Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
JRSM Open ; 15(7): 20542704241274292, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39228407

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To investigate long COVID (LC) symptoms self-reported via a digital application. Explore associations between various demographic factors and intensity of LC symptoms. Design: A retrospective case series study. We analysed self-reported symptoms from 1008 individuals with LC between November 30, 2020, and March 23, 2022. Setting: England and Wales. Participants: Individuals with LC using the healthcare application in 31 post-COVID-19 clinics and self-reporting LC symptoms. Main outcome measures: Highest reported LC symptoms, associations with demographic factors and intensity of symptoms. Results: 109 symptom categories were identified, with pain (26.5%), neuropsychological issues (18.4%), fatigue (14.3%) and dyspnoea (7.4%) the most prevalent. The intensity of reported symptoms increased by 3.3% per month since registration. Age groups 68-77 and 78-87 experienced higher symptom intensity (32.8% and 86% higher, respectively) compared to the 18-27 age group. Women reported 9.2% more intense symptoms than men, and non-white individuals with LC reported 23.5% more intense symptoms than white individuals with LC. Higher education levels (national vocational qualification (NVQ) 3 to NVQ 5) were associated with less symptom intensity (27.7%, 62.8% and 44.7% less, respectively) compared to the least educated (NVQ 1-2). People in less deprived areas had less intense symptoms than those in the most deprived area. No significant association was found between index of multiple deprivation (IMD) decile and number of symptoms. Conclusion: Treatment plans must prioritise addressing prevalent LC symptoms; we recommend sustained support for LC clinics. Demographic factors significantly influence symptom severity, underlining the need for targeted interventions. These findings can inform healthcare policies to better manage LC.

2.
Clin Kidney J ; 16(4): 635-646, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37007693

ABSTRACT

Supportive care (SC) is a multidimensional and person-centred approach to managing advanced CKD that engages the person and their caregivers in shared decision making from the outset. Rather than focusing on disease-specific therapies, SC is a collection of adjuvant interventions and adaptations to conventional treatments that can be used to improve the individual's quality of life. Recognizing that frailty, multi-morbidity and polypharmacy are more common among older people with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and that people in this group tend to prioritize quality of life over survival as a goal of care, SC represents an important adjunct to disease-specific therapies in CKD management. This review provides an overview of SC in the older person with advanced CKD.

3.
Nephron ; 146(3): 306-314, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34515166

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The use of novel kidney injury biomarkers has been shown to improve diagnostic assessment and prognostic prediction in various populations with acute kidney injury (AKI), but their use in a standard clinical practice have been rarely reported. METHODS: We reported the clinical implementation of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) measurement for routine AKI diagnostic workup of patients receiving nephrology consultation in a tertiary academic centre. Specific focus was made on the diagnostic performance to discriminate functional ("pre-renal") from intra-renal AKI and to predict AKI progression. RESULTS: Forty-five urine NGAL (uNGAL) and 25 plasma NGAL (pNGAL) samples in the first 50 consecutive patients were analysed. KDIGO Stage 1, 2, 3 AKI, and renal replacement therapy occurred in 10%, 40%, 50%, and 24% of cases, respectively. The uNGAL was lower in patients with transient AKI (<48 h) and no sign of urinary tract infections (37 [25-167] ng/mL) than sustained or progressive AKI (298 [74-1,308] ng/mL) (p = 0.016), while pNGAL did not discriminate transient (264 [100-373] ng/mL) from persistent AKI (415 [220-816] ng/mL) (p = 0.137). The median uNGAL level was 63 (35-1,123) ng/mL for functional/pre-renal AKI and 451 (177-1,315) ng/mL for intra-renal AKI (p = 0.043), while the pNGAL was 264 (114-468) and 415 (230-816) ng/mL (p = 0.235), respectively. CONCLUSION: NGAL, as part of the routine workup, is useful for diagnostic and prognostic assessment of new-onset AKI in clinical practice. Interpretation of an increased NGAL level should be clinically evaluated in its clinical context, particularly considering concomitant infection (urinary or systemic). Clinical adoption of emerging AKI biomarkers as diagnostic tests in clinical practice should be further encouraged.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , Acute Kidney Injury/therapy , Biomarkers , Humans , Kidney Function Tests , Lipocalin-2 , Prognosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL