Management of exposed, infected implant-based breast reconstruction and strategies for salvage.

INTRODUCTION: Complications of implant-based breast reconstruction are rare but mastectomy flap necrosis and peri-implant infection are the most frequent and remain an important cause of early implant failure. This study aimed to compare the results of three different management strategies employed to deal with these complications at our institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A consecutive series of 71 infected/exposed prostheses in 68 patients over a 20-year period were analysed. Management strategies included explantation and delayed reconstruction, implant salvage and explantation and immediate autologous reconstruction. RESULTS: Only 19 of 45 (42%), managed with implant removal, went on to delayed reconstruction. Methods of delayed reconstruction were distributed equally between implant-only, implant and autologous tissue and autologous-only reconstructions. The implant was successfully salvaged in nine cases, but reducing the implant size or introducing new tissue as a flap increased the success from 45% to 53%. Three patients with infected implant-only breast reconstruction underwent explantation and immediate conversion to autologous-only reconstructions. CONCLUSIONS: All the three interventions reviewed here have their place in the management of infected implant-based breast reconstructions. It is noteworthy that following implant removal, the likelihood of the patient proceeding to delayed reconstruction of any kind is similar to the likelihood of successful salvage (42% vs. 45%). This study population had high numbers of exposed implants in irradiated fields. Reducing implant size or introducing new tissue in the form of a flap increases the chances of successful implant salvage. In the presence of mild infection, removal of exposed/infected implants and immediate conversion to an autologous-only reconstruction can prove to be successful.

Oncoplastic breast surgery: a review and systematic approach.

Oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS) is relatively new, but has made rapid progress from its tentative steps of infancy in the 1990s. The recent Milanese Consensus Conference on Breast Conservation concluded that, firstly, oncoplastic techniques are warranted to allow wide excision and clear margins without compromising cosmesis. Secondly, such surgery is ideally performed at the same time as oncological excision. Whilst technically more challenging than standard breast conserving therapy (BCT), OBS is well proven, if not yet widely practised, both oncologically and aesthetically and a review of the available techniques is perhaps timely. The roots of breast conserving therapy can be traced to the 1930s, actually due to advances made in radiotherapy, and the last 20 years have seen it become firmly established. This review aims to summarise the key historical developments and latest innovations in OBS. Not only are our patients, who expect not only safe cancer treatment but a satisfactory aesthetic outcome, increasingly informed and demanding, but longer follow up has stimulated surgeons to improve outcomes. In many cases, particularly with ptosis and macromastia, the cancer can be treated, usually with wider excision margins, simultaneously improving the aesthetic appearance. Present at the birth of OBS, the Institut Curie has continued to introduce innovative techniques over the last two decades and a systematic approach, comprising nine basic techniques, has evolved to allow high quality treatment of any and all breast cancers suitable for OBS.

Lateral mammaplasty reconstruction after surgery for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Up to 60 per cent of cancers develop laterally in the breast and breast-conserving surgery frequently produces superolateral nipple-areolar complex (NAC) distortion aggravated by postoperative irradiation. Correction is technically demanding and the outcomes are variable. Lateral mammaplasty may allow wider excision margins and prevent such deformities. METHODS: This was a review of 86 consecutive patients who had lateral mammaplasty: combined wide tumour excision with NAC repositioning on a reliable dermoglandular pedicle. Simultaneous axillary surgery was performed via a separate or combined incision. Aesthetic outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: The median age of the women was 54 (range 29-75) years; 55 (64 per cent) had palpable tumours and 73 (85 per cent) underwent simultaneous axillary surgery. Median radiological and histological tumour sizes were 29.8 and 33.6 mm, respectively, and median weight of excised tumour was 150 g. Two patients required haematoma evacuation. Eleven women required revisional surgery for involved or close margins. Aesthetic outcomes were excellent or good in 93 per cent. CONCLUSION: Lateral mammaplasty produced clear margins in 87 per cent of women. It is an option when a deformity is anticipated after breast-conserving surgery, and is particularly valuable when neoadjuvant chemotherapy has downgraded a large tumour.

[Nipple and areola reconstruction by tattooing, "F" and "Z" flaps]. / La reconstruction de la plaque aréolo-mamelonnaire par tatouage, lambeaux << F >> et << Z >>

Nipple and areola reconstruction is very important in the evaluation of the quality of breast reconstruction. It can be done during the primary or secondary breast reconstruction or later. We have performed the techniques of nipple reconstruction routinely since 1992. Under local anesthesia during a second operative time or general anesthesia during breast reconstruction, the local "F" and "Z" skin flaps and tattooing grant a quality result in the wound and the long-term projection. They are easily reproduced, rapid and as there is no graft the choice of the incisions grants a good tolerance. Complications are rare and it is always possible to use other techniques in case of poor result. We also present the main techniques of nipple and areola reconstruction with their advantages and limits.

