ABSTRACT
Purpose: Down syndrome (DS) is a developmental disability associated with difficulties in deglutition. The adult Ts65Dn mouse model of DS has been previously shown to have differences in measures of swallowing compared with euploid controls. However, the putative mechanisms of these differences in swallowing function are unclear. This study tested the hypothesis that the Ts65Dn genotype is associated with atypical measures of tongue muscle contractile properties, coinciding with atypical swallow function. Methods: Adult (5-month-old) Ts65Dn (n = 15 female, 14 male) and euploid sibling controls (n = 16 female, 14 male) were evaluated through videofluoroscopy swallow studies (VFSS) to quantify measures of swallowing performance including swallow rate and inter-swallow interval (ISI). After VFSS, retrusive tongue muscle contractile properties, including measures of muscle fatigue, were determined using bilateral hypoglossal nerve stimulation. Results: The Ts65Dn group had significantly slower swallow rates, significantly greater ISI times, significantly slower rates of tongue force development, and significantly greater levels of tongue muscle fatigue, with lower retrusive tongue forces than controls in fatigue conditions. Conclusion: Tongue muscle contractile properties are altered in adult Ts65Dn and coincide with altered swallow function.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Acute gastroenteritis (AGE) is a common health care problem accounting for up to 200 000 pediatric hospitalizations annually. Previous studies show disparities in the management of children from different ethnic backgrounds presenting to the emergency department with AGE. Our aim was to evaluate whether differences in medical management also exist between Hispanic and non-Hispanic children hospitalized with AGE. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective study of children aged 2 months to 12 years admitted to the pediatric hospital medicine service from January 2016 to December 2020 with a diagnosis of (1) acute gastroenteritis or (2) dehydration with feeding intolerance, vomiting, and/or diarrhea. Differences in clinical pathway use, diagnostic studies performed, and medical interventions ordered were compared between Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients. RESULTS: Of 512 admissions, 54.9% were male, 51.6% were Hispanic, and 59.2% were on Medicaid. There was no difference between Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients in reported nausea or vomiting at admission, pathway use, or laboratory testing including stool studies. However, after adjusting for covariates, Hispanic patients had more ultrasound scans performed (odds ratio 1.65, 95% confidence interval 1.04-2.64) and fewer orders for antiemetics (odds ratio 0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.95) than non-Hispanic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were no differences in many aspects of AGE management between Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients, there was still variability in ultrasound scans performed and antiemetics ordered, despite similarities in reported abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. Prospective and/or qualitative studies may be needed to clarify underlying reasons for these differences.
Subject(s)
Antiemetics , Gastroenteritis , Child , Humans , Male , Infant, Newborn , Female , Antiemetics/therapeutic use , Child, Hospitalized , Retrospective Studies , Prospective Studies , Gastroenteritis/diagnosis , Gastroenteritis/therapy , Vomiting/etiology , Vomiting/drug therapy , Nausea/drug therapy , Emergency Service, HospitalABSTRACT
Down syndrome (DS) is a developmental disorder associated with a high incidence of challenges in vocal communication. DS can involve medical co-morbidities and structural social factors that may impact communication outcomes, which can present difficulties for the study of vocal communication challenges. Mouse models of DS may be used to study vocal communication differences associated with this syndrome and allow for greater control and consistency of environmental factors. Prior work has demonstrated differences in ultrasonic vocalization (USV) of the Ts65Dn mouse model of DS at a young adult age, however it is not known how USV characteristics are manifested at mature ages. Given that the aging process and age-related co-morbidities may also impact communication in DS, addressing this gap in knowledge may be of value for efforts to understand communication difficulties in DS across the lifespan. The current study hypothesized that the Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey mouse models of DS would demonstrate differences in multiple measures of USV communication at a mature adult age of 5 months. METHODS: Ts65Dn mice (n = 16) and euploid controls (n = 19), as well as Dp(16)1Yey mice (n = 20) and wild-type controls (n = 22), were evaluated at 5 months of age for USV production using a mating paradigm. Video footage of USV sessions were analyzed to quantify social behaviors of male mice during USV testing sessions. USV recordings were analyzed using Deepsqueak software to identify 10 vocalization types, which were quantified for 11 acoustic measures. RESULTS: Ts65Dn, but not Dp(16)1Yey, showed significantly lower proportions of USVs classified as Step Up, Short, and Frequency Steps, and significantly higher proportions of USVs classified as Inverted U, than euploid controls. Both Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey groups had significantly greater values for power and tonality for USVs than respective control groups. While Ts65Dn showed lower frequencies than controls, Dp(16)1Yey showed higher frequencies than controls. Finally, Ts65Dn showed reductions in a measure of complexity for some call types. No significant differences between genotype groups were identified in analysis of behaviors during testing sessions. CONCLUSION: While both Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey show significant differences in USV measures at 5 months of age, of the two models, Ts65Dn shows a relatively greater numbers of differences. Characterization of communication phenotypes in mouse models of DS may be helpful in laying the foundation for future translational advances in the area of communication difficulties associated with DS.
