rates. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of all ED visits to a large, suburban, quaternary care hospital in one calendar year. LWBS was calculated as patient registration to nurse recognition and documentation of patient abandonment (traditional method) vs registration to last onsite RTLS timestamp (study method). Descriptives of patterns of patient abandonment rates and patient demographic data were also included. RESULTS: Our study shows that traditional methods of measuring LWBS times significantly overestimate actual patient tolerance to waiting times (median 70, mean 92 min). Patients triaged to resource intensive categories (Emergency Severity Index (ESI) 2, 3) wait longer than patients triaged to less resource intensive categories (ESI 4, 5). CONCLUSION: Compared to traditional methods, RTLS is an efficient and accurate way to measure LWBS rates and helps set the stage for assessing the efficacy of interventions to reduce LWBS and reduce the gap between those seeking evaluation at emergency departments and those ultimately receiving it.

Using a Potentially Aggressive/Violent Patient Huddle to Improve Health Care Safety.

BACKGROUND: Unexpected situations of workplace violence are occurring in the United States at increasing rates in health care environments, warranting increased attention to processes supporting safety for health care workers. At a large, academic hospital, two patient safety incidents had occurred in a two-year period in which a patient had become violent at the time of admission from the emergency department (ED) to the medical unit. METHODS: A multidisciplinary quality improvement (QI) team was formed to address the risk of violent patient events. Using two iterative Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles, the QI team designed and tested a huddle handoff communication tool, the Potentially Aggressive/Violent Huddle Form. An ED nurse would initiate the huddle process by informing the admitting unit that a patient at risk for violence was being admitted. The admitting care team would then call the ED team so that both teams participated in the handoff call together. The huddle process occurred for 21 transfers in the first PDSA cycle and for 18 transfers in the second. RESULTS: RNs from the ED and the six medical units reported feeling safe during the transfer process 100% of the time during both tests of change PDSAs (vs. 54.7% at baseline). In the ED, from the first test of change to the second test of change, satisfaction with the process improved from 53.3% to 75.0%. CONCLUSION: The huddle handoff communication tool and other methods to facilitate the transfer of potentially violent patients have the potential to decrease the number and severity of violent incidents in the health care workplace.

Effect of a physician assistant as triage liaison provider on patient throughput in an academic emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: Overcapacity issues plague emergency departments (EDs). Studies suggest that triage liaison providers (TLPs) may shorten patient length of stay (LOS) and reduce the proportion of patients who leave without being seen (LWBS), but these results are not universal. Previous studies used physicians as TLPs. We evaluated whether a physician assistant (PA), acting as a TLP, would shorten LOS and decrease LWBS rates. METHODS: The authors used an observational cohort controlled before-and-after study design with predefined outcome measures, comparing 8 pilot days to 8 control days. The TLP evaluated all Emergency Severity Index (ESI) level 3, 4, and 5 patients, excluding pediatric and behavioral health patients. RESULTS: A total of 353 patients were included on pilot days and 371 on control days. LOS was shorter on pilot days than control days (median [interquartile range {IQR}] = 229 [168 to 303] minutes vs. 270 [187 to 372] minutes, p < 0.001). Waiting room times were similar between pilot and control days (median [IQR] = 69 [20 to 119] minutes vs. 70 [19 to 137] minutes, p = 0.408), but treatment room times were shorter (median [IQR] = 151 [92 to 223] minutes vs. 187 [110 to 254] minutes, p < 0.001). Finally, a lower proportion of patients LWBS on pilot days (1.4% vs. 9.7%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a PA as a TLP was associated with a 41-minute decrease in median total LOS and a lower proportion of patients who LWBS. The decrease in total LOS is likely attributable to the addition of the TLP, with patients having shorter duration in treatment rooms on pilot days compared to control days.

Effectiveness of patient-collected swabs for influenza testing.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of self-collected and health care worker (HCW)-collected nasal swabs for detection of influenza viruses and determine the patients' preference for type of collection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled adult patients presenting with influenzalike illness to the Emergency Department at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, from January 28, 2011, through April 30, 2011. Patients self-collected a midturbinate nasal flocked swab from their right nostril following written instructions. A second swab was then collected by an HCW from the left nostril. Swabs were tested for influenza A and B viruses by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and percent concordance between collection methods was determined. RESULTS: Of the 72 paired specimens analyzed, 25 were positive for influenza A or B RNA by at least one of the collection methods (34.7% positivity rate). When the 14 patients who had prior health care training were excluded, the qualitative agreement between collection methods was 94.8% (55 of 58). Two of the 58 specimens (3.4%) from patients without health care training were positive only by HCW collection, and 1 of 58 (1.7%) was positive only by patient self-collection. A total of 53.4% of patients (31 of 58) preferred the self-collection method over the HCW collection, and 25.9% (15 of 58) had no preference. CONCLUSION: Self-collected midturbinate nasal swabs provide a reliable alternative to HCW collection for influenza A and B virus real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.