Dropped Gallstone Mimicking Retroperitoneal Tumor 5 Years After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Posing a Diagnostic Challenge.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the standard treatment for cholecystitis. The major complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy include bleeding, abscess formation, biliary injury with bile leakage, and bowel injury. Gallbladder perforation and subsequent stone spillage are not uncommon in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The majority of these spilled stones remain clinically silent. But sometimes they can cause abscesses and make diagnosis challenging especially when it occurs years after the procedure and when the abscess form in uncommon sites. A 66-year-old female with a history of laparoscopic cholecystectomy presented with aggravating abdominal pain in the right upper quadrant (RUQ). The CT abdomen revealed a mass in the retroperitoneum behind the hepatic flexure. Upon further examination, follow-up CT scans, and biopsy repeatedly failed to exclude malignancy, so it was suggested that the patient undergo surgical removal of the mass. The pathological analysis of the excised mass revealed that it was a dropped gallstone from the procedure that triggered an inflammatory reaction. Dropped gallstones should be considered as a differential diagnosis in a patient with a history of laparoscopic cholecystectomy presenting with an abdominal or retroperitoneal abscess, as a failure of early recognition puts the patient at risk of undergoing unnecessary and invasive procedures.

Long-Term Carriage of Medicopsis romeroi, an Agent of Black-Grain Mycetoma, Presenting as Phaeohyphomycosis in a Renal Transplant Patient.

Medicopsis species are rare fungal pathogens that frequently resist common antifungal therapies and are difficult to identify morphologically as conidia are produced in pycnidia, a key feature of coelomycetes. Immunocompromised patients are at risk of these infections, even after remote exposure, and typically present with phaeohyphomycoses without dissemination. We present the case of a renal transplant recipient 6.5 years post-transplant who developed a slowly progressive soft tissue infection mimicking a synovial cyst. A cultured isolate was identified as Medicopsis romeroi by sequencing of multiple ribosomal loci. The patient responded well to debridement and posaconazole therapy. Solid-organ transplant patients are at risk of opportunistic fungal infection long after transplant, and molecular methods are often required for definitive identification.

A tale of two soles: sociomechanical and biomechanical considerations in diabetic limb salvage and amputation decision-making in the worst of times.

Foot ulcerations complicated by infection are the major cause of limb loss in people with diabetes. This is especially true in those patients with severe sepsis. Determining whether to amputate or attempt to salvage a limb often requires in depth evaluation of each individual patient's physical, mental, and socioeconomic status. The current report presents and juxtaposes two similar patients, admitted to the same service at the same time with severe diabetic foot infections complicated by sepsis. We describe in detail the similarities and differences in the clinical presentation, extent of infection, etiology, and socioeconomic concerns that ultimately led to divergent clinical decisions regarding the choices of attempting diabetic limb salvage versus primary amputation and prompt rehabilitation.

Clinical efficacy of the pan metatarsal head resection as a curative procedure in patients with diabetes mellitus and neuropathic forefoot wounds.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the pan metatarsal head resection (PMHR) compared with nonsurgical management of wounds in the forefoot in people with diabetes. METHODS: The authors evaluated 92 patients with diabetes (66.3% male), with ulcers classified as University of Texas grade 1A or 2A at the plantar aspect of the forefoot using a case-control model. Cases were patients treated with multiple metatarsal head resections for multiple metatarsal head wounds, and controls received standard nonsurgical care. Both groups received standard off-loading and wound care. Outcomes included time to healing, reulceration, infection, and amputation. RESULTS: Patients in the surgery group (SG) healed significantly faster than those in the standard therapy group (ST; 84.2 ± 39.9 days for the ST vs 60.1 ± 27.9 days for the SG; P = .003) and had fewer recurrent ulcers (39.1% for the ST vs 15.2% for the SG; P = .02; odds ratio [OR] = 3.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3-9.7) and infections during 1 year of follow-up (64.5% for the ST vs 35.5% for the SG; P = .047; OR = 2.4; 95% CI = 1.0-6.0). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients receiving an incident amputation in the follow-up period (13.0% for the ST vs 6.5% for the SG; P = .5). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that the PMHR may be associated with shorter times to healing and lower morbidity compared with standard care alone in patients without digital gangrene and with multiple plantar forefoot ulcers.

Adventitious bursae underlying chronic wounds: another possible deterrent to healing.

Adventitious bursae typically develop in areas of chronic frictional irritation, usually under bony prominences. Although adventitious bursae are generally well understood, there is a paucity of data on effects of bursae underlying chronic wounds in neuropathic patients. This manuscripts reviews 4 clinical cases, each with a neuropathic patient with adventitious bursae underlying chronic nonhealing wound and strategies for treatment.