ABSTRACT
The Anthropocene is witnessing a loss of biodiversity, with well-documented declines in the diversity of ecosystems and species. For intraspecific genetic diversity, however, we lack even basic knowledge on its global distribution. We georeferenced 92,801 mitochondrial sequences for >4500 species of terrestrial mammals and amphibians, and found that genetic diversity is 27% higher in the tropics than in nontropical regions. Overall, habitats that are more affected by humans hold less genetic diversity than wilder regions, although results for mammals are sensitive to choice of genetic locus. Our study associates geographic coordinates with publicly available genetic sequences at a massive scale, yielding an opportunity to investigate both the drivers of this component of biodiversity and the genetic consequences of the anthropogenic modification of nature.
Subject(s)
Amphibians/genetics , Biodiversity , Genetic Variation , Human Activities , Mammals/genetics , Animals , Climate Change , Cytochromes b/genetics , Evolution, Molecular , Geographic Mapping , Humans , Mutation , PhylogeographyABSTRACT
Gene trees are often assumed to be equivalent to species trees, but processes such as incomplete lineage sorting can generate incongruence among gene topologies and analyzing multilocus data in concatenated matrices can be prone to systematic errors. Accordingly, a variety of new methods have been developed to estimate species trees using multilocus data sets. Here, we apply some of these methods to reconstruct the phylogeny of Buarremon and near relatives, a group in which phylogenetic analyses of mitochondrial DNA sequences produced results that were inconsistent with relationships implied by a taxonomy based on variation in external phenotype. Gene genealogies obtained for seven loci (one mitochondrial, six nuclear) were varied, with some supporting and some rejecting the monophyly of Buarremon. Overall, our species-tree analyses tended to support a monophyletic Buarremon, but due to lack of congruence between methodologies, resolution of the phylogeny of this group remains uncertain. More generally, our study indicates that the number of individuals sampled can have an important effect on phylogenetic reconstruction, that the use of seven markers does not guarantee obtaining a strongly-supported species tree, and that methods for species-tree reconstruction can produce different results using the same data; these are important considerations for researchers using these new phylogenetic approaches in other systems.
