Molecularly matched therapy in the context of sensitivity, resistance, and safety; patient outcomes in end-stage cancer - the MetAction study.

Background: In precision cancer medicine, the challenge is to prioritize DNA driver events, account for resistance markers, and procure sufficient information for treatment that maintains patient safety. The MetAction project, exploring how tumor molecular vulnerabilities predict therapy response, first established the required workflow for DNA sequencing and data interpretation (2014-2015). Here, we employed it to identify molecularly matched therapy and recorded outcome in end-stage cancer (2016-2019).Material and methods: Metastatic tissue from 26 patients (16 colorectal cancer cases) was sequenced by the Oncomine assay. The study tumor boards interpreted called variants with respect to sensitivity or resistance to matched therapy and recommended single-agent or combination treatment if considered tolerable. The primary endpoint was the rate of progression-free survival 1.3-fold longer than for the most recent systemic therapy. The objective response rate and overall survival were secondary endpoints.Results: Both common and rare actionable alterations were identified. Thirteen patients were found eligible for therapy following review of tumor sensitivity and resistance variants and patient tolerability. The interventions were inhibitors of ALK/ROS1-, BRAF-, EGFR-, FGFR-, mTOR-, PARP-, or PD-1-mediated signaling for 2-3 cases each. Among 10 patients who received treatment until radiologic evaluation, 6 (46% of the eligible cases) met the primary endpoint. Four colorectal cancer patients (15% of the total study cohort) had objective response. The only serious adverse event was a transient colitis, which appeared in 1 of the 2 patients given PD-1 inhibitor with complete response. Apart from those two, overall survival was similar for patients who did and did not receive study treatment.Conclusions: The systematic MetAction approach may point forward to a refined framework for how to interpret the complexity of sensitivity versus resistance and patient safety that resides in tumor sequence data, for the possibly improved outcome of precision cancer medicine in future studies. ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02142036.

p38 MAPK activation through B7-H3-mediated DUSP10 repression promotes chemoresistance.

Immunoregulatory protein B7-H3 is involved in the oncogenic and metastatic potential of cancer cells, as well as in drug resistance. Resistance to conventional chemotherapy is an important aspect of melanoma treatment, and a better understanding of how B7-H3 enhances drug resistance may lead to the development of more effective therapies. We investigated the in vitro and in vivo sensitivity of chemotherapeutic agents dacarbazine (DTIC) and cisplatin in sensitive and drug resistant melanoma cells with knockdown expression of B7-H3. We found that knockdown of B7-H3 increased in vitro and in vivo sensitivity of melanoma cells to the chemotherapeutic agents dacarbazine (DTIC) and cisplatin, in parallel with a decrease in p38 MAPK phosphorylation. Importantly, in B7-H3 knockdown cells we observed an increase in the expression of dual-specific MAP kinase phosphatase (MKP) DUSP10, a MKP known to dephosphorylate and inactivate p38 MAPK. DUSP10 knockdown by siRNA resulted in a reversion of the increased DTIC-sensitivity seen in B7-H3 knockdown cells. Our findings highlight the potential therapeutic benefit of combining chemotherapy with B7-H3 inhibition, and indicate that B7-H3 mediated chemoresistance in melanoma cells is driven through a mechanism involving DUSP10-mediated inactivation of p38 MAPK.

Ets-1 transcription factor is widely expressed in benign and malignant melanocytes and its expression has no significant association with prognosis.

Ets-1 transcription factor has been associated with tumor progression in various carcinomas, but its expression in malignant melanoma was only recently described. The study was conducted in two steps: exploratory and confirmatory. In the first step, we studied 69 primary melanomas, 28 metastatic melanomas, 10 usual intradermal nevi and 13 various melanocytic skin lesions. In the second step, an additional group of 98 patients with follow-up of up to 200 months was also evaluated. Immunohistochemical analysis of formalin-fixed/paraffin-embedded tissues was performed using 1G11 antibody and polymer conjugate for visualization. While Ets-1 was variably expressed in 83% primary melanomas in exploratory and 69% in the confirmatory group, the expression of Ets-1 was also found in normal benign melanocytes and all nevi. Analysis of the exploratory group revealed lower expression of Ets-1 in primary melanomas than in common nevi (P=0.048, Mann-Whitney U-test) and metastatic melanomas expressed significantly less Ets-1 than primary melanomas (P=0.015, Mann-Whitney U-test). There was a negative correlation between Ets-1 expression and the largest dimension of the primary tumors (r=0.23, P=0.034, Spearman's correlation rank test), but no correlation with the depth of tumor invasion (Breslow thickness) or the presence of ulceration was found. Analyses of the confirmatory group revealed no association between Ets-1 expression with disease-specific survival or time to treatment failure. However, a statistical trend was found for worse outcome for those primary melanomas that had strong expression (H-score >100) of Ets-1 (P=0.054). Ets-1 is expressed in benign melanocytes probably due to their neural crest origin. We conclude that Ets-1 expression cannot be used to differentiate between benign and malignant melanocytic lesions and it has no definite association with clinical outcome. At the same time, its role in tumor progression in some cases of malignant melanoma cannot be entirely excluded.

Expression of S100A4 combined with reduced E-cadherin expression predicts patient outcome in malignant melanoma.

The aim of the present study was to analyze the expression of S100A4 and E-cadherin in a panel of primary and metastatic malignant melanoma, and to correlate the expression level to clinicopathological parameters. The expression of S100A4 was examined by immunohistochemistry in 99 superficial spreading and 60 nodular primary melanomas, while the expression of E-cadherin was analyzed in 92 superficial spreading and 52 nodular lesions from the same panel. The expression levels of S100A4 and E-cadherin in the biopsies were inversely correlated, with S100A4 being expressed at the highest frequency in the nodular and E-cadherin in the superficial spreading lesions, respectively. When analyzing the melanoma subgroups separately, it was revealed that expression of S100A4 had a more significant impact on patient outcome in early superficial spreading melanomas than in the nodular subtype, while E-cadherin expression did not predict patient outcome in any of the subgroups. When examining all the patients, both markers give clinical information as predictors for disease-free survival, but when combining the expression of the two markers, a stronger significant correlation between high E-cadherin expressing/S100A4 negative biopsies and increased disease-free survival (P=0.002) was revealed, demonstrating the importance of examining the expression of more than one factor involved in the metastatic cascade when predicting patient outcome. We have also evaluated the relationship between the expression of these two antigens and cell cycle and signal transduction factors.

Clinical and cell line specific expression profiles of a human gene identified in experimental central nervous system metastases.

Some cancers, particularly malignant melanomas and carcinomas of the breast and lung, metastasize to the central nervous system (CNS) in advanced stages. In order to develop into clinically manifest metastases, hematogenously disseminated tumor cells must respond to trophic factors within the CNS microenvironment. We have previously identified a nuclearfactor, com1, expressed in human breast carcinoma cells upon formation of experimental metastatic tumors in the CNS. In the present study distinct com1 mRNA expression was detected in cerebral metastases from patients with lung carcinomas, whereas the expression level was generally much lower in glioblastomas (primary brain tumors). In tissue specimens from normal brain and lung, as well as in glioma and lung carcinoma cell lines, com1 expression was barely detectable. One potential mechanism involved in the induction of com1 expression was indicated in the metastatic MCF7/LCC2 breast carcinoma cells. Significant increases in the level of com1 mRNA were observed upon activation of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling, which is known to operate during metastatic tumor cell proliferation within the CNS. The observations in this study strengthen the assumption that com1 may be involved in the tumor cell response to regulatory signals upon metastasis formation.