ABSTRACT
The most important etiologies of achalasia are idiopathic and related to Chagas' disease. The lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) in idiopathic achalasia (Id Ach) is higher compared with a healthy group, but there are different reports in Chagasic achalasia (Ch Ach). We compared the LESP of patients with both forms of achalasia and a control group. The LESP of 213 achalasia patients without previous treatment and 32 healthy volunteers were assessed. In 126 patients, the etiology could be demonstrated using serologic tests (Id Ach, 94 and Ch Ach, 32). The LESP of 213 patients was 31.86+/-14.18 mmHg and in the control group was 17.92+/-7.03 mmHg (P < 0.0001). The LESP in Id Ach and Ch Ach was 33.28+/-13.63 mmHg and 23.5+/-12.09 mmHg (P < 0.0001), respectively. Only the Id Ach group achieved statistical difference in relation to the control group (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, the LESP of Id Ach patients was higher than in Ch Ach patients and the control group, but there was no LESP difference between the Ch Ach and control groups.
Subject(s)
Chagas Disease/diagnosis , Esophageal Achalasia/diagnosis , Esophagogastric Junction/physiopathology , Analysis of Variance , Case-Control Studies , Chagas Disease/etiology , Esophageal Achalasia/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Manometry/methods , Pressure , Probability , Reference Values , Sensitivity and Specificity , Severity of Illness Index , Statistics, NonparametricABSTRACT
Two hundred and forty Brazilian patients with chest pain and normal cardiac evaluation were submitted to computerized esophageal manometry. Endoscopic examination and/or swallow barium studies had excluded obstructive lesions. Motor disorders were found in 63% of patients; non-specific motors disorders and hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter were the most common. The finding of nutcracker esophagus in only 6% of the patients is a quite different rate from what has been previously described in the literature. Esophagitis was observed at endoscopy in 13.4% of the patients, hiatus hernia in 19.7% and peptic gastric or duodenal ulcer in 4.9%. It should be emphasized that after excluding pain as being of cardiac origin an abnormal manometry result points to the esophagus as the probable site of origin of the pain; esophageal investigation is important for establishing proper treatment for these patients.