[Evaluation of asymmetric implants in breast augmentation surgery]. / Evaluation des prothèses asymétriques dans la chirurgie mammaire d'augmentation.

Since more than 30 years, the quality of breast implants has continued to evolve in order to improve the aesthetic results of prosthetic augmentation. Shapes and materials of these implants have also evolved to obtain stronger and more reliable prostheses almost similar to the natural breast. Therefore it can be considered that the use of asymmetric implants is the last step in implant technology before using made to measure implants. Asymmetric implants allow obtaining different contours in harmony to the different breast shapes capable to reproduce faithfully, in all dimensions, the anatomy of the female breast, including the differences between each side which maximise the naturalness of the result. Such implants have an axis directed towards the exterior and lower part of the chest wall, are wider than high with a thinner part on their inner edge and a concave rear side moulding the curves of the chest wall. In our own experience, we placed between 2002 and 2004, asymmetric implants in 100 patients. Such implants were easy to place and no secondary rotation was observed. The control of secondary displacements even in case of prosthesis change seems to be linked to their concave rear side, roughness and asymmetry. When analysing retrospectively the medical records, no distinctive features were observed when compared to symmetric classic implants in easiness in the surgical procedure or in complications except a slightly higher rate of seroma formation. However asymmetric implants are less appropriate in case of major breast ptosis, patients being unsatisfied by the "too natural" breast shape. Moreover a high risk of secondary rotation seems to be real in such cases. In summary, for all these reasons, asymmetric implants, are gradually considered to be a first-rank choice for implants in breast augmentation cosmetic surgery.

Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: I. Implant reconstruction.

The long-term cosmetic outcome of breast implant reconstruction is unknown. The morbidity and cosmetic outcome of 360 patients who underwent immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction with various types of implants have been analyzed prospectively over a 9-year period. Of these patients, 334 who completed their reconstruction were suitable for evaluation of their cosmetic outcome. The early complication rate (< 2 months) was 9.2 percent, with an explantation rate of 1.7 percent. The late complication rate (> 2 months) was 23 percent, with a pathological capsular contracture rate of 11 percent at 2 years and 15 percent at 5 years and an implant removal rate of 7 percent. The revisional surgery rate was 30.2 percent. The cosmetic results were assessed prospectively using an objective five-point global scale. Every patient was scored at each visit once surgery was completed. The overall cosmetic outcome deteriorated in a linear fashion, from an initial acceptable result of 86 percent 2 years after patients completed their reconstruction to only 54 percent at 5 years. This decline in cosmetic outcome was not associated with the type of implant used, the volume of the implant, the age of the patient, or the type of mastectomy incision employed. Radiotherapy was not a significant factor because only 28 patients were irradiated. Upon Cox model analysis, pathological capsular contracture was the only factor that contributed significantly to a poor cosmetic outcome in which p < 0.0001 (relative risk 6.3). Despite a high revisional surgery rate, deterioration still occurred, suggesting that other unaccounted for variables were responsible. On photographic retrospective review of the patients without capsular contracture who demonstrated deterioration in their cosmetic scores, it became clear that a possible reason for their poor results was late asymmetry produced by the failure of both breasts to undergo symmetrical ptosis with aging.

Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: II. Tram flap reconstruction.

Although it is thought that transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap breast reconstruction produces excellent cosmetic results that are maintained over the long term, there is little objective evidence in the literature to support this. One hundred seventy-one consecutive patients who underwent TRAM flap reconstruction were prospectively analyzed over an 8-year period to assess their morbidity and late cosmetic outcome.The early patient complication rate (< 2 months) was 37.4 percent, the late hernia and fat necrosis rates (> 2 months) were 8.8 and 13.5 percent, respectively, and the contralateral symmetrization rate was 33.9 percent. The cosmetic results were evaluated prospectively using an objective five-point global scale. Each patient was scored at each visit once surgery was completed. Follow-up continued until a flap was lost, a patient died, or the point of last patient contact was reached. Six patients died during the study. The actuarial percentage cosmetic outcome remained stable during the study period, with an acceptable result in 96.4 percent of patients at 2 years and in 94.2 percent of patients at 5 years. Only five patients in this series obtained poor cosmetic outcomes, with three due to substantial flap necrosis and two because of poor flap design. Two free TRAM flaps were also lost. Log-rank analysis revealed that neither patient age nor timing of surgery significantly affected the cosmetic outcome. Single pedicle and supercharged (single pedicle) TRAM flaps produced slightly better results than bipedicle and free TRAM flaps. In this prospective longitudinal study, TRAM flap reconstructions were shown to produce aesthetically pleasing results. Moreover, with long-term follow-up, it was demonstrated that these reconstructions maintained their stability.