Subject(s)
Down Syndrome , Mice , Male , Animals , Down Syndrome/genetics , Vocalization, Animal , Ultrasonics , Phenotype , Disease Models, AnimalABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Oral feeding by children with bronchiolitis on high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is questioned, resulting in high practice variability. Our objective was to determine the incidence of aspiration pneumonia and adverse feeding events in otherwise healthy children with bronchiolitis on HFNC who fed orally from admission. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective chart review, in a tertiary children's hospital, of 876 children who were <24 months old, admitted for bronchiolitis, and treated with HFNC in the pediatric ward from March 2017 to May 2020. Primary outcomes included the incidence of aspiration pneumonia and adverse feeding events. Secondary outcomes included escalation of care, frequency and duration of nil per os status, length of stay, and 7-day readmission. RESULTS: Most patients (77.2%) met inclusion criteria and were fed orally within 2 hours of admission. The average maximum HFNC flow rate was 8 L/min (1 L/kg/min); the average maximum respiratory rate was 62 ± 10. Adverse feeding events occurred in 11 patients (1.6%), of which 3 had a concern for possible microaspiration. None were diagnosed with or treated for aspiration pneumonia. Few patients (8.1%) were made nil per os while on HFNC but returned to oral feeding by discharge. CONCLUSION: Among those with bronchiolitis on HFNC who received oral nutrition on admission, there were few incidences of adverse feeding events and no diagnoses of aspiration pneumonia, suggesting that oral feeding while on HFNC can be well-tolerated in similar populations. However, this study was limited by its single-center retrospective design, and future prospective studies are needed.
Subject(s)
Bronchiolitis , Pneumonia, Aspiration , Humans , Child , Infant , Child, Preschool , Cannula , Retrospective Studies , Bronchiolitis/epidemiology , Bronchiolitis/therapy , Bronchiolitis/complications , Hospitalization , Pneumonia, Aspiration/complications , Pneumonia, Aspiration/therapy , Oxygen Inhalation TherapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Medication errors and adverse drug events are common in the pediatric population. Limited English proficiency and low health literacy have been associated with decreased medication adherence, increased medication errors, and worse health outcomes. This study explores parental factors affecting medication management in underserved communities. METHODS: Using qualitative methods, we identified factors believed to affect medication management among parents. We conducted focus group discussions between December 2019 and September 2020. We recruited parents and health care professionals from local community partners and a tertiary care children's hospital. Sessions were recorded and transcribed. Three investigators created the coding scheme. Two investigators independently coded each focus group and organized results into themes using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Eleven focus groups were held (n = 45): 4 English-speaking parent groups (n = 18), 3 Spanish-speaking parent groups (n = 11), and 4 health care professional groups (n = 16). We identified 4 main factors that could impact medication delivery: 1) limited health literacy among parents and feeling inadequate at medication administration (knowledge/skill gap), 2) poor communication between caregivers (regarding medication delivery, dosage, frequency, and purpose) and between providers (regarding what has been prescribed), 3) lack of pediatric medication education resources, and 4) personal attitudes and beliefs that influence one's medication-related decisions. CONCLUSIONS: The compounding effect of these factors - knowledge, communication, resource, and personal belief - may put families living in underserved communities at greater risk for medication errors and suboptimal health outcomes. These findings can be used to guide future interventions and may help optimize medication delivery for pediatric patients.
