Anti-pan-neurofascin antibodies induce subclass-related complement activation and nodo-paranodal damage.

Autoimmune neuropathy associated with antibodies against pan-neurofascin is a new subtype of nodo-paranodopathy. It is relevant because it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Affected patients often require intensive care unit treatment for several months, and data on the reversibility and long-term prognosis are limited. The pathogenicity including IgG subclass-associated mechanisms has not been unravelled, nor directly compared to anti-neurofascin-155 IgG4-related pathology. Understanding the underlying pathology might have a direct impact on treatment of these severely affected patients. By a multicentre combined prospective and retrospective approach, we provide clinical data of a large cohort of patients with anti-neurofascin-associated neuropathy (n = 18) including longitudinal titre and neurofilament light chain assessment via Ella® and relate clinical data to in vitro pathogenicity studies of anti-neurofascin antibodies. We assessed antibody binding characteristics and the pathogenic effects of anti-pan-neurofascin versus neurofascin-155 antibodies on living myelinating dorsal root ganglia co-cultures. Additionally, we analysed the IgG subclass profile and the complement binding capacity and effector functions considering the effects of intravenous immunoglobulin preparations via enzyme-linked immunosorbent and cell-based assays. In contrast to chronic neurofascin-155 IgG4-associated neuropathy, anti-pan-neurofascin-associated disease presented with a high morbidity and mortality, but as a monophasic and potentially reversible disorder. During follow-up, antibodies were no longer detectable in 8 of 11 patients. Anti-pan-neurofascin had direct access to the nodes of Ranvier in myelinating cultures titre-dependently, most probably inducing this severe phenotype. Antibody preincubation led to impaired paranode formation, destruction of paranodal architecture and alterations on paranodal myelin and sensory neurons in the cultures, with more severe effects than neurofascin-155 antibodies. Besides IgG4, subclass IgG3 was detected and associated with complement binding and cytotoxic effects in vitro. As a possible correlate of axonal damage in vivo, we detected highly increased serum neurofilament light chain levels (sNF-L), correlating to serum C3a. Still, sNF-L was not identified as a marker for poor prognosis, but rather as an intra- and interindividual marker for acuteness, severity and course, with a strong decrease during recovery. Our data provide evidence that anti-pan-neurofascin antibodies directly attack the node and induce severe and acute, but potentially reversible, nodo-paranodal pathology, possibly involving complement-mediated mechanisms. Screening for autoantibodies thus is crucial to identify this subset of patients who benefit from early antibody-depleting therapy. Titre and sNF-L might serve as valuable follow-up parameters. The prospect of a favourable outcome has high relevance for physicians, patients and relatives during months of critical care.

Evaluation of the EFNS/PNS diagnostic criteria in a cohort of CIDP patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS)/Peripheral Nerve Society (PNS) diagnostic criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) in a cohort of patients diagnosed and treated for CIDP in a tertiary university hospital. METHODS: In a monocentric retrospective study of 203 CIDP patients, diagnosed according to expert opinion, we evaluated the EFNS/PNS diagnostic criteria. Clinical course and nerve conduction studies (NCS) over 1 year from first referral were studied. Secondarily, we compared the clinical and paraclinical characteristics, including nerve ultrasound, of patients who failed with those who fulfilled the criteria in order to identify clinically relevant differences. RESULTS: At 1 year, 182 (89.7%) patients fulfilled the criteria (156/76.9% definite, 22/10.8% probable, and 4/2% possible). Twenty-one (10.3%) patients did not because the electrodiagnostic criteria remained negative. These still showed signs of demyelination but did not reach the cut-off values. They also presented typical, albeit less pronounced, multifocal nerve enlargement in ultrasonography. Mean disability at presentation and 1 year after was significantly lower. Most importantly, a relevant proportion of these patients also responded to therapy (6/21 = 28.6% vs. 82/182 = 45.3% of those fulfilling the criteria). INTERPRETATION: CIDP diagnosis could be established for 89.7% of patients over the course of 1 year using EFNS/PNS criteria. The remaining patients (10.3%) presented with milder disability, less accentuated demyelination, but otherwise similar characteristics and still considerable probability of treatment response. Failure to fulfill diagnostic criteria should not automatically preclude treatment. Nerve ultrasound should be considered as a complementary diagnostic tool to detect signs of inflammation in CIDP.

Recurrent trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-induced aseptic meningitis with associated ampicillin-induced myoclonic twitches
.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of recurrent trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-induced aseptic meningitis with associated ampicillin-induced myoclonic twitches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patient was investigated using cerebral computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, cerebrospinal fluid examination, and electroencephalography. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for access to clinical files for research purposes and publication. RESULTS: We present a middle-aged woman with two recurrent episodes of aseptic meningitis after treatment with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Additionally, she developed myoclonic twitches as a rare side effect of ampicillin. CONCLUSION: Aseptic meningitis is a rare adverse reaction to medications like antibiotics. The pathogenesis of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-induced aseptic meningitis is not yet completely understood, but an immune-mediated hypersensitivity reaction is suspected. If patients with an antibiotic therapy due to a systemic or local infection present with severe headache, not only common diagnosis of a parainfectious headache, but also antibiotic-induced aseptic meningitis should be considered.
.