Respiratory complications after adenotonsillectomy in high-risk children with obstructive sleep apnea: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) occurs in 1%-4% of children; adenotonsillectomy is an effective treatment. Mortality/severe brain injury occurs among 0.6/10 000 adenotonsillectomies; in children, 60% are secondary to airway/respiratory events. Earlier studies identified that children aged <2 years, extremes of weight, with co-morbidities of craniofacial, neuromuscular, cardiac/respiratory disease, or severe OSA are at high risk for adverse post-operative respiratory events (AE). We aimed to: Firstly, investigate which risk factors were associated with AEs either in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), or both in this population. Secondly, we investigated factors associated with post-operative PICU AE despite no event in the PACU in order to predict need of post-operative PICU after their PACU stay. METHODS: Retrospective study of children admitted to the PICU after adenotonsillectomy between 08/2006-09/2015. Demographics, risk factors, and occurrence of AE (oxygen saturation <92, stridor, bronchospasm, pneumonia, pulmonary edema, re-intubation) were recorded. RESULTS: During the studied time period 4029 tonsil/adenoid procedures were performed in 3997 children. 179, admitted to the PICU post-operatively, met criteria for analysis. PICU AEs occurred in 59%: 44%-83% in any particular risk category. PACU AEs occurred in 42%. Of those with PACU events: 92% suffered AEs in the PICU; however, 35% of those without a PACU AE still suffered a PICU AE. CONCLUSIONS: Among high-risk children undergoing TA, absence of adverse events in PACU during a 2-hour observation period does not predict absence of subsequent AEs in the PICU.

Enhanced visualization of the surgical field in pediatric direct laryngoscopy using a three-dimensional endoscopic system.

BACKGROUND: Direct laryngoscopy and rigid bronchoscopy are currently performed using 2-dimensional endoscopic systems. Our objective was to determine whether a 3-dimensional endoscopic system can enhance visualization of the surgical field in pediatric direct laryngoscopy and rigid bronchoscopy. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted. Thirty three children who underwent direct laryngoscopies in a tertiary referral children's hospital were enrolled. Direct laryngoscopy was performed using both 2- and 3-dimensional endoscopic systems, after which the surgeons scored the quality of the images obtained with each system on a scale from 1 (low) to 5 (high). Comparison of the scores obtained with the 2 endoscopic systems was performed. RESULTS: The 33 study children (mean age 2.3 years, M:F ratio 1:1.6) underwent 47 direct laryngoscopies. The mean score for visualization of the glottis was 4.8 for the three-dimensional system compared to 4.0 for the two-dimensional system (P = .025), 4.7 vs. 3.8, respectively, (P = .019) for the subglottis, and 4.6 vs. 3.9, respectively (P = .031) for visualization of the proximal trachea. The mean score for visualization of the distal trachea was 3.0 vs. 3.7, respectively (P = .020). In a child with recurrent type 3 laryngotracheal cleft a residual tracheo-esophageal fistula could not be detected using the 2D system, but was immediately detected using the 3D system. CONCLUSIONS: Visualization of the glottis, subglottis and proximal trachea during direct laryngoscopy using a 3-dimensional endoscopic system was rated by the surgeons as being superior to the conventional 2-dimensional technique. Further outcome studies that will demonstrate the clinical advantage of the 3D technology are highly required. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b.

Development of an International Odor Identification Test for Children: The Universal Sniff Test.

OBJECTIVE: To assess olfactory function in children and to create and validate an odor identification test to diagnose olfactory dysfunction in children, which we called the Universal Sniff (U-Sniff) test. STUDY DESIGN: This is a multicenter study involving 19 countries. The U-Sniff test was developed in 3 phases including 1760 children age 5-7 years. Phase 1: identification of potentially recognizable odors; phase 2: selection of odorants for the odor identification test; and phase 3: evaluation of the test and acquisition of normative data. Test-retest reliability was evaluated in a subgroup of children (n = 27), and the test was validated using children with congenital anosmia (n = 14). RESULTS: Twelve odors were familiar to children and, therefore, included in the U-Sniff test. Children scored a mean ± SD of 9.88 ± 1.80 points out of 12. Normative data was obtained and reported for each country. The U-Sniff test demonstrated a high test-retest reliability (r27 = 0.83, P < .001) and enabled discrimination between normosmia and children with congenital anosmia with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 86%. CONCLUSIONS: The U-Sniff is a valid and reliable method of testing olfaction in children and can be used internationally.

Vocal fold paralysis in infants with tracheoesophageal fistula.

OBJECTIVES: We describe the clinical characteristics and management of vocal fold paralysis in infants who were born with a tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF). METHODS: This retrospective case series included all infants born with TEFs who presented to our pediatric otolaryngology unit and intensive care unit because of dyspnea or aphonia in the years 2005 and 2006, and who were found to have vocal fold paralysis. RESULTS: Five boys and 1 girl were studied. One infant had stridor before TEF repair, and 5 after it. All children underwent flexible laryngotracheobronchoscopy and were treated in the pediatric intensive care unit before diagnosis of the vocal fold paralysis (5 bilaterally and 1 unilaterally) was made. The ages at diagnosis of paralysis ranged between 14 days and 14 months. Five infants required tracheostomy. CONCLUSIONS: Vocal fold paresis in infants is difficult to diagnose. The risk for recurrent laryngeal nerve injury associated with TEF and TEF repair should be emphasized in these children. We recommend that all newborns with TEF should be examined by an otolaryngologist before operation to confirm the mobility of the vocal folds and to rule out other associated airway malformations, and examined after operation if respiratory difficulties develop.