Subject(s)
Medication Therapy Management , Parents , Humans , Child , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Focus GroupsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Nutrition Dashboard is an interactive nutrition technology platform that displays food provision and intake data used to categorise the nutrition risk of hospitalised individuals. The present study aimed to investigate the Nutrition Dashboard's ability to identify malnutrition compared with a validated malnutrition screening tool (MST). METHODS: A retrospective observational study at a 99-bed hospital was conducted using medical record and food intake data presented via the Nutrition Dashboard. Inter-Rater Reliability of food intake estimation between hospital catering staff and a dietitian reported good agreement across 912 food items (κ = 0.69, 95% confidence interval = 0.65-0.72, p < 0.001). Default nutritional adequacy thresholds of 4500 kJ and 50 g protein were applied for Nutrition Dashboard categorisation of supply and intake. Generalised estimating equation regression models explored the association between the Nutrition Dashboard risk categories and the MST, with and without controlling for patient demographic characteristics. RESULTS: Analyses from 216 individuals (1783 hospital-stay days) found that those in the highest risk Nutrition Dashboard category were 1.93 times more likely to have a MST score indicating risk compared to the lowest Nutrition Dashboard category (unadjusted odds ratio = 1.93, 95% confidence interval = 1.17-3.19, p < 0.01). When patient weight was added to the model, lower weight became the only significant predictor of MST ≥ 2 (p < 0.01) CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicates a role for nutrition intake technology in malnutrition screening. Further adaptions that address the complexities of applying this technology could improve the use of the Nutrition Dashboard to support identification of malnutrition.
Subject(s)
Malnutrition , Nutrition Assessment , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Nutritional Status , Malnutrition/diagnosis , Malnutrition/etiology , Mass ScreeningABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To identify locations with higher need for acute pediatric mental health (MH) interventions or services and describe these communities' socio-demographic characteristics. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included patients 5 to 18 years old with an emergency department (ED) or hospital admission between 2017 and 2019 for a primary known MH diagnosis or symptoms. We extracted visit data from the electronic medical record, mapped patients to their home census tract, calculated normalized visit rates by census tract, and performed spatial analysis to identify nonrandom geographic clusters and outliers of high utilization. Census tract utilization rates were stratified into quartiles, and socioeconomic and demographic characteristics obtained from the US Census Bureau were compared using analysis of variance, chi-square tests, and multivariable analysis. RESULTS: There were 10,866 qualifying visits across 617 census tracts. ED and hospital admission rates ranged from 2.7 to 428.6 per 1000 children. High utilization clusters localized to neighborhoods with lower socioeconomic status (p < .05). Southern regions with high utilizers were more likely to have fewer children per neighborhood, higher rates of teen births, and lower socioeconomic status. Multivariate analysis showed regions with high utilizers had fewer children per neighborhood, lower median household income, and more families that lacked computer access. CONCLUSION: ED and hospital utilization for pediatric MH concerns varied significantly by neighborhood and demographics. Divergent social factors map onto these locations and are related to MH utilization. Leveraging geography can be a powerful tool in the development of targeted, culturally tailored interventions to decrease acute pediatric MH utilization and advance child MH equity.
Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Mental Health , Adolescent , Child , Humans , Child, Preschool , Retrospective Studies , Emergency Service, Hospital , IncomeABSTRACT
Pediatric palliative home-based care has been shown to improve symptoms, quality of life, and coordination of care. Despite these successes, hospital utilization in our own palliative home-based care population remained high as some caregivers lacked confidence to manage symptoms at home and had difficulty in recalling or accessing "sick care plans." Our team developed the Symptom Management Plan (SMP), a multi-system "sick care plan," as a quality improvement project with the aim of improving caregiver confidence to manage symptoms at home. An Electronic Health Record-based SMP template was created for common symptoms: respiratory distress, seizures, feeding intolerance, and constipation with core subspecialists' input. Individualized SMPs were created and reviewed with caregivers at every subsequent palliative home nursing visit. Caregivers were surveyed on their confidence 3 and 6-months post-implementation. Resource utilization was analyzed throughout implementation. At 6 months, 73% of caregivers reported "better" or "much better" confidence in managing their child's symptoms after using the SMP, and 76% of caregivers perceived the SMP prevented urgent care or emergency department (ED) visits. After the SMP was launched, the rate of ED visits decreased from 0.86 to 0.47 per 100 patient-days, and admissions decreased from 0.56 to 0.39 per 100 patient-days. These rates further decreased to 0.31 ED visits and 0.19 admissions per 100 patient-days within 4 and 6 months. Introducing the SMP for our home-based palliative care patients was associated with improved caregiver confidence in managing acute symptoms at home and a reduction in hospital utilization.
Subject(s)
Home Care Services , Palliative Care , Caregivers , Child , Humans , Power, Psychological , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Ticket to Home (TTH), a survey tool designed to assess parental comprehension of their child's hospitalization and postdischarge care needs, allows providers to address knowledge gaps before discharge. Our goal was to evaluate the impact of TTH on parents' retention of discharge teaching. METHODS: In this pilot study, we enrolled a convenience sample of families admitted to pediatric hospital medicine and randomly assigned families on the basis of team assignment. The intervention group received TTH before discharge. The control group received usual care (without TTH survey tool). Both groups were sent a survey 24 to 72 hours postdischarge to assess parental understanding of discharge teaching. A senior-level provider also completed a survey; responses were compared with evaluate parent level of understanding. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used for analysis. RESULTS: Although 495 parents consented to participate, only 100 completed the necessary surveys (41 intervention and 59 control). Both groups showed high parent-provider concordance regarding reason for admission (92.7% intervention versus 86.4% control; P = .33). The intervention group had significantly higher concordance for return precautions (90.2% vs 58.2%; P < .001), which remained significant when controlling for covariates (odds ratio 6.24, 95% confidence interval 1.78-21.93). Most parents in the intervention group felt sharing TTH responses with their medical team was beneficial (95.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Parents who received TTH before discharge were more likely to accurately recall return precautions and valued sharing TTH results with the team. Given that response bias may have affected pilot results, additional studies in which researchers use larger samples with more diverse patient populations is required.
Subject(s)
Aftercare , Patient Discharge , Child , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Parents/education , Pilot ProjectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The US Census confirms a rise in Spanish-speakers, many of whom have limited English proficiency (LEP) and require interpreters. Parent perceptions of interpreter services throughout hospitalization are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To explore Spanish-speaking LEP parents' views regarding roles of interpreters and providers (attending, resident, or nurse) during a hospital encounter, optimal modalities of interpretation, and barriers to services. METHODS: Spanish-speaking LEP parents of children discharged from the hospital medicine service participated in focus groups. Sessions were audio-recorded and transcribed in Spanish, translated into English, and verified for translation accuracy. Qualitative methods were used for thematic analysis. RESULTS: Four sessions (n = 23 participants representing 15 families) were held. Parents felt the interpreter's primary role was to act as a conduit for word-for-word interpretation. They desired kind and trustworthy interpreters with medical knowledge. They saw providers as leaders of the encounter who should allot enough time for interpretation, not use Spanish unless they were fluent, and give frequent medical updates. In-person interpreters were preferred over telephone and video for their ability to convey body language and build relationships. Barriers to requesting interpreters included embarrassment and inability to directly request services, which resulted in using family members as interpreters. On family-centered rounds, parents preferred professional interpreters over bilingual providers. CONCLUSIONS: Modifications are required to improve interpreter services to meet the needs of LEP families. Parents emphasized in-person interpreters' social skills, frequent provider updates, and additional navigation support as essential components of effective care. Next steps include implementing guidelines and interventions to optimize interpreter services.
Subject(s)
Child, Hospitalized , Communication Barriers , Child , Focus Groups , Humans , Parents , Physician-Patient Relations , TranslatingABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Discharge communication is critical for the continuity of patient care. However, discharge summaries are often not available in time for follow-up visits, and the content is inconsistent. We aimed to decrease the average time to discharge summary completion by 25%, reduce deficiencies (information errors) by 50%, and increase discharge summary template use to >80% in 6 months. METHODS: A pediatric interprofessional team used quality improvement methods to identify barriers and implement interventions, including discharge summary completion time expectation, electronic health record discharge summary template changes addressing gaps, and training. Notable changes to the template included embedded writing tips to guide writers and specific template choices for common diagnoses to standardize content. The primary outcome measure was the mean discharge summary completion time. Secondary measures were the percentage of discharge summaries with deficiencies and the rate of template use. RESULTS: After interventions, the mean discharge summary completion time decreased by 70% (from 71.5 to 21.8 hours). Discharge summary deficiencies decreased 44% (from 4.5% to 2.5%), and template use increased from 62% to 97%. CONCLUSION: Quality improvement methods and a newly designed electronic health record-discharge summary template were used to dramatically improve discharge summary timeliness and standardize content to streamline continuity of care.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency have been associated with poorer health outcomes. Children with cancer are at high risk for vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency. At our institution, we identified high variability in vitamin D testing and supplementation in this population. Of those tested, 65% were vitamin D deficient/insufficient. We conducted a quality improvement (QI) initiative with aim to improve vitamin D testing and supplementation among children aged 2-18 years with newly diagnosed cancer to ≥80% over 6 months. METHODS: An inter-professional team reviewed baseline data, then developed and implemented interventions using Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. Barriers were identified using QI tools, including lack of automated triggers for testing and inconsistent supplementation criteria and follow-up testing post supplementation. Interventions included an institutional vitamin D guideline, clinical decision-making tree for vitamin D deficiency, insufficiency and sufficiency, electronic medical record triggers, and automated testing options. RESULTS: Baseline: N = 26 patients, four (15%) had baseline vitamin D testing; two (8%) received appropriate supplementation. Postintervention: N = 33 patients; 32 (97%) had baseline vitamin D testing; 33 (100%) received appropriate supplementation and completed follow-up testing timely (6-8 weeks post supplementation). Change was sustained over 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: We achieved and sustained our aim for vitamin D testing and supplementation in children with newly diagnosed cancer through inter-professional collaboration of hematology/oncology, endocrinology, hospital medicine, pharmacy, nursing, and information technology. Future PDSA cycles will address patient compliance with vitamin D supplementation and impact on patients' vitamin D levels.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Quality Improvement , Vitamin D Deficiency , Vitamin D/blood , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Dietary Supplements , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Neoplasms/blood , Vitamin D Deficiency/diagnosis , Vitamin D Deficiency/drug therapy , VitaminsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine patient history as well as clinical and laboratory features associated with true bacteremia versus false bacteremia in previously healthy febrile children ages 0 to 36 months in the era of polyvalent conjugate pneumococcal immunization. METHODS: Using retrospective chart review, we examined history, physical examination, and laboratory characteristics associated with true and false bacteremia. We included subjects under 3 years old, with a positive blood culture obtained in the emergency department or clinic from July 2011 to July 2013, and fever defined as a temperature of greater than or equal to 100.4°F by history or examination. We excluded those with a previously known underlying disease process that could increase the risk for positive blood culture, for example, immunodeficiency, cancer, cystic fibrosis, or significant skin disorders such as severe eczema, as well as patients with any indwelling central line, shunt, or other implanted device, or recent hospitalization for a febrile illness. RESULTS: Thirty subjects (24%) had true bacteremia, and 97 (76%) had false bacteremia. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, exposure to sick contacts (odds ratio, 0.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.6; P = 0.01) and increased hours to positive blood culture (odds ratio, 0.8; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-0.9; P < 0.001) remained significant factors associated with false bacteremia. Age, maximum reported temperature, and reported days of fever were not associated with true bacteremia. CONCLUSIONS: We found that previously healthy children with true bacteremia are more likely to grow bacteria faster on blood culture and lack exposure to sick contacts than children with false bacteremia.
Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Pneumococcal Infections , Bacteremia/diagnosis , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Fever/epidemiology , Fever/etiology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Retrospective Studies , Streptococcus pneumoniaeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Pediatric Hospital Medicine (PHM) Core Competencies define the expertise required of practitioners and provide a framework for educational activities. Since initial publication in 2010, the scope of practice for pediatric hospitalists has evolved in clinical, research, administrative, and educational arenas. OBJECTIVE: To describe the methodology utilized in the revision of The PHM Core Competencies to ensure a product reflective of current roles and expectations for pediatric hospitalists across all training pathways and practice settings. METHODS: The Society of Hospital Medicine (SHM) Pediatrics Special Interest Group supported the initiation of the revision. A diverse group of editors and authors was engaged from among members of SHM, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Academic Pediatrics Association. Editorial roles were expanded to represent all practice settings. More than 80 individuals contributed, representing both university and community sites, and all US geographic regions. Editors conducted a two-part needs assessment; a survey related to content was distributed to the PHM community and content from recent conferences and PHM related publications was reviewed. The final compendium consists of 4 sections and 66 chapters, including 12 new chapters and 36 chapters with substantial changes. Individual chapters and the entire compendium underwent rigorous internal and external review. CONCLUSION: The PHM Core Competencies: 2020 Revision reflects the work of a broad spectrum of PHM practitioners responding to the practice and educational changes in PHM over the past decade. The compendium can inform education, training, and career development for pediatric hospitalists practicing now and in coming years.
Subject(s)
Clinical Competence/standards , Hospital Medicine/education , Hospitalists , Hospitals, Pediatric , Pediatrics/organization & administration , Child , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Hospitalists/education , Hospitalists/standards , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) and the Pediatric Hospital Medicine (PHM) subboard developed a content outline to serve as a blueprint for the inaugural certification examination through practice analysis. The systematic approach of practice analyses process is described in the study. METHODS: A diverse, representative panel of 12 pediatric hospitalists developed the draft content outline using multiple resources (publications, textbooks, PHM Core Competencies, PHM fellow's curriculum, etc). The panel categorized practice knowledge into 13 domains and 202 subdomains. By using the ABP database self-defined practicing pediatric hospitalists were identified. Participants rated the frequency and criticality of content domains and subdomains along with providing open-ended comments. RESULTS: In total, 1449 (12.1%) generalists in the ABP database self-identified as pediatric hospitalists, and 800 full-time pediatric hospitalists responded. The content domains that were rated as highly critical and frequently required in practice were weighted more heavily (ie, the percentage of examination questions associated with a domain) than the less critical and less frequently rated. Both community and noncommunity pediatric hospitalists rated domains similarly (P = .943). Subdomain and preliminary weights were rated with similar means and SDs in the majority of topics. CONCLUSIONS: There was concordance in the rating of domain and universal tasks among both community and noncommunity hospitalists. The areas of significant differences, although minor, could be explained by difference in practice settings. The practice analysis approach was structured, engaged the PHM community, reflected the breadth and depth of knowledge required for PHM practice, and used an iterative process to refine the final product.
Subject(s)
Certification , Curriculum , Hospital Medicine/education , Hospitalists/education , Hospitals, Pediatric , Pediatrics/education , Clinical Competence , Curriculum/standards , Educational Measurement/standards , Hospitals, Community , HumansABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Pediatric discharge from the inpatient setting is a complex, error-prone process. In this study, we evaluated the outcomes of using a standardized process for hospital discharge of pediatric patients. METHODS: A 1-year pre- and postintervention pilot study was designed to improve discharge transition of care. The bundle intervention, facilitated by advanced practice providers, included risk identification and intervention. Process and outcome metrics included patient satisfaction measures on the discharge domain (overall discharge, speed of discharge process, whether they felt ready for discharge), use of handouts, scheduling of follow-up appointments, and postdischarge phone call. RESULTS: Significant improvements were found in all aspects of patient satisfaction, including speed of the discharge process and instructions for discharge, discharge readiness, and the overall discharge process. Length of stay decreased significantly after intervention. The checklist identified â¼4% of discharges without a correct primary care physician. Significant differences were found for scheduled primary care appointment before discharge and patients receiving handouts. The bundle identified risks that may complicate transition of care in approximately half of the patients. Phone communication occurred with almost half of the patients after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Integration of an evidence-based discharge checklist can improve processes, increase delivery of patient education, and improve patient and family perceptions of the discharge process. Involvement of key stakeholders, use of evidence-based interventions with local adaptation, and use of a consistent provider responsible for implementation can improve transitions of care.
Subject(s)
Checklist , Patient Discharge , Pediatrics , Risk Assessment , Adolescent , Aftercare , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Pilot Projects , Risk Assessment/methodsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Skin and soft tissue infections are common pediatric diagnoses with substantial costs. Recent studies suggest blood cultures are not useful in management of uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections (uSSTIs). Complete blood cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein are also of questionable value. We aimed to decrease these tests by 25% for patients with uSSTIs admitted to the pediatric hospital medicine service within 3 months. METHODS: An interdisciplinary team led a quality improvement (QI) project. Baseline assessment included review of the literature and 12 months of medical records. Key stakeholders identified drivers that informed the creation of an electronic order set and development of a pediatric hospital medicine-emergency department collaborative QI project. The primary outcome measure was mean number of tests per patient encounter. Balancing measures included unplanned readmissions and missed diagnoses. RESULTS: Our baseline-year rate was 3.4 tests per patient encounter (573 tests and 169 patient encounters). During the intervention year, the rate decreased by 35% to 2.2 tests per patient encounter (286 tests and 130 patient encounters) and was sustained for 14 months postintervention. There were no unplanned readmissions or missed diagnoses for the study period. Order set adherence was 80% (83 out of 104) during the intervention period and sustained at 87% postintervention. CONCLUSIONS: Our interdisciplinary team achieved our aim, reducing unnecessary laboratory testing in patients with an uSSTI without patient harm. Awareness of local culture, creation of an order set, defining appropriate patient selection and testing indications, and implementation of a collaborative QI project helped us achieve our aim.
Subject(s)
Quality Improvement , Skin Diseases, Infectious/diagnosis , Soft Tissue Infections/diagnosis , Unnecessary Procedures , Blood Culture , Child , Emergency Service, Hospital , Hospitalization , Hospitals, Pediatric , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Many Americans have limited English proficiency (LEP) and difficulty communicating with health care providers, creating inequitable health care delivery. Despite widespread interpreter availability in hospitals, perceptions of interpreter services in the pediatric inpatient setting are largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate staff perspectives regarding: 1) roles of the interpreter and provider (attending, resident, and nurse) during an encounter, 2) modalities of interpretation, and 3) barriers to services. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with: 1) hospital-employed Spanish interpreters, 2) Pediatric Hospital Medicine attendings, 3) pediatric and internal medicine-pediatric residents, and 4) medical unit nurses. Sessions were audio-recorded and transcribed. Using Atlas.ti, 2 investigators created the coding scheme, independently coded the data, and achieved consensus. Qualitative methods were used for thematic analysis. RESULTS: Fourteen groups (nâ¯=â¯59 participants) were held: 3 interpreter groups (nâ¯=â¯10), 3 attending groups (nâ¯=â¯14), 2 resident groups (nâ¯=â¯17), and 6 nurse groups (nâ¯=â¯18). Most believed the interpreter's role was to serve as a conduit (provide word-for-word interpretation), act as a cultural broker, and maintain transparency (not withhold information). All groups felt providers should interact with families as they would with English-speaking families. In-person interpreters were preferred over telephone and video for being more accurate, efficient, and personable. Barriers to accessing services included time needed for interpretation, overconfidence in language skills, variable family dynamics, and identification of LEP families. CONCLUSIONS: In-person interpreters are highly valued, fulfilling complex roles. However, operational and human factors limit access to services in the hospital. These findings, along with family perspectives, can be used to optimize interpretation experiences.