ABSTRACT
Efficient oral mucosal wound healing requires coordinated responses from epithelial progenitor cells, yet their spatiotemporal recruitment and activation remain unclear. Using a mouse model of palatal mucosal wound healing, we investigated the dynamics of epithelial cells during this process. Proliferation analysis revealed that, in addition to the expected proliferation center near the wound edge, distal cell populations rapidly activated post-injury by elevating their mitotic activity. These distal cells displayed predominant lateral expansion in the basal layer, suggesting roles beyond just tissue renewal. However, while proximal proliferation center cells sustained heightened proliferation until re-epithelialization was completed, distal cells restored basal turnover rates before wound closure, indicating temporally confined contributions. Lineage tracing of Wnt-responsive epithelial cells showed remarkable clone expansion in basal layers both proximally and distally after wounding, contrasting with gradual clone expansion in homeostasis. Although prioritizing tissue repair, epithelial progenitor cells maintained differentiation programs and barrier functions, with the exception of the leading edge. At the leading edge, we found accelerated cell turnover, but the differentiation program was suspended. In summary, our findings uncovered that oral wound re-epithelialization involves two phases: an initial widespread response with proliferation of proximal and distal cells, followed by proliferation confined to the wound proximal region. Uncovering these stage-specific healing mechanisms provides insights for developing targeted therapeutic strategies to improve wound care.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Mutations in low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) cause various bone diseases. Several mouse models were generated to study the role of LRP5 in bone development. But most of the studies were confined to the appendicular skeleton. The role of LRP5 in the axial skeleton, especially in the craniofacial skeleton, is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the craniofacial phenotype with the LRP5G171V mutation. METHODS: To understand how LRP5 affects craniofacial bone properties, we analyzed LRP5 high-bone-mass mutant mice carrying the G171V missense mutation (LRP5HBM ). Quantitative microcomputed tomographic imaging and histomorphometric analyses were used to study craniofacial phenotypes and bone density. Histology, immunohistochemistry, and in vivo fluorochrome labeling were used to study molecular mechanisms. RESULTS: LRP5HBM mice showed overall minor changes in the craniofacial bone development but with increased bone mass in the interradicular alveolar bone, edentulous ridge, palatine bone, and premaxillary suture. Elevated osteocyte density was observed in LRP5HBM mice, along with increased Runx2 expression and unmineralized bone surrounding osteocytes. Meanwhile, LRP5HBM mice exhibited increased osteoprogenitors, but no significant changes were observed in osteoclasts. This led to a high-bone-mass phenotype, and an increased osteocyte density in the alveolar bone and edentulous ridge. CONCLUSION: LRP5HBM mice display increased bone mass in the alveolar bone with minor changes in the craniofacial morphology. Collectively, these data elucidated the important role of LRP5 in axial bone development and homeostasis and provided clues into the therapeutical potential of LRP5 signaling in treating alveolar bone loss